PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF GOVERNANCE POLICY

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)

Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

West Des Moines Community School District Performance Evaluation Report Support Staff

Support Services Evaluation Handbook

The information contained in this guideline is the processes typically recommended by Human Resource Services (HRS).

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals

Supervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy

JOB PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Monroe County Community College Administrators. Name: Position: Supervisor: Evaluation Period:

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

EMPLOYEE CONDUCT / CONFLICT OF INTEREST

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Performance Management

PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors

CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN

Performance Evaluation System

SECTION IX Purpose

Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

APPENDIX C: FACULTY EVALUATION FORM PROBATIONARY FIRST-YEAR APPOINTMENT

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees

3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM. A. Policy

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

STATUS OF EMPLOYMENT:

5.2 Performance Management Policy

TABLE OF CONTENTS C. SUMMATIVE EVALUATION REPORT (FORM C) D. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN - YEARS 2, 3, 4 (FORM D) 16-17

Selection and Hiring Manual

INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

DEPARTMENT OF TEACHER EDUCATION Professional Behavior Plan

IT Service Desk Unit Opportunities for Improving Service and Cost-Effectiveness

The word "supervisor," as used in this document, shall mean anyone who is in a rating capacity.

Setting the Expectation for Success: Performance Management & Appraisal System

TITLE: Employee Performance Evaluations

It will be the line manager s responsibility to structure the programme in such a way that both parties are clear about what to expect.

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

FINDLAY CITY SCHOOLS PLANNING CONFERENCE AND REVIEW FOR SCHOOL NURSE

Employee Performance Management Policy and Procedure

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Disciplinary Action Rule

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS

GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DISCIPLINARY PROCESS REQUIREMENTS TO MAINTAIN CERTIFICATION. Preamble... Page 2

Performance Appraisal System

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

Certified Employee Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program Washoe County School District

Michael E. Shultz Assistant Administrator Director Of Loss Control & Training Michigan County Road Commission Self-Insurance Pool

Manager, Corporate Planning & Reporting BC Oil & Gas Commission, Victoria Applied Leadership. Office of the Commissioner - Corporate Affairs

Professional Position Description Section I Position Information Position Title

Employee Support and Development Performance Management Planning. Government Departments and Agencies

Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:

Position Title: Management Info Chief. Working Title: Technical Project Management Section Chief

Code of Conduct, Statement of Corporate Purpose, Managing Unsatisfactory Performance, SES Performance Management

All supervisors must conduct planning and evaluation sessions each fiscal year.

Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff

CHAPTER 5 - SAFETY ASSESSMENTS, LOG OF DEFICIENCIES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS

Teacher Performance Appraisal. Frequently Asked Questions. Table of Contents. Classroom Observation & Pre- and Post-Observation Meetings 9

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD) Personnel Management Performance Appraisals, Awards and Training

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal

DATE ISSUED: 10/29/ of 8 UPDATE 98 DNA(LEGAL)-P

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Division of Human Resources Staff Performance Management Procedure

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCEDURE

Mentorship Program Information Package

Ball State University PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM FOR NONEXEMPT STAFF PERSONNEL. Evaluation Period: March 1, 2012, to February 28, 2013.

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Probation at ECU Academic and General Staff Guidelines for Managers/Supervisors

I. THE PLAN. Init.10/10

WAC Release of a school district from designation as a. required action district. (1) The state board of education shall release

JOB AIDS AND RESOURCES FAQs Performance Evaluation System

APPRAISAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SUPPORT STAFF 1

Performance Management in the Scottish Government Main bargaining unit

Communications Policy

Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations

NIPISSING-PARRY SOUND CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Performance Management System

British Columbia Ministry of Education. Provincial Guidelines: Maintenance of Order under section 177 of the School Act

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

Supervisor s Guide to Performance Management: Performance Evaluation 1

RATER S GUIDE STATE OF ALASKA

How quality assurance reviews can strengthen the strategic value of internal auditing*

Individual Career Development Plan

Coordinated Timetabling: Principles, Rules & Responsibilities Originating/Responsible Department:

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form

ARKANSAS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND. Policy Type Subject of Policy Policy No. Administrative Personnel Performance Evaluation System 1013

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

Table of Contents Performance Management Process Schedule II Levels P age

Transcription:

