Quiver representations [1,2,3], invariant theory and Coxeter groups

Similar documents
Classification of Cartan matrices

Lecture 4 DISCRETE SUBGROUPS OF THE ISOMETRY GROUP OF THE PLANE AND TILINGS

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

Chapter 7. Permutation Groups

Geometric Transformations

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD

Matrix generators for exceptional groups of Lie type

Ideal Class Group and Units

Structure of the Root Spaces for Simple Lie Algebras

Group Theory. 1 Cartan Subalgebra and the Roots. November 23, Cartan Subalgebra. 1.2 Root system

Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices

The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics

Lecture 16 : Relations and Functions DRAFT

6.2 Permutations continued

UNIVERSITY OF PUNE, PUNE BOARD OF STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS SYLLABUS

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

1 Symmetries of regular polyhedra

1 Sets and Set Notation.

How To Prove The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Largest Fixed-Aspect, Axis-Aligned Rectangle


ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS

Lecture 18 - Clifford Algebras and Spin groups

GROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV

Solving Simultaneous Equations and Matrices

Orthogonal Diagonalization of Symmetric Matrices

Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality

The Banach-Tarski Paradox

BABY VERMA MODULES FOR RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRAS

CLUSTER ALGEBRAS AND CATEGORIFICATION TALKS: QUIVERS AND AUSLANDER-REITEN THEORY

FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES

Lecture 8 : Coordinate Geometry. The coordinate plane The points on a line can be referenced if we choose an origin and a unit of 20

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES

Recall that two vectors in are perpendicular or orthogonal provided that their dot

NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS

Logo Symmetry Learning Task. Unit 5

it is easy to see that α = a

MATH2210 Notebook 1 Fall Semester 2016/ MATH2210 Notebook Solving Systems of Linear Equations... 3

MATH1231 Algebra, 2015 Chapter 7: Linear maps

Section 1.1. Introduction to R n

ORIENTATIONS. Contents

THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY

Chapter 6. Orthogonality

Group Theory. Contents

o-minimality and Uniformity in n 1 Graphs

Chapter 7: Products and quotients

Spectral Networks and Harmonic Maps to Buildings

Lecture 17 : Equivalence and Order Relations DRAFT

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 24 Apr 2014

Dedekind s forgotten axiom and why we should teach it (and why we shouldn t teach mathematical induction in our calculus classes)

Very Preliminary Program

Linear algebra and the geometry of quadratic equations. Similarity transformations and orthogonal matrices

Applied Linear Algebra

Nonzero degree tangential maps between dual symmetric spaces

Connecting Transformational Geometry and Transformations of Functions

THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE

Lecture 14: Section 3.3

Algebra I Credit Recovery

Factoring Patterns in the Gaussian Plane

Finite dimensional topological vector spaces

Elements of Abstract Group Theory

The number of generalized balanced lines

The Ideal Class Group

1 The Concept of a Mapping

COMBINATORIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HIGMAN-SIMS GRAPH. 1. Introduction

Actually Doing It! 6. Prove that the regular unit cube (say 1cm=unit) of sufficiently high dimension can fit inside it the whole city of New York.

Factoring bivariate polynomials with integer coefficients via Newton polygons

Vector Spaces; the Space R n

3. INNER PRODUCT SPACES

Master of Arts in Mathematics

Galois representations with open image

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

Linear Algebra Done Wrong. Sergei Treil. Department of Mathematics, Brown University

Introduction to Finite Fields (cont.)

SMALL SKEW FIELDS CÉDRIC MILLIET

Lecture 15 An Arithmetic Circuit Lowerbound and Flows in Graphs

MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

Solving Geometric Problems with the Rotating Calipers *

Thnkwell s Homeschool Precalculus Course Lesson Plan: 36 weeks

Chapter 13: Basic ring theory

FINITE DIMENSIONAL ORDERED VECTOR SPACES WITH RIESZ INTERPOLATION AND EFFROS-SHEN S UNIMODULARITY CONJECTURE AARON TIKUISIS

Bachelor Degree in Business Administration Academic year 2015/16

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2012

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 7 Mar 2012

ON TORI TRIANGULATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINUED FRACTIONS OF CUBIC IRRATIONALITIES.

Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes

EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010

Let H and J be as in the above lemma. The result of the lemma shows that the integral

5.3 The Cross Product in R 3

On Integer Additive Set-Indexers of Graphs

Introduction to Modern Algebra

IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction

I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

Comments on Quotient Spaces and Quotient Maps

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

9. Quotient Groups Given a group G and a subgroup H, under what circumstances can we find a homomorphism φ: G G ', such that H is the kernel of φ?

Metrics on SO(3) and Inverse Kinematics

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Common Core Unit Summary Grades 6 to 8

Transcription:

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2015 1 Quiver representations [1,2,3], invariant theory and Coxeter groups D.H.Banaga *, M.A.Bashir ** Shaqra a University, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia * College of mathematical Science and Statistic, Elneilain University, Sudan ** Abstract- We utilized root systems, via correspondence, in other areas of study. In particular, we considered quiver representations, invariant theory and Coxeter groups. A I. PRELIMINARIES reflection is natural geometric concept. It is a linear transformation of Euclidean space that fixes a hyper plane (i) Let be Lie algebra then the Killing form on is defined by points wise and sends its orthogonal vectors to their opposite with respect to. Here we will introduce Coxeter systems and Weyl group and their classifications. While the finite reflection groups have a special type of root system. To clarify that we consider the following concepts: (ii) The Lie algebra is semisimple if and only if and is non- degenerate. (iii) where is Cartan sub algebras, then we can define abstract root systems as follows: II. ABSTRACT ROOT SYSTEMS If is non degenerate on, so there is an induced isomorphism. by definition, Let's calculate ( Symmetric) = ( invariant) = = ( = ( invariant) Thus, we have that, also compute.. (1) Inparticular, letting, we get. this is sometimes called the co-root of, and denoted. then we can use (1) to rewrite this fact

