Understanding Yield Grades and Quality Grades for Value-Added Beef Producers and Marketers

Similar documents
United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef

BeefCuts. Primal & Subprimal Weights and Yields 1300-pound Steer Choice, YG3 Dressing Percentage: 62% Chuck Rib Loin. Round. Brisket. Plate.

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

A comparison of beef breed bulls for beef production & carcass traits. Future cattle production -seminar Viikki Campus

Understanding Grid Marketing: How Quality Grades and Grid Conditions Affect Carcass Value. By Pete Anderson Ag Knowledge Services

Managing cattle for the kind of beef you want your kids to eat.

HOW TO PREPARE THE PERFECT PRIME RIB

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Career Cluster Agriculture Meat and Dairy Product Processing

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

Home Slaughtering and Processing of Beef

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

MARKET LAMB & GOAT SELECTION & EVALUATION. Aaron Renfroe Extension Assistant Sheep and Goat Texas AgriLife Extension Service San Angelo, Texas

Value-Added Agriculture in Tennessee: A Summary of 2012 Census Results December 2014 SP 769

U.S. Beef and Cattle Imports and Exports: Data Issues and Impacts on Cattle Prices

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS CONTAINING MECHANICALLY DEBONED MEAT 1

PCR-C-073, CHILI MACARONI WITH BEEF, COOKED, DEHYDRATED, PACKAGED IN A BRICKPACK POUCH, SHELF STABLE

SYSCO Branded Premium Pork Products Produced By

Lesson # 9: Poultry Processing

IOWA STATE FAIR * AUGUST 11-21, 2016 * FFA BEEF CATTLE

** ANIMAL ID NUMBERS MUST BE DESIGNATED IN **

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

FUTURES TRADING OF LIVE BEEF CATTLE (HEDGING) by Clarence C. Bowen

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

INCIDENT REPORT Smithfield Beef Group Souderton, INC., Establishment 1311 Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan Report

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Two lab experiments for Middle School/High School, Food Prep and Culinary

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Chicken. Beef. Pork. Mutton. agriculture, forestry & fisheries. Department: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Carcass Traits and Merit

Meat Goats. January Kent Orrell Extension Educator, Kiowa Co. Okla.

Beef Primal Cuts OUTSIDE FLAT 2050 OUTSIDE 2030

Extending Shelf-Life of Beef Cuts Utilizing Low Level Carbon Monoxide in Modified Atmosphere Packaging Systems

SHEEP. The Value of Independence CARCASE AUTHENTICATION AND VERIFICATION SERVICES MEAT AND LIVESTOCK COMMERCIAL SERVICES LTD (MLCSL)

Fresh Meat Processing. Objective

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX , USA b Texas Beef Council, 8708 Ranch Rd. 620 N., Austin, TX , USA

Texas Correlations CEV Pathway: Food Products/Processing Systems

Swine EPD Terminology

HENDRY COUNTY 4-H SWINE RECORD BOOK

Project Pig Production Planner

Valuing Market Hogs: Information and Pricing Issues

Breeds of Swine. Berkshire. Chester White

Beef Demand: What is Driving the Market?

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM Figure 1

Beef Cattle. Production MP184 DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N

EBLEX BEEF BRP MANUAL 4. Beef production from the dairy herd

Fo o d P r o d u c t s A n d P r o c e s s i n g S y st e m s Interest In A Supervised Agricultural Experience (S A E )

Swine Feeding and Fitting Guidelines. Ryan Harrell Dec. 2008

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General

Pacific County Market Livestock Project 4-H/FFA Organization Livestock Show and Auction

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

How to Raise and Show Pigs

Beef Cattle Handbook

Chapter 5 DASH Your Way to Weight Loss

Alternative Marketing Arrangements in the Beef Industry: Definition, Use, and Motives

Declining Quality Grades: A Review of Factors Reducing Marbling Deposition in Beef Cattle.

