NMR Inter-Laboratory Comparison Scheme by Innovative Solutions S.r.l. Spin off company of the Technical University of Bari

Similar documents
Methods verification. Transfer of validated methods into laboratories working routine. Dr. Manuela Schulze 1

Proficiency testing schemes on determination of radioactivity in food and environmental samples organized by the NAEA, Poland

GUIDELINES FOR THE VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ACTIVE CONSTITUENT, AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICAL PRODUCTS.

Centre d expertise en analyse environnementale du Québec

Performance and advantages of qnmr measurements

NABL NATIONAL ACCREDITATION

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

QUALITY MANUAL GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. October 2008 Revision 08

R103 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: PROFICIENCY TESTING FOR ISO/IEC LABORATORIES

OIML D 18 DOCUMENT. Edition 2008 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

EffiValidation 3.0 software basic training module

Interlaboratory studies

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROGRAMME OF REFERENCE MATERIAL CERTIFICATION IN SERIAL PRODUCTION

General Rules for the certification of Management Systems

Annex 7 Guidelines on pre-approval inspections

Wine Proficiency test Organization 2009

Definition of Minimum Performance Requirements for Analytical Methods of GMO Testing European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL)

1. PURPOSE To provide a written procedure for laboratory proficiency testing requirements and reporting.

SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTROL TESTS ON THE FINISHED PRODUCT

Maria Belli. (former APAT) IX. Congress of clinical chemistry & laboratory medicine Prague September 2009

PT/EQA STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF TEST ITEMS

Guide to Method Validation for Quantitative Analysis in Chemical Testing Laboratories

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

North American Development Bank. Bid Evaluation Procedures

PROPOSED UPDATED TEXT FOR WHO GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS: MAIN PRINCIPLES (JANUARY 2013)

Hessian Agency for the Environment and Geology Ludwig-Mond-Straße 33 D Kassel, Germany. Department I3 (Air Pollution, Emission)

rtech laboratories began working toward ISO 9002:1994 in ISO 17025: Practical Benefits of Implementing a Quality System STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

OPERATIONAL STANDARD

THERMAL INSULATION MATERIALS

ISO and SANAS guidelines for use of reference materials and PT scheme participation Shadrack Phophi

DHI DANETV Test Centre Quality Manual

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

Working with ICH Quality Guidelines - the Canadian Perspective

Certifying Reference Materials to ISO Guide 34

ISO/IEC QUALITY MANUAL

State Meat and Poultry Inspection (MPI) Program Laboratory Quality Management System Checklist

Application of ISO/IEC for the Accreditation of Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) Certification Bodies

Change Healthcare Claims Provider Information Form *This form is to ensure accuracy in updating the appropriate account

A commitment to quality and continuous improvement

Measuring equipment in a laboratory.

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2003/94/EC

Wine Proficiency test Organization 2010

OD-2017-Ed.1.5 CHECK LIST FOR TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES

Enhanced calibration High quality services from your global instrumentation partner

Quality Management System Policy Manual

Nonconformities (NCs) and Observations (OBs)

Print House Projects Klaudyny Street 28/ Warsaw Terms of Service of sale of services in SAAS system

2. SUMMER ADVISEMENT AND ORIENTATION PERIODS FOR NEWLY ADMITTED FRESHMEN AND TRANSFER STUDENTS

USE OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN THE LABORATORY

ISO How to Meet. Requirements for Method Verification. Prepared by:

APPENDIX 7-B SUGGESTED OUTLINE OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN VETERINARY TESTING LABORATORIES

TG TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC :2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES

International GMP Requirements for Quality Control Laboratories and Recomendations for Implementation

FSSC Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART I

Recognition of my Product (Testing Laboratory) Why I need recognition, what is the effect?

The Laboratory Quality Assurance System. A Manual of Quality Procedures and Forms. 3rd Edition

CONTROL PLANS IN FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS NEEDED TO PRODUCE QUALITY DATA

ISMS Implementation Guide

RULES FOR THE PARTICIPATION IN INTER- LABORATORY COMPARISONS AND PROFICIENCY TESTING SCHEMES

General and statistical principles for certification of RM ISO Guide 35 and Guide 34

GLOBAL AEROSPACE PROCEDURE

There is a need for a coordinating role by the Commission supported by the Framework programme, to facilitate and harmonise those developments.

