Medical Device Single Audit Program

Similar documents
An Overview of the Medical Devices Single Audit Program

Table of Contents. Preface 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Scope 3.0 Purpose 4.0 Rationale 5.0 References 6.0 Definitions

Medical Devices. Notified Bodies and the CE certification Process for Medical Devices. European Surgical Robotics Demonstration Day

Med-Info Regular Information Bulletins for the Medical Device Industry

Comparative analysis between the possible regulatory approaches to GMP compliance TITOLO PRESENTAZIONE

Medical Device Approvals in Brazil: A Review and Update

Table of Contents. To control records generated by the Medical Device Single Audit Program and Quality Management System (QMS) processes.

PROPOSED DOCUMENT. Quality management system Medical devices Nonconformity Grading System for Regulatory Purposes and Information Ex-change

An Alternative Method for Maintaining ISO 9001/2/3 Certification / Registration

Quality Management System Certification. Understanding Quality Management System (QMS) certification

Private Certification to Inform Regulatory Risk-Based Oversight: Discussion Document

IMDRF. Final Document. 9 December 2013

IAF Informative Document. Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015. Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015)

National Accreditation Board for Certification Bodies. Accreditation Criteria

ISO 9001: A Quality Manual for the Transition Period and Beyond

Chapter 2 ISO 9001:2008 QMS

Guidelines on the Nonconformity Grading and Exchange Form MDSAP AU G

A GUIDE FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE

IAF Informative Document. IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Management System Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17021:2011 from ISO/IEC 17021:2006

ISO 13485:201x What is in the new standard?

UNDERSTANDING THE EC DIRECTIVE 98/79/EC ON IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICES

Gap Analysis of the Change Control Process The History of a Transformed Change Control System

Registration of Class B Medical Devices

Outline for Today s Presentation. Objectives of Environmental Regulations/Laws.

GMP and QMS Regulation in Japan

Accreditation and Competence?

FSSC Q. Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008. Quality module REQUIREMENTS

Review and Revision of ISO/IEC 17021

How companies leverage quality and quality certifications to achieve competitive advantage

Medical Device Training Program 2015

Global Regulatory Requirements for Medical Devices

Establishment of a Quality Systems approach to Clinical Site Management An Overview of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

Foreword Introduction - The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) Scope Section Overview Normative References...

TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT II QUALITY AUDIT

IAQG AS 9104 System Process Flowcharts

Quality Management System Certification. Understanding Quality Management System (QMS) certification

Information Security Management Systems

NOTICE. Re: GD210: ISO 13485:2003 Quality Management System Audits Performed by Health Canada Recognized Registrars

IVD Regulation Overview. Requirements to Assure Quality & Effectiveness

Australian Standard. Information technology Service management. Part 2: Guidance on the application of service management systems

Medical Device Marketing Authorization System (MDMA) MDMA User Manual

An Introduction to ISO 22000: Food Safety Management Systems

Using Insight Auditing SWOT Analysis to Drive Business Excellence

Appendix A: Sample Interview Note-taking Booklet

QUALITY ASSURANCE GUIDE FOR GREEN BUILDING RATING TOOLS

Australian Transport Council. National Standard for the Administration of Marine Safety SECTION 5

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:2013 from ISO/TS 22003:2007

32 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2013 INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE FOR WATER, WASTEWATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

1 Introduction to ISO 9001:2000

UNIQUE DEVICE IDENTIFICATION. and in the European Union. Laurent SELLES Senior Coordinator for International Relations Health Technology and Cosmetics

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:201X from ISO/TS 22003:2007

Validation Audit Process Definition and Criteria

3 Terms and definitions 3.5 client organization whose management system is being audited for certification purposes

ORACLE CONSULTING GROUP

FINAL DOCUMENT. Guidelines for Regulatory Auditing of Quality Management Systems of Medical Device Manufacturers Part 1: General Requirements

Emerging ISO Standards on Facilities Management. Questions? May 7, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVAL TEMPLATE (DOE G A, Appendix A, )

Overview. Health Science Authority. Implementation of ICH guideline in Singapore. Singapore s experience

