Appendix D.2. Geotechnical Methods for Karst Feasibility. Testing

Similar documents
Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

Sample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

720 Contour Grading. General. References. Resources. Definitions

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

AN AEM TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNDESIGNED WASTE STORAGE FACILITIES

Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist

SECTION EARTH MOVING

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

APPENDIX F. RESIDENTIAL WATER QUALITY PLAN: ALLOWABLE BMP OPTIONS

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

GUIDELINES FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES. Materials Engineering Report No M (Supersedes Report No.

Indiana State Department of Health Construction Guidelines for Gravity and Flood-Dose Trench Onsite Systems

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Appendix B. Stormwater Design Guidelines for Karst Terrain. Appendix B. B.1 Why Karst Terrain is Different

Outlet stabilization structure

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF WATER MAINS. A. Conform to requirements of Section Submittals.

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RESOURCE REGULATION TRAINING MEMORANDUM

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

ON-SITE STORMWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM (OSDS) DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MINIMUM GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

(1) Discuss the determination of the need for public visitation. Visitor center density within 100 miles.

Watershed Delineation

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils

SECTION REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. 1. Trench excavation, backfill, and compaction; Section

APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION & RIGHT-OF OF-WAY PERMIT

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF SEWER MAINS

Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

Post Construction Stormwater Management Checklist Program

Receiving Water Body:

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

16 12 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL CODE OF HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP.

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010

1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD TTY Users Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd

Trenching and Excavation Safety

Exploration. Exploration methods

REPORT OF WORK GUIDELINES

On Site Treatment Systems

P-23 - DEVELOPMENT OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE INSPECTION PROGRAM

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness

APPENDIX B DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR APPROVED TREATMENT METHODS

Low Impact Development Checklist

Preventing Basement Flooding

February 4, Report Recommendations and NIPSCO Responses. 4.3 Maintaining and Controlling Vegetation Growth

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Site Remediation. Policy Memo 95-01

SECTION 7 UNDERDRAIN SERVICE

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL

SECTION 55 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS (FAA D-701)

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Local Road Assessment and Improvement Drainage Manual

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRIVATE BUILDING SEWER LINES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN

Official OPP Overall Penn State Stormwater Program Latest Revision/Review: 5/28/2015

Remedial Investigation

Excavation Procedure. MIDGA Reviewed: 07/29/14 Effective: 06/20/09 Supersedes: Original Preparer: Owner: Approver: Safety Safety Safety

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. New Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Ordinance

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS

CHAPTER - X WATER HARVERSTING AND RECHARGING IN HARD ROCK AREAS

Stream Buffer Variance Application Stream Buffer Protection Ordinance

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Sewer Rehabilitation Design Requirements

STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO. 854 SANITARY SEWER LATERALS

Stormwater Design Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions:

Technical Guidance Manual

SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS N.J.A.C. 7:26 Subchapter 2A. Additional Specific Disposal Regulations For Sanitary Landfills

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]

A perforated conduit such as pipe, tubing or tile installed beneath the ground to intercept and convey ground water. or structures.

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

SE-10 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. Objectives

BMP 6.4.6: Dry Well / Seepage Pit

ources of Drinking Water

NJ Interception Drainage

SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For Site Located at 420 South Avenue Rochester, New York NYSDEC Spill No PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:

STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DAM SAFETY BRANCH

Transcription:

Appendix D.2 Geotechnical Methods for Karst Feasibility Testing

The following information on BMP design and SWM geotechnical testing in Karst areas has been adapted from the Carroll County Water Resource Management Manual and Ordinance (CCWRM) dated July 2, 1996. For a complete discussion of these items, please refer to the Carroll County document. Section 1: Stormwater Management in Karst Areas In general, stormwater runoff should not be concentrated and should be conveyed through vegetated areas; in addition, the facilities should be designed in accordance with the following standards: (1) Detention/retention ponds should be designed and constructed with a synthetic or clay liner approved by the local plan approval authority. (2) Discharges from SWM facilities or directly from impervious surfaces should not be routed within 1000 feet of the edge of any existing unremediated sinkhole. The flow should then be directed to an area not underlain by carbonate rock. Alternatively, these discharges may be routed to a stable watercourse via a pipe or lined channel. (3) Sinkholes occurring within stormwater management structures should be repaired within 72 hours of first observation of occurrence. (4) Liners: Where natural soil permeabilities are greater than 10-6 cm/sec or 1.4 x 10-3 inches per hour for the two-foot interval below the depth of the proposed facility, a stable, low permeability liner shall be installed as follows: (a) One foot of clay with a permeability less than 10-7 cm/sec, or; (b) Two feet of clay with a permeability less than 10-6 cm/sec, or; (c) Two feet of compacted soil with a permeability less than 10-5 cm/sec with a 30 mil thick artificial liner with a permeability less than 10-7 cm/sec, or; (d) A very low permeability base constructed of concrete. Section 2: Soils Investigation for Karst Areas The purpose of a karst investigation is to identify subsurface voids, cavities, fractures, or other discontinuities which could pose an environmental concern or a construction hazard to an D.2.1

