Trends in Environmental Remediation

Similar documents
PROGRAM AT A GLANCE 12

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist

Prepared for ENRY2000, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, September 27, 2001

Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable Arlington, VA November 14, 2013 Jim Woolford, Director Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology

CURRENT AND FUTURE IN SITU TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMEDIATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IN SOIL, SEDIMENTS, AND GROUNDWATER

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

Installation Environmental Restoration Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Supply Center Richmond Narrative

SUCCESSFUL FIELD-SCALE IN SITU THERMAL NAPL REMEDIATION AT THE YOUNG-RAINEY STAR CENTER

Soil and Groundwater. Removing Contaminants. Groundwater. Implementing. Remediation. Technologies 1 / 6

Bioremediation. Biodegradation

Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

The Use of Stable Isotope and Molecular Technologies to Monitor MNA and Enhance In-Situ Bioremediation

TCE. The Use & Remediation of TCE at NASA. Keep reading. is developing innovative. NASA s pollution prevention efforts significantly reduced TCE use

A PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR RESTORATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER

Challenges in subsurface in situ remediation of chlorinated solvents

FMC Environmental Solutions Peroxygen Talk January 2010 Use of Compound Specific Isotope Analysis to Enhance In Situ

Green Remediation via an Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation Solar-Powered System

DRAFT. GROUNDWATER REMEDY COMPLETION STRATEGY: Moving Forward with Completion in Mind

In-Situ Remediation Strategies as Sustainable Alternatives to Traditional Options. Ryan Bernesky, B.Sc., P.Ag. February 26, 2013

ZYMAX NEW FORENSICS ISOTOPE ANALYSIS

Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants. Nora Barbour Sutton

INTRODUCTION TO GREEN & SUSTAINABLE REMEDIATION: THREE APPROACHES

Alternate Concentration Limits/Groundwater Cleanup Levels. Title slide

EPA Region 3/ Pa Dept of Environmental Protection Streamlining the Process for the One Cleanup Program Under RCRA

Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination

Interim Summary Report for the Treatment Facility D Helipad In-Situ Bioremediation Treatability Test

Incorporating Greener Cleanups into Remedy Reviews

Water Pollution. A Presentation for Café Scientifique Cherie L. Geiger, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry, UCF

Use of Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs) to Determine Cleanup or Regulatory Levels Under RCRA and CERCLA

In-situ Bioremediation of oily sediments and soil

3. Asbestos Abatement Course 1. Introduction and Background to Asbestos Abatement. 4. Health Effects and Medical Surveillance

Site Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point

3-D Data Visualization Taking the Next Step in Data Presentation

COST AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

Frequently Asked Questions FAQ (click to follow link) How Does The Thermal Well System Work? How Much Does It Cost?

Environmental and Economical Oil and Groundwater Recovery and Treatment Options for hydrocarbon contaminated Sites

Bioremediation. Introduction

The Groundwater Pollution and Hydrology Course

REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER

Performance Management for Environmental Remediation Projects. William C. Lattin, PMP US Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office

Rehabilitation and Remediation of POPs

Guidance on Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Ground Water By Natural Attenuation

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

Well gauging results LNAPL in Benzol Processing Area

This page intentionally left blank

Technical Impracticability Decisions for Ground Water at CERCLA Response Action and RCRA Corrective Action Sites

SiREM-Major Services/Products

PILOT PROJECT TO OPTIMIZE GROUND WATER REMEDIATION SYSTEMS AT RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION FACILITIES: SUMMARY REPORT AND LESSONS LEARNED

Utilizing an Innovative, Effective Site Assessment and Monitoring Tool

Tim Johnson, Mike Truex, Jason Greenwood, Chris Strickland, Dawn Wellman: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Technology Assessment for Remediation at Solvent Contaminated Drycleaner Sites

MISSION. NAVFAC Environmental Restoration

June 29, 2012 Version 1.2

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

8.30 PBS SR-0030 Soil and Water Remediation

Evaluation of Site-Specific Criteria for Determining Potability

Chapter 12 Physical and Chemical Groundwater Remediation Technologies

In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvent R&D 100 Award Winner

Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds with Oxygen and Propane Gas infusion

Acknowledgements U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Risk: Real Property Used as Collateral

