Response from the Voice of the Listener & Viewer to Ofcom s

Similar documents
Response of Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd to Ofcom s Consultation on Securing Long Term Benefits from Scarce Spectrum Resources

Intellect response to the Ofcom Consultation:

Issue 1. BT response to the Ofcom consultation on Securing long term benefits from scarce spectrum resources a strategy for UHF bands IV and V

RSPG public consultation related to the draft opinion on EU spectrum policy implications of the digital dividend.

Promoting Digital TV Broadcasting Worldwide. Discover the Benefits of digitag Membership

Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Services

9 The continuing evolution of television

Driving the evolution of digital terrestrial television

Section 3. The growth of digital television 3

The role of independent producers and independent production quotas in local TV

DIGITAL SATELLITE TELEVISION - SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT (PAPER D)

Pay-TV exclusivity in apartment developments

Television Access Services for People with Sensory Impairments. July 2010

Decision to make the 700 MHz band available for mobile data - statement

The 700 MHz Band. Impact of the UHF spectrum reallocation on TV markets in Europe. 38 th EPRA meeting, Vilnius, October 2013

Get ready. for the TV switch-off on 24 October The going digital booklet. Official Government Publication

Ministry of Technology, Communication and Innovation

How To Migrate From Analogue To Digital Television Broadcasting

Proposal to give a Direction setting must-carry obligations on the terrestrial transmission network Consultation document

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation

TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN MEXICO THREE YEARS AFTER THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM

FOXTEL Response. Friday Septemer 3, Australian Communications and Media Authority Five-year Spectrum Outlook

Digital TV business models

OECD COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 2001 Broadcasting Section

Pay TV market investigation. Consultation document

ARD and ZDF Comments on the Draft RSPG Opinion on the Radio Spectrum Policy Programme

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Radio Switchover. Methodology Report

EU policy and regulation of technical platform services to digital television. Agenda. 1. From analogue to digital television

Mobile TV: The time to act is now

Position Paper on Interference in C-band by Terrestrial Wireless Applications to Satellite Applications

The GSMA strongly support Denmark licensing the / MHz band 2 in a manner that will accommodate future use of

Your guide to the digital TV switchover

ARD and ZDF welcome the opportunity to present their comments on the Consultation document.

Case studies on migration from Analogue to DTTB of Hungary

BBC Trust Distribution Framework for BBC Services

Statement on proposals for the Freeview HD genre and on amendments to Digital UK s LCN Policy

Digital Television Update. Chart Pack for Q April 2013

Broadcast. Please note the below concepts help ensure the way we distribute revenue to members is equitable.

The Ministry is seeking feedback on demand for four Digital Terrestrial Television Licence sets that the Government is proposing to allocate.

Below we provide general comments on the use of the C-band and, more specifically, on the UKE proposals.

Digital Radio Action Plan Version 1. 8 July 2010

Variation of 900 MHz, 1800 MHz and 2100 MHz Mobile Licences A consultation

The Co-Existence of Broadcasting and Mobile Services

1 Annex 11: Market failure in broadcasting

Telephone Service: A Natural Monopoly?

Europe Economics Report to DCMS. Independent Review: Government Cost Benefit Analysis of Digital Radio Switchover. Summary

Citizens Band (CB) radio spectrum use information and operation. Of 364

6. COMPETITION BETWEEN TV DISTRIBUTION PLATFORMS

Digital Terrestrial Television in Italy: state of the art and current regulatory issues. Sarajevo, 30 March 2006

television audience measurement - a guide

Report to the Secretary of State (Culture, Media and Sport) on the operation of the media ownership rules listed under Section 391 of the

A Householder s Planning Guide for the Installation of Antennas, including Satellite Dishes

ACT. No Sierra Leone THE SIERRA LEONE BROADCASTING CORPORATION ACT, SIGNED this 8th day of January, ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Factsheet 6 Ownership of media devices and services. Ofcom Oxford Media Convention 2 March 2016

Understanding DVB-T2. Key technical, business, & regulatory implications. Digital Terrestrial Television Action Group.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT

New licensing framework. for the. Republic of Namibia

Communication Regulation in the UK. International Seminar Electronic Communication Regulatory Framework in the Era of Convergence

Where to go with digital sound broadcasting

We believe Ofcom s role should be to licence, nurture and protect in relation to Community radio.