Governance Policy 655 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF GOVERNANCE POLICY CONTENTS 1.0 PRINCIPLES 2.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK 3.0 AUTHORIZATION 1.0 PRINCIPLES 1.1. The South Shore Regional School (SSRSB) believes that the performance of the organization is directly linked to the performance of individual employees. The performance appraisal of all employees is essential to the achievement of quality educational experiences for all students in the Board s care. 1.2. The SSRSB believes the performance appraisal process provides opportunities for staff development and encourages the professional growth of each staff member while acknowledging and affirming the efforts, involvement, and achievements of all employees. The performance appraisal process will strive to ensure that all employees perform in a competent and caring manner, value quality of learning for all students, and will support a positive, respectful, and safe environment that respects the cultural and individual differences of all individuals. 2.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK 2.1. This policy complies with the Education Act and other related provincial acts and policies. 2.1.1. This policy applies to all non-teaching employees, with the exception of Senior Administration. 2.1.2. The Performance Appraisal process will: 2.1.2.1. Reflect specific dimensions of each position relevant to an approved job description for that position. 2.1.2.2. Be a collaborative and interactive process. 2.1.2.3. Provide an opportunity to review the job. 2.1.2.4. Include a review of general performance standards. 2.1.2.5. Endeavor to maintain and improve employee/job performance. 2.1.2.6. Improve communication between the employee and his/her immediate Principal by providing an opportunity to provide specific feedback to individual employees on their job performance. 2.1.2.7. Provide an opportunity for employees to reflect on their own performance and to set professional goals that will support professional growth and career planning. 2.1.2.8. Assess employee training needs. 2.1.3. Appraisal criteria will be based on the approved job description, which will be subject to an annual review as per SSRSB Policy 660: Job descriptions and any relevant Collective agreement provisions. GOVERNANCE POLICY 655: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF Page 1 of 2

Governance Policy 655 3.0 AUTHORIZATION 3.1. The Superintendent is authorized to issue procedures in support of this policy. GOVERNANCE POLICY 655: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF Page 2 of 2

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES CONTENTS 1.0 PROCEDURES 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 1.0 PROCEDURES 1.1. Process for Determining Frequency of Appraisal 1.1.1. Frequency for Custodial Staff and Bus Drivers 1.1.1.1. Supervisory evaluation is an on-going process dedicated to continuous improvement and individual growth. Therefore, the supervisory performance appraisal will be conducted: 1.1.1.2. On an annual basis for all term and probationary employees 1.1.1.3. Every three (3) years for permanent staff; 1.1.1.4. At any time deemed necessary by the Supervisor; or 1.1.1.5. When the employee moves to a new classification. 1.1.2. Frequency of All Other Employees 1.1.2.1. Evaluation is an on-going process dedicated to continuous improvement and individual growth. Therefore, the performance appraisal will be conducted as follows: 1.1.2.2. Term and probationary employees will undergo an annual evaluation by Supervisor only. 1.1.2.3. A Supervisory evaluation will be performed once every four (4) years for permanent employees; or 1.1.2.4. At any time deemed necessary by the Supervisor; or 1.1.2.5. When the employee moves to a new classification. 1.1.2.6. And will include the development of a Professional Growth Plan (Appendix A ) in the years in which the Supervisory Appraisal process is not applicable. 1.2. Process for Supervisory/Formative Appraisal 1.2.1. Pre-Appraisal Conference 1.2.1.1. The performance appraisal process is a confidential process. The employee s immediate Principal, or designate, will be responsible for completing the process. The process for the appraisal will normally include the following components: 1.2.1.2. The Principal (appraiser), or designate will meet with the employee to explain the appraisal process as described in the appraisal instrument. 1.2.1.3. The current job description will be reviewed. 1.2.1.4. During the pre-appraisal conference, the appraisal will be reviewed and discussed for clarification. This will be an opportunity for input, feedback, and questions. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 655: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF Page 1 of 4