RECOMMENDATION. on the Evaluation of Quality Management System of National Metrology Institutes

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

THE INTERNATIONAL HARMONIZED PROTOCOL FOR THE PROFICIENCY TESTING OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORIES

Tender for Printing of Posters Annual Rate Contract. Ref: CDACH/Pur/16/Print/RC-Poster Date: March 17, 2016

Design of Experiments for Analytical Method Development and Validation

CollegeNET, Inc. Privacy and Security Statement

ANALYTICAL METHODS INTERNATIONAL QUALITY SYSTEMS

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

NIST HANDBOOK 150 CHECKLIST

How to implement a Quality Management System

ADVICE NOTE FORMING A RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION. A quick guide to forming a residents' association for your block

QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT (QRM): A REVIEW

Luminus Devices, Inc Luminus Testing Laboratory Quality Management Systems Manual

ORDINANCE ON THE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE CERTIFICATES IN THE. Chapter One GENERAL PROVISIONS

COMPLIANCE BY DESIGN FOR PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORIES INSIGHT FROM FDA WARNING LETTERS

CHEMISTRY. Real. Amazing. Program Goals and Learning Outcomes. Preparation for Graduate School. Requirements for the Chemistry Major (71-72 credits)

Steps to ISO/IEC Accreditation

Guidance for Industry

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

The age of competence: an update on the international laboratory accreditation scene for veterinary testing laboratories

USING CLSI GUIDELINES TO PERFORM METHOD EVALUATION STUDIES IN YOUR LABORATORY

International Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results. Operating Procedures

Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC)

AUDIT PROTOCOL FOR THE VICTORIAN WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK

Bogue Machine Company, Inc. Business Instruction

High Level Importance: ISO Microbiology compliance

GUIDELINE ON ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT MASTER FILE (APIMF) PROCEDURE 1 (The APIMF procedure guideline does not apply to biological APIs.

Lehigh University CHEM 112 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II Spring 2016 Course Syllabus. Instructors:

LAB 37 Edition 3 June 2013

Procedures and General Requirements

Dated 29 February Flood Re Limited. Payments Dispute Process. Version 1.0

Transcription:

NMR Inter-Laboratory Comparison Scheme by Innovative Solutions S.r.l. Spin off company of the Technical University of Bari Version n. 1, September 2014 Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 1 / 13

SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 THE NEED FOR NMR INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS... 3 1.2 REFERENCE NORMATIVE... 3 2. THE SCHEME: Innovative Solutions NMR Inter-Laboratory Comparison (IS-NMR-ILC)... 4 SCHEME FEATURES... 4 a. Call... 4 b. Registration... 4 c. Publication of the experimental instructions for participants... 5 d. Samples preparation... 5 e. Samples delivery... 5 f. NMR analysis... 5 g. Submission of the results... 5 h. Data elaboration... 5 i. Report publication... 6 3.CRITERIA TO BE MET FOR PARTICIPANTS... 7 4. INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS... 8 4.1 INSTRUCTION FOR PARTICIPANTS... 8 4.2 PRIVACY... 8 4.3 SUBCONTRACT... 8 4.4 COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS... 8 4.5 COSTS... 8 4.6 COLLUSION AND FALSIFICATION OF RESULTS... 8 5. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PARTICIPANT PERFORMANCE... 9 DETERMINATION OF THE ASSIGNED VALUE... 9 6. REFERENCES... 10 7. ANNEX 1 REGISTRATION FORM... 11 Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 2 / 13

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 THE NEED FOR NMR INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS Since its first application as quantitative technique,[1] NMR spectroscopy has been successfully used for many applications involving several kind of matrixes (small molecules, pharmaceuticals and natural products in both simple and complex mixtures). One of the major advantages of quantitative NMR (qnmr) is its primary analytical characteristic. It can be applied in the quantitative estimation of purity of compounds without using any specific reference standard. Moreover, the recent progress in the development of high sensitive instruments allowed for reduction of the detection limits, thus making the technique appealing for analysis of molecules in very low concentrations. A comprehensive recent review aiming to extend awareness of experimental protocols for accurate NMR quantification of analytes is available in Trends in Analytical Chemistry.[2] Despite the advantages deriving from the use of qnmr and despite the plethora of well documented validation processes (e.g., precision, accuracy, linearity, reproducibility, robustness, selectivity, and specificity), very few official NMR based quantification methods are known. With the aim to extend the use of qnmr in official methods, Innovative Solutions organizes NMR inter-laboratory comparisons (ILCs) according to ISO/IEC 17043:2010 and reference normative therein. ILCs provide objective standards for individual laboratories, permit them to compare analytical results from different laboratories and represent a way to check the quality and the accuracy of the analytical job. Validation by ILCs is the starting point for official recognition of the analytical methods. The ILCs are organized by Innovative Solutions for its own account or on behalf of third parties. In all cases, a scientific committee is responsible for the experimental design. [1] J. L. Jungnickel, J. W. Forbes, Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 938-942. [2] S. K. Bharti, R. Roy, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 35 (2012) 5-26. 1.2 REFERENCE NORMATIVE ISO/IEC 17043:2010 Conformity assessment- General requirements for proficiency testing. ISO 13528:2005 Statistical method for use in proficiency testing for inter-laboratory comparisons. IUPAC TECHINCAL REPORT The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories, Pure Appl. Chem.,Vol. 78, No. 1, pp145-196, 2006. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 3 / 13