New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting

How To Understand And Understand Solid And Hazardous Waste

Before beginning any construction or demolition activities at your construction site,

Soil remediation you can trust In Situ Thermal Desorption. The real ISTD TERRATHERM R TECHNOLOGY. Technology

N62661.AR NS NEWPORT a

Technology Overview. Using Remediation Risk Management to Address Groundwater Cleanup Challenges at Complex Sites

N O T E S. Environmental Forensics. Identification of Natural Gas Sources using Geochemical Forensic Tools. Dispute Scenarios

Bioremediation of Petroleum Contamination. Augustine Ifelebuegu GE413

Citizen Suit Provisions. Restoring Hazardous Landscapes! Science, Justice, and Law! Declaration of National Environmental Policy

This is Superfund. A Community Guide to EPA s Superfund Program

Presented by: Craig Puerta, PE, MBA December 12, 2012

ANALYSIS OF DNAPL SOURCE DEPLETION COSTS AT 36 FIELD SITES

ENVIRONMENTAL APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT

Cost-Effective Bioremediation of Perchlorate in Soil & Groundwater

EVALUATION OF SELECTED ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION SUPPORT SOFTWARE* T.M. Sullivan 1 M. Gitten 2 P.D. Moskowitz 1. June 1997

References Book of HERA Group. Cleaning, Restoring and Remediation treatment of polluted soils

USEPA Risk-Based Standards for Controlling Contaminated Sites Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) April 2, 2007 Aaron Yeow, USEPA

Appendix H. Hazardous Materials. Regulatory Agencies Involved in Hazardous Materials Pollution Prevention and Solid Waste in Alameda County

BIOREMEDIATION: A General Outline Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001

Street Address (number and street): City: County: ZIP Code: B. CURRENT SITE PRIORITY INFORMATION Was free product present this quarter?

SERDP Project ER-1295 Products

Case Study 3 Conservation Chemical Company, Kansas City, Missouri, EPA Region 7

Framework for Integrating Sustainability Into Remediation Projects

Chapter 10. Overview of Federal Laws and Regulations Governing Incineration

California State Water Resources Control Board. Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Guidance Manual. September 2012

Compliance Guidance for Motor Vehicle Waste Disposal Wells in Oregon September 2015

SUBCHAPTER 02S RULES AND CRITERIA FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DRY-CLEANING SOLVENT CLEANUP FUND SECTION.0100 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

ECORISK. Consulenze Ambientali. of Francesco Fratepietro, MChem MSc

Innovative LNAPL Recovery Techniques

Self-Calibrating Remote Control Monitoring Systems

This document was prepared in conjunction with work accomplished under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 with the U. S. Department of Energy.

Optimizing Remedies with Performance-Based Contracts

Environmental Forensics

Site Description and History

Module 1 Introduction

Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation A Guide for Decision Makers and Practitioners

How To Treat A Contaminant Plume

Review of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods Unsaturated Zone. Dept. of Earth Sciences University of the Western Cape

Transcription:

Stephen Rosansky, P.E, PMP Trends in Environmental Remediation IX Seminário Inernacional Sobre Remediação e Revitalizaçao de Áreas Contaminadas 1

Battelle Memorial Institute Non-profit charitable trust founded in 1929 Applying science and technology to real-world problems Largest applied research and development organization in the world Generates over $6 billion annually in global R&D Oversees over 22,000 employees in 130 locations worldwide 20 International Locations

Battelle The Business of Innovation 1929 2014

Battelle Conferences Eighth International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments January 12 through 15, 2015, New Orleans, LA Third International Symposium on Bioremediation and Sustainable Environmental Technologies May 18 through 21, 2015, Miami, Florida Tenth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds May 23 through 26, 2016 Monterey, California www.battelle.org/sedimentscon www.battelle.org/biosymp www.battelle.org/chlorcon

Overview of Presentation Where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going? 5

Key Environmental Regulations in the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 1976, amended 1984 Regulates cleanup of facilities that treat, store and dispose of hazardous wastes Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) 1980, amended 1986 Established trust fund and regulations to cleanup the most problematic sites. 1,652 sites as of June 12, 2012 6

