Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute



Similar documents
Effects of a White Certificate trading scheme on the energy system of the EU-27

World Simulations with GEM-E3

Documentation of the Applied Dynamic Analysis of the Global Economy (ADAGE) Model

Some micro- and macro-economics of offshore wind*

The impact of increased efficiency in the use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Spain

Capacity Building through Energy Modelling and Systems Analysis

THE SOCIOECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY AND LOW CARBON TRAJECTORIES IN SOUTH AFRICA

Summary of the Impact assessment for a 2030 climate and energy policy framework

Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050

Greenhouse gas abatement potential in Israel

Tailoring transport choices

Implications of Abundant Natural Gas

Module 1: Introduction to Industrial Energy Management

The Economic Impacts of Reducing. Natural Gas and Electricity Use in Ontario

Cost-Benefit Analysis for a Pipeline Project

Revision of Primary Energy Factors in EU Legislation. A EURELECTRIC view

Green Power Accounting Workshop: Concept Note For discussion during Green Power Accounting Workshop in Mexico City, May 13th 2011

Analysis of the EU Renewable Directive by a TIMES-Norway

Outline. 1. Climate and energy: where do we stand? 2. Why a new framework for 2030? 3. How it works. 4. Main challenges. 5.

BUSINESS- -AS-USUAL SCENARIOS FOR POLAND

Draft consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM00XX

How vehicle fuel economy improvements can save $2 trillion and help fund a long-term transition to plug-in vehicles Working Paper 9

Energy Projections Price and Policy Considerations. Dr. Randy Hudson Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Economic Outcomes of a U.S. Carbon Tax. Executive Summary

Some information on using a right approach in applied trade analysis. Based on ARTNeT capacity building workshop materials artnet.unescap.

Modelling of global energy scenarios under CO 2 emissions pathways with TIAM-UCL

SP Energy Networks Business Plan

Alternatives to Traditional Regulation

The Clean Power Plan and Reliability

THE UK CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAMME AND EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE. Gabrielle Edwards United Kingdom

The current electricity costs of energy-intensive industries in Germany

The Challenge of Co-product Management for Large-scale Energy Systems: Power, Fuel and CO₂

What Development for Bioenergy in Asia: A Long-term Analysis of the Effects of Policy Instruments using TIAM-FR model

The Impact of a Carbon Tax on the Australian Economy: Results from a CGE Model*

THE DECISIVE ROLE OF CARBON STORAGE POTENTIAL IN THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE CCS OPTION

OUTLOOK FOR NATURAL GAS IN EUROPE

Finance and Policy Committee. Date: 14 October Item 17: TfL Energy Purchasing 2017 to This paper will be considered in public.

Long-term Vision and Medium-term Business Plan of the Osaka Gas Group

Netherlands National Energy Outlook 2014

THE MACRO-ECONOMIC REBOUND EFFECT AND THE UK ECONOMY

NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT IN FINLAND ACCEPTED BY THE FINNISH PARLIAMENT

Methodologies for assessing green jobs Policy brief

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

Promotion of energy efficiency and renewable energy experiences from Norway

An Economy-Wide Carbon Tax: Implications for Commercial Buildings

Heating technology mix in a future German energy system dominated by renewables

EU energy and climate policies beyond 2020

The European Renewable Energy Directive and international Trade. Laurent Javaudin Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.

BECS Pre-Trade Analytics. An Overview

Consequential Life Cycle Analysis Case study of the biomass

The Energy Transition in Germany Past, Present and Future

Institutional investors expectations of corporate climate risk management

SHELL HAUSWÄRME-STUDIE. Nachhaltige Wärmeerzeugung für Wohngebäude Fakten, Trends und Perspektiven

World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India Insights. International Energy Agency

Energy White Paper at a glance

Guidance for U.S. Positions on MDBs Engaging with Developing Countries on Coal-Fired Power Generation 1

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Work Stream 1 March 2014

NATURAL GAS DEMAND AND SUPPLY Long Term Outlook to 2030

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

Sectoral Decarbonization Approach Tool Summary of feedback from beta testing

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol

Norwegian position on the proposed EU framework for climate and energy policies towards 2030

Prudential plc. Basis of Reporting: GHG emissions data and other environmental metrics.

GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY MARKET OUTLOOK 2013

Transcription:

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute Dr. Matthew Winning Energy Institute, University College London ETSAP Workshop, Copenhagen 19 Nov 2014

Contents 1. UK Times Model (UKTM) 2. Macro Stand-Alone 3. Capital-energy substitution 4. UKTM-MSA scenarios, issues and results 5. GTAP-UCL 6. Conclusions and extensions

UKTM Energy Systems model Bottom-up with energy technology choice Partial equilibrium, least-cost optimisation Exogenous energy demands New features Non-CO 2 greenhouse gases Non-energy mitigation options Energy storage and other energy infrastructures New time slices (4 intra-day x 4 seasonal) Updated industry and residential sectors Development process Transparency at the forefront of development (data, assumptions, structure is clear and traceable, full replicability of results, comprehensive QA processes) Full sectoral data update & 2010 base-year recalibration User constraints categorized & explicit UKTM will be fully open-source from January 2015

MARKAL-Macro in UK Strachan and Kannan (2008), Hybrid modelling of longterm carbon reduction scenarios for the UK, Energy Economics (30), 2947 2963 Strachan, Pye and Hughes (2008), The Role of International Drivers on UK scenarios of a low-carbon Society, Climate Policy, 8:sup1, 125 139 Results: loss of GDP in UK ranging from 0.3% to 1.5% by 2050

Motivation Q/ Is it worthwhile linking full-blown CGE model to TIMES for overall impacts i.e. marginal benefit of using TIMES-MSA vs CGE for overall economic impacts? Q/ TIMES-MSA vs. CGE parameterisation of elasticity of substitution between capital and energy

TIMES-MSA (Kypreos and Lehtila, 2013) A single-agent, single-sector neoclassical optimal growth general equilibrium model Cumulative and discounted utility maximisation of a representative consumer-producer agent Production function is energy and a capital/labour composite GDP comprises of consumption, investment and energy system costs Explore MSA parameter sensitivities e.g. elasticity of substitution between capital/labour composite and energy E.g. capital to GDP ratio in the UK

TIMES-MSA ENERGY SOURCES TECHNOLOGY CHARACTERISTICS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS & POLICIES LABOUR GDP CONSUMPTION UKTM USEFUL ENERGY SERVICES MACRO ENERGY PAYMENTS TECHNOLOGY MIX FUEL MIX EMISSIONS SOURCES & LEVELS FUEL & EMISSION MARGINAL COSTS RANKING OF MITIGATION OPTIONS CAPITAL INVESTMENT

TIMES-MSA Parameter Description Default Value TM_ARBM Arbitrary multiplier for the last period replication 1 TM_DEFVAL(item) Default values for regional Macro constants TM_DEFVAL(ESC) 1.03 TM_DEPR(r) Depreciation rate (percentage) 5.00 TM_DMTOL(r) Lower bound factor for the demand variables 0.50 TM_ESUB(r) Elasticity of substitution 0.25 TM_GDP0(r) GDP in the first period TM_GR(r,y) Projected annual GDP growth in per cent TM_IVETOL(r) Investment and energy cost upper bound tolerance 0.50 TM_KGDP(r) Initial capital to GDP ratio 2.50 TM_KPVS(r) Initial capital value share in all production factors 0.25 TM_SCALE_CST Scaling factor for cost units 0.00 TM_SCALE_NRG Scaling factor for the demand units 1.00 TM_SCALE_UTIL Scaling factor for the utility function 0.00 TM_QFAC(r) Switch for market penetration penalty function * 0.00

TIMES-MSA Parameter Description Default Value TM_ARBM Arbitrary multiplier for the last period replication 1 TM_DEFVAL(item) Default values for regional Macro constants TM_DEFVAL(ESC) 1.03 TM_DEPR(r) Depreciation rate (percentage) 5.00 TM_DMTOL(r) Lower bound factor for the demand variables 0.50 TM_ESUB(r) Elasticity of substitution 0.25 TM_GDP0(r) GDP in the first period TM_GR(r,y) Projected annual GDP growth in per cent TM_IVETOL(r) Investment and energy cost upper bound tolerance 0.50 TM_KGDP(r) Initial capital to GDP ratio 2.50 TM_KPVS(r) Initial capital value share in all production factors 0.25 TM_SCALE_CST Scaling factor for cost units 0.00 TM_SCALE_NRG Scaling factor for the demand units 1.00 TM_SCALE_UTIL Scaling factor for the utility function 0.00 TM_QFAC(r) Switch for market penetration penalty function * 0.00