Preparation for ISO OH&S Management Systems

Final Document. Title: IMDRF Standards Operating Procedures. Authoring Group: IMDRF Management Committee. Date: 17 December 2014

Application of ISO/IEC for the Accreditation of Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) Certification Bodies

IAF Mandatory Document for the use of Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques ( CAAT ) for Accredited Certification of Management Systems

IRCA QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AUDITOR/LEAD AUDITOR TRAINING IRCA Reg. No. A18021 (5 DAYS)

Records and Document Management

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 2015

CP14 ISSUE 5 DATED 1 st OCTOBER 2015 BINDT Audit Procedure Conformity Assessment and Certification/Verification of Management Systems

Aerospace Quality Management Requirements Update: April 2009

ISO 9001 Quality Management System Lead Auditor Training (IRCA)

RAPS ONLINE UNIVERSITY

UK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme

ISO 9001:2008 The Standard for World-Class Quality

Medical Device Software Standards for Safety and Regulatory Compliance


PMAs, 510(k)s, and Advanced IDE Topics

NABL accreditation is a formal recognition of the technical competence of a medical testing laboratory

AS9100:2016 Transition Guide

Accredited Body Report CPA Australia. For the period ended 30 June 2013

September 2010 Report No

Supplier Quality Agreements

GUIDE 62. General requirements for bodies operating assessment and certification/registration of quality systems

AS9100 B to C Revision

New changes to cleanroom & clean air device classifications: ISO & 2

Table of Contents. 1. Purpose/Policy

Designation HRPA OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR

ICH Public Meeting. Joseph C. Famulare. October 2, Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA Office of Compliance

Environmental management. The ISO family of International Standards

Internal Audit Quality Assessment. Presented To: World Intellectual Property Organization

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES

ISO/TS 16949:2002 Guidance Document

SECTION B DEFINITION, PURPOSE, INDEPENDENCE AND NATURE OF WORK OF INTERNAL AUDIT

HKCAS Supplementary Criteria No. 8

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

INTRODUCTION TO ISO 9001 REVISION - COMMITTEE DRAFT

Info 15:2 TRAINING 2015/2016. Info 13:19

Compliance Focused Preapproval Preparation Program. By Mike Ronningen, RAC

TG TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC :2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

Recognition of my Product (Testing Laboratory) Why I need recognition, what is the effect?

Transcription:

Medical Device Single Audit Program CAPT Kimberly Lewandowski-Walker FDA/ORA/Office of Medical Products and Tobacco Operations National Expert, Medical Devices 1

Objectives Introduction to MDSAP What is MDSAP? MDSAP Development Team How does MDSAP work? Assessment vs. Audit Benefits Benefits for the Regulatory Authorities Benefits for the FDA Benefits for the Auditing Organizations Benefits for the Manufacturers Quality Management System Conclusion 2

MDSAP Development Team* o Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) Two (2) members o Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) Three (3) members o Health Canada/Santé Canada Two (2) current members o FDA/CDRH/OC Five (5) current members One (1) consultant o FDA/ORO/ORA One (1) National Expert Investigator *Development team governed by eight (8) member Regulatory Authority Council made up of two (2) upper management representatives 3 from each participating regulatory authority

Formal Statement of Cooperation Regarding the Development of a Medical Device Single Audit Program Australia Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) Brazil Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) Canada Health Canada/Santé Canada United States of America Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4

Formal Statement of Cooperation Regarding the Development of a Medical Device Single Audit Program The goal of the MDSAP is to provide for more effective, efficient and less burdensome regulatory oversight of the quality management systems of medical device manufacturers. The implementation of the MDSAP is intended to allow for a single audit to satisfy the regulatory requirements of the Participants. Source: Statement of Cooperation 5

The objectives of the MDSAP are to: Operate a single audit program that provides confidence in program outcomes; Enable the appropriate regulatory oversight of medical device manufacturers quality management systems while minimizing regulatory burden on industry; Promote more efficient and flexible use of regulatory resources through work-sharing and mutual acceptance among Participants, while respecting the sovereignty of each country; Source: Statement of Cooperation 6