Environmental Programs and Accomplishments CERCLA >20% of sites have been removed from the NPL because no further response was needed to protect human health and the environment RCRA About one quarter of RCRA sites have achieved corrective action performance standards UST Closed more than 1.7 million sites since 1984 Brownfields Completed 99,450 cleanups making 364,000 hectares of land available since 2006 (http://www.epa.gov/brownfields) Federal Facilities Program More than 23,000 of the ~29,000 Department of Defense Installation Restoration Program sites have achieved Response Complete Source: Alternatives to Managing the Nations Complex Contaminated Groundwater Sites (National Academy of Science, 2013) 7

Environmental Restoration Highlights 2000 2010 Remedy Optimization and Long Term Management Chlorinated Source Zone Remediation Improved Mgmt. Strategies Improved Site Understanding Emphasis on Risk Reduction Improved Monitoring 1990 In Situ Dissolved Phase Chlorinated Solvent Treatment Monitored Natural Attenuation Rapid in Situ Technology Development (1990s) Hydrocarbon Remediation Ex Situ Remedy Implementation Substantial Characterization (early 1980s) Enactment of Superfund (1980) 8

% Implemented % Implemented Historical Treatment Trends at Superfund Sites 100 90 80 70 60 Pump and Treat 50 In Situ Treatment 40 30 20 10 0 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 Year 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Source Area Treatment Source: Adapted from the 2014 Superfund Remedy Report Dissolved Phase Treatment 20 Ex Situ Treatment 10 In Situ Treatment 0 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 Year 9

Percent Used Reduction of Costly Energy Intensive Ex Situ Treatment Technologies 90,0 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 Incineration & Solidification 0,0 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 Year Source: Adapted from the 2014 Superfund Remedy Report 10

Percent Used Evolution of In Situ Treatment Technologies Flushing Phytoremediation Thermal Treatment Multi-Phase Extraction Air Sparging Chemical Treatment Bioremediation Soil Vapor Extraction 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Year Source: Adapted from the 2014 Superfund Remedy Report 11

WHERE ARE WE NOW? 12

Battelle Conference Cluster Analysis Cluster Analysis using OmniViz TM Data Mining Software 2,632 Abstract Analyzed 2010 Chlorinated Conference (859) 2012 Chlorinated Conference (869) 2014 Chlorinated Conference (904) 13

Battelle Conference Cluster Analysis (Cont.) OmniViz uses statistical and pattern recognition algorithms to analyze the presentation titles/abstracts Helps to understand the key themes within textual data Provides unique perspective on commonalities within the data Relative position and grouping among clusters show commonality Major themes are identified, but small outliers from emerging issues or new technologies may be bundled into other clusters 14

Theme Map of Clusters iron\sulfate\mineral DHC\qPCR\dechlorination biodegradation\aerobic ISCO\injection\oxidant injection\pilot\tce TCE\injection\degradation fractured bedrock DNAPL vapor intrusion\indoor air LNAPL\recovery\transmissivity vapor intrusion\building\gas 15

Record Count Record Count Contaminant Trends DNAPL Trends High Resolution Site Characterization Growing use of high resolution site characterization for DNAPL source zones Consider matrix diffusion from low-permeability units ISCO is top technology by record count for DNAPL source zones LNAPL Trends Importance of transmissivity and relationship with recoverability (new ASTM method) Natural source zone depletion 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 35 30 2010 2012 1,4-Dioxane 2014 CO 2 flux measurements 25 20 Emerging Contaminants 1,4-dioxane most prevalent EC in abstracts 15 10 5 0 PFOA/PFOS still outlier in abstracts 2010 2012 2014 16 Business Sensitive

Record Count Technology Trends Top 3 Technologies Bioremediation [Anaerobic (58%); Aerobic (37%); Cometabolic (5%)] ISCO (persulfate dominant, permanganate and ozone declining) Natural Attenuation Growing applications Biogeochemical transformation (45% increase in ~5 years) New technologies Show up as outliers outside of clusters Biogeochemical Transformation 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2010 2012 2014 Electrokinetic-Bioremediation (EK-BIO TM ) for low permeability zones (e.g., only 6 record counts) 17

Additional Site Issues and Trends Fractured Bedrock 4% of abstracts May need TI Waivers for complex sites Vapor Intrusion 6% of abstracts Source: U.S. EPA NAVFAC 18