Goat and Sheep Situation & Outlook

Understanding and Using Cattle Basis in Managing Price Risk

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

United States Standards for Grades of Lettuce

Horse Meat Production in Canada

The subject of breeds intrigues most beef cattle. Type and Breed Characteristics and Uses. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle V:

It s all about managing food. Food Recall Plan Template For Food Manufacturers

INNOVA. Software solutions that empower meat processors

Recipe For Marbling. Page 1 of 12. Quality grade continues to generate largest grid premiums

The Strategic Marketing Institute Working Paper

Effects of Supplemental Vitamin E with Different Oil Sources on Growth, Health, and Carcass Parameters of Preconditioned Beef Calves 1

Keeping It Legal: Regulations and Licenses for Growing and Selling Food in Oregon

Measuring Beef Demand

Harrington s guide to serving The World s Finest Ham. & other fine smoked meats

Food Service Specialist, Third Class. Performance Qualification Guide

Meat processing is a complicated business, with tight

VACCINATION PROGRAMS FOR DAIRY YOUNG STOCK

Growth & Feeding Puppies Karen Hedberg BVSc Growth

VMC Body Fat / Hydration Monitor Scale. VBF-362 User s Manual

Transcription:

SP 755 Understanding Yield Grades and Quality Grades for Value-Added Beef Producers and Marketers Rob Holland Director Center for Profitable Agriculture Dwight Loveday Associate Professor Department of Food Science and Technology December 2013 Yield grade should not be confused with yield and should not be confused with quality grade. Yield is the dressing percentage which is calculated by dividing the carcass weight by the animal s live weight. The terms yield grade and quality grade are often, incorrectly, used interchangeably. The two terms are very different and they reflect very different carcass traits. It is important for cattle producers and value-added beef entrepreneurs to understand the difference between yield and quality grades and how both are determined and used in the industry. Important to the understanding and application of yield and quality grades is the definition of beef quality, cutability and undesirable carcass traits. This publication is intended to provide definitions and explanations of these important terms for cattle producers and entrepreneurs that are interested in direct marketing beef. Yield grades Yield grades are expressed in numbers that estimate the percentage of expected cutability from a carcass. Cutability is defined as the percentage of closely trimmed, boneless, retail cuts from the round, loin, rib and chuck the four major beef wholesale cuts. It is an estimate of the relative amount of lean, edible meat from a carcass. The yield grade is determined by evaluating four carcass factors: 1. External fat thickness over the ribeye. 2. Ribeye area. 3. Estimate of the percentage of kidney, pelvic and heart fat. 4. Hot carcass weight.

Figure 1: USDA yield grade labels. Yield Grade Formula: Yield Grade = 2.5+(2.50*Adj. Fat Thickness, inches)+(0.20*%kidney, Pelvic and Heart)+(0.0038*Hot Carcass Wt., pounds)-(0.32*ribeye Area, square inches) Using the yield grade formula, what is the Yield Grade for a carcass that weighs 760 pounds, has an Adj. Fat Thickness of 0.50 inches fat, 2.5% KPH and 13.2 sq. inches of REA? YG = 2.5 + (2.50*.45) + (0.20*2.5) + (0.0038*700) - (0.32*13.2) = 2.914. This carcass would be marketed as a YG2 because the decimals are dropped and not rounded. There are five yield grades: USDA yield grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The lower the numerical value of the USDA yield grade, the higher the expected yield of closely trimmed, boneless retail cuts. A yield grade 1 carcass provides the greatest amount of saleable beef while a yield grade 5 is the lowest-yielding carcass. An example yield grade stamp is provided in Figure 1. Producers tend to use yield grades more than consumers. The yield grade is important to producers because it can affect animal value and the overall economic returns from the animal. Consumers are more familiar with quality grades, which are used to predict meat palatability. Beef cutability traits Beef cutability traits are those carcass measurements or evaluations that predict the expected amount of retail cuts from the carcass. Carcass cutability traits evaluate indicators of fatness and muscling. USDA Beef Yield Grades are marketing tools that indicate carcass cutability. The carcass traits used to determine the USDA Yield Grade are: Fat Thickness at the 12th Rib (Adj. Fat Thickness): To determine the overall fatness of a beef carcass, the carcass should be split between the 12th and 13th ribs. This split is called ribbing the carcass. The fat thickness is measured three-quarters the distance of the ribeye muscle from the backbone. Fat thickness measurement is oftentimes visually adjusted to reflect the total fatness of the carcass. For example, a USDA grader evaluates the total fatness of the carcass and can adjust the fat thickness higher if the carcass is fatter than the measurement or adjust the fat thickness lower if the carcass is leaner than the measurement indicates. Carcass fatness is the most important factor in determining cutability. 2 University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