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2015 2 For, and (set of roots) Now we can define by. this is the reflection through the plane orthogonal to in. The group generated by the for is a Coxeter group. Properties of root system : Basic properties of the root decomposition are : 1. 2. if 3. is non degenerate 4. is non degenerate Definition (2.1) : An abstract reduced root system is a finite set which satisfies : 1. spans 2. If then and (i.e. with ) and 3. If then (this is the reduced part), the number is called the rank of. Notice: That given root system is, and, we get that is root system. III. REFLECTION GROUPS Suppose and are two mirror, is two half planes where is disjoint union of two half planes,define the angle with measure, Here. Let,. The composition is the counterclockwise rotations about the angle if and a translation if. is group generated by the two reflections. Definition (3.1): A reflection group in a space of constant curvature is a discrete group of motions of generated by reflection.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2015 3 Theorem (3.2): Let be a reflection group in. There exists a convex polytope such that : i. is a fundamental domain for the action of in ; ii. The angle between any two half spaces is equal to zero or for some positive integer unless the angle is divergent. iii. is generated by reflections. Definition (3.3): A finite reflection group is a pair where is Euclidean space, is a finite subgroup of and generated by all reflections in. Generation means :, then genertaes if where is defined as one of the following equivalents definitions: i. (semantic) ii. (syntactic) Equivalence : if there is an isometry s.t. Example (3.4): is field of two elements. Consider action of on basis of. Consider semi direct product, the product is acts on : Let us check that this is the action of : = It is reflection since and,., IV. COXETER SYSTEMS Definition (4.1): A group is a Coxeter group if there exists a subset such that where and for all. The pair (W, S) is then called a Coxeter system.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2015 4 1. Let be a Coxeter system. If is finite then we say that is finite. If and. Where and is Coxeter system for, one say that is reducible. Other wise is irreducible. 2. Let be a Coxeter system. The Coxeter graph assigned to is constructed as follow: (i) The elements of form the vertices of ; (ii) given, there is no edge between and if ; (iii) given, there is an edge labelled by between and if Example (4.3): Use the definition(4.1) to find the Coxeter system for. Example (4.4): The Coxeter graph of following : Theorem (4.5): If is a finite irreducible Coxeter system, then its Coxeter graph is one of the following : Theorem (4.6): Each of the Coxeter systems represented by the Coxeter graphs the map is surjective and we get a bijection arises from a finite reflection group. Hence

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2015 5 V. WEYL GROUPS Here we will study Weyl groups as special case of finite reflection groups. Indeed they are finite Euclidean reflection groups defined over instead of. Definition (5.1): A lattice of rank is a free - module. A weyl group is a finite Euclidean reflection group admitting a - invariant lattice,where. Note that for all we have the following identity, Where is the angle between these vectors. Thus we have Since the only root system is crystallographic, we must have or. Hence the only possibilities for are and. VI. DYNKIN DIAGRAMS Definition (6.1): Now if we change the notaion for Coxeter graphs, we get a Dynkin diagrams. Namely, for an essential crystallographic root system and a fundamental system of, we assign a graph to as follows : The elements of from the vertices of. Given and the angle between them, we assign or edge(s) between and by the following rule No edge 1 edge 2 edges 3 edges Lemma (6.2):

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2015 6 If is irreducible, then at most two root lengths occur in. If two root lengths occur in, we call the roots short and long. We denote it in the Coxeter graph of by an arrow pointing towards the shorter root.i.e., if we have A Coxeter graph with such arrow is called a Dynkin diagram. Theorem (6.3): If is an irreducible essential crystallographic root system, then its Dynkin diagram is one of the following: Theorem (6.4): There exists a crystallographic root system having each of VII. CONCLUSION A finite reflection group with a special type of root system has a Coxeter graph made a Coxeter system that we can represented it by a Dynkin diagram with such an arrow. a group can have more than one Coxeter system. as its Dynkin diagram. [5] Introduction to Lie algebras Alexander Kirillov.Jr Departement of mathematics, Sunny at Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. [6] Cartan matrices with null roots and finite Cartan Matrices Stephen Berman, Robert Moody & Maria Wonen Burger University of Saskatchewan Indiana University Novemeber 22,1971. [7] Relaunch.hcm.uni-bonn.de/fileadmin/perrin/chap5.pdf REFERENCES [1] Lecture Note Reflection Groups Dr.Dmitriy Rumynin Anne Lena Winstel Autumn Term 2010. [2] Reflection Groups and Rings of Invariants - M elanie ULDRY- Lausanne, spring semester 2012. [3] Reflection groups in algebraic geometry Igor V. Dolgachev article electronically published on October 26, 2007. [4] Structure theory of semisimple Lie groups A.W.Knap -1997. AUTHORS First Author D.H.Banaga, Lecturer, College of Science and Humanity Studies, Shaqra a University, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia Email: duaa-f@hotmail.com Second Author M.A.Bashir, professor of mathematics, College of mathematical Science and Statistic, Elneilain University, Sudan Email: mabashir09@gmail.com