2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum award

AUSTRALIAN DIRECT MARKETING ASSOCIATION SUBMISSION PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION DRAFT RESEARCH REPORT

DIGITAL TELEVISION AND RADIO SERVICES IN IRELAND AN INTRODUCTION

LIGHTMOOR VILLAGE INTEGRATED RECEPTION SYSTEM. Telford A RESIDENTS GUIDE

Maintained in accordance with Section 15.5 of the Undertakings given to the Competition Commission

Joint response to Ofcom s consultation on cognitive access to the interleaved spectrum

Opportunities for Growth in the UK Events Industry

Shure WireleSS Frequency Guide

FAIR TRADING GUIDELINES.

Spectrum management strategy. Ofcom s strategic direction and priorities for managing spectrum over the next 10 years

TV Platforms in Germany

How To Help The Internet Of Things (Iot) Work With The Government

Solutions Overview. IPTV on your Network.

Impact of a Radio Switchover on the Government s Emergency Communications Policy. Digital Radio Action Plan Report

ST HELENA TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE, CAP 106 LICENCE TO OPERATE BROADCASTING STATIONS AND TO BROADCAST SERVICES (TELEVISION BROADCASTING LICENCE)

4G LTE Opportunities & Challenges in DTT arena

Mobile Backhaul The Next Telecoms Revolution

SCREEN PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA (SPAA) SUBMISSION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS

UK - New licence Requirements for Overseas Gambling Operators by Marcos Charif

COMMUNICATIONS OUTLOOK 1999

Ofcom and Internet Technology

AGENDA. Coffee break (11:30-11:50)

the Government Gazette [Staatscourant] Complimentary English Translation of the Authentic Dutch text, adjustments included, 10 th July 2012

The Regulation of Unfair Practices in TV and Radio Advertisements

Conflicts of interest between asset managers and their customers:

THE FUTURE OF TERRESTRIAL BROADCASTING IN TURKEY. DigiTAG 19th General Assembly 17th December 2014 EBU Headquarters GENEVA

what s new on DVB-T2?

Television New Zealand Limited and subsidiaries. Statement of Intent. For 4 Years Ending 30 June 2018

Broadcast. Stig Eide Sivertsen

HMG Review of Business Broadband. Call for evidence MAY 2016

Cyfrowy Polsat IR Newsletter October 2014

Rate Increase FAQs. Q. I refuse to pay more money for lousy service. If you are experiencing trouble with your service please call us.

Gambling Team 3 rd Floor Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2-4 Cockspur Street London SW1Y 5DH

: Coaxial Cable Television Interference to Aviation Systems EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

National strategy for very high-speed networks. - Very high-speed broadband for all

Global Forum on Competition

Gambling Protections and Controls. April 2014

Impact Assessment (IA)

Interoperability and Freedom of Choice in Digital and Interactive Television. A perspective from the Digital Interoperability Forum

Transcription:

Working for quality and diversity in British broadcasting Founded in 1983 by Jocelyn Hay CBE PO Box 401, Gravesend, Kent DA12 9FY Telephone: 01474 338711 / 01474 338716 Fax: 01474 325440 E-mail: info@vlv.org.uk Web: www.vlv.org.uk Response from the Voice of the Listener & Viewer to Ofcom s Second consultation on coexistence of new services in the 800 MHz band with digital terrestrial television Digital Terrestrial Television on the 800 MHz Band: A Service under Threat? 26 April 2012 Honorary Officers: Jocelyn Hay CBE President Hugh Peltor CBE Treasurer Robert Clark Secretary

