2014 R&D Investment Trends in Korea

Similar documents
Section 2 Evaluation of current account balance fluctuations

HIGH-LEVEL SYMPOSIUM Excess Capacity and Structural Adjustment in the Steel Sector

McKinsey Global Institute. June Growth and competitiveness in the United States: The role of its multinational companies

7-13 December, The Korea Development Institute lowered its outlook for Korea's economic growth for this year and next.

Further Developments of Hong Kong s Offshore RMB Market: Opportunities and Challenges

e 2015f. Real GDP Growth (%)

I. World trade developments

Mitsubishi Electric Announces Consolidated and Non-consolidated Financial Results for Fiscal 2016

WORLDWIDE RETAIL ECOMMERCE SALES: EMARKETER S UPDATED ESTIMATES AND FORECAST THROUGH 2019

X. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1/

November 2, 2011 (For your information) Mazda Motor Corporation FISCAL YEAR ENDING MARCH 2012 FIRST HALF FINANCIAL RESULTS (Speech Outline)

Insurance Market Outlook

Consolidated Financial Results for the First Two Quarters of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2016 (Japan GAAP)

The global economy Banco de Portugal Lisbon, 24 September 2013 Mr. Pier Carlo Padoan OECD Deputy Secretary-General and Chief Economist

WHAT YOU DON T KNOW ABOUT MADE IN ITALY

Consolidated Earnings Report for the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2011 [Japanese GAAP]

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Ireland

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Singapore Q A Manpower Research Report

Monetary policy assessment of 13 September 2007 SNB aiming to calm the money market

U.S. Trade Overview, 2013

Economic and Market Outlook. EU Automobile Industry

Consolidated Financial Results for the First Three Quarters of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2016 (Japan GAAP)

2015 Farm Bank Performance Report Key Findings

THE RETURN OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE OR CAPEX CYCLE IN MALAYSIA

QUARTERLY REPORT For the six months ended September 30, _ indd /12/21 11:54:11

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS A MESSAGE FROM THE CEO. shareholders equity ratio and ROE both rose to over 10%.

What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education?

MBA Forecast Commentary Joel Kan,

Martin Hemmert. Korea University Business School

Forecasting Chinese Economy for the Years

2013 global economic outlook: Are promising growth trends sustainable? Timothy Hopper, Ph.D., Chief Economist, TIAA-CREF January 24, 2013

Harmonizing Government Policies and Enterprise Strategies for IoT Business

Main trends in industry in 2014 and thoughts on future developments. (April 2015)

Statement to Parliamentary Committee

(April 1, 2015 June 30, 2015)

Global strategy of LG Electronics as a leading Korean company

Chapter-2. The Global Economic Situation and India s External Sector

Market Forecast Report -Semiconductor and FPD Manufacturing Equipment-

Chapter 2 Competitiveness of Japanese Companies

Financial Results for the Nine-Month Period Ended March 31, 2013

A Long-term Forecast of Demographic Transition in Japan and Asia

Trends in Digitally-Enabled Trade in Services. by Maria Borga and Jennifer Koncz-Bruner

Consumer Credit Worldwide at year end 2012

EFN REPORT. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR THE EURO AREA IN 2013 and 2014

Financial Information

The World is Flat and Beckoning

CANADA AND U.S. AUTO SALES: ROOM FOR FUR- THER GROWTH? October Factors supporting the U.S. sales outlook: Employment Growth

National University Phase I Verification

Monetary Policy Matters

Country Report. To the. International Councils of Securities Associations

How To Understand The Economic Benefits Of Foreign Direct Investment In The United States

Is U.S. Household Savings Rate Dangerously Low?

Statement by. Janet L. Yellen. Chair. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. before the. Committee on Financial Services

Backgrounder. Australian businesses as investors in research and development. December page 1

SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION FACTBOOK

The Macroeconomic Situation and Monetary Policy in Russia. Ladies and Gentlemen,

I. World trade developments

New Monetary Policy Challenges

FY2015 Survey on the International Operations of Japanese Firms JETRO Overseas Business Survey

HALF YEAR REPORT AS OF JUNE 30

Consolidated Business Performance for Fiscal Year 2013 (Based on Japan GAAP)

The President s Report to the Board of Directors

Implementation of management policies

P R E S S R E L E A S E

Analysis of Survey Results

Contents. Key points from the 2014 Q4 Survey 4. General economic environment 5. Market conditions and the economy 6. Cash flow and risk 9 M&A 11

Economic and Market Report. EU Automotive Industry Quarter

BTMU Focus Latin America Mexico: Export performance in 2014

2. UK Government debt and borrowing

Global Sector. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Global Direct GDP. Global GDP Impact by Industry

THE DEVELOPING INSURANCE MARKET IN BRAZIL

FACTORS AFFECTING THE LOAN SUPPLY OF BANKS

Overview for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 (from April 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008)

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

January 27, 2016 Consolidated Financial Results for the First Nine Months of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2016 <under Japanese GAAP>

Why Has Japan Been Hit So Hard by the Global Recession?

