Figure 1 Proposed transformation to a coordinated homeless prevention and housing-first system

Similar documents
Ending Family Homelessness through Housing First (Rapid Rehousing)

The Road Home. Spokane Regional Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness Annual Update. July 2010

The President s 2016 Budget: Fact Sheet on Homelessness Assistance

STATE OF GEORGIA HOMELESS ACTION PLAN

Senate Bill (SB) 855: Housing Support Program Orange County Application

What is Housing First? Revised November 9, 2006

Homelessness Prevention & Rapid Re-housing: Community Perspectives

Promising Strategies: Mercer County Board of Social Services and Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness. Mercer County, New Jersey

Changes in the HUD Definition of Homeless

DENVER HOUSING FIRST COLLABORATIVE COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES REPORT. Jennifer Perlman, PsyD, and John Parvensky

2015 HUD CoC Competition Evaluation Instrument

Homelessness in Greater New Orleans: A Report on Progress toward Ending Homelessness May 2012

PERFORMANCE BASED CONTRACTS EXAMPLES FROM COLUMBUS, OHIO

The Role of Public Housing Agencies in Preventing and Ending Homelessness. August 11, 2011

Outcomes for People on Allegheny County Community Treatment Teams

MEMORANDUM NOTE DE SERVICE

Promising Strategy: Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and the. Charitable Assistance to Community s Homeless, Inc.

FY 2013 CONSOLIDATED PLAN CONFERENCE CALL

Supportive Housing Collaborations Miami Dade Examples

Denver Sheriff Department

RECOVERY HOUSING POLICY BRIEF

Mental Illness, Addiction and the Whatcom County Jail

State of Georgia. Homeless Action Plan To End Homelessness in Ten Years

A Homeless Prevention System for London Ontario

Training and Consultation Services. Helping Organizations Achieve Excellence

Released: March 1, 2011

Rebuilding Lives Updated Strategy: Recommended Strategies RLUS Steering Committee

The Plan to End Community Homelessness In Austin - Travis County ECHO. Ending Community Homelessness Coalition

Closing the Front Door: Creating a Successful Diversion Program for Homeless Families

Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health

LOCAL NEEDS LOCAL DECISI NS LOCAL BOARDS

Department of Public Welfare. Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. Olmstead Plan for Pennsylvania s State Mental Health System

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) APPLICATION GUIDEBOOK HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM (HPRP)

Scope of Services provided by the Mental Health Service Line (2015)

2016 HOME REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACQUISITION AND/OR REHABILITATION or NEW CONSTRUCTION

Case Management Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-housing

Integrated Care for the Chronically Homeless

Impact of Georgia s Settlement Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice on Housing Programs

City of Los Angeles, Consolidated Plan

National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

Homelessness Partnering Strategy Community Plan Community: Ottawa Aboriginal Region: Ontario

STATE SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FOR ADULTS

The Five Year Plan to End Homelessness Among Veterans: Actions for FY Pete Dougherty Paul Smits

Rental Assistance Guidebook

Housing Trust Fund, Ending Long-Term Homelessness Initiative Fund & Housing with Supports for Adults with Serious Mental Illness

Homeless Veterans Services Birmingham VA Medical Center

The National Coalition for Homeless Veterans estimates that on any given night, 271,000 veterans are homeless.

Georgia Department of Community Affairs. Draft Strategic Recommendations for the Georgia Department of Community Affairs

PRISONER REENTRY IN MICHIGAN. History & Overview June 2, 2011

SANTA CLARA COUNTY REENTRY SERVICES SEAMLESS SYSTEM OF SERVICES, SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION Ready to Change: Promoting Safety and Health for the Whole

Project Awards: By Agency

All the Way Home: Re-entry and Housing. NAEH Conference July 13, 2005 Richard Cho

MAYOR S HOUSING THE HOMELESS TASK FORCE REPORT

Housing is Health & Recovery

Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) Veterans Health Administration Homeless Programs

Strategic Agenda: Health and Human Services Integrated Service Delivery Project

Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF)

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES FAMILY INVESTMENT ADMINISTRATION TEMPORARY CASH ASSISTANCE MANUAL COMAR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 1300

HACG Moving to Work Housing Initiative. Update for Homeless Coalition Meeting September 18, 2014

County of San Bernardino Department of Behavioral Health Mental Health Services Act

Feedback from Stakeholders. Presentation by Neighborhood Housing & Community Development Community Development Commission

Testimony of Adrienne Poteat, Acting Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia

Windsor Essex Housing and Homelessness Plan FINAL PLAN APRIL 2014

Taking research to practice: Program design and evaluation LESSONS FROM THE DOORWAY PILOT