Understanding Yield Grades and Quality Grades for Value-Added Beef Producers and Marketers Ribeye Measurement with Grid Ribeye Area: Ribeye area is the area of the ribeye muscle located at the 12th and 13th ribs. The ribeye muscle, and only the ribeye muscle, is measured using a grid. The muscle area is expressed in square inches. Most fed beef carcasses will have ribeye areas measuring between 11 and 15 square inches. Percent Kidney, Pelvic Fat and Heart (% KPH): The percent KPH is the internal fat in or around the kidney, pelvic and heart regions. KPH is expressed as a percentage of the hot carcass weight. Most carcasses will have 1.5-4.0 percent KPH. Hot Carcass Weight: HCW is the unchilled carcass weight in pounds after the head, hide and internal organs have been removed. For most fed cattle, HCW will be approximately 60-64 percent of the live animal slaughter weight (dressing percent). Acceptable carcass weight typically ranges from 600 pounds to 900 pounds. Quality grades are indicators of the expected palatability of the beef including flavor, juiciness and tenderness. The expected palatability is expressed through eight different quality grades: Prime Commercial Choice Utility Select Cutter Standard Canner The prime, choice, and select grades are typically used for retail and food service cuts of meat while the lower grades are often used in manufactured beef products. The quality grade is determined by carcass maturity and marbling. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture 3

Beef quality carcass traits Beef quality carcass traits are the carcass characteristics most associated with beef palatability or eating satisfaction of the beef. USDA Quality Grades are an assessment of eating quality and are determined by carcass maturity and marbling. Maturity: There are five classifications for beef carcass maturity: A, B, C, D and E. Maturity refers to the physiological age and not necessarily the chronological age of the animal. Although not perfectly related to the actual age of the animal, A maturity cattle tend to be 9-30 months of age, B is 30-42 months, C is 42-72 months, D is 72-96 and E is greater than 96 months of age. Most fed beef will be A maturity. Physiological maturity is determined by the ossification (cartilage turning to bone) pattern of the backbone, lean color, and rib bone shape and color. The most important factor is the ossification pattern of the dorsal tip (button) of the thoracic vertebrae. The thoracic vertebrae is the section of the backbone that has the ribs attached. In A maturity cattle, the buttons will have no to very little ossification, the ribs are red and round, the lean color is light red and the lean texture is fine. As cattle mature, the buttons contain greater ossification, the ribs become whiter and flatter, the lean color becomes darker and the meat texture becomes more coarse (grainy). Marbling: Marbling is defined as the flecks of fat within the muscle (i.e., intramuscular fat) and is associated with the flavor and juiciness of meat. Greater marbling levels tend to improve eating satisfaction. Marbling is evaluated in the ribeye muscle between the 12th and 13th ribs. There are nine degrees of marbling: abundant (most), moderately abundant, slightly abundant, moderate, modest, small, slight, traces and practically devoid (least). The greater the amount of marbling, the higher the quality grade. 4 University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