Mazda Motor Corporation FISCAL YEAR MARCH 2016 FULL YEAR FINANCIAL RESULTS (Speech Outline)

How To Calculate Real Gdp In Japanese Economy

Women and Men in the Recovery: Where the Jobs Are Women Recover Jobs Lost in Recession in Year Five

Management s Discussion and Analysis

International Business Strategy

Main Economic & Financial Indicators Russian Federation

Will Bulgaria Remain a "Quiet Place" for Higher Education?

CAN INVESTORS PROFIT FROM DEVALUATIONS? THE PERFORMANCE OF WORLD STOCK MARKETS AFTER DEVALUATIONS. Bryan Taylor

IPA Global Publishing Statistics. Rüdiger Wischenbart

General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination January 2010

Opportunities in the China Healthcare Sector. December 2008

Accelerate Profit Growth

Consolidated Financial Results April 1, June 30, 2001

Antonio Fazio: The outlook for the global economy and Italy

Economic Outlook for FY2005 and Basic Economic and Fiscal Management Measures

Press Release. FY 2012/13 Alstom achieves a solid commercial and operational performance and free cash flow turns positive

Project LINK Meeting New York, October Country Report: Australia

Strategic Roadmap Development for international education in the PTE sector

Global Investing 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. 3/1/2013

Daiwa Securities Group - Passion For the Best 2008

Indo-German Investments & Cooperation

Taipei - Economic Profile in 2008

Q2 and Half-Year 2010 Results

TURKISH CONTRACTING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET

Transcription:

2014 R&D Investment Trends in Korea 1 Iee Hwan Kim, Executive Deputy Chairman Korea Industrial Technology Association The world economy has been recovering at a slow pace since the second quarter of 2013 as the national debt of developed countries is gradually restructured following the economic slump in 2011, and this trend is expected to continue through 2014. The global economy s road to the recovery paints a bright picture that the Korean economy in 2014 will improve compared to 2013, but some difficulties are also expected, such as heavier household debt accompanied by increased interest rates, the surging price of jeonse (leasing a house on a fully refundable lump-sum deposit), reduced consumption among the elderly, and the investment slowdown in a construction industry hit by the government s slashed budget. The 2013 Import and Export Assessment and 2014 Economic Outlook published by the Korea International Trade Association (KITA) forecasts that Korea will be the world s seventh-ranked exporter and pass 1 trillion dollars in trade volume for the third consecutive year. This can be considered an all the more meaningful outcome because the country has performed satisfactorily amid sluggish world trade caused by the global downturn. Korean companies also continued to make substantial progress. According to Interbrand s list of the Best Global Brands 2013, Samsung Electronics, which first ranked as one of the top 10 global brands in 2012, climbed one place from ninth to eighth this year. Also, Hyundai Motor (53rd in 2012) and Kia Motors (87th) saw improvement both in their brand value and ranking, placing 43rd and 83rd, respectively. Notably, the Interbrand report shows that brand value for all three of these companies went up by more than 15 percent from the previous year, indicating that the brand value of Korean companies is growing rapidly. In addition, in a survey released by the Nikkei, Japan s leading economic newspaper, identifying 2012 market share in the world s 50 categories of major goods and services, Korea ranked third in the number of items holding first place in the global market, with eight Korean products obtaining the biggest market share in their respective categories. Still, there are a number of challenges confronting Korean corporations. According to an annual trust survey by Edelman, a global public relations consulting firm, the credibility of Korean companies was rated at 31 percent, the lowest since the survey began, even outpaced by emerging markets such as India, Brazil, and Russia. In the 2013 Global Competitiveness Report recently published by the World Economic Forum (WEF), Korea generally performed unsatisfactorily, ranked 25th in national competitiveness, 20th in business sophistication and innovation, and 22nd in technological readiness, all of which declined from their 2012 rankings of 19th, 17th, and 18th, respectively. Moreover, the OECD projects that the country s potential growth rate will stand at 4.10 percent between 2012 and 2017, slow down to 3.32 percent between 2018 and 2030, and drop sharply to 0.55 percent between 2031 and 2060. Korea s total R&D expenditures in 2012 stood at 55,450.1 billion won (equivalent to 49.2 billion dollars), an 11.1 percent increase (or 5,559.7 billion won) from a year earlier,

