EHRs Can Place Excessive Data Entry Burden on Physicians



Similar documents
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use Objectives

EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)

Stage 2 of Meaningful Use Summary of Proposed Rule

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Attesting for Meaningful Use Stage 2 in 2014 Customer Help Guide

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures

Meaningful Use - The Basics

STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Guide To Meaningful Use

0 What is Meaningful Use and where are we? 0 What is the Physician Quality Reporting System and where stage are we on?

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

VIII. Dentist Crosswalk

Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method

InteliChart. Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use. Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future

E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013

Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

MICROMD EMR VERSION OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS

EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified

EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)

Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA

2013 Meaningful Use Dashboard Calculation Guide

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

Changes with MU Stage 2. Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management

Meaningful Use Qualification Plan

Special Topics in Vendor- Specific Systems. Outline. Results Review. Unit 4 EHR Functionality. EHR functionality. Results Review

Appendix 2. PCMH 2014 and CMS Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know

Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Ten Points of Interest

Quest to Attest 2014 Stage 1 Meaningful Use. Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, Stage 1 Meaningful Use

CROSSWALK NCQA 2014 PCMH HRSA 19 Requirements Meaningful Use

Andrew C. Bledsoe, MBA, CHPA, PCMH CCE Executive Director. Northeast KY Regional Health Information Organization.

DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014

Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express*

Mark Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMSS Healthcare IT Futurist

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM

Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Specialists. NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Client Alert. CMS Releases Proposed Rule On Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Record Technology

hospital s or CAH s inpatient or professional guidelines

1/16/2015 HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL. We have no financial disclosures

Meaningful Use Stage 2: Important Implications for Pediatrics

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Transcription:

EHRs Can Place Excessive Data Entry Burden on Physicians Required Structured Data Only Small Percentage of Typical Patient te JOHNSON CITY, Tenn., Oct. 7, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- A new study by WebChartMD (www.webchartmd.com) indicates that as little as 7% of data in a typical patient note is required to be structured in order to meet Meaningful Use. The percentage rose to 9% when lab data was present. The study analyzed one hundred de-identified orthopedic and cardiovascular patient notes obtained from MTSamples.com. While a larger body of documents needs to be analyzed to confirm study findings, the key takeaway appears to be that as much as 91% to 93% of data typically captured within EHRs in a structured format (e.g. point-and-click templates and drop-down boxes) could instead be captured as unstructured data (e.g. dictation and transcription, or free-text entry) and still meet Meaningful Use requirements. "This study is especially relevant for physicians frustrated by the negative impact EHRs can have on their patient interactions and their productivity," said Mark Christensen, WebChartMD's CEO. "Physicians are often asked to capture more data in a structured format then Meaningful Use requires." Data required to be structured for Meaningful Use are: demographics (preferred language, sex, race/ethnicity, date of birth) vital signs (height, weight, blood pressure, BMI) smoking status problem list medication list medication allergies lab tests/values minimum of one Family History entry According to Elisabeth Myers, Policy and Outreach Lead at the CMS, much of the data routinely documented as part of the patient encounter such as the History of Present Illness, Assessment, and Plan, to name a few key document sections can be incorporated into the patient record within the EHR as unstructured data without in any way preventing the physician and clinic from meeting Meaningful Use. "Too many physicians struggle with their EHRs when they simply don't need to be," said Christensen. "A greater use of dictation and transcription could represent a faster and easier means of documenting large portions of their patient encounters." Adding dictation and transcription is easier than many physicians realize. "Virtually every EHR is capable of incorporating transcription into the patient note via what's called an interface," said

Nathan Mitchell, WebChartMD's Operations Manager. "Setting up an interface can take anywhere from 30 minutes to six weeks, and requires the cooperation of the EHR vendor." For more information on how your physicians can incorporate dictation and transcription into their EHR workflow, contact Kris Girardi of 360 Transcription Corporation, at 877-360-TRAN (8726) or kris.girardi@360transcription.com.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Mark Christensen, 877-386-6677 ext. 105, or mark@webchartmd.com Has Structured Data Become Healthcare s Monster? Increased Use of Unstructured Data Could Reduce Physician Frustration JOHNSON CITY, TN - One of Meaningful Use s most misunderstood requirements is the extent to which data needs to be captured in a structured format. Does a physician really need to document the entire patient encounter as structured data in order to meet Meaningful Use? The answer is no, according to The Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) providing the physician is capturing a select number of data points the CMS requires in a structured format within an ONC-certified EHR. What patient data does Meaningful Use require to be captured in a structured format? Of the twenty-three Objectives of Meaningful Use, only eight pertain to structured data entry into the EHR. Those are: 1. Patient demographics 2. Problem list 3. Medication list 4. Medication allergy list 5. Patient Vitals 6. Smoking status 7. Family health history 8. Lab Results (LOINC format) (One additional Meaningful Use Objective Record electronic notes in patient records, specifically states that the patient note can be dictated and transcribed, providing the document is in a searchable format. See list of all 23 Meaningful Use Objectives at conclusion of this article). For the above eight Objectives, those data must be captured within the structured format of the EHR in order to meet Meaningful Use requirements. But all other patient information routinely documented as part of the patient encounter such as the History of Present Illness, Subjective, Objective, Review of Systems, Social History, Assessment, and Plan, to name a few can be dictated and transcribed without in any way preventing the physician and clinic from meeting Meaningful Use. Page 1 of 4

