The purpose of this circular is to provide a brief description of the framework and how this will amend CySEC s current approach of supervision.

Similar documents
The APRA Supervision Blueprint

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Protecting Australia s depositors, insurance policyholders and superannuation fund members

Framework for Cooperative Market Conduct Supervision in Canada

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [9] (4/13) Sound Credit Risk Assessment and Valuation for Loans Page 314-1

ASTRAZENECA GLOBAL POLICY SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT (SHE)

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Charter

Regulatory Risk Framework

A Changing Commission: How it affects you - Issue 1

: Cyprus Investment Firms : Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission DATE : April 14, 2016

SUPERVISION GUIDELINE NO. 9 ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1995 (NO. 1 OF 1995) RISK MANAGEMENT

FCA FACTSHEET. How the FCA will supervise firms

Technology and Cyber Resilience Benchmarking Report December 2013

Risk management systems of responsible entities

BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

An Overview of Basel II s Pillar 2

Statement by. Ben S. Bernanke. Chairman. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. before the

IRM CERTIFICATE AND DIPLOMA OUTLINE SYLLABUS

Risk governance: OCC codifies risk standards, paving the way for increased enforcement actions

International Diploma in Risk Management Syllabus

Communications Manager

shareplc: Pillar 3 Disclosures CONTENTS Oxford House Oxford Road Aylesbury Buckinghamshire HP21 8SZ phone visit

GUIDANCE NOTE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

GROUP POLICY TO COMBAT MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING. Anti-Money Laundering Policy

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

Policy Statement PS20/15 Strengthening individual accountability in banking: UK branches of non EEA banks. August 2015

Systems Assurance Management in Railway through the Project Life Cycle

Overview TECHIS Carry out security testing activities

6/8/2016 OVERVIEW. Page 1 of 9

CRO Forum Paper on the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA): Leveraging regulatory requirements to generate value. May 2012.

APPENDIX A NCUA S CAMEL RATING SYSTEM (CAMEL) 1

Client Update Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive Comes Into Force

Peer Reviews on Pre-application of Internal Models for NSAs and Colleges Final Report

RE: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 041: Concept Release on Audit Quality Indicators

Aegon Global Compliance

MBa Compliance Essentials

III. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN BANKING ORGANIZATIONS

LIST OF AVAILABLE COURSES

FINAL NOTICE. (1) imposes on Bank of Beirut (UK) Ltd ( Bank of Beirut ) a financial penalty of 2,100,000; and

INTERAGENCY GUIDANCE ON THE ADVANCED MEASUREMENT APPROACHES FOR OPERATIONAL RISK. Date: June 3, 2011

How To Assess A Critical Service Provider

Safety Management Systems (SMS) guidance for organisations

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

Implementation of Solvency II: The dos and the don ts

TGA key performance indicators and reporting measures

APCC London Regional Forum. Monday, 16 th June 2014

Internal Audit Division

Terms of Reference - Board Risk Committee

Policy statement: Assessment, recording and reporting achievement.

Report of the 11th A2ii IAIS Consultation Call Risk-based Supervision in Inclusive Insurance. 23 July 2015

CONSULTATION PAPER Proposed Prudential Risk-based Supervisory Framework for Insurers

Association of Mortgage Intermediaries response to FCA DP16/1 on the ageing population and financial services

FINANCIAL SERVICES FLASH REPORT

CENTRAL BANK OF KENYA (CBK) PRUDENTIAL GUIDELINE ON BUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT (BCM) FOR INSTITUTIONS LICENSED UNDER THE BANKING ACT

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool

Linking Risk Management to Business Strategy, Processes, Operations and Reporting

Wealth Advisory Services Winning with clients

Bank of Papua New Guinea Prudential Standard BPS251: Business Continuity Management

National Occupational Standards. Compliance

THE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM PRESENTATION DEFINITION

Chairman s Statement. Contents & Introduction. Introduction

Fundamental Principles of Financial Auditing

AfDB New Procurement Policy: Training Program for the Bank s Procurement Staff. Risk-based design of Procurement Arrangements - Introduction