The objectives of the MDSAP are to (continued): Promote, over the longer term, greater global alignment of regulatory approaches and technical requirements based on international standards and best practices; Promote consistency, predictability and transparency of regulatory programs by standardizing oversight practices and procedures of Participants over third-party auditing organizations, and the practices and procedures of participating third-party auditing organizations; and Leverage, where appropriate, existing conformity assessment structures. Source: Statement of Cooperation 7

MDSAP Current Development Status Program support infrastructure including IT Initial Recognition, Surveillance, and Re-Recognition Criteria for MDSAP Recognized Auditing Organizations (IMDRF Lead) Standardized AO Auditor Competency and Competency Maintenance Requirements Standardized Regulatory Authority Assessor Competency and Competency Maintenance Requirements Standardized Audit and Assessment Models Auditing of a Manufacturer by an MDSAP Recognized AO Assessment of MDSAP Recognized AO s by participating Regulatory Authorities 8

MDSAP Current Development Status Standardized Rating System for Manufacturer Audit Findings Standardized Rating System for Recognized Auditing Organization Assessment Findings MDSAP Quality Management System MDSAP Program Communication Strategy (External and Stakeholders) MDSAP Program Launch Strategy Training on MDSAP Program 9

January 1, 2014 Pilot Study Recognition of initial participating auditing organizations began: Application assessment of candidate auditing organizations Assessment audits of candidate auditing organization head office and critical locations Witness audits of candidate auditing organization auditors performing audits of manufacturers 10

MDSAP Pilot Audit Process Designed and developed to ensure a single audit will provide efficient yet thorough coverage of the requirements of medical devices quality management systems ISO 13485:2003 Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices (RDC ANVISA 16/2013) Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) 11

MDSAP Pilot Audit Process AND other specific requirements of medical device regulatory authorities participating in the pilot MDSAP program, such as: Registration Licensing Adverse event reporting 12

How will Regulatory Authorities utilize the Single Audit Program and resulting audit report/certificate? Australia: TGA will use an MDSAP audit report as part of the evidence that is assessed for compliance with medical device market authorization requirements unless the medical device is otherwise excluded or exempt from these requirements or if current policies restrict the use of MDSAP audit reports 13

How will Regulatory Authorities utilize the Single Audit Program and resulting audit report/certificate? Brazil: ANVISA will utilize the outcomes of the program, including the reports, to constitute an important input on ANVISA s pre-market and post-market assessment procedures, providing, when applicable, key information that is expected to support regulatory technical evaluation on these issues. 14

How will Regulatory Authorities utilize the Single Audit Program and resulting audit report/certificate? Health Canada: HC will use an MDSAP audit as part of their Canadian Medical Device Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS) certification program. Upon the successful completion of the pilot, Health Canada s intent is to implement the Medical Device Single Audit Program as the mechanism to achieve regulatory compliance for quality management system requirements in Canada. 15

How will Regulatory Authorities utilize the Single Audit Program and resulting audit report/certificate? United States: FDA will accept the MDSAP audit reports as a substitute for FDA routine inspections. Inspections conducted for cause or compliance follow-up by FDA will not be affected by this program. Moreover, the MDSAP would not apply to any necessary pre-approval or post-approval inspections in support of Premarket Approval (PMA) applications. 16

What Auditing Organizations can apply to the MDSAP Pilot? During the pilot, the only Auditing Organizations that will be allowed to apply to the MDSAP for recognition will be the accredited organizations/registrars currently utilized in the Health Canada CMDCAS program. The list of registrars recognized by Health Canada can be found on the Health Canada website. 17

What Auditing Organizations can apply to the MDSAP Pilot? As part of the MDSAP application process, the Auditing Organizations will be required to comply with the following IMDRF MDSAP documents, in addition to other documents approved by the Pilot Coalition Regulatory Authority Council: IMDRF MDSAP WG N3 Requirements for Medical Device Auditing Organizations for Regulatory Authority Recognition IMDRF MDSAP WG N4 Competency and Training Requirements for Auditing Organizations 18