existing or proposed SWM facility. By definition, karst investigations are required only in areas suspected of containing carbonate rocks. The requirements outlined below should not be interpreted as all-inclusive. The design of any subsurface investigation should reflect the size and complexity of the proposed project. The investigation should determine the nature and thickness of subsurface materials, including depth to bedrock and to the water table. Subsurface data may be acquired by backhoe excavation and/or soil boring. These field data should be supplemented by geophysical investigation techniques, deemed appropriate by a qualified professional. The data listed herein should be acquired under the direct supervision of a qualified geologist, geotechnical engineer, or soil scientist who is experienced in conducting such studies. Pertinent site information shall be collected which should include the following: 1. Bedrock characteristics (type, geologic contacts, faults, geologic structure, rock surface configuration). 2. Soil characteristics (type, thickness, mapped unit). 3. Photogeologic fracture traces. 4. Bedrock outcrop areas. 5. Sinkholes and/or other closed depressions. 6. Perennial and/or intermittent streams. Section 3: Location of Borings Borings should be located to provide representative area coverage of the proposed facilities. The exact location of borings will be based on the following conditions or features: 1. In each geologic unit present, as mapped by the Maryland and U.S. Geological Surveys (USGS) and local county records. 2. Placed near on-site geologic or geomorphic indications of the presence of carbonate rock. 3. On photogeologic fracture traces. D.2.2

4. Next to bedrock outcrop areas (i.e., ten feet from). 5. As near to identified sinkholes and/or closed depressions as possible. 6. Near the edges and center of the proposed facility, and spaced at equal distances from one another. 7. Near any areas identified as anomalies from any geophysical studies. Section 4: Number of Borings The density shall be dependent upon the type and size of the proposed facility such that a representative sampling is obtained, as follows: 1. Ponds/wetlands - a minimum of three per facility, or three per acre, whichever is greater with at least one along the centerline of the proposed embankment and the remainder within the proposed impoundment area. 2. Infiltration trenches - a minimum of 2 per facility. 3. Additional borings - to define lateral extent of limiting horizons, or site specific conditions, where applicable. Section 5: Depth of Borings Borings shall be extended to depths dependent upon bedrock type as follows: 1. Non-carbonate rocks - a minimum depth of 5 feet below the lowest proposed grade, within the facility unless auger/backhoe refusal is encountered. 2. Carbonate rocks - a minimum of 20 feet below ground surface or proposed grade; where refusal is encountered the boring may either be extended by rock coring or moving to an adjacent location within 10 linear feet of the original site, in order that the 20-foot minimum depth be reached. D.2.3

Section 6: Identification of Material All material penetrated by the boring shall be identified, as follows: 1. Description, logging, and sampling for the entire depth of the boring. 2. Any stains, odors, or other indications of environmental degradation. 3. A minimum laboratory analysis of two soil samples, representative of the material penetrated including potential limiting horizons, with the results compared to the field descriptions. 4. Identified characteristics shall include, as a minimum: color; mineral composition; grain size, shape, and sorting; and saturation. 5. Any indications of water saturation shall be carefully logged, to include both perched and groundwater table levels, and descriptions of soils that are mottled or gleyed should be provided. Water levels in all borings shall be taken at the time of completion and again 24 hours after completion. The boring must remain fully open to total depth of these measurements. 6. When conducting a standard penetration test (SPT), estimation of soil engineering characteristics, including N or estimated unconfined compressive strength. Section 7: Geophysical Investigation An electromagnetic terrain conductivity survey may be conducted over the entire area of the facility and extending outward to 200 feet beyond the boundaries of the proposed facility. This survey may be performed to provide a qualitative evaluation of the area to be utilized. The survey results may be used to identify suspect areas which will be further evaluated using borings. The use of this technique may reduce the total number of borings for a site by better defining suspect areas. This survey shall include appropriate techniques such that representative data are collected from a minimum depth of 20 feet below ground surface or the final proposed grade, whichever is deeper. These data shall then be correlated with boring data in the site area. D.2.4

Section 8: Evaluation At least one subsurface cross section shall be provided. It should extend through a central portion of the proposed facility, using the actual or projected boring data and the geophysical data. In addition, an iso-conductivity map should be constructed. Finally, a bedrock contour map should be developed to include all of the geophysical and boring data. A sketch map or formal construction plan indicating the location and dimension of the proposed facility and line of cross section should be included for reference, or as a base map for presentation of subsurface data. Section 9: Sinkhole Remediation Proper sinkhole remediation involves investigation, stabilization and final grading. For more information, please see the CCWRM, Section 4.2. Section 10: Sinkhole Stabilization Sinkholes should be repaired by (1) reverse-graded backfilling, (2) concrete plugging, or (3) an engineered subsurface structure. For more information on these methodologies, see the CCWRM, Section 4.2.2. Section 11: Monitoring of BMPs in Karst Regions A water quality monitoring system installed, operated and maintained by the owner/operator may be required in a karst region. For areas requiring monitoring, at least one monitoring well shall be placed at a point hydraulically up gradient from the BMP and two (2) down gradient monitoring wells shall be provided within 200' of the facility. The wells shall be fitted with locking caps. Bi-annual sampling should take place, and an annual report should be filed with the plan approval authority. D.2.5