indicating that the country expanded its R&D investment despite difficult economic conditions. The nation s R&D expenditure-to-gdp ratio was 4.36 percent, up 0.32 percentage points from 4.04 percent in the previous year, the second-highest R&D investment ratio after Israel, which invested 4.38 percent of its GDP in 2011. Figure. Total R&D Expenditure and as a Percentage of GDP (Korea) Source: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Press Release (December 11, 2013) Corporations spent 43,222.9 billion won (77.9%), spearheading the nation s R&D efforts, followed by public research institutions and universities, which were found to invest 6,950.3 billion won (12.5%) and 5,276.9 billion won (9.5%) in R&D, respectively. The corporate sector s share in the total R&D expenditure (77.9%) was relatively higher than that of major countries such as the United States (68.3%), Japan (77.0%), and Germany (67.3%). Figure. International Comparison of R&D Expenditure by Actor Source: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Press Release (December 11, 2013) Out of a total of 43,222.9 billion won spent by the corporate sector in R&D in 2012, large corporations spending took up the largest portion, 32,070.9 billion won (up 13.1% from the previous year), followed by small and medium-sized enterprises and venture firms with R&D 2

investment of 5,813.2 billion won (up 11.4%) and 5,338.8 billion won (up 15.6%), respectively, suggesting that R&D expenditures increased overall, regardless of size. R&D expenditures by the manufacturing industry rose by 4,535 billion won (13.6%) from the previous year s 37,960.4 billion won, while the figure for the service sector averaged 3,777.1 billion won, up 397 billion won (11.7%) from the previous year, accounting for 8.7 percent of total corporate R&D expenditures, a relatively low figure compared to that of major developed countries such as the United States (29.2% in 2008) and the United Kingdom (24.1% in 2009). Korea s corporate R&D investment is predicted to continue to grow in 2014. The Korea Industrial Technology Association (KOITA) has recently conducted an RSI (R&D Sentiment Index) 1 survey targeting a sample of 1,000 companies that had research centers or R&D departments, and asked them to forecast their R&D investment in 2014. According to the survey results, their investment RSI and employment RSI stood at 114.3 and 113.0, respectively, indicating that respondent companies plan to increase both R&D investment and employment of researchers. They are considering expansion of R&D investment despite uncertain economic prospects, striving to secure growth engines for the future. By corporate type, the investment and employment RSI for large corporations scored 118.5 and 117.7, respectively, higher than middle-standing enterprises* (117.5 and 113.1), and small and medium-sized enterprises (113.4 and 112.5), suggesting that they are willing to invest and hire more for R&D. Table. 2014 RSI by Corporate Size Middle-Standing Small and Medium- Category Total Large Corporation Enterprise Sized Enterprise Investment RSI 114.3 118.5 117.5 113.4 Employment RSI 113.0 117.7 113.1 112.5 * Middle-standing enterprises refer to those not belonging to the category of small and medium-sized enterprises, yet recording less than 1 trillion won in sales. Specifically, all industries except construction were planning to increase investment in R&D and recruitment of research manpower compared to 2013. In particular, the automobile sector scored highest both in investment and employment RSI, showing strong intent to continue with their R&D efforts. Most industrial segments planned to expand R&D investment in 2014, while the construction sector recorded scores below 100 in both of the RSIs, and are therefore expected to scale down their investment compared to 2013. 1 KOITA RSI (KOITA R&D Sentiment Index) over 100, less than 100, and equal to 100 indicate improvement, deterioration, and no change, respectively, compared to the year of the survey. 3