The bottom line is that there is nothing in Meaningful Use that restricts healthcare providers from using dictation and transcription to document those sections of the patient encounter not specifically cited as needing to be structured. Structured vs. Unstructured Data What is the difference between structured and unstructured data? Simply put, structured data is information captured within a field or format that can be automatically identified by the EHR. The CMS requires certain data to be structured for two key reasons: first, to make it portable to other EHRs or electronic applications; and secondly, to enable it to be associated with standardized code sets and clinical terminologies like SNOMED CT. Structured data is recorded within EHRs via documentation tools, including but not limited to, drop-downs, check boxes, radial buttons, and in limited cases via text entry (such as the entry of like blood pressure measures or patient weight, height, age, etc.). The other type of data found within EHRs is unstructured data, so named because it is not entered in a field or format automatically recognized or identified by the EHR. Examples of unstructured data are the free text notes typed into a text box by a healthcare professional, and transcribed patient notes which are interfaced into the patient record. Unstructured data is often, but not limited to, qualitative information about the patient s health history or health context that provides additional decision-making support. The Structured Data Monster Since Meaningful Use requires only a limited subset of patient data to be structured, could it be that EHRs are placing an over-emphasis on structured data at the expense of physician efficiency and patient care? Have we created a monster out of the EHR-based clinical documentation workflow, placing unnecessary demands on physicians to structure data that in many ways is better captured in an unstructured, or narrative, format? Critics of unstructured data would argue that it impedes our ability to collect and analyze the data needed to move our nation toward a more evidence-based approach to healthcare. Data is indeed the engine for driving improvements in healthcare, but wouldn t it be far easier and faster for physicians to narrate the details of the patient encounter, and then use technology to index and structure the free text for analytics and reporting purposes? A large population of physicians as many as 30% or more express on-going frustration with their EHR-based clinical documentation workflow. For many of those physicians, a greater use of dictation and transcription provided it is in a searchable text format could represent a faster, easier and less frustrating means of documenting their patient encounters. In sum, data remains the key to improving our healthcare system. The current emphasis on structuring all data generated via the patient encounter instead of just those data points mandated by Meaningful Use, however, may not be the optimal experience for many physicians or patients. For those physicians experiencing high levels of frustration with their EHR-based Page 2 of 4

clinical documentation tools, dictation and transcription could provide an effective alternative for documenting those parts of the patient encounter not specifically mandated for capture via the EHR s structured data capture tools. About the author: Mark Christensen is CEO of WebChartMD (www.webchartmd.com), a healthcare company specializing in software applications that manage the clinical documentation workflow. Page 3 of 4

Summary Table: Meaningful Use Stage 2 Objectives Stage 2 Measure Description Impacts Transcription? 1 Use computerized physician order entry (CPOE) Physician order labs, medication, xray, radiology Little to none orders via the EHR. 2 Generate prescriptions electronically Use EHR to send prescriptions to pharmacies ne 3 Record demographics as structured data Language, gender, race, ethnicity, date of birth 4 Maintain an up to date problem list as structured Maintain an up to date problem list as structured data. data. 5 Maintain active medication list as structured data Maintain active medication list as structured data 6 Maintain active medication allergy list as structured Maintain active medication allergy list as structured data data 7 Record and chart changes in vital signs as structured Height, weight, BP, BMI, children growth chart data 8 Record smoking status as structured data Record smoking status as structured data 9 Implementation of clinical decision support tools. Use EHR-based applications to improve patient care. 10 Report Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) to CMS. CQMs measure degree to which a provider competently and safely delivers clinical services that are appropriate for the patient in an optimal timeframe. 11 Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information. Includes online access and ability to download 12 Provide clinical summaries for patients. Provide clinical summaries for patients. 13 Protect electronic health information with the EHR. Protect electronic health information within the EHR 14 Incorporate clinical lab-test results into EHR. Incorporate clinical lab-test results into EHR. Lab results do require some structured data in LOINC for the purposes of the CCDA in transitions of care 15 Perform medication reconciliation on new patients. Insures that receiving physician has complete 16 Provide summary of patient care for patients transitioning to other source of care. knowledge of patient s medications When transitioning a patient to a new source of care, patient documentation needs to be provided with transition. This objective incorporates the structured data into a C-CDA for transitions of care and that is fundamentally the biggest use of structured data. 17 Transmit electronic data to immunization registries Functionality within EHR to transmit specific data 18 Use electronic messaging to communicate with Use electronic messaging to communicate with patients patients 19 Record electronic notes in patient records. tes can be dictated, text must be searchable 20 Scans and test accessible via EHR Scans and tests accessible via EHR 21 Record patient family health history as structured Indicate that first-degree family history has been data reviewed or enter one structured data 22 Report cancer cases to a registry. Report cancer cases to a registry 23 Report cases other than cancer to specialized registries. Report cases other than cancer to specialized registries. Page 4 of 4