PERSONAL SAFETY LEADERSHIP

Similar documents
FACTSHEET ON bizsafe AWARDS 2014

WSH Guide TO. Behavioural Observation and Intervention

WORKPLACE SAFETY. Table 1: Industries with highest fatalities rates and types of highest fatal* / non fatal^ injuries

AIHA's View of the Use of OHS Performance Criteria In Contracting and Procurement White Paper

ISO & ISO Legal Compliance Know Your Risk - Reduce your Risk"

EXECUTIVE SAFETY LEADERSHIP

Health and Safety Policy and Procedures

ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS MANUAL

The anglo american Safety way. Safety Management System Standards

Corporate Risk Management Policy

Human factors is the term used to describe the interaction

Mauro Calvano. About Aviation Safety Management Systems

Study Report on Crane Incident Analysis. Prepared by: Mr Simon Lee Chairman of Crane Incident Analysis Workgroup

Zero Harm at Siemens Energy Service UK&I Presentation to IOSH - May Restricted Siemens AG 20XX All rights reserved.

Finance and Resources Committee

Seminar on Tower Crane Safety

Care service inspection report

Accident Prevention Techniques

The Role and Responsibilities of the Managing Partner Timothy I. Michel, CPA

Safety Programs and Policies

Health, Security, Safety and Environment (HSE)

Corporate Health and Safety Policy

CHAPTER 3 - CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM)

SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY POLICY

E XPERT PERFORMANC E. Building Confidence. Charting Your Course to Higher Performance. The Number 1 Challenge for New Leaders

WHAT MAKES YOUR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SYSTEMS STANDARD BEST-IN-CLASS?

Managing Occupational Safety and Health in Schools

Healthcare of New Zealand Limited Role Description Date of Last Review: July 2013

Chapter 3 Office of Human Resources Absenteeism Management

Corporate Health and Safety Policy Issue 9

DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL BUSINESS CONTINUITY POLICY

May Duke Energy EHSMS Manual. Environmental, Health and Safety Management System Manual

The role will require the management of consultancy and in-house teams in the successful execution of the estates strategy.

Safety Regulation Group SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS GUIDANCE TO ORGANISATIONS. April

Health and safety a priority? Our BS OHSAS should come first.

WE ALL HAVE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Health, safety and environment policy and management arrangements

Independent Trustee (Corporate)

What was the impact for you? For the patient? How did it turn out? How has this helped you in your job? What was the result?

Investors in People First Assessment Report

PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP AN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME

1 Introduction to ISO 9001:2000

Project Management for Process Improvement Efforts. Jeanette M Lynch CLSSBB Missouri Quality Award Examiner Certified Facilitator

Measuring ROI in Leadership Development

Introduction to Team-based Organizations

PEOPLE FOR PROJECTS SAFE. RELIABLE. PRODUCTIVE. Labour Hire Project Management Plant & Equipment

CHAPTER 5 - SAFETY ASSESSMENTS, LOG OF DEFICIENCIES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BUSINESS CONTINUITY. Specialist Operations Contingency Planning Business Continuity Manager

Why S & B Plant Services

CODE OF PRACTICE. Safety Management. Occupational Safety and Health Branch Labour Department CODE OF PRACTICE ON SAFETY MANAGEMENT 1

Chapter 1: Health & Safety Management Systems (SMS) Leadership and Organisational Safety Culture

Safety & The Bottom Line: Proving The Financial Benefits Of Your Safety Initiatives

EXECUTIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVIEW GUIDE

TRUST BOARD - 25 April Health and Safety Strategy Potential claims, litigation, prosecution

Does Your Business Strategy Prioritize Talent Management?

Starting a Construction Engineering Program at Marquette University

Organizational Change: Managing the Human Side

Application management services that power business transformation

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MEDIA SERVICES

Information Governance Management Framework

Clients in Construction Best Practice Guidance

U & D COAL LIMITED A.C.N BOARD CHARTER

13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

SUPPLY CHAIN PREQUALIFICATION PACKAGE

Contractor Management Applying Safety Analytics and Insurance Benchmarking

Generic risk assessment form. This document forms part of Loughborough University s health and safety policy Version 3 February 2014

Safety Management Systems (SMS) guidance for organisations

SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-24 NATIONAL HIGH MAGNETIC FIELD LABORATORY NHMFL FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SAFETY PROCEDURE SP-24

Quality & Safety Manual

Head of Engineering Job Description

Business Continuity Policy. Version 1.0

Temporary Worker Safety Checklist

Quality Management Subcontractor QM Guide-Section Two

Health and Safety Activity Checklist

Meeting the Challenges in Industrial Safety Management in Construction Works (Dec-2007)

SUBJECT: Audit Report Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration Recordkeeping Requirements (Report Number HR-AR )

OAKPARK SECURITY SYSTEMS LIMITED. Health & Safety Policy. Requests or suggestions for amendment to this procedure

HSMS. Group Health AND Safety Management System

Injury Management. Making it Work. Injury Management Making it Work 1

Contractor Safety Management Program Document

Publishers Note. Anson Reed Limited St John Street London EC1V 4PY United Kingdom. Anson Reed Limited and InterviewGold.

