Gordon Personal Profile Inventory (Call Center)

Similar documents
Sample Personal Profiles for CVs Handout

Supervisor Manufacturing Industry

Sam Sample RESPONDENT FEEDBACK REPORT 360 APPRAISAL. Psychometrics Ltd.

Retail Sales Potential Identification (RSPI) Report

Synergize! Prevue Report. Ms. Mary Sample. Director of Human Resources

How To Be A Successful Employee

Setting the Expectation for Success: Performance Management & Appraisal System

HOGAN DEVELOPMENT SURVEY. o V e R V I e W g U I D e

SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

VHMA Sample Evaluation ( PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Continuous Learning & Development

Sally Sample 24 August 2010

Contact Center LeaderPro. Candidate Feedback

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version BRIEF-A. Interpretive Report. Developed by

Managing Conflict How to Manage Interpersonal Conflict at Work. Overview. Leading Effectively Webinar Series

SENIOR SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR

APPLICATIONS GUIDE. TRACOM Sneak Peek. Excerpts from. Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

What was the impact for you? For the patient? How did it turn out? How has this helped you in your job? What was the result?

Candidate Assessment Report. Chris Williams ABC Company

competency potential questionnaire

User s Guide CALIPER. The Caliper Profile. Use It Today. Get Results Today. Make Better Decisions Today. Solutions for peak performance.

Interviewing Strategies & Tips. Career Center For Vocation & Development

How To Be A Team Member

HR09a ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (Employee)

Customer Experience Outlines

Terex Leadership Competency Model

Accountability for Others being responsible for the consequences of the actions of those whom you manage.

Role Expectations Report for Sample Employee and Receptionist

Need Information? Go to: Have Questions?

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

I Opt (Input Output Processing Template)

Keith R. Dutton, M.S., SPHR. Connor M. Walters, Ph.D., CFLE. Department of Management & Quantitative Methods

qüé= RJjfkrqb=mboplk^ifqv=qbpqÒ=

Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework. The Centre for Learning and Development

Chapter Five: RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS

Student Profile Template

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE. Distributed by: Performance Programs, Inc

Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator MBTI

The Competent Communicator Manual

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric

WHO GLOBAL COMPETENCY MODEL

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

Overall Candidate Evaluation Form

Winning Leadership in Turbulent Times Developing Emotionally Intelligent Leaders

Professional Development Needs Assessment for Teachers

Psychological Assessment Guidelines for Psychologist

SI Coordinator Handbook. Information, Resources and Forms

Human Resources Generalist/Consultant

INTRODUCTION...1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REFERENCE CHECKS...2

South Carolina Budget and Control EPMS Performance Characteristics

Big 5 Personality Questionnaire (B5PQ)

Job Description. About Best Union Group

Improving Safety Communication Skills: Becoming an Empathic Communicator

Personality Style Considerations in Effective Negotiation

Performance Description for Employee

Success Profile. Barista. June 2003 SUCCESS PROFILES

Potential Interview Questions

Leadership, Change, and Organizational Effectiveness. Martin M. Chemers University of California, Santa Cruz

Interview Questions. Accountability. Adaptability

Executive Assistant to CEO

Schema Therapy Rating Scale For Individual Therapy Sessions (STRS-I-1) August 15, 2005

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION: MOTIVATION, IMPACT AND BEING HEARD

Competency Based Interview Questions

CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC DECATHLON

Report For: Sam Sample ACME Inc. 12/30/2009

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL Job Description. JOB TITLE: Client Relationship Manager

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

Team Building MARZIO ZANATO

THE BEHAVIORAL-BASED INTERVIEW

Leadership Skills & Emotional Intelligence

The CPA Way 6 - Communicate

Interview styles. 1. Behavioural Interviewing What is the Behavioural Interview?

Virtual Child Written Project Assignment. Four-Assignment Version of Reflective Questions

Managing Conflict: A Practical Approach. Objectives. Managing Conflict. Conflict. Managing Conflict. Claire Tehan, MA

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function BRIEF. Interpretive Report. Developed by. Peter K. Isquith, PhD, Gerard A. Gioia, PhD, and PAR Staff

Personality Profile Sample Report

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS & TECHNIQUES Collected by MBA Dept

Sam Sample 27 Mar 2013 EXPERT STANDARD REPORT PERSONALITY JTI JUNG TYPE INDICATOR. Psychometrics Ltd.

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

Behavioral Interview Questions

Coaching and Feedback

Clinical Social Work Team Leader

DEEPER LEARNING COMPETENCIES April 2013

BSM Connection elearning Course

APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES

SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Professional Telesales Skills

MINUTE TAKING. All material copyright of Lindsay Wright This pack is for sample purposes only, and not for re-use

Transcription:

Gordon Personal Profile Inventory (Call Center) Name: Date Of Testing: April 13, 2012 The Gordon Personal Profile Inventory (GPP I) is designed to measure personality traits that are predictive of job success. It has a lengthy history of use as a candidate selection tool for jobs in industrial, business, educational, military, and other settings. Previous research has shown the GPP I to meet or exceed scientific standards established for selection tools. This report provides information about, presented in a manner to help you judge John's potential for effective performance in a call center position. Specific information provided includes: An overview of John's standing on traits and competencies necessary for success in call center positions (page 2) An overview of John's overall job fit and potential for growth into positions requiring higher levels of leadership ability (page 2) Definitions of each trait and competency (pages 3 and 4) In-depth information on the implication of John's scores on each trait for John's behavior in general and performance on specific job competencies (pages 5-10) 1 of 9

Summary of Scales Norm Group: National Sample of U.S. Adults Scores Scales Ascendancy (Assertiveness) 29 93 Responsibility 21 20 Emotional Stability 23 45 Sociability 29 93 Self Esteem 102 81 Cautiousness 26 66 Original Thinking 34 96 Personal Relations 23 46 Vigor 35 97 Call Center Job Fit Leadership Potential Page 2 of 9

Trait Definitions To be verbally ascendant, adopt an active role in the group, make independent decisions, and be self assured in relationships with others. Tendency to stick to the job assigned to the individual; to be persevering and determined. The ability to exert emotional control and maintain resilience. To like to be with and work with people. Tendency to view oneself in favorable terms. The measure of Self-Esteem is provided by the sum of the following four scale scores: Ascendancy, Responsibility, Emotional Stability, and Sociability. To consider issues very carefully before making decisions; to be reluctant to take chances. To generally like to work on difficult problems, be intellectually curious, enjoy thought provoking questions and discussions, and like to think about ideas. Tendency to have faith and trust in people; to be tolerant, patient, and understanding. Tendency to be vigorous and energetic, work and move rapidly, and desire to accomplish more than the average person. Page 3 of 9

Call Center Competency Definitions Demonstrates competencies and personality traits that have been found to be predictive of success in call center positions. Demonstrates the ability to focus despite distractions. Readily adapts to changing circumstances or unexpected events. Maintains composure under pressure. Demonstrates recognition of suspect or incorrect information. Readily detects discrepancies or errors in products. Demonstrates the ability to enter or code information correctly. Processes records or transactions quickly and accurately. Follows company procedures. Represents the organization in a positive light. Takes independent action when needed. Works extra hours or long periods without a break when necessary. Takes action to exceed customer expectations. Proactively seeks to help customers. Resolves customer complaints. Builds rapport with coworkers, supervisors, and customers. Is socially perceptive. Maintains cooperative working relationships with team members. Effectively influences the sale of new or additional products or services. Comfortable with self. Has a high sense of self worth and a positive self image. Views self in a favorable light. Demonstrates personality traits that have been found to be predictive of leadership success. Page 4 of 9

To be verbally ascendant, adopt an active role in the group, make independent decisions, and be self-assured in relationships with others. 29 93 John's very high score on this Ascendancy scale suggests that John is likely to be verbally assertive and convey an impression of competence. John is likely to feel at ease in making independent decisions. On the other hand, John's inclinations to speak and take the lead may sometimes come at the expense of listening to and understanding others' perspectives. John may also overlook the need to involve important stakeholders in planning and decision making. Citizenship: While John is likely to take independent action as necessary, this may be an overused strength. For example, John may also be likely to take independent actions without following appropriate or required approval processes. Customer Focus: John is likely to avoid unnecessary escalation of customer complaints or grievances. However, John may be reluctant to escalate customer complaints even when it is clearly necessary to do so, preferring to resolve complaints through own means. Sales Influence: John is likely to display a high level of assertiveness when attempting to influence customers, which may help drive sales. However, there is a risk that some customers may perceive John's sales style as overly direct or abrasive. Implications for Leadership Potential Leadership Potential: John's style is likely to be perceived favorably in organizations that have cultures where dominance, assertiveness, and being outspoken are valued leadership characteristics. John's main challenge in this area is to ensure that his/her very high ascendancy is not displayed in a manner that is socially inappropriate or that alienates others. Tendency to stick to the job assigned to the individual; to be persevering and determined. 21 20 John's low score on this Responsibility scale suggests that John's behavior is likely to be impulsive and inconsistent. John is unlikely to stick to tasks that do not have clear personal value or incentives attached. Attention to Detail: John is likely to make more errors in entering and coding information than most team members. John may not consistently complete work-related documents and forms in a thorough manner. Adaptability: John is likely to be ineffective in jobs or tasks that require long periods of concentration and focus. Citizenship: John may take frequent or unauthorized breaks from work, even when there is much work to accomplish. John may also be less likely than others to consistently adhere to established procedures and routines. Customer Focus: John may miss opportunities to follow through in ensuring that customer complaints or grievances are resolved. Page 5 of 9

The ability to exert emotional control and maintain resilience. 23 45 John's average score on this Emotional Stability scale suggests that John is able to exert emotional control in most situations. However, when under more stress than usual, John may become overly sensitive, give in to pressure, or demonstrate obvious frustration. Adaptability: John is likely to be able to keep emotions under control in most situations, but may struggle to do so when under unusual stress. John is also likely to adapt actions based on changes in circumstances or events, although he/she may occasionally be reluctant or slow to do so. Customer Focus: John is likely to usually maintain poise when dealing with dissatisfied customers. However, John may occasionally show outward signs of being upset when dealing with especially difficult customers or when faced with unusual pressure. Sales Influence: John is likely to maintain resilience in the face of setbacks or rejections involving customers. However, John may occasionally take time to recover from setbacks or rejections perceived as especially upsetting to him/her. To like to be with and work with people. 29 93 John's very high score on this Sociability scale suggests that John's enjoyment of social interaction is well-above average. John is also likely to be skilled at building rapport with others and to have a wide range of social contacts. On the other hand, John's tendency to socialize may impede his/her ability to make progress on work assignments. Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork: John is likely to find it easy to build rapport with customers and co-workers. John's main challenge in this area is likely to be avoiding excessive socializing that interferes with work or meeting goals. Sales Influence: John is likely to have the social skills necessary to establish a fast connection with customers and quickly put them at ease. John may occasionally need to be reminded of the importance of making efficient use of customers' time, due to a tendency toward excessive socializing. Page 6 of 9

Tendency to view oneself in favorable terms. The measure of Self-Esteem is provided by the sum of the following four scale scores: Ascendancy, Responsibility, Emotional Stability, and Sociability. 102 81 John's high Self-Esteem score indicates that John has a positive self-image and is likely to display self-confidence in carrying out everyday work activities. Self-Confidence: John's high level of self-confidence is likely to positively impact many aspects of John's on-the-job performance, such as credibility and influence with customers. To consider issues very carefully before making decisions; to be reluctant to take chances. 26 66 John's high score on the Cautiousness scale indicates that John is likely to consider issues or situations carefully before making decisions. John is also unlikely to take chances or risks. Citizenship: John is likely to follow established procedures and routines. Page 7 of 9

To generally like to work on difficult problems, be intellectually curious, enjoy thought provoking questions and discussions, and like to think about ideas. 34 96 John's high score on the Original Thinking scale indicates that John is intellectually oriented and enjoys working on issues that require creative problem-solving skills to resolve. At the same time, John may become easily bored with routine and may not fully think through details when contemplating innovative ideas. Customer Focus: John is likely to search for and generate innovative solutions for meeting non-routine customer requests or requirements. However, John may spend too much time trying to identify the best solution possible, rather than simply finding a solution that works. John may also overlook details or important implications of implementing own ideas. Implications for Leadership Potential Leadership Potential: John is likely to have a problem-solving orientation conducive to leadership success. John's main challenge is likely to be balancing an inclination toward thinking with the need to take timely action. Tendency to have faith and trust in people; to be tolerant, patient, and understanding. 23 46 John's average score on the Personal Relations scale indicates that, in some situations, John is likely to be tolerant, patient, and understanding. However, John might occasionally tend to display reduced trust in others, or a tendency to be somewhat critical of others. Citizenship: John is likely to represent the organization in a positive light in most communications with customers. Customer Focus: John is likely to be generally effective in resolving customer complaints or grievances in a manner that ensures customer satisfaction and maintenance of the customer relationship. John may occasionally lose patience or show signs of irritation with difficult customers. Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork: John is likely to develop and maintain cooperative working relationships with most team members. John may occasionally lose patience or demonstrate signs of irritability when working with uncooperative individuals or when under unusual stress. John is also likely to be as socially perceptive as most people, demonstrating awareness and understanding of others' reactions in most circumstances. Sales Influence: John is likely to be as effective as most people in this type of job in taking the perspective of customers when thinking through issues, including potential influence tactics. Also, while John may not be thoroughly comfortable with a high-pressure sales approach, John will attempt to convey important sales messages to the best of his/her ability. Page 8 of 9

Tendency to be vigorous and energetic, work and move rapidly, and desire to accomplish more than the average person. 35 97 John is likely to be dynamic, productive, and highly motivated. John's rapid pace of activity is likely to result in substantial task accomplishment. On the other hand, John's high level of energy could potentially be perceived by others negatively (e.g., as false enthusiasm or hyperactivity). Sales Influence: John is likely to be perceived as energetic and enthusiastic by customers. However, John may be perceived by some customers as overly intense or overly eager to make a sale. Implications for Leadership Potential Leadership Potential: John is likely to drive hard for success and accomplish a great deal. On the other hand, when working as part of a team, John may need to be reminded to attend to how well direct reports and peers are maintaining pace with all that John desires to accomplish. In addition, John's very high score in this area predisposes him/her to becoming more frustrated than most individuals when situational constraints impede progress toward goals. Note. The GPP I should never be used as the sole basis for making an employment decision. Interviews and other selection tools should be used to corroborate GPP I results and to assess competencies not directly measured by the GPP I (e.g., Decision Making; Oral Communication). In addition, when interpreting scores on the competencies in this report, as well as Overall Job Fit (i.e., average competency score), relevance of the competencies to the particular job and organization must be carefully considered. For more information on best practices for using test scores in selection decisions, please consult the GPP I Manual, the Uniform Guidelines for Employee Selection Procedures, the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, or the Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures. Page 9 of 9