Response from the Voice of the Listener & Viewer to Ofcom s Second consultation on coexistence of new services in the 800 MHz band with digital terrestrial television Digital Terrestrial Television on the 800 MHz Band: A Service under Threat? Voice of the Listener & Viewer (VLV) is an independent, non-profit-making association, free from political, commercial and sectarian affiliations, working for quality and diversity in British broadcasting. VLV represents the interests of listeners and viewers as citizens and consumers across the full range of broadcasting issues. VLV is concerned with the structures, regulation, funding and institutions that underpin the British broadcasting system. Introduction 1. We welcome the opportunity to respond to Ofcom s second consultation on the prospects for the coexistence of free-to-air television with the proposed new 4G mobile services in the 800 MHz band. The Principle of Free-to-air Access 2.1. We recognise the seriousness of the issues at stake from the point of view of a number of different players and, specifically, we acknowledge that: (1) The British Government places a high priority on the opening up of spectrum opportunities for new mobile services as well as the significant amounts of money in the billions of pounds that could flow into the National Treasury as a result of a new round of spectrum auctions; (2) There is a demonstrable need in Britain and internationally for improved mobile access to internet services; (3) The Government proposes to set aside some 180 million to mitigate the adverse effects of interference with digital terrestrial television reception - caused by the introduction of new services within the 800 MHz band of frequencies (DCMS, 2012). 2.2. However, we are concerned that current proposals for the use of the 800 MHz band will result in unacceptable and unjustifiable detriment to current and future users of free-to-air digital terrestrial television services (DTT). 2.3. In the current consultation document Ofcom notes the criticism that for the first time a UK regulator would licence a new service knowing that it would adversely affect an existing service. But the document goes on to reject the use of spectrum guard bands a kind of insulation designed to secure the integrity of and access to the DTT 2

signal - as an inefficient use of spectrum (Ofcom 2012: 12). We do not think this rejection is justifiable. Indeed, in our view the rejection of what we see as necessary protections for existing services provides evidence that Ofcom (and the Government) do not accept the co-primary status granted by the World Radiocommunications Conference to broadcasting and the newer mobile telecoms services. Rather, this statement appears to provide evidence of an intention to favour mobile telecoms services at the expense of television services. 2.4. In addition and in view of the fact that millions of users have only recently been required to switch from analogue to digital broadcasting, incurring costs and in some cases experiencing anxiety in the process, it seems unreasonable and disproportionate to then deprive many of these people of a television signal and service upon which they have come to rely. 2.5. Partly this is an issue of principle - one of upholding existing access rights - and partly it is a question of numbers and of the acceptability of the various forms of mitigation proposed. As recently as June 2011 Ofcom presented research suggesting that 760,000 households in Britain could be adversely affected. But by February 2012 this figure had trebled with a new total of 2.3 million households. This latest figure means that approximately one in ten of all UK homes will be affected (Ofcom, 2011: 4; Ofcom, 2012b: 4). 2.6. That the estimate of numbers likely to be affected has changed so radically also gives cause for concern as to the reliability of the research methods adopted. Government s Proposals for Mitigation 3.1. In respect of the numbers game it is worth noting that the forms of mitigation proposed do not at present extend to second or third television sets and that the numbers of television sets affected will be significantly larger than the number of households affected. 3.2. The first line of mitigation proposed entails the provision of one free filter to be fitted by the householder to the main television set. Assistance may be provided for the over-75s and those registered as disabled. There is also an intention to send out these filters proactively to households likely to be affected, though this may not happen in all cases. 3.3.The second line of mitigation if the filter does not work - entails assistance in moving the affected household to a new platform for the reception of television signals, that is, to a cable or satellite subscription provider or to Freesat. 3.4. It is also proposed that the mitigation service, named MitCo will be run by the 3