Understanding Yield Grades and Quality Grades for Value-Added Beef Producers and Marketers Figure 2: Beef Carcass Merit Chart The USDA grading chart that appears in Figure 2 shows the relationship of maturity and marbling to the USDA Quality Grade. In a maturity, prime carcasses have slightly abundant or greater marbling, choice has small to moderate marbling, select has a slight degree of marbling and standard carcasses have traces and practically devoid. Some cattle are marketed as premium choice (Ex. Certified Angus Beef) and they are typically A maturity with modest and moderate degrees of marbling. Official USDA Official USDA quality grades can only be assigned and used in marketing when done by an official USDA grader. Quality grades are not automatically done by USDA and the on-site inspector is not an official quality grader. The on-site USDA inspector works for the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) while the USDA quality grader works for the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). FSIS and AMS are both units of USDA, but they are different agencies. AMS offers quality grading on a voluntary and fee-based basis. If an animal owner desires to have meat from their animal graded, an official USDA, AMS quality grader must be requested to be on-site during processing. Quality grades can only be used in marketing when graded by an official USDA, AMS quality grader. While lots of folks often estimate or guess at quality grades either from looking at a live animal, looking at an ultrasound or from observing the carcass, it is important to stress that quality grades can only be used in marketing or promotions when graded by an official USDA, AMS grader. Many times, the official USDA quality grade will be advertised or promoted to the consumer. This promotion may be done by application of the official USDA quality grade shield directly on the Inspection vs Grading Difference between graders and inspectors: USDA employs both graders and inspectors. Inspectors work for USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) while graders work for Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). FSIS inspectors are responsible for inspecting live animals, carcasses, internal organs and the head. They also evaluate beef, byproducts and the facility for safety, cleanliness and wholesomeness. AMS graders evaluate carcasses for quality and cutability. Graders are also responsible for certifying various USDA Certified programs such as Certified Hereford Beef or Certified Angus Beef. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture 5

Figure 3: Examples of grade shields. Inspection vs Grading continued... A USDA grader, not an inspector, determines both yield grades and quality grades, often at the same time during processing. That is, when a USDA grader is in a processing facility to grade carcasses, he or she normally provides both the yield grade and quality grade. Both of these measures can be valuable to the cattle producer for the purpose of comparing carcass traits genetics and other production considerations. The quality grade can be of additional value and benefit to consumers. packaging. These shields are often referred to as the quality grade stamp. Example quality grade shields for USDA Prime, USDA Choice and USDA Select are shown in Figure 3. Additional information about official USDA meat grading can be obtained from the USDA, AMS Meat Grading and Certification Branch Office at: https://tiny.utk.edu/ag/meatgrading Undesirable carcass traits Undesirable carcass traits are those carcass characteristics that can negatively affect beef palatability or marketing. Producers should follow good management and quality assurance practices to produce high-quality, wholesome beef. Among the most common undesirable carcass traits are bruises, injection site scar tissue and dark cutters. Bruises and Injection Sites: Trim losses from bruising and injection contamination are costly to both producers and packers. Producers should follow good management practices and beef quality assurance programs that result in safe, high-quality beef products. Dark Cutters: Dark cutting refers to muscle tissue that does not turn the typical red color when the meat is exposed to air. Dark cutting beef is often a result of stress to the animal prior to harvesting. Environmental factors such as extreme heat, cold and rain or extreme weather fluctuations can lead to dark cutters as well. Other psychological and nutritional issues may cause the muscle color to develop improperly as well. Dark cutters do not pose food safety or meat palatability problems, but are often not marketable due to their abnormally dark color. 6 University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

Understanding Yield Grades and Quality Grades for Value-Added Beef Producers and Marketers Summary A better understanding of the terms yield grade and quality grade should be helpful as value-added beef producers and marketers communicate with their processor and customers. Yield and quality grades are important meat terms that relate directly to cattle production and profitability. While yield and quality grades are often used incorrectly to describe the same thing, they actually reflect very different carcass traits. It is important to understand that official USDA quality grades can only be assigned and used in marketing when done by an official USDA, AMS grader. It is important for cattle producers and value-added beef entrepreneurs to understand the difference between yield and quality grades and how both are determined and used in the industry. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture 7

and Federal-State Market Improvement Program This publication is part of the Tennessee Value-Added Beef Program and made possible in part by funding from the Southern Risk Management Education Center, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal State Market Improvement Program, the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture and from the sale of agricultural specialty license plates (the Ag Tag ). Funds received from Ag Tag sales are returned to the agricultural community in the form of grants for youth programs, marketing development projects and other agricultural activities. 8B ag.tennessee.edu SP 755 12/13 Programs in agriculture and natural resources, 4-H youth development, family and consumer sciences, and resource development. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture and county governments cooperating. UT Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment.