Instructional Materials Review. Frequently Asked Questions



Similar documents
3. Why did the Department decide to require the statewide use of core instructional materials?

2015 SDA Teacher Application

REQUEST FOR PERSONAL CURRICULUM

Recruitment & Hiring. How a disciplined hiring process can help schools choose the right team.

Steilacoom High School SIP Plan Summary

2OO7. Distance Learning Course Guide migrant student graduation enhancement program

MSGP Associated Course Codes with Descriptions

Instructionally Appropriate IEPs. A Skills Based Approach to IEP Development Division of Special Populations

How To Improve Education Planning In Dekalb County Schools

Assessments in Alabama

Oh, that explains it. Michigan Merit Curriculum High School Graduation Requirements

Georgia s New Tests. Language arts assessments will demonstrate: Math assessments will demonstrate: Types of assessments

State Board of Education Update

Assessments in Florida

Spring School Psychologist. RTI² Training Q &A

A Guide for Professional Development/Transition Planning for Implementation of the College- and Career-Ready Standards

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

Request for Proposals

NORTH PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT

Evaluating the School Strategic Plan Components Title I Rubric for Schoolwide Projects

ISLE Open Educational Resources What IOER Offers Now

Illinois State Board of Education

Postsecondary Education Readiness Test (P.E.R.T.) Frequently Asked Questions

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Louisiana Special Education Guidance

Welcome to Our World CONNECTED INSTRUCTION DELIVERED DIGITALLY

Highly Qualified Teacher Professional Development Resource Guide

History and Social Science

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

MASTER SCHEDULE GUIDING PRINCIPLES, PRIORITIES, MILESTONES & METRICS

Standards: What does it mean to Community College Faculty? General Overview & Panel Discussion. OhioMATYC April 12, 2013

If students are to succeed

Assessments in Arizona

ON THE SAME PAGE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS THROUGH LABOR-MANAGEMENT COLLABORATION

District: LITTLESTOWN AREA SD AUN: Test Date: PSSA Spring English Language Arts. Mathematics Science

Michigan High School. Graduation Requirements. Rigor. Rigor. Relevance. Relationships. Relationships

California Standards Implementation. Teacher Survey

Comprehensive Plan. for. World Class Schools

Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview

CCSS-Aligned Assessments

Orange County Public Schools. State Accountability System September 2, 2014

NEA Academy InTASC Classes

SUSTAINABILITY. Goal: Sustain environmental literacy by ensuring effective implementation of the 2010 Environmental Literacy for Illinois Plan.

Certification Teacher Competencies and Skills 1

Copyright 2013 CTB/McGraw-Hill LLC. 1

Aligning IEP Goals to Common Core Standards. Presented by L.E.A.S.E. Coordinators

New York State Comprehensive Course Catalog Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) updated 4/15/2014

ACT, Inc. 500 ACT Drive P.O. Box 168 Iowa City, Iowa (319)

EDN205 ICT in the Classroom

Math Program Selection. Board of Education March 12, 2014

Standardized Testing in Alabama and Nationwide Thomas Rains, Policy Director December 2013

a. What is the period of validity for an educator s license? Less than 5 years 5 years X 3 Greater than 5 years

An asset to the education system an asset to economic development.

Assessment of Oregon s Students with Disabilities: Information and Updates

GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

LaVergne Middle School S.I.P.

REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION JUNE

EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS SPECIALIST

UTAH. ESEA Flexibility Request

ASSESSMENT DIRECTIONS: Please use the data sets provided below to complete Steps 1-3 of the worksheet. Day 3 Assessment

State College Area School District Elementary Curriculum Office. Elementary Mathematics Pilot Plan

Department of Teaching & Learning

Ready Common Core Instruction 7 Answer Key

Frequently Asked Questions

Program Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) 2007 Standards - Option A

Highly Qualified Teachers Questions & Answers. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) of February 11, 2009

Electronic Textbook Pilot Project

NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Transcription:

Instructional Materials Review Frequently Asked Questions 2015-2016

Table of Contents OVERVIEW:... 2 TIMELINE:... 3 TYPES OF MATERIALS:... 3 DIGITAL VERSIONS:... 3 FEES/CONTRACTS:... 4 RATINGS & PUBLICATIONS:... 4 NEXT STEPS:... 5 GENERAL QUESTIONS:... 4 POINT OF CONTACT:... 5