1.2.1.5. Realistic time-lines are established and adhered to. 1.2.2. Post-Appraisal Conference 1.2.2.1. The Principal, or designate shall meet with the employee to review his/her report within three weeks following the specified deadline for data collection. At the post- conference meeting, the appraiser and the employee will: 1.2.2.2. Review the Supervisory Report. 1.2.2.3. Provide an opportunity for feedback on/discussion of the forms & report. 1.2.2.4. Discuss changes/improvements to the appraisal system. 1.2.2.5. Review recommendations. Revisions may be made if applicable. 1.2.2.6. If revisions are not necessary, the appraisal document may be signed by both parties at the conclusion of this meeting. If revisions are deemed necessary, another meeting will be held between the appraiser and employee to affix signatures to the final appraisal document. 1.2.2.7. Signatures do not indicate agreement, simply that the form was reviewed and discussed. Comment sections are available for both parties to respond the evaluation. 1.2.2.8. Recommendations may include: 1.2.2.9. Further training/development; or 1.2.2.10. Movement to an individual plan to address serious issues(section 6.0), or 1.2.2.11. Continuing focus on agreed upon professional growth goals, or 1.2.2.12. The development of professional goals and/or performance improvement goals through consultation (Section 4.0). 1.2.2.13. Distribution of Report: The original signed Performance Appraisal Report, along with any letters of comment or rebuttal, will be forwarded to the Department by the appraiser to be included in the employee s personal file. A copy of the signed Supervisory Report will be provided to the employee. 1.2.3. Disagreement with Formative Performance Appraisal 1.2.3.1. In situations where the employee disagrees with aspects of his/her performance appraisal, the employee may send a formal letter of rebuttal to the Director of that will be attached to the Supervisory appraisal. 1.3. Process for Personal Growth Plan 1.3.1. In years in which a Supervisory Performance Appraisal is not applicable, employees will engage in performance planning and goal setting by completing a Professional Growth Plan (Appendix A ). This is an opportunity for employees to reflect on their performance, to identify areas of professional strength, to focus on areas for growth and improvement, and to establish and prioritize goals that support their on-going professional development and growth. 1.3.2. Professional Growth Plan Process ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 655: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF Page 2 of 4

1.3.2.1. The Principal, or designate will meet with the employee to review the most current job description relevant to the employee s position. 1.3.2.2. The Principal, or designate, and the employee will review the Professional Growth Plan template (Appendix A) and will discuss each of the goals. 1.3.2.3. A reasonable time-frame will be agreed upon for the employee to complete a Professional Growth Plan. A meeting date will be set for the Principal, or designate and the employee to review the proposed plan. If revisions are deemed appropriate, the plan will be revised in a timely manner to facilitate the implementation of the plan. The Principal, or designate and employee will sign the plan. 1.3.2.4. A final meeting to review the outcomes of the plan will be arranged to take place at the end of the cycle. This meeting will be scheduled before May 15 th in the school year. Both parties will sign the plan at the end of the cycle. The original plan will be filed in the employee s personal file; a copy will be provided to the employee. 1.3.2.5. This aspect of the performance appraisal process will begin anew unless the employee is scheduled to participate in the Supervisory Performance Appraisal process; or the process is warranted as a result of the Performance Growth Plan, or the employee s job description has changed significantly. 1.4. Process for Summative Appraisal 1.4.1. If there are serious issues identified through the Supervisory process, the Principal may recommend that the Employee be moved to a summative process, which is outside of this appraisal and growth plan. The summative process is an individualized plan (Appendix B), developed with input from the Employee and the Principal, including the Director of, or designate. It clearly outlines the performance issues, sets comprehensive goals, that will include supports offered, targets to be reached and a time line for follow up. Failure to meet the achievements outlined in the summative process may lead to discipline or dismissal. 1.4.2. The Summative Process 1.4.2.1. An initial meeting must be scheduled within 10 working days concluding the meeting to review the Supervisory appraisal. This meeting will include the Principal, the Employee and the Director of or designate. The Employee should also be notified that they may invite their Union representative for support if they choose. 1.4.2.2. A plan for improvement will be collaboratively developed by the Employee and the Principal, with the assistance of the Director of Human Resources or designate. This plan will include: 1.4.2.3. Issues Identified 1.4.2.4. Specific Goals 1.4.2.5. Supports / Resources Provided 1.4.2.6. Indicators of Success 1.4.2.7. Timelines to demonstrate indicators of success 1.4.2.8. At the meeting, follow up meetings will be scheduled to review the progress of the plan for improvement. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 655: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF Page 3 of 4

1.4.2.9. The Director of, or designate, will provide a summary of the meeting, the final plan for improvement and the follow up meeting dates, in a letter to the Employee, copied to the Employee s Personnel file and the Principal, within 10 working days following the meeting. 1.4.2.10. The Director of, or designate, will also provide summary letters following each follow up meeting and the concluding meeting. These letters will be addressed to the Employee, copied to the Employee s personnel file and the Principal. 1.4.2.11. The Director of, or designate, will also provide summary letters following each follow up meeting and the concluding meeting. These letters will be addressed to the Employee, copied to the Employee s personnel file and the Principal. 1.4.2.12. At the concluding meeting, a recommendation will be made. If the indicators of success have been met, the Employee returns to the regular cycle outlined in this policy. If the Principal determines that insufficient progress has been made on the plan for improvement, a recommendation will be made for an individual decision on that employee. 1.4.2.13. An individual recommendation will include a meeting with the Employee, the principal, the Director of and /or designate and the Employee s Union representative. 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES It shall be the responsibility of the Superintendent to ensure these administrative procedures are followed. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 655: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-TEACHING STAFF Page 4 of 4