2. THE SCHEME: Innovative Solutions NMR Inter-Laboratory Comparison (IS-NMR-ILC) SCHEME FEATURES The IS-NMR-ILC scheme is organized with the following steps: a) Call b) Registration c) Publication of the experimental instructions for participants d) Samples preparation e) Sample delivery f) NMR analysis g) Submission of the results h) Data elaboration i) Report publication a. Call The call makes known the aim of the ILC, the scientific committee, the customer for which Innovative Solutions (coordinator) organizes the ILC, the sample matrix and the NMR experiment selected for the ILC. Technical requirements of the participants are also indicated. Concerning the costs, the customer can fund the ILC or can ask participants to pay a registration fee. When the customer funds the ILC, he becomes the owner of the data and decides on publication of the results. b. Registration NMR Spectrometer Profile In order to participate to IS-NMR-ILCs, a NMR Spectrometer Profile must be active on http://nmr.mxcs.it/index.php. Each participant will confidentially be provided with a unique identification username and password to login the NMR spectrometer profile. NMR spectrometer profile activation must be requested by email to qualita@innovative-solutions.it indicating NMR Spectrometer Profile activation as subject and attaching (as pdf file) the registration form (see Annex 1) duly filled in and signed by legal representative. If a participant plans to use more than one NMR spectrometer, additional NMR Spectrometer Profiles must be activated. Each participant must send one registration form per NMR spectrometer. Activation of NMR Spectrometer Profile is free of charge and does not give any right to participate to inter-laboratory comparisons. Inter-laboratory comparison Participation to a specific ILC must be asked by email to qualita@innovative-solutions.it according to section 5 Registration of the call for participation. Should a registration fee be due, bank transfer details demonstrating execution of the payment must be sent. After registration acceptance by Innovative Solutions, a link to the specific ILC will be active on the NMR Spectrometer Profile. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 4 / 13

c. Publication of the experimental instructions for participants General information and experimental instructions will be published on the NMR Spectrometer Profile. Instructions will be available only after registration is completed. d. Samples preparation Materials are carefully selected to meet the need of participants, and they are subjected to quality control. Details of test materials are given in the Call for Participation. The test parameters are constantly reviewed to ensure they meet the needs of current laboratory testing and regulatory requirements. In order to check the quality of analytical materials, several factors such as homogeneity of the sample population, sample stability and all of the production steps are controlled. When possible, homogeneity tests are applied in accordance with IUPAC technical report The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. Test material batches are tested for homogeneity for at least one test parameter where appropriate. Details of homogeneity tests performed and results are published on final report. In case of non-conformity, materials are retired. If this produces a delay, participants will be promptly apprised. e. Samples delivery Samples are sent by an express courier guaranteeing delivery within two days. Shipping codes will be given to participants in order to follow the way of packs. Samples are sent in an appropriate packaging, to guarantee the integrity of materials during transport. After delivery, the only responsible for preservation of the sample is the participant. Participants must verify the integrity of the received analytical material within 24 h from delivery. Any kind of problem must be quickly communicated to qualita@innovative-solutions.it (in case of broken materials, taking pictures is recommended). See paragraph 4.4 for appeals and complaints. f. NMR analysis Samples will be analyzed by participants, in accordance with methods and timetables provided by protocol and instructions. Each deviation from instructions, if any, must be declared to coordinator before the closure of comparison. g. Submission of the results Submission of the results will be possible by on line procedure using the form on website http://nmr.mxcs.it/index.php. Participants can ask for a different result submission procedure. The possible different result submission procedure requires additional costs and must be communicated to Innovative Solutions no later than 15 days before deadline. After deadline, result submission is no longer possible. h. Data elaboration NMR data are submitted to statistical processing by Innovative Solutions staff, in accordance with the appropriate statistical principles of reference normative. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 5 / 13

i. Report publication Results of the statistical elaboration of the NMR will be published on the website and will be available to the participants free of charge. Possible additional costs for non-participants will be decided by the customer. Normally, report will be published within 45 working days after deadline. Hard-copy reports will be available depending on the decision of the customer (additional costs are required for hard-copy reports). Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 6 / 13

3.CRITERIA TO BE MET FOR PARTICIPANTS Normally, no restrictions concerning hardware are applied unless NMR experiment selected for the specific ILC requires well defined hardware features. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 7 / 13

4. INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS 4.1 INSTRUCTION FOR PARTICIPANTS An instruction paper containing all information about ILC (NMR experiment, sample features, deadlines, costs, etc.) is drawn up for each program. All information are available on the NMR spectrometer profile. In case of changes of the ILC scheme design or operation, participants will be informed promptly by email. Unless differently stated in the specific call for participation, the minimum number of participants for each ILC is 10. 4.2 PRIVACY Unless differently stated in the call, in the framework of an inter-laboratory comparison, the identity of each participant will be unknown to other participants. In order to guarantee the confidentiality of participants, a specific and casual serial number will be assigned to each NMR spectrometer. In case of infringement of anonymity, the serial number can be changed under formal and written request. 4.3 SUBCONTRACT In some circumstances, various aspects of the scheme may be executed by subcontractors. In such cases, Innovative Solutions will inform participants in advance. Even in case of subcontract, Innovative Solutions is responsible for all steps of the ILC. Subcontracted steps, subcontractors and contact details will be declared in the Call for Participation. 4.4 COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS It is available a procedure for managing complaints to allow participants to appeal against valuation of their own performances. Records will be maintained of all complaints, appeals, investigations and corrective action taken. For any kind of problem, contact Innovative Solutions by email to direzione@innovativesolutions.it. 4.5 COSTS Possible costs (with payment details) will be declared in the Call for Participation. 4.6 COLLUSION AND FALSIFICATION OF RESULTS Innovative Solutions strongly stigmatizes collusion and falsification because they are contrary to professional scientific conduct. To participants falsifying results may be denied participation in successive comparisons. To prevent collusion and falsification, Innovative Solutions reserves the right to distribute more than one test material, so that participants cannot compare results. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 8 / 13

5. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PARTICIPANT PERFORMANCE Unless different evaluation will be appropriate, z-scores will be calculated for proficiency testing. For z scores, the following limits must be considered: - z 2.0 indicates satisfactory performance; - 2.0 < z < 3.0 indicates questionable performance; - z 3.0 indicates unsatisfactory performance. DETERMINATION OF THE ASSIGNED VALUE Assigned values are determined in accordance with ISO 13528 by consensus value of results. The assigned value is the best estimation available for the true value. The assigned value can be set as a consensus value. An estimate of the uncertainty of the consensus will be also provided. If the uncertainty is too high, z-scores may be issued for information only and should not be used by participants as fully evaluative of performance. The statistics for the derivation of the assigned value will be summarized in each ILC report. If necessary, reports will detail any complications in the derivations,. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 9 / 13

6. REFERENCES UNI CEI E N ISO/IEC 17043:2010 - Conformity assessment General requirements for proficiency testing. ISO 13528: 2005 Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter-laboratory comparisons IUPAC TECHINCAL REPORT The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories Pure appl. Chem.Vol. 78, No1, pp145-196, 2006 J. L. Jungnickel, J. W. Forbes, Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 938-942. S. K. Bharti, R. Roy, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 35 (2012) 5-26. Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 10 / 13

7. ANNEX 1 REGISTRATION FORM This form must be printed on headed paper of the Company/Institution/University Legal name of the Company/Institution/University Legal representative or his/her nominee VAT Number Name of the lab Address: Street ZIP Code Town Country Contact person: Family name Name Phone (landline) Mobile phone Fax e-mail Spectrometer: Manufacturer Model Production year Magnetic field ( Probehead Expertise of the lab (Please, add lines if needed): Matrix Topic (for instance (for instance metabolite quantification, origin assessment, shelf milk, wine, life assessment, etc.) etc.) Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 11 / 13

(for instance chemical synthesis, pharmaceutic als, etc.) (for instance purity assessment, enantiomeric excess, etc.) I ask for activation of on line NMR Spectrometer Profile to be used for participation to NMR Inter-Laboratory Comparisons organized by Innovative Solutions S.r.l. (IS-NMR-ILC). I am aware that: - activation of the NMR Spectrometer Profile is free of charge; - participation to IS-NMR-ILCs requires compliance with the IS-NMR-ILC Scheme and with the Call for participation of the specific comparison. Moreover, I declare that (Legal name of the Company/Institution/University) will never demand economic contribution for any reason related to its registration in the Inter-Laboratory Comparison platform of Innovative Solutions S.r.l. According to Italian Law D. Lgs. 196/2003, with the subscription of the present letter I authorize Innovative Solutions S.r.l. to use information above for purposes related to activities regarding Inter-Laboratory Comparisons. Date and place Signature of the legal representative or his/her nominee Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 12 / 13

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS S.r.l. Zona H, 150/B - 70015 Noci (BA) Phone +39 0805963607 Edition: September 2014; Version no. 1 13 / 13