OVERVIEW: 1. What is the purpose of the online review? A: To help districts identify quality instructional materials and assessment tools aligned to Louisiana s state standards. 2. How will the online review process work? A. There are three phases to the review process. In Phase 1, Louisiana educators and interested citizens provide the initial screening of materials. Phase 2, state vetting, results in the final annotated findings by content experts. Each review is made available for public input and publisher response during a designated two- week timeframe. Responses and public comments that are not received by the deadline will not be included as part of Phase 3. Phase 3, the rating publication, is when the final results are summarized and made available as curricular resources through the classroom toolbox on the Louisiana Department of Education s (DOE) website. 3. What evaluation tools will be used as part of the online review of materials? A: The rubrics are unique to subject and resource type. All tools are located on the DOE website. 4. How will the decision be made to review content that is submitted and will partially aligned content be reviewed? A: Review of submissions will be prioritized based on following criteria with copyright noted accordingly: Early Childhood (Copyright 2010-2015 acceptable) Instructional materials integrated across multiple content areas Instructional materials for Language/Literacy development Instructional materials for Cognitive Development - Math ELA/Literacy (Copyright 2015 or later) Instructional Materials K- 12 Full Courses/Stand Alone o High School Courses: English I- IV Benchmark Assessments 3-12 Mathematics (Copyright 2015 or later) Instructional Materials K- 12 Full Courses/Stand Alone o High School Courses: Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 Benchmark Assessments K- 12 Social Studies (Copyright 2015 or later) Instructional Materials K- 12 Full Courses/Stand Alone o High School Courses: World Geography, Civics, US History, World History 5. Who are the reviewers? A: Reviewers are educators from across the state trained on Louisiana s state standards and on the evaluation rubrics used for this process. 6. Can publishers refuse to have the results published on the website once a review is completed? A: No. Content providers cannot withdraw the results of the DOE review once they are submitted.

7. Will the online review process have any effect on district funding for instructional materials? A: No. Policy changes to Bulletin 741 removed restrictions on local textbook budgets. This change increases the flexibility for districts allowing each to purchase materials they deem most appropriate for their schools. TIMELINE: 1. When will the online review process begin for 2015-2016? A: ELA, Math, and Social Studies will begin August 2015 and close midnight October 30, 2015. A: Early Childhood round begins April 2015 and close midnight January 1, 2016. 2. Will all reviews be published at the same time? A: No. Results from the reviews will be published on a rolling basis, as each item is finalized. TYPES OF MATERIALS: 1. Can intervention materials be submitted for review? A: No. ELA Text Sets, Small Group Writing, Small Group Reading, Math Remediation and Supplemental programs will not be reviewed in the 2015-2016 online submissions. 2. Is there a list of courses? A: No. Any instructional content may be submitted that aligns to Louisiana s state ELA and math standards or the Louisiana Birth to Five Early Learning and Development Standards in for early learning materials. 3. Will teacher and student editions be reviewed? A: Yes. The submission must be in a digital format. DIGITAL VERSIONS: 1. What is meant by digital versions? A: Only electronic digital versions (open or proprietary) will be reviewed. Interactive digital or.pdf versions that are not paper. o Open educational resources (OER): learning materials that are freely available under a license that allows them to be reused, revised, remixed, and redistributed. See www.oercommons.org. o Proprietary: to be sold. 2. All materials must be submitted electronically for review; however, can other formats be made available to school systems? A: Yes. Any formats (e.g., Braille, Audio, Large print /Print, and Digital) can be made available.

3 Is it likely that districts will purchase printed versions of these digital materials? A: Districts may purchase any formats deemed most appropriate for their students. 4. Can digital materials require specialized software installation in order to be reviewed? A: No. The installation of software applications in conjunction with content alignment reviews may present difficulty if system requirements cannot be met. Instead, we recommend that PDF versions be submitted. FEES/CONTRACTS: 1. Is there a fee assessed per title? A: No. 2. Will there be any state contracts for titles reviewed? If so, must prices be locked in for any specified amount of time? A: The LDE will offer state contracts for Tier 1 and Tier 2 materials published on the curricular resources webpage. State contracts are negotiated in accordance with state procurement requirements. RATINGS & PUBLICATIONS: Products must meet all the non- negotiable criteria; must all Common Core State Standards (CCSS) also be addressed? A: All non- negotiable criteria must be met in order to have the indicators of superior quality evaluated. The DOE will rate alignment as follows: Tier I Exemplifies Quality: Products meet all the criteria outlined in the rubric and all indicators of superior quality. Tier 2 Approaching Quality: Products meet all the non- negotiable criteria outlined in the rubric and most indicators of superior quality. Tier 3 Does not represent Quality: Products either do not meet the non- negotiable criteria and/or meet few indicators of superior quality. GENERAL QUESTIONS: 1. Will the online review process be used for science materials? A: Science material will not be reviewed at this time. 2. What will be the role of the depository in the online review process? A: The depository will continue to communicate with the DOE and school districts on matters related to the purchase and delivery of instructional materials. 3. Many parishes in Louisiana have been "closed" districts. Now that the caravan will not offer districts an opportunity to learn about new materials, will the districts be "open?" A: The terminology open and closed district is not officially defined in Louisiana. However, school districts may purchase textbooks and instructional material as deemed appropriate.

4. Are publishers allowed to visit schools and/or send samples? A: Arrangements for solicitation should be coordinated through local school district officials. NEXT STEPS: To submit materials for review (both free and for purchase) access guidance on the DOE website. POINT OF CONTACT: Who is the point of contact for concerns and/or clarifications? A: LouisianaCurriculumReview@la.gov