WHERE ARE WE HEADED? 19 Business Sensitive

Complex Sites Large size Enhanced Bioremediation and Monitored Natural Attenuation Heterogeneous hydrogeology Non-aqueous phase liquids Multiple and recalcitrant compounds Historic legacy sites It is estimated that there are ~12,000 complex sites in the U.S., at which achieving unlimited use may not be possible in reasonable time >50 Years to Complete 20

Known Challenges Lack of adequate site characterization Difficult and costly to effectively treat (DNAPL) source zones using current technologies Matrix diffusion Inadequate treatment in low permeability media Current environmental regulations and cleanup objectives Achieving MCLs not realistic at some sites maximum extent practicable and similar terms are poorly defined Very few technical impracticability waivers issued Emerging contaminants and issues (e.g. vapor intrusion) necessitate re-evaluation of sites 21

Perform Targeted Site Characterization Reduce uncertainties in source zones Total mass Physical state of mass (e.g. as DNAPL, dissolved, sorbed, vapor) Hydrogeologic, biological & chemical properties Understand boundaries between source and dissolved phase plume Distinguish between plumes sustained from DNAPL dissolution from those sustained by back diffusion 22

Apply High Resolution Site Characterization Multi level monitoring systems Molecular diagnostic tools CSIA (Compound specific isotope analysis) qpcr (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) Mass flux tools Geophysics 23

Improve Remediation Technologies Optimize application of existing technologies Amendment formulations Enhancing delivery mechanisms & procedures Combining technologies Develop new technologies Biogeochemical reduction Smoldering technology Port Hueneme, California 93043-4370 Technical Report TR-NAVFAC-EXWC-EV-1303 BEST PRACTICES FOR INJECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF AMENDMENTS Battelle Memorial Institute and NAVFAC Alternative Restoration Technology Team March 2013 Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited 24

Electrokinetic (EK)-Bio Field Application Concept Courtesy of Geosyntec

Improve Performance Assessment Tools and Metrics Improve performance monitoring Real-time data Remote telemetry and sensors Better understand long-term impacts of treatment Relationship between mass remaining in source area and dissolved-phase plume response Increase use of alternative performance metrics Performance Metrics Commonly Used Source mass removal Change in dissolved phase conc. Not Commonly Used, but are Available Mass remaining Nature and extent of DNAPL Physical, biological, and chemical properties Under Development Mass flux distribution Mass discharge rates Stable isotope ratios Source: Alternatives for Managing the Nation's Complex Contaminated Groundwater Sites. NAP, 2013 26

Monitoring Enhanced Bioremediation using Electrical Resistance Tomography Series of in-well and aboveground electrodes Track injection, distribution, & consumption of electron donor Near real time data

Address Emerging Contaminants and other Issues Emerging Contaminants 1,4-Dioxane Perflourooctane sulfanate (PFOS) & perflourooctanoate (PFOA) Vapor Intrusion May re-open sites previously closed Need for improved real-time measurement techniques for temporal variability Need for improved risk models 28

Apply Better Decision Making Not practical to achieve MCLs at many sites. Phrases such as extent practicable and diminishing return are ambiguous Risk Reduction Technical Feasibility Life-Cycle Cost Decisions must be made based on risk Containment and Institutional Controls may provide better solution at some sites Greater emphasis on green and sustainable remediation In 2012, EPA began allowing closure of thousands of low-threat USTs even when groundwater contaminant concentrations exceed MCLs. (SWRCB, 2012) 29

Summary Much progress has been made to cleanup contaminated sites A large percentage of remaining sites are complex (e.g. contain DNAPL, fractured bedrock, multiple contaminants, large. Current technologies and strategies are not always able to achieve regulatory requirements A change in management strategy, improvements existing technologies, and development of new technologies and monitoring techniques are necessary 30

References B.H. Kueper, H.F. Stroo, C.M. Vogel, C.H. Ward. 2014. Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone Remediation. SERDP/ESTP Committee on Future Options for Management in the Nation's Subsurface Remediation Effort; Water Science and Technology Board; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Research Council. 2013. Alternatives for Managing the Nations Groundwater Sites. EPA. 2013. Superfund Remedy Report, 14th Edition. 31 Business Sensitive

Questions? 32 800.201.2011 solutions@battelle.org www.battelle.org