The ILM Level 3 Diploma Programme in Leadership & Management consists of the following units, ILM credit values and guided learning hours.

Competence Criteria for Member (MCIBSE)

Corporate Health and Safety Strategy

Stakeholder management and. communication PROJECT ADVISORY. Leadership Series 3

CAPABILITY BROCHURE. FORGACS Marine and Defence Brochure 1

CONTRACTOR S MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

15 Guiding Principles

(Sample) Safety and Health Training Plan

Relationship Manager (Banking) Assessment Plan

PREVENTING WORKPLACE INJURIES. It Takes Leadership

Young Enterprise Masterclass

Dutch Labour Standards Foundation The Standard for reliability. Information set about Standard NEN 4400 and the Labour Standards Register

Shared service centres

West Dunbartonshire Council s Employee Recognition Framework

Court of Appeal Decides On Liability For Workplace Accident

The ANU OHS Strategic Plan Report prepared for the OHS Policy Committee 23 February 2011

the Defence Leadership framework

The New Era of Hiring and Investigating Employees

Board Governance Principles Amended September 29, 2012 Tyco International Ltd.

Transcription:

PERSONAL SAFETY LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY TEAMBUILD ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD SUMMARY In 2012, Johnny Lim Chee Hwa joined Teambuild Construction Group as its Executive Director. During Johnny s first few months with the company, he quickly realised that one of his biggest challenges was in the area of workplace safety. Although Teambuild s safety performance was better compared to the industry s average, safety standards and practices varied across worksites and there were still incidents of injuries that could have been prevented. As more building projects were secured, Johnny and his management team were faced with the challenge of raising and maintaining high safety standards across all Teambuild s construction sites.

PERSONAL SAFETY LEADERSHIP OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the safety leadership of Johnny Lim, the Executive Director of Teambuild Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd, through his vision and commitment to overcome the challenges in managing workplace safety. ABOUT TEAMBUILD ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD Teambuild Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd is an A1 1 registered civil engineering and construction company based in Singapore. Its business focuses on public housing, private residential, institutional and commercial projects. Teambuild began as a small construction outfit in 1992. Today, the company employs some 300 permanent employees, with multiple construction projects employing some 700 sub-contractor workers across its worksites. ABOUT JOHNNY LIM CHEE HWA Executive Director Teambuild Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd Johnny Lim is a registered architect with more than 20 years of experience in the Construction industry. He joined Teambuild Construction Group as an Executive Director in 2012, reporting directly to the Construction Group CEO. His key areas of responsibilities are: To assist the CEO in the formulation and execution of strategies and budget plans; To assist the CEO in overseeing the operations of the company; To oversee the overall business development; To strengthen the design and build capability of the company; 1 Under the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) Contractors Registration System which serves the construction procurement needs of the public sector in Singapore, an A1 grade requires the contractor to have a minimum financial capital of $15 million, a past 3-year track record of completing construction projects with a minimal value of $150 million, and the ISO9001:2008(SAC), ISO14000, OHSAS18000, and GGBS accreditations. Page 1

To look at new technologies and new businesses; To oversee, formulate and implement systems and processes for the Construction Group; and To set up, implement and propose improvements to departmental policies, procedures, processes and activities. Prior to joining Teambuild Construction Group, Johnny was with the Far East Organization as the Deputy Director for the Property Services Division where he reported directly to the Executive Director. In this role, he helped oversee four departments; the Development and Projects, Property Enhancement Department, Customers Service and Estates. Earlier, Johnny held the position of Senior Vice-President of the Architecture Division in CPG Consultants Pte Ltd. Besides being responsible for the Division s profit and loss, and key performance indicators, he was also the Project Director, Lead Designer, Architectural Qualified Person and Superintending Officer for many of the major projects in CPG. With strengths in both design and management, Johnny has a wealth of knowledge and experience in managing large-scale projects both locally and overseas. He is known to be effective in leading, organizing and managing different business segments effectively and profitably. Page 2

