Operational monitoring and modelling of Airborne and Ground-based Safety Nets performance



Similar documents
Feedback: Safety nets at

ICAO Standard Phraseology A Quick Reference Guide for Commercial Air Transport Pilots

SESAR Air Traffic Management Modernization. Honeywell Aerospace Advanced Technology June 2014

Chapter 15. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

Surveillance infrastructure -

PRESENTATION. Patrick Ky Executive Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION

IBAC Bulletin B00-2 Pacific Implementation of RVSM and RNP 10/50NM Lateral

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 19. April 2012 Prepared By Fakhir.F. Mohammed Civil Aviation Consultant

EUROPEAN NETWORK OPERATION SAFETY TOP 5 RISKS. HOW TO IDENTIFY, ANALYZE AND RESPOND? RUNWAY SAFETY ACTION PLANS. Joe Sultana

"What's being done to keep the helicopter in the air?"

THE SESAR CONCEPT AND SWIM. David Bowen Head of ATM Operations & Systems SESAR Joint Undertaking

Integrated surface management Herve Drevillon (DSNA) Airport safety support tools for pilots, vehicle drivers and controllers Nicolas Leon (DSNA)

White Paper Mode S and the European Mandates

Technical Standard Order

CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance monitoring and analysis Service (NIPS) Eric Potier

Annex to Decision 2013/008/R

Risk Assessment of the "Undetected Simultaneous Transmissions" Phenomenon

1.1 The circumstances of each aircraft emergency can vary to such an extent that detailed instructions cannot be given for every situation.

ADS-B NRA deployment by DSNA

NATO Developments in UAS Airworthiness and Sense & Avoid Functional Requirements. Mr. Dave Seagle US HoD, NATO FINAS

INITIAL TEST RESULTS OF PATHPROX A RUNWAY INCURSION ALERTING SYSTEM

Preface The TCAS Solution... 5

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

G1000TM. Transponder Pilot s Guide

International Civil Aviation Organization. The Third Meeting of the Regional ATM Contingency Plan Task Force (RACP/TF/3)

Official Journal of the European Union L 13/3

Final Report No by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

UAS Safety in Non-segregated Airspace

How To Improve The Performance Of Anatm

OPERATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR AIRSPACE PLANNING

Safety Risk Impact Analysis of an ATC Runway Incursion Alert System. Sybert Stroeve, Henk Blom, Bert Bakker

Integration of Drones in Civil Airspace

Aircraft Tracking & Flight Data Recovery

Performance management Identification of metrics

CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 9 AIR SPACE AND AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SERIES 'L', PART I

ILS Replacement. ACI World Safety Seminar November 2008 Kempinski Hotel Beijing Lufthansa Centre

CNS/ATM SYSTEMS IN INDIA

CIVIL AVIATION ADVISORY PUBLICATION CAAP 42

ANNEX. Annex (Rules of the Air) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 is amended as follows:

STANDARDIZING PERFORMANCE METRICS

Surveillance in Canadian Airspace Today and in the Future

First ATC Support Tools Implementation (FASTI) Validation Plan

Understanding Compliance with Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Out

Simulation in Air Traffic Control IALA seminar Jurgen van Avermaete General Manager Procedures

Opening the European Sky to UAS From military to civilian

AERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point: ASD

Air Traffic Management System and Aids JSC «VNIIRA-OVD»

Communication, Navigation, Surveillance (CNS) engineers and executives of Airports Authority of India

SESAR Studies & Demonstration Projects on RPAS & Cyber-Security

Training program for S2 (TWR) rating

INSTALLATION OF MODE 'A' / 'C' AND MODE S TRANSPONDERS.

TOWARDS A MORE SECURE ATC VOICE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM

Breakdown of separation near Melbourne Airport, Victoria 5 December 2010

Merging arrival flows without heading instructions

IMPLEMENTATION OF ADS-C & CPDLC SERVICES

Evolution of the Surveillance Infrastructure

( T A C T ) C A ) I A

NFPL IMPLEMENTATION ATS OPERATIONAL ASPECTS

WHICH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO CONTACT

Aircraft incident to SE-DSO over Sjöbo, Skåne County, Sweden on 13 October The report is also available on our web site:

Advanced Data Link Infrastructure Solution for Next Generation of Air Traffic Management

Safety Management Challenges for Aviation Cyber Physical Systems

Air Traffic Management. Steve Bradford Chief Scientist Architecture & NextGen Development April 22, 2013

Human Error and Safety Federal Aviation Human Error and Safety Administration Risk Analysis HESRA

European ADS-B Regulation

air traffic control automation system

Avionics requirements for civil aircraft Edition 30/10/2013

Adapting to air traffic growth in Europe

Benefits of Highly Predictable Flight Trajectories in Performing Routine Optimized Profile Descents: Current and Recommended Research

Evolution in Regional Aircraft Avionics

EASA Safety Information Bulletin

FLIGHT TRAINING DEVICES

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Remote Tower Solutions. BY SEARIDGE TECHNOLOGIES AND NAVCANatm. The cost-effective alternative for airport monitoring and control

Workpackages. This view provides the list of the SESAR Workpackages More information can be obtained by selecting a Workpackage.