TIMES-MSA Parameter Description Default Value TM_ARBM Arbitrary multiplier for the last period replication 1 TM_DEFVAL(item) Default values for regional Macro constants TM_DEFVAL(ESC) 1.03 TM_DEPR(r) Depreciation rate (percentage) 5.00 TM_DMTOL(r) Lower bound factor for the demand variables 0.50 TM_ESUB(r) Elasticity of substitution 0.25 TM_GDP0(r) GDP in the first period TM_GR(r,y) Projected annual GDP growth in per cent TM_IVETOL(r) Investment and energy cost upper bound tolerance 0.50 TM_KGDP(r) Initial capital to GDP ratio 2.50 TM_KPVS(r) Initial capital value share in all production factors 0.25 TM_SCALE_CST Scaling factor for cost units 0.00 TM_SCALE_NRG Scaling factor for the demand units 1.00 TM_SCALE_UTIL Scaling factor for the utility function 0.00 TM_QFAC(r) Switch for market penetration penalty function * 0.00

Capital-energy substitution Both cross-price substitution and Morishima elasticity of substitution North America Europe SR LR SR LR Morishima 0.41 0.44 1.05 1.07 0.14 0.17 0.77 0.80 Cross-price 0.22 0.38 0.36 0.52 0.17 0.34 0.31 0.48 (M.J. Koeste et al, 2008)

Capital-energy substitution Both cross-price substitution and Morishima elasticity of substitution North America Europe SR LR SR LR Morishima 0.41 0.44 1.05 1.07 0.14 0.17 0.77 0.80 Cross-price 0.22 0.38 0.36 0.52 0.17 0.34 0.31 0.48 (M.J. Koeste et al, 2008)

UKTM-MSA results Total Energy Total energy 2040 (PJ) 7000 6800 6600 6400 6200 6000 5800 5600 5400 UKTM_BASE UKTM_BASE_MSA UKTM_LowGHG_Int2 UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_Int2

UKTM-MSA results Base MSA Final energy by fuel LowGHG-MSA ALL BIO ALL COALS ALL ELECTRICITY ALL GAS ALL HYDROGEN ALL MANFUELS ALL OIL PRODUCTS ALL OTHER RNW ALL BIO ALL COALS ALL ELECTRICITY ALL GAS ALL HYDROGEN ALL MANFUELS ALL OIL PRODUCTS ALL OTHER RNW

UKTM-MSA results Base Base MSA LowGHG FUEL TECHS AGR FUEL TECHS HYG FUEL TECHS PRC FUEL TECHS SERV FUEL TECHS UPSTREAM FUEL TECHS ELC FUEL TECHS INDUS FUEL TECHS RES FUEL TECHS TRA LowGHG- MSA

UKTM-MSA results Total Emissions GHG emissions 2040 (kt) 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 EMIS GHG UPS EMIS GHG TRA EMIS GHG SER EMIS GHG RES EMIS GHG PRC EMIS GHG NEU EMIS GHG IND EMIS GHG HYG EMIS GHG ELC EMIS GHG AGR 0-100000 BASE MSA_035 LowGHG_MSA_Int2

UKTM-MSA results Total System Costs 10300000 Total System Cost 10000000 9700000 9400000 9100000 8800000 8500000

GDP loss from baseline UKTM-MSA results Scenario 2020 2030 2040 LowGHG 0.29-0.67-0.73 LowGHG (esub 0.35) 0.21-0.68-0.72

UKTM-MSA results Macro variables: Consumption ( bn) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 UKTM_BASE_MSA 1458 1646 1866 2147 2607 UKTM_BASE_MSA_ 035 1461 1649 1868 2148 2606 UKTM_LowGHG_M SA 1463 1646 1861 2136 2589 UKTM_LowGHG_M SA_035 1463 1648 1861 2137 2590

Macro variables UKTM-MSA results Energy System costs 500.00 450.00 400.00 350.00 300.00 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 UKTM_BASE_MSA_2050 UKTM_BASE_MSA_035 UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_2050_Int2 UKTM_LowGHG_Int2_MSA_035

420.00 Macro variables UKTM-MSA results Investment ( bn) 400.00 380.00 360.00 340.00 320.00 300.00 280.00 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 UKTM_BASE_MSA_2050 UKTM_BASE_MSA_035 UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_2050_Int2 UKTM_LowGHG_Int2_MSA_035

UKTM-MSA issues NLP solver MINOS vs. CONOPT Lower bound on demand required Demand marginals volatility further analysis required

GTAP-UCL Based on GTAP-E production structure GTAP8 database based on Social Accounting Matrix and trade data 129 regions, 57 economic sectors, 5 factors of production MCP formulation solved in GAMS Currently standardised methodology of the disaggregation of electricity sector as part of ADVANCE FP7 project

Conclusions and future work Comparison of capital/energy substitution in MSA vs. CGE models Linking UKTM with GTAP-UCL Application of MSA to European Times Model WholeSEM link GTAP-UCL and/or UKTM- MSA with UK land-water models such as FORESEER at Cambridge

Thank you for listening m.winning@ucl.ac.uk Questions please!