BACKGROUND Mr Johnny Lim was approached to join the Teambuild Construction Group as its Executive Director in 2012 during the time when Teambuild s construction business was steadily growing. The company was bringing in an annual turnover of more than $200 million. What began as a small construction outfit in 1992 had grown into a company with 130 permanent employees, with multiple construction projects employing some 700 sub-contractor workers across its worksites. Teambuild s management wanted someone to bring a fresh perspective in moving the business forward, and Johnny was hired to fulfill this role. During Johnny s first few months with the company, he quickly realised that one of his biggest challenges was in the area of workplace safety. Although Teambuild s safety performance was better compared to the industry s average, safety standards and practices varied across worksites and there were still incidents of injuries that could have been prevented. As more building projects were secured, Johnny and his management team were faced with the challenge of raising and maintaining high safety standards across all Teambuild s construction sites. Johnny was no stranger to the Construction industry. His prior experiences as an architect and subsequently with a developer had made him aware of the inherent dangers and potential risks present in construction works. Nonetheless, he strongly believed that safety was a basic right of every worker. He was well aware that every worker s well-being contributed to the overall business productivity and that a single fatal or serious accident could result in major down-time and financial loss to the company. Instead of just being preoccupied with your own work, we tell the workers that they should watch out for each other because at the end of the day, we want them to go back home safely to their families and loved ones. Mr Johnny Lim Executive Director Page 3

INHERITED CHALLENGES Hiring external consultants as Safety Advisors in its earlier years had unintentionally resulted in a lack of ownership and personal accountability for safety by Teambuild s own employees. Safety had become more of a paperwork compliance than an actual priority. In 2009, faced with an increasing number of accidents on sites, the management team made the decision to groom a selected group of construction supervisors as Workplace Safety & Health (WSH) Officers, thus seeing the establishment of an in-house safety team. This move led to an improvement in Teambuild s safety performance as the in-house WSH Officers became more familiar with the risks and dangers on sites, and took on responsibility for ensuring that they were managed and mitigated. Yet, safety performance stagnated in 2010 and 2011, with accidents continuing to occur on sites. Teambuild s WSH Officers faced the challenge of a lack of cooperation from the project teams and inadequate control over the subcontractors, especially with time pressures to complete the building projects. To have a significant shift in safety performance, Johnny recognised the need to instill a strong safety culture in Teambuild. He envisioned a culture where safety was a key priority of every individual from management, supervisors, workers and the subcontractors. Johnny also firmly debunked the notion that achieving zero accidents was an impossible task, even with Teambuild s expanding construction business. With this vision as a driving force, he started to consider how safety had been implemented in the company at the macro perspective and what executive changes he could make to advance Teambuild s safety outcomes and performance in a sustainable manner. MAKING SAFETY A PRIORITY 1. Taking direct responsibility Johnny understood that having a direct overview of safety issues in his personal capacity as Executive Director would send a strong signal on the importance of workers safety, and allow him to personally address any roadblocks. He established a direct reporting line for the Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS) function to the Executive Director, where it was Page 4

previously a staff function under the Construction Director (refer to Figure 1). A weekly update on safety matters was initiated to understand the issues on-the-ground that required his personal attention. Johnny also promoted Mr Allan Low, a WSH Officer with 5 years of experience, to a WSH Manager, recognising that prioritising safety also meant creating a career pathway and development opportunities for staff within the Safety Unit. Figure 1: Teambuild s organisation chart. 2. Going to the ground Johnny also wanted to personally observe the site situation, knowing that management visibility at the site would send a strong signal of their commitment to workers safety. Together with the senior management team, he regularly arranged for impromptu visits to the various project sites. These visits were intentionally unplanned and unannounced so that the real issues on site could be observed. During these visits, the management team would take the opportunity to stress the importance of good housekeeping as they believed that the discipline taken to keep a Page 5

site neat and free of debris was the fundamental step to doing safe and productive work. This emphasis led to a 15 to 30 minutes practice of daily housekeeping by each worker for their respective work areas at the end of each work day. Good housekeeping not only results in a lower probability of accidents but allows greater accessibility for people and machines to maneuver on the construction site. Having seen it for myself, this definitely enhances safety and productivity on site. Mr Johnny Lim Executive Director Figure 2: Good housekeeping by Teambuild workers demonstrated that a neat and tidy site was not an impossible task in construction. 3. What gets measured gets managed To drive home the message that safety was an integral part of Teambuild s business, Johnny and the management team incorporated safety as a key performance indicator for Page 6