Remote Tower Operations

ASTRAEA the findings so far

ADS-B is intended to transform air traffic control by providing more accurate and reliable tracking of airplanes in flight and on the ground.

For the purpose of see-and-avoid, visual observers must be utilized at all times

International Civil Aviation Organization

The ABC of the RTBA. Ministère de l écologie, du Développement durable et de l énergie.

Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA) Report for Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Release: 1. BSBPMG503A Manage project time

Introduction of a More Automated Environment in En-Route ATC

Appendice 1 al Regolamento ENAC ATSEP Basic training Shared

Position Descriptions. Aerospace

USE OF GROUND BASED WEATHER RADAR DATA IN AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

ATCoach Radar Training Simulator

ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC

Overview of NM and CDM

Air Traffic Management

Australian Enhanced Flight Tracking Evaluation Performance Report. August 2015

Transcription:

Operational monitoring and modelling of Airborne and Ground-based Safety Nets performance 22-24 October 2008 Thierry Arino, Christian Aveneau, Stanislaw Drozdowski & Béatrice Raynaud Email: safety-nets@eurocontrol.int Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008

Background & context Ground-based & airborne safety nets (STCA & ACAS) Two systems of different maturity and scope, developed independently from each other STCA standardisation is under progress in Europe STCA is mandatory for end of 2008 STCA is deployed in several States with a wide range of implementations ACAS standards are defined at ICAO level since 1997 ACAS II mandatory carriage exists worldwide There is a single ACAS compliant equipment Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 2

History 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 O ACAS formance riented ARPs ACASA project (European ACAS mandate) IAPA project (ACAS vs. ATM modification) ASARP project (ACAS vs. RVSM) I-AM-SAFE feasibility study PASS project (STCA performance) EMOTION-7 project (TCAS monitoring) SIRE initiative (TCAS safety improvement) Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 3

PASS monitoring activity (Phase 1) Contribute to a better knowledge and understanding of the current operational situation Collection and analysis of relevant STCA and ACAS occurrences in Europe Data provision by DSNA, Skyguide and DFS Radar Surveillance & RA downlink Airborne recordings Air Safety Reports (by pilots) Mode S Ground Station Approach & ACC units ATC recording (radar situatio STCA alerts, R downlink, etc ATCO incident reports Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 4

Initial monitoring results (1/2) Ongoing qualitative & quantitative analysis of the sequence of STCA & ACAS related events ATC2 STCA 1 STCA 2 AC1+TCAS AC2+TCAS STCA (1) STCA (2) LOS ATC2 AC2 climb again TA TA CPP RA RA 1000ft AC1: «TCAS descent» CPA CoC Hdist (NM) 15 8 6.20 5.6 5 4 3.8 1.8 1.1 0.95 Vdist (ft) 1500 1000 900 850 800 700 700 750 1000 1700 Hrate (NM/mn) 14 13.4 13 13.5 13.5 13.4 13.3 11.7 7.8 Vrate (ft/mn) 1100 975 900 1100 1100 1100 1100-3000 -5400 56:20 56:48 56:56 56:59 57:02 57:06 57:08 57:16 57:20 57:21 57:23 57:28 Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 5

Initial monitoring results (2/2) Statistical analysis of SNETrelated occurrences Number of aircraft (No urgency in light color) Timing and nature of events (STCA alert, controller s reaction, pilot s response, TCAS RAs, etc) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 simultaneous 1-5 s 6-10 s 11-15 s 16-20 s 21-25 s 26-30 s 31-35 s 36-40 s 41-45 s 46-50 s Position of aircraft manoeuvre compared to avoiding action time > 50 s Specific analysis of TCAS occurrences based on RA downlin Nearly 900 encounters with valid recorded RAs Mode A/C threat 29% Unknow n threat Other 5% 1% Mode S threat 17% TCAS threat in TA-only 2% TCAS threat with cordinated RA 17% TCAS threa w ithout RA 29% Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 6

Setting-up the model-based performance evaluation Enhanced simulation framework building on the results of the I-AM-SAFE feasibility study and the PASS monitoring activity Encounter model for Safety-net related occurrences Controller response model ATC surveillance model STCA simulations Pilot response model Altimetry error model ACAS simulations Underlying level of safety (without STCA nor ACAS) Level of safety achieved with STCA Overall level of safety with ACAS Safety nets contribution Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 7

Next steps of the PASS study (Phases 2 & 3) Develop quantified performance and safety requirements for STCA alerts Safety encounter model STCA performance metrics (e.g. warning times) Level of STCA / ACAS interaction 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 50s 80s 90s <0 <20 <40 <60 <80 <100 <120 <140 <160 <180 seconds TMA NoCFL L TMA NoCFL H EnRte CFL Lo EnRte CFL H Provide core elements for a consistent overall concept for STCA and ACAS operations Operational requirements and recommended ATCO working method Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 8

Conclusions Ongoing operational monitoring of airborne and groundbased safety-net related occurrences will provide a better understanding of the current situation Encounter model-based methodology demonstrated to be applicable and useful to evaluate STCA performances and level of STCA / TCAS interaction Future modelling of airborne and ground-based safety nets performance to be complemented with specific Human Factors and Safety assessment methodologies Foundation for safe and efficient STCA and ACAS joint operations (end 2010 / early 2011) Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 22-24 October 2008 9