Table. 2014 RSI by Industry Investment RSI Employment RSI Meanwhile, companies were found to have the greatest difficulty in recruiting R&D professionals. According to KOITA s survey, a shortage of technology development personnel ranked as the top concern related to technology infrastructure for more than half of respondents (55.7%), followed by funding for technology development (48.9%), research facilities and equipment (43.2%), and research space (24.3%). Five out of 10 companies (49.6%) reported that a shortage of research personnel poses a setback for preparing future business while 19.8 percent of respondents said, we are having difficulties pursuing our current business, indicating that seven out of 10 companies are having difficulties properly conducting their business due to the shortage of research personnel. In particular, 95 percent of corporate research institutions located in local areas reported difficulties securing research personnel, showing the recent trend of such talent being disproportionately concentrated in metropolitan areas. External observers expect R&D investment in Korea to expand continuously. According to the 2013 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard, R&D investment by Korean companies increased by 8.9 percent in 2012 year-to-year, an increase second only to China (12.2%) and accounting for 3.3 percent of global R&D investment, making Korea the sixth-largest R&D investor among 46 countries, following the United States (35.1%), Japan (18.9%), Germany (10.5%), France (5.2%), and the United Kingdom (4.2%). The 2014 Global R&D Funding Forecast, published by the U.S.-based Battelle Memorial Institute based on data from the World Bank, IMF, and R&D Magazine, forecasts that total R&D expenditures in Korea will amount to 63 billion dollars, up 2 billion dollars, or 3.6 percent of the nation s GDP, from 2013. Korea will be the fifth-largest investor of R&D in 2014, as in 2013, following the United States (465 billion dollars), China (284 billion dollars), Japan (165 billion dollars), and Germany (92 billion dollars). Furthermore, the Korean government has established the Third Basic Plan for Science and Technology (2013-2017) under the Framework Act on Science and Technology, identifying the vision, goals, and direction of Korea s policy for innovation in science and technology. In the basic plan, a new era of hope opened with creative science and technology has been declared as the vision, while the scope of the former plan has been expanded to realize a creative economy by, for example, fostering new industries and creating 4

more jobs. Five major strategies have been presented: expanding and improving the efficiency of national R&D investment; developing national strategic technologies; enhancing mid-to-long term creative capabilities, supporting the creation of new industries; and creating more jobs in science and technology. Seventy-eight tasks in 19 areas will be promoted under these strategies. By implementing such initiatives, the government aims to increase R&D s contribution to national economic growth, create new jobs, and position Korea among the world s top seven in capacity for innovation in science and technology. Based on the strategy of expanding national R&D investment, the government plans to invest 92.4 trillion won from the government R&D budget in order to raise R&D investment to 5.0 percent of GDP by 2017, and has allocated 17.5 trillion won for government R&D investment, up 4.0 percent from 2013. Thanks to continuing corporate investment efforts and the policy of government support, the number of corporate research institutions in Korea is expected to reach 30,000 in the first half of 2014. Companies currently contribute 78 percent to the total national research costs and 69 percent of the total national research professionals. Increased R&D investment by companies has made it possible for Korea to achieve enough quantitative growth to compete with the rest of the world. Such growth, as the main driver of Korea s economic growth and industrial development, sets the stage for companies to have developed a number of new technologies and products, thereby helping the nation s economy become the seventhlargest exporter in the world. Despite this quantitative growth, there are many challenges to address before Korea can be considered a technologically advanced country. According to KOITA s study, the technology level of domestic companies is 68 percent of the highest level, which requires 5.3 years of efforts. When it comes to the technology trade balance, Korea is chronically in the red by an annual total of 6 trillion won. As for the concentration rate of R&D costs borne by top-notch companies, the top five, 10, and 20 companies in sales account for 32.2 percent, 39.0 percent, and 45.4 percent, respectively, of the combined R&D costs of all companies, a strong indication of their concentration rate. Sixty-six percent of company researchers have undergraduate degrees and only 20 percent of all doctorate holders in Korea are engaged at the forefront of corporate R&D. To overcome those challenges and further develop Korea s industrial technology, changes need to be made to the policy of government support so that existing quantitative growth can be made qualitative. To this end, first of all, support for enhancing the efficiency of private R&D investment and creating an investment ecosystem shall be reinforced. Since the amount of support for companies is already world class, the support system needs to be innovated in terms of quality. Second, the support system shall be transformed from supplier (government)-oriented to customer (company)-oriented. In other words, a customized support system meeting the needs of individual company shall be established. Third, knowledge of science and technology accumulated in universities, government-funded research institutions and other public sectors shall be actively shared and utilized. For that purpose, among other things, an ecosystem shall be created where links between public sectors and industry can result in active collaboration. 5

In 2014, KOITA also will make every effort to strengthen competitiveness in science and technology by: developing a customer-oriented policy and expanding participation; identifying policy demands from a variety of industrial sectors and making suggestions; helping company research institutions sharpen their competitive edge; strengthening networking for open-ended R&D collaborations; improving R&D capabilities through expanded technical exchange and cooperation; and enhancing the demand-oriented membership support system. 6