Length of stay numbers are approximate and were calculated using a weighted average over multiple programs. 97

5-Year Strategic Plan Revised, 2010

Houston/Harris County Continuum of Care Rapid Re-housing Business Rules

How To Help Mentally Ill Offenders In The Criminal Justice System

SUPPORTIVE HOUSING OPTIONS NYC

HIV/AIDS Housing Inventory

Complete Program Listing

Promising Strategies: Utah Workforce Services and The Road Home A Public/Private Partnership to End Family Homelessness. Salt Lake City, Utah

801 Pennsylvania Ave. SE Suite 201 Washington, DC (202) PROGRAMS AND SERVICES GUIDE MAY 2012

Emergency Solutions Grants Program. Eligible Expense Guide

Community Metrics. Wilder Research Summary Statistics. Executive Summary. Project description

INTEGRATING HOUSING IN STATE MEDICAID POLICY

St Johns County CoC Governance Charter St Johns County Continuum of Care St Johns County Continuum of Care Board Purpose of the CoC and CoC Board

WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT

2013 Annual Awards Entry Form (Complete one for each entry.)

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

PHA Profile: King County Housing Authority Housing Access and Services Program (HASP) Housing Choice Voucher Program

Bexar County, Texas San Antonio

Recovery Innovations of Arizona Programs

Public and Indian Housing

JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM

Housing, Health, and Independent Living Program (HHIL) GETTING HOUSED, STAYING HEALTHY

Housing Services Office (HSO) Newsletter Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services (BHCS)

Resource Allocation and Monitoring Strategies

New York City Department of Homeless Services Audit Services Directive Number 1 Audit Protocols For Human Services Contracts

Quality Data Assures Quality Decisions. Acknowledgements: Symmetric Solutions, Inc. prepared this document under the direction of

Transitioning to The Health Home Model in PSH. Presented by Eric Morse, LISW-S, Chief Operating Officer

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) SHELTER PROGRAM AWARD TRAINING

Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Inmate Services Bureau Education Based Incarceration Unit 1

Accessing Affordable Housing: The Rights of Previously Incarcerated Individuals

ELIGIBLE USES: Eligible uses include existing rental housing, new construction, and substantial rehabilitation.

Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board Alcohol and Drug Adult Day Treatment Services

Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board

EMERGE VISTA Request for Host Site Applications Program Year

Business Plan Summary

Orange County Investment in Programs to Prevent and End Homelessness Review and Recommendations. Barbara Poppe and associates

Transcription:

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal C. PROGRAM/PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Provide a short description of the program/project. The proposed Whatcom County Homeless Services Center (WCHSC) project adapts evidenced-based models of homeless prevention, rapid re-housing, jail diversion, and focused re-entry planning to transform our current continuum of care from managing homelessness to ending homelessness. Key components establish new commitments to increase access to supportive and mainstream services that are vital to retaining permanent housing. As called for in the State s 10-year plan, this project proposes a shift in focus from emergency response strategies to prevention and long term housing. This systems change approach, affecting all homeless subpopulations, increases the efficiencies of the existing homeless housing infrastructure which consists of low-rent housing, transitional housing and emergency shelter. At the same time, it saves money by diverting some individuals away from high-cost institutional facilities. Under this new approach, our community is committed to homeless prevention, rapid re-housing, institutional discharge planning, and supportive services. Figure 1 Proposed transformation to a coordinated homeless prevention and housing-first system