companies that are successful in the spectrum auction and that the new organisation will exist for one year after the completion of the roll-out of new services (DCMS, 2012). 3.5. In our view there are a number of problems with the forms of mitigation proposed. These include the costs of converting second and third television sets, the lack of knowledge on who to turn to and the possibility that householders will respond to a loss of signal by purchasing a new television set, paying for the checking of a rooftop aerial etc. before they discover the real reasons for the loss of signal. In cases where a house or flat stands empty for several months or even years MitCo could have disappeared before the new resident discovers the absence of a working digital TV signal. And the absence of this signal may also have implications for general amenity and property prices. Finally, it will be in MitCo s interest to limit the costs entailed in carrying out the mitigation activities. 3.6. If the proposed changes go ahead we believe that no consumer should be put in the position of having to incur additional cost in order to continue to receive free-toair broadcast television services. 3.7. A deeper issue of principle arises in respect of the widely held belief that public service broadcasting should be universally accessible and free at the point of use. Conversion to cable or satellite platforms and the introduction of one-off installation costs or monthly subscription costs break with these principles. In the past there has been consensus across the political parties in Britain that universal access to public service broadcasting is important for reasons of informed citizenship as well as for information, leisure and recreational purposes and for life-long learning. The prospect of more-or-less enforced migration to pay TV platforms would undermine these principles. Representing the Interests of Citizens and Consumers 4.1. As part of VLV's role in representing the interests of listeners and viewers as citizens and consumers we have supported the concept and introduction of Freeview. It has enabled all consumers and citizens to easily access many more television services than the five available on the now discontinued analogue services. And, as already pointed out, these services whether analogue or digital, have been free at the point of access. 4.2. We particularly support the Freeview technology as it has provided an economical way to access the digital services without the need to commit to an expensive subscription or the installation of new equipment. A relatively cheap set top box was all that was required and this was, arguably, a key factor in the relative ease with which so many citizens of the UK have been able to switch over from analogue to digital television services in the last four years (2009-12). 4

4.3. We are concerned that the current proposals for the use of the 800 MHz band will put at risk this service which is essential for many isolated, poor, old or vulnerable citizens. As noted above broadcasting is a vital source of information and entertainment for these and all citizens. 4.4. We have seen a draft of the submission to this consultation from Freeview and support the basic arguments in that submission. 4.5. We are concerned that there are no formal arrangements for consumer monitoring and involvement, should this second major change to the reception of television in a decade go forward. When the original decision to switch from analogue to digital terrestrial television was announced the Minister established an expert consumer group to monitor and advise on the project. VLV has been a member of this group since its inception. We consider that, should this technological change go forward, then it is essential that a formal independent monitoring group is established representing the interests of the citizen and consumer. 4.6. In the light of Government proposals and Ofcom s latest consultation we intend to consult further with other UK consumer groups and to examine the European and international dimension of our concerns. Sources Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2012) Eliminating interference with TV signals from 4G mobile services at URL: http://www.culture.gov.uk/news/media_releases/8865.aspx (accessed on 16 April, 2012) DigiTAG (2012) The Beginning of the end of terrestrial television in Europe? at URL: http://www.digitag.org/webletters/2012/external-mar2012.html (accessed on 12.4.12) Ofcom (2009) Digital dividend: clearing the 800 MHz band. London: Ofcom. Ofcom (2011) Coexistence of new services in the 800 MHz band with digital terrestrial television. Consultation published on 2 June with a closing date for responses on 11 August 2011. Ofcom (2012a) Second consultation on coexistence of new services in the 800MHz band with digital terrestrial television. London: Ofcom. Consultation published 12 February with a closing date for responses of 19 April, 2012. Ofcom (2012b) Technical analysis of interference from mobile network base stations in the 800 MHz band to digital terrestrial television. Further modelling. Technical report published 23 February 2012. 5