What oversight will Regulatory Authorities have over the Auditing Organizations? In accordance with best practices, the Regulatory Authorities involved in the Pilot Coalition have developed a robust plan and schedule of assessing the competence and compliance of MDSAP Auditing organizations to include headquarters office assessments, critical site location assessments, and witnessed audits on an annual basis as part of a four year recognition program. 19

Assessment vs. Audit Assessment & Recognition Of Auditing Organization By Regulatory Authorities Of compliance to the IMDRF Recognition Criteria (including ISO/IEC 17021, GHTF SG3/N19, etc.) 4-year cycle MDSAP Assessment Model Audits Of Device Manufacturers By Auditing Organization Of compliance to ISO 13485 + specific quality system requirements from PRAs regulations 3-year cycle MDSAP Audit Model 20

What oversight will Regulatory Authorities have over the Auditing Organizations? The Regulatory Authorities involved in the pilot Coalition will utilize as the basis of the recognition and assessment process the following IMDRF MDSAP documents, in addition to other documents drafts and approved by the Pilot Coalition Regulatory Authority Council: IMDRF MDSAP WG N5 Regulatory Authority Assessment Strategy for the Recognition and Monitoring of Medical Device Auditing Organizations IMDRF MDSAP WG N6 Regulatory Authority Assessor Competency and Training Requirements 21

What oversight will Regulatory Authorities have over the Auditing Organizations? In addition, IMDRF MDSAP WG N11 is a document being produced to grade nonconformities resulting from a Regulatory Authority assessment of an Auditing Organization and to document the decision process for recognizing an Auditing organization or revoking recognitions. When finalized, this document will also be utilized under the Regulatory Authority Assessment program. 22

Harmonization Efforts for Implementing a Quality Management System within MDSAP QMS Framework Model IWA 4:2009(E) Quality management systems Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2008 in local government 23

Basic Approach Document internal processes (i.e., procedures, templates, flowcharts [process mapping]) Use Best Practices approach Timeliness, Consistency, Efficiency, and Transparency Implement an easy to use QMS Framework, and Use the PDCA Approach Do what you say (Do) Say what you do (Plan) Prove it (Check) Improve it (Act) 24

Benefits for the Regulatory Authorities Promotes efficient and flexible use of regulatory resources through work-sharing and mutual acceptance among regulators while respecting the independence of each participating regulatory authority. Promotes greater alignment of regulatory approaches and technical requirements globally based on international standards and best practices. Moves to create an international coalition of countries dedicated to pooling technology, resources, and services to improve the safety and oversight of medical devices in a more efficient manner that is also less burdensome for industry. 25

Benefits for the FDA Provides confidence in the ability to use third parties through direct recognition and monitoring Enables enhanced regulatory oversight of medical device manufacturers quality management systems (post marketing phase) Does not restrict the ability to inspect per current practices but gives more intelligence on how to best allocate resources 26

Benefits for the Auditing Organization (AO) Single assessment for all jurisdictions Reduced burden on AO resources (by reducing the number of necessary regulatory recognitions) Standard recognition criteria (i.e. ISO/IEC 17021 + IMDRF N3) Common manufacturer audit criteria and audit report template Specified auditor competence criteria 27

Benefits for Manufacturers May be acceptable alternative to inspection required for marketing authorization in some countries Reduced burden on manufacturer resources (by reducing the number of regulatory inspections/audits from as many as four a year to one a year) Common audit criteria capturing the requirements of all participating regulatory authorities to be used by recognized auditing organizations Predictability in outcome, based on the use of a standardized non-conformity grading system 28

How can medical device manufacturers participate? As of January 2014, the CMDCAS registrars are allowed to start submitting their application for MDSAP recognition. The MDSAP project plan targets the review of applications every six months for the duration of the pilot. 29

How can medical device manufacturers participate? After a successful assessment, the MDSAP Auditing Organization applicants will be allowed to perform MDSAP audits for medical device manufacturers that will be utilized by the Regulatory Authorities as previously discussed. 30

How do I find out more specifics on the documents, policies, and procedures that will be utilized in the MDSAP pilot? http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/interna tionalprograms/default.htm 31