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 2 WCHSC is a central entity that implements the new programs and coordinates their activities with Homeless Coalition partner agencies. New programs emphasize (1) prevention assistance to reduce the number of households that will become homeless, (2) rapid re-housing of those who are homeless, (3) supportive services promoting housing stability and self-sufficiency, and (4) specialized diversion, discharge planning and re-entry programs which complete Whatcom County s comprehensive re-entry service commitments. 2. Describe the proposed housing and/or services, and linkages to other mainstream systems (jails, prisons, social service, medical, etc.). Whatcom County Homeless Service Center. WCHSC serves as a resource center and coordinates entry from multiple partner agencies already serving persons and families who are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness. Partner agencies provide direct services for clients who are pre-screened and authorized to receive services. WCHSC provides these services: Standardized housing risk assessment. Utilizing a best practice, WCHSC s Prevention and Rapid Exit Coordinator (PREC) assesses homeless risk factors, with a standardized tool used throughout Whatcom County, for each client that is referred for homeless housing services. This tool determines housing and housing readiness needs. Rapid exit coordination 1. Based on the housing risk assessment, the PREC refers clients to partner agencies for homeless prevention, housing, and supportive services increasing their likelihood of retaining stable housing. 2 Partner agencies provide these services as part of their contractual relationship with WCHSC. Housing coordination services. Within WCHSC a housing resource specialist helps partner agencies to connect clients with permanent housing. Through outreach, this specialist cultivates relationships with private-sector landlords to increase the number of units available as stable housing for homeless households. The housing specialist responds to landlord complaints and manages the newly established Risk Mitigation Fund. Risk Mitigation Fund. Opening the door to homeless individuals and families may require landlords to relax screening criteria and rent to people who might not otherwise qualify. In return for relaxing these criteria, landlords receive a commitment from WCHSC to assess tenant housing readiness, provide ongoing support, and guarantee to pay from the risk mitigation fund any unpaid rent or costs associated with significant damage to the rental unit. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI). WCHSC provides leadership and support to partner agencies as they work toward continuous improvement of these new programs. CQI is a process of looking at provided services, evaluating their effectiveness, and making adjustments to improve those services, as indicated by performance data. HMIS, partner agency reporting, and other information will result in data-driven decisions about resource allocation and performance. 1 The term rapid exit refers to a swift exit from homelessness 2 WCHSC will adapt the risk assessment tool from Hennepin County, MN.

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 3 Community-Oriented Re-Entry program (CORE). CORE is a team approach to re-entry and discharge planning with access to tenant-based housing assistance and mainstream services through the WCHSC. Recently, the Whatcom County criminal justice, substance abuse and mental health systems opened a Crisis Triage Center to coordinate services for people with mental health and/or substance abuse disorders who tend to cycle through the county jail and hospital emergency department. The state-of-the-art Crisis Triage Center is staffed 24/7 to provide expedited assessment, stabilizing interventions, and access to services. This diverts these clients, many of whom are homeless, away from costly local/state incarceration and psychiatric hospitalization. In addition, the county created a new boundary spanner staff position to act as a liaison between criminal justice, mental health, and substance abuse treatment systems, linking offenders to appropriate services. What s missing from this system is a focused connection to appropriate permanent housing. Through a multi-party Memorandum of Understanding, CORE team members collaborate with WCHSC s rapid exit coordinator and housing specialist to provide housing solutions. 3. Describe the potential for the program/project to be funded after the HGAP grant expires, using committed resources from the criminal justice, social service, health or other systems. These evidence-based approaches save money by diverting people away from high-cost institutional services (e.g. jails, state hospitals, hospital EDs) and high-cost emergency and transitional shelter services. Money saved can be reprogrammed to pay for less costly alternative services as demonstrated by Whatcom County s $2 million investment in the new Crisis Triage Center. Another component of a new countywide policy is a local Housing Trust Fund 3 to provide a stable funding source for the main program components. 4. Describe how the proposed model is connected to state and local homeless plans, and provide other evidence of local support. Project component Whatcom Plan WA State Plan Establish WCHSC and associated services. Establish rapid exit coordinator; housing resource specialist. Establish outcomes-focused contracting for all homeless program funds. C.O.R.E. team approach to re-entry and discharge planning with access to tenantbased funding. Develop one-stop homeless services center Implement a Housing First approach (p.8); and service integration (p.10) Build capacity for ALL homeless populations (p.8-9), especially those most costly to the community when they are not in stable housing and receiving supportive services. Strategies 1, 4, 7; 8, and 16 Strategy 12 Strategy 15 Strategy 2 and 3 Establish HMIS and integrate into all homeless service programs. HMIS system (p.9) Strategy 17 3 Currently, the City of Bellingham and Whatcom County are preparing an interlocal agreement to retain a consultant to help design a local housing trust fund.