Corporate Risk Management Policy

submission of Information to the Central Bank Under Solvency II

APRA S FIT AND PROPER REQUIREMENTS

Financial Action Task Force Groupe d'action financière

AUSTRAC. supervision strategy

PART A: OVERVIEW Introduction Applicability Legal Provisions Effective Date...2

DECLARATION ON STRENGTHENING THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM LONDON SUMMIT, 2 APRIL 2009

asset management advisory services TCC Asset Management 1

The Bank of England, Prudential Regulation Authority

Solvency ii: an overview. Lloyd s July 2010

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Business Continuity Program

Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions. FSB Recommendations and Time Lines

March Guide to the regulation of workplace defined contribution pensions

Twin-peaks regulation: key changes and challenges

Consultation on Impact Based Levies and Other Levy Related Matters CP 61

SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES: PU GUIDELINES ON MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR THE OUTSOURCING OF MATERIAL FUNCTIONS

Guidelines on supervisory review process

Consultative report. Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems. Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions

10 Shenton Way MAS Building Singapore Telephone: (65) Facsimile: (65)

CQC s strategy 2016 to Shaping the future: consultation document

The Prudential Regulation Authority s approach to banking supervision. June 2014

Regulated Outsourcing

YEARENDED31DECEMBER2013 RISKMANAGEMENTDISCLOSURES

CONSULTATION PAPER CP 41 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CREDIT INSTITUTIONS AND INSURANCE UNDERTAKINGS

Housing Association Regulatory Assessment

Accreditation Application Forms

Achieve. Performance objectives

PRINCIPLES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONCENTRATION RISK

GUIDANCE NOTE FOR DEPOSIT-TAKERS. Operational Risk Management. March 2012

10 Shenton Way MAS Building Singapore Telephone: (65) Facsimile: (65)

Jersey MONEYVAL Report Summary

Revised May Corporate Governance Guideline

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Guideline. Operational Risk Management. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. No: E-21 Date: June 2016

Navigate the regulatory maze

USING THE EVALUABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

Internal Audit and supervisory expectations building on progress

JOHNSON ELECTRIC HOLDINGS LIMITED (the Company ) and its subsidiaries (collectively the Group )

Transcription:

TO : i. Cyprus Investment Firms ii. UCITS Management Companies iii. Administrative Services Providers iv. Regulated Markets FROM : The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission DATE : 02 September 2014 CIRCULAR No. : CI144-2014-27 FILE No. : EK.02.03.001, EK.01.03.004 SUBJECT : Development of a Risk Based Supervision Framework- A brief description As previously communicated, with circular CI144-2014-05, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission ( the Commission or CySEC ) has proceeded with the design and development of a Risk Based Supervision Framework ( RBS-F ), as part of its effort to increase efficiency and effectiveness in supervising the Regulated Entities, thus ensuring their healthy operation. Such framework will enable the Commission to determine its supervisory approach, by evaluating and accounting for the risks faced by each Regulated Entity. The purpose of this circular is to provide a brief description of the framework and how this will amend CySEC s current approach of supervision. 1. What is RBS-F and CySEC s Attitude to Risk Effective risk management requires a framework that helps to facilitate and support all formal risk-management activities. It is a process, which reflects and takes into consideration the activities and issues occurred in the past or present, but also take into consideration potential and plausible future events. In order to be an effective risk-based regulator, CySEC has implemented a structured approach to assess risk. The Risk Based Supervision Framework ( RBS-F ), is designed to ensure that risks are managed at a relevant level. This involves ensuring appropriate review, challenge and oversight of the risks bared by the Regulated Entities. A methodology was established which will allow CySEC to identify those Regulated Entities which warrant more intensive supervision. It is acceptable that risk cannot be entirely eliminated, while some of the risks accepted or that are not eliminated, may lead to failures.

The aim is that more focus is given to those entities which are of greatest importance, in terms of the impact their possible failure will have and those which are considered to have the greatest risks. Consequently, CySEC s judgement of the risk that each Regulated Entity poses to its statutory objectives, will determine the overall intensity of the regulatory approach to be followed. 2. The Advantages of RBS-F Significant benefits exist, which make the implementation of the RBS-F important to both the entities regulated by the Commission and the Commission itself. The RBS-F is aiming to assist with: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) Making better risk-based judgments. Taking prompt and consistent regulatory action where necessary. Prioritising regulatory activities. Strengthening the ability to take effective regulatory action. Improving oversight and reporting on high risk regulated firms. Allocating resources in a more efficient manner and where these are mostly required. Adopting a consistent way of risk assessment across all Regulated Entities. Operating a framework which is in line with those used by other significant regulators, both within the European Union and other countries. Achieving better understanding of the Regulated Entities operations and key risk. Providing clarity of the risks posed by each Regulated Entity. Encouraging the frequent, open communication between the Regulated Entities and the Supervisor. 3. Overview of the RBS-F A risk assessment will be performed for all entities at least on an annual basis, the results of which will be used to define each entity s monitoring program for the regulatory period. CySEC will assess risk for each Regulated Entity based on the impact (i.e. the potential harm that could be caused) and probability of failure (i.e. how likely the event is to occur). Each of these (i.e. the impact and probability) will be assessed based on a set of predefined risk measures and / or evaluation categories / factors - Diagram 1. 2

Impact is designed to capture the size of a Regulated Entity and the potential harm that it could do to CySEC s responsibilities and reputation. The impact is calculated using numerical data about the entity, from information to be taken from the entity s regulatory returns. Probability will be assessed based on the evaluation categories applicable to the Regulated Entity. The evaluation categories are distinguished in four (4) main categories: (a) Anti Money Laundering: Aim is to ensure that Regulated Entities minimise the possibility that they may be used for financial crime. (b) Prudential: Aim is to assess the safety and soundness of the Regulated Entities and reduce the threat entities pose to the stability of the financial system in providing critical financial services. (c) Conduct: Aim is to ensure that clients get a fair treatment and ensure that markets are resilient and fair. (d) Governance: Aim is to assess whether processes and decisions that seek to define actions, grant power and verify performance of the entity are adequate. Different evaluation categories / factors will be assessed with a set of predefined risk measures. Risk measures can be both quantitative and qualitative: 3

(a) Quantitative assessment will be performed for all entities and will reflect the entity s inherent probability (i.e. in combination with impact will indicate each entity s inherent risk). Inherent probability will be assessed based on a set of (mostly) numerical data, which will be provided by the Regulated Entities upon CySEC s request, and will indicate each Regulated Entity s size and key characteristics of its business activities. (b) Qualitative assessment evaluates each entity s procedures, systems and controls implemented. The areas of qualitative assessments will be driven from the results of the quantitative assessment, or other external factors identified during the regulatory period. CySEC, based on the results of the qualitative assessments, will identify any actions that need to be taken from the Regulated Entities, and will monitor these accordingly. The probability calculated from the quantitative and the qualitative assessment will result to an entity s overall probability (i.e. net probability). The graph in Appendix A indicates the core areas of the risk assessment: the main evaluation categories and the factors which fall under each category. To be noted that depending on the type of entity and the risk profile of each entity identified during the quantitative risk assessment, evaluation categories, evaluation factors and risk measures may differ. 4. RBS-F Stances and Approach to Supervision The risk assessment will be performed for all entities at least on an annual basis (i.e. the regulatory period) and depending on the results, the intensity of supervision will be defined. CySEC will score each entity in four (4) risk categories: low (L), medium-low (ML), medium-high (MH), high (H). This is measured based on similar scores allocated to impact and probability. All entities will be subject to the basic monitoring procedures which involve the analysing of their regulatory returns submitted to CySEC. An illustration (not a definite one) of the way CySEC will supervise Regulated Entities is shown below. 4

H MH ML L Relationship managed Remediation from thematic reviews Thematic reviews De minimis Establishment of a supervisory programme, that is designed to enable each of the Probability Ratings to be assessed through regular meetings, targeted reviews and tailored remediation plans Entities will be prioritised for thematic reviews to where inherent probability scores show they are relevant. Where thematic reviews show that probability of failure is higher, then closer supervision may be required until remediation is completed Subject to desk-top data analysis and potential selection for thematic reviews Limited interaction beyond administrative supervisory processes/ supervision through reporting / regulatory returns Concluding we note that CySEC is currently working towards preparing a more detailed documentation with respect to the approach to be followed. This will be shared with Regulated Entities in due time. Should you have any queries on the RBS-F, please do not hesitate to contact: Mrs. Marinella Georghiadou (Officer, Supervision Department), or send an email to the address supervision@cysec.gov.cy. Yours sincerely, Demetra Kalogerou Chairman, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission 5

APPENDIX A OF CIRCULAR CI144-2014-27 Core Areas of the Risk Assessment 6