all employees and sub-contractors (20% of individual KPI) to create a sense of shared accountability for safety by all. This decision was faced with initial resistance from the project managers who felt it imposed an additional layer of safety monitoring which would slow down site progress and incur unnecessary costs. However, Johnny and the management team stood firm by their decision, believing that this would contribute to a culture that would embrace and value workers safety in the long term. 4. Raising subcontractors safety standards As a main contractor, Teambuild was responsible for managing subcontractors across its building projects. This included safety but one challenge faced was that the subcontractors were different in their levels of safety culture and competency. Moreover under time pressure, it was not uncommon for them to ignore the WSH Officers and violate safety measures. Johnny was determined to raise the standard of safety management consistently across all Teambuild s subcontractors. First, Johnny and the management team imposed a requirement for all subcontractors to be minimally certified with bizsafe level 3 2 in order to be considered for Teambuild s projects. An internal safety assessment checklist was also developed to assess the subcontractors safety performance before awarding sub-contracting works to them. This ensured an acceptable level of safety management across all Teambuild s subcontractors. Johnny also initiated the development of an in-house safety performance management system to monitor subcontractors across its project sites. Under this system, safety violations would be photographed by the WSH Officers and highlighted to the subcontractors involved. Those with poor safety performance would be highlighted during the weekly review chaired by Johnny. If safety performance was consistently poor, the subcontractor s management would then be called in for a meeting with Teambuild s management team. Johnny would adopt a collaborative, nonpunitive approach, focused on resolving the issues that could be causing the persistent poor safety performance. 2 bizsafe is a five-step programme by the Workplace Safety and Health Council, Singapore, that assists companies to build up their WSH capabilities. At bizsafe Level 3, companies would have implemented an audited WSH risk management system for their work activities and processes. Page 7

This helped to create open communication lines and fostered a good rapport between Teambuild and its subcontractors. Johnny s personal involvement in these meetings raised Teambuild s reputation as a company that placed a high priority on safety and created a strong influence on the subcontractors to elevate their safety management standards. Over time, this attracted like-minded subcontractors who cared about their safety performance to work alongside Teambuild. 5. Looking ahead Recognising that innovation could improve productivity and safety, Johnny started exploring new construction technologies for Teambuild. One area of exploration was in the area of PPVC - Prefabricated, Prefinished Volumetric Construction, where pre-fabricated modules were cast in an off-site factory before being delivered to sites for installation. This reduced the number of construction activities on site required for the installation and joining of the modules, translating to less debris and hence a cleaner, more organized and safer work site for the workers. Figure 3: Johnny championed the use of PPVC - Prefabricated, Prefinished Volumetric Construction, a new technology that improved site productivity and safety. Page 8

ACHIEVING A LEAP Johnny s personal safety leadership and the company s commitment to safety proved fruitful. In 2013, Teambuild achieved a leap in reducing their accident frequency and severity rates (refer to Figures 4 & 5). Teambuild also received the bizsafe STAR and bizsafe Partner Awards by the Workplace Safety and Health Council, Singapore, in recognition for their improved safety outcomes and performance. This was a significant milestone for Teambuild in their journey towards achieving zero harm. Johnny understood that this journey was not solely about achieving a performance target of zero fatalities and injuries, but instead a relentless striving to prevent all work accidents and injuries without compromise. Figure 4: Teambuild s accident frequency rate across construction sites. Page 9

Figure 5: Teambuild s accident severity rate across construction sites. With improved safety outcomes and performance, Teambuild also achieved the following business benefits: Improved company reputation and higher competitive advantage with developers as a result of Teambuild s accomplishment of zero reportable accident rates; Higher levels of trust and loyalty from employees and workers with the personal involvement of top management in safety; Higher safety standards of Teambuild s subcontractors, which has also attracted likeminded subcontractors who value their workers safety; Reductions in business costs from workmen compensation payouts caused by accidents. Page 10

CLOSING REMARKS Johnny s personal safety leadership has shown that the key success of a company s safety journey lies within the commitment of top management. Instead of the common perception that safety requirements were a hindrance to work progress, Johnny believed that it was a business leader s moral responsibility to ensure every worker returns home safely. For businesses to be successful, he shared that safety was a required long-term investment, and would ultimately lead to higher employees morale, loyalty and productivity. To begin a company s safety journey, Johnny emphasized that an awareness, knowledge and commitment from the top management is required. Top management must visibly create a strong position on the importance of safety in the company, and take the lead in motivating their employees towards achieving a leap in safety standards. In this regard, Johnny shared his thoughts on what makes a good leader: A good leader is not only one who knows how to achieve excellent results, but one who inspires every individual in the organization to achieve the results with him. Mr Johnny Lim Executive Director ------- End ------- Page 11

RECOMMENDED CASE DISCUSSION 1. What do you think are the significant decisions/actions that Johnny took to achieve a leap in Teambuild s safety performance? If you were in Johnny s position, would you have done anything differently? 2. Johnny had a vision that achieving zero accidents was not an impossible task and this became his driving force. What do you think about his vision? What is your safety vision for your company? 3. What were the safety challenges that Johnny faced and how did he resolve them? Can you identify with any of the challenges / what are some of the safety challenges you face in your company? Can you apply any lessons from the case? 4. What are the business benefits that Teambuild achieved from improving their safety outcomes and performance? Do you think the benefits can be replicated in your company? Why or why not? 5. What do you think is the role of top management in workplace safety? Page 12