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 4 5. Describe the specific numbers and characteristics of those to be served and units/beds created, and quantify the total unmet need addressed in the proposal. We estimate the annual demand for homeless prevention, housing-first, and supportive services in three general subpopulation categories: imminent risk households that require minimal prevention assistance to avoid eviction; homeless households that need a moderate level of temporary financial assistance and supportive services to obtain permanent housing; and high-need individuals who may require permanent rental assistance, supportive services and case management. Using these estimates, we developed a model that simulates the increases and decreases in service demands and the interaction across subpopulation categories. Each year WCHSC and partner agencies will (A) provide homeless prevention assistance to approximately 500 households annually, our estimate of the total demand based on eviction court data; (B) provide shallow rent subsidy for 200 homeless households and up to half of these clients receive case management and supportive services, and (C) up to 60 chronically homeless and/or institutional discharge individuals will receive deep rent subsidy including leased housing for sex offenders and dangerous mentally ill intensive case management and supportive services. Using these approaches and the other project components described earlier, we expect to decrease overall homelessness by 19% in three years, and by 56% in nine years. These estimates and projections will be revised as appropriate after full implementation of HMIS and other evaluation methods. More detailed outcomes are described in section 8 below. 6. Provide evidence that the proposed model reduces homelessness. The project s main components are best practices recommended by HUD and the National Alliance to End Homelessness, modeled after Hennepin County, Minnesota and Portland, Oregon programs. Hennepin County s family homeless program achieved 95% housing retention one year after assistance for prevention clients and 88% housing retention for rapid exit clients. It also reduced the length of shelter stays. Hennepin County evaluation data show that from program inception in 1998 to 2003, the proportion of families in transitional shelters with few housing barriers decreased from 55% to 2%, thus reserving shelter housing and support services to the neediest homeless. Portland s Transition to Housing program which serves families, individuals, and the chronically homeless achieved a 73% retention rate at an average annual cost per household of $1,200. Our proposed risk mitigation fund is based on Portland s Fresh Start and Risk Mitigation Pool that encourages for-profit and nonprofit landlords to relax renting requirements for clients. 7. Provide evidence that the proposed model reduces overall government costs, such as the cost of homeless housing and services in prisons, hospitals and treatment facilities. Re-entry planning: Studies show dramatic public cost savings from good re-entry planning programs that permanently house certain subpopulations. 4 Locally, for example, a Whatcom County program designed to safely house sex offenders released from DOC facilities cost $17,854 for housing assistance for 14 individuals over an 18-month period. Without this program, DOC would incur $322,500 in incarceration costs maintaining offenders until their maximum release date. 5 WCHSC and the CORE team will produce similar savings as they work collaboratively with the Crisis Triage Center to divert potential jail bookings to appropriate treatment housing alternatives. Homeless housing: The costs of building and operating additional transitional or emergency housing is much more costly than shallow subsidies to prevent homelessness or to support people in permanent housing. It costs $1,680 per month for typical transitional housing in Whatcom County, compared to the 4 See, for example: Metraux, Stephen & Dennis P. Culhane (2004). Homeless Shelter Use and Reincarceration Following Prison Release: Assessing the Risk. Criminology & Public Policy 3(2) 5 Source: DOC, based on incarceration cost of $68.49/day for 4,718 days saved

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 5 fair market rent ($741 for 2-bedroom apartment), or shallow rent subsidy of $500 or less (not unusual for Hennepin and Portland). 8. Provide a short description of outcomes and methods that will be used to collect outcomes. Central to this project is a detailed and integrated approach to collecting and reporting outcomes. Outcomes-based contracting adapted from Hennepin County and Portland is a primary objective of CQI. HMIS system implementation has begun in Whatcom County and is one method of collecting and reporting outcome data. The program will develop an evaluation and outcome reporting system to supplement HMIS capabilities for the purpose of tracking outcomes including but not limited to those in following table: Primary services: Homelessness prevented (households) Secondary services: Moderate needs homeless housed (households) Tertiary services: Chronic homeless housed (individuals) Year 1 assisted 250 100 30 Year 2 assisted 500 200 60 Year 3 assisted 500 200 60 Total assisted 1,250 500 150 Percent housed after one year Change in number of homeless subpopulation by 2015 Approximate project cost per subpopulation Avg. cost per homeless assisted 85% 75% 50% NA -52% -73% $ 910,000 $ 968,000 $ 2,631,500 $ 728 $ 1,936 $ 17,543 In addition, WCHSC s housing resource specialist, working with for-profit and nonprofit housing developers and landlords will, facilitate the addition of 300 units of housing with relaxed rental qualifications and 100 units of supportive housing. 9. Provide evidence of project readiness (funding in place, site secured, etc.). Whatcom County s Homeless Coalition, Housing Advisory Committee and community leaders prepared for this systems transformation project during Phase I ten-year planning last year. Homeless Coalition steering committee members identified evidence-based models to adapt to local conditions, visited four sites and began adapting their tools last summer (e.g. partner agency outcomes-based contracts, risk assessment tool, job descriptions, evaluation methods). Concurrently, our community decided to reserve all of the county s 2163 funds and much of the sponsor-based Shelter Plus Care funding for this project. Portland s Transition to Housing program agreed to participate in a Housing First Mentoring Academy in early 2007 to kick-start this project. All partner and collaborating agencies will participate in this two-day workshop. The Mentoring Academy applies to all homeless and at-risk subpopulations and focuses on implementation issues related to integrating services and outcome-based contracting and reporting. As part of CQI, Academy participants will continue to meet regularly to raise and resolve

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 6 issues that arise throughout the three-year project. Also, Whatcom County has already initiated the process to become HMIS compliant and is committed to integrate HMIS into all WCHSC and partner agency activities. Finally, the Bellingham/Whatcom County and Archdiocesan Housing Authorities recently committed to setting aside up to 20% of new housing units as permanent supportive housing for the homeless. 10. Describe the capacity of involved organizations to successfully implement the proposal. Whatcom County is committed to an open public process that gives existing homeless coalition members and others the opportunity to become partner agencies. A great strength of this transformative project is its reliance on existing organizations, whose missions align with project goals. We identified a local organization eager to manage the project. This entity recently assumed these responsibilities for a statewide project involving contract administration and performance monitoring of nearly 40 organizations over a multi-year period. Existing service providers that comprise the county s homeless coalition already have the outreach and referral networks, case management expertise, and detailed knowledge of their particular client subpopulation s assets and needs. Our community has a well-developed governance structure for multi-agency projects. Formal policy and funding decisions are delegated to the county s Housing Advisory Committee. The Whatcom County Homeless Coalition and its steering committee meet monthly to plan future projects and confer about ongoing activities related to the local continuum of care. HGAP and local funds described in this project focus on building community homeless service capacities that are currently limited: homeless prevention services, case management focused on housing outcomes, integrating re-entry and discharge planning and crisis triage services with housing resources, and encouraging more private sector involvement in homeless housing solutions.

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 7 D. PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE Please limit the timeline to no more than 20 steps. FORM C Steps/Activities Responsible Party Timeline 1. RFQ for project/program mgmt. Whatcom County Health Dept. Dec 2006 2. Negotiate contract with CTED Whatcom County Health Dept.; CTED Dec 2006 3. Negotiate/sign contract with project/program manager (hereafter, WCHSC manger) Whatcom County Health Dept. Jan 2007 4. HMIS compliance WCHSC manger Jan 2007 5. Convene inaugural CORE meeting to develop Memorandum of Understanding 6. Establish WCHSC; hire project manger, rapid exit coordinator and housing specialist 7. Organize and conduct Housing First Mentoring Academy Level I) for collaborating/partner agencies; set schedule for continuing monthly meetings 8. Issue RFPs for WCHSC partner agency homeless services 9. Issue RFQ for project performance tracking and evaluation Whatcom County Corrections (lead agency) Jan 2007 WCHSC manger Feb 2007 WCHSC manger Mar 2007 WCHSC manager Mar 2007 WCHSC manager Mar 2007 10. Establish landlord risk mitigation fund and policies; conduct landlord recruitment activities WCHSC housing specialist Apr 2007 11. HGAP quarterly reports to CTED WCHSC manager Apr 2007 (ongoing) 12. Finalize housing risk assessment tool WCHSC rapid exit coordinator Apr 2007 13. Award outcomes-based contracts to partner agencies WCHSC manager May 2007 14. Lease re-entry housing units 1 and 2 Partner agency under contract May 2007 15. Coordinate and train Triage Center staff CORE team June 2007 16. Implement HMIS data integration WCHSC manager June 2007 17. Coordinate with RSN to implement housing model Whatcom County Health Dept. July 2007 18. Community HGAP Summit WCHSC manager Sep 2007 19. First annual review of partner agency performance WCHSC manager June 2008 20. Develop opportunities for leveraging additional funding Whatcom County; WCHSC manger July 2008

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 8 E. ESTIMATED BUDGET FORM D 1. Grant Term (Check only one box): 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 4 Yrs 5 Yrs 2. Proposed HGAP Activities 3. HGAP Funding Request a. Acquisition b. Rehabilitation 4. Other Funding Estimates (From Section I, below) 5. Total Estimated Funding (Sum of columns 3 & 4) c. New Construction Subtotal: Capital Project Costs (Sum of lines a - b) d. Real Property Leasing $ 273,750 $ 273,750 e. Supportive Services 500,000 693,750 1,193.750 f. Operations 40,000 40,000 g. Rental Assistance 1,430,000 1,180,000 2,610,000 Subtotal: Non-Capital Program Costs (Sum of lines d - g) h. Administrative & Outcome Measurement Costs (For HGAP funding, total admin/outcome costs may not exceed 20% of the total request. Admin costs may not exceed 10%.) TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET (Sum of funding totals for Capital, non-capital, & Admin/Outcome Costs) 2,203,750 1,913,750 4,117,500 250.000 146,000 396,000 $ 2,453,750 $ 2,059,750 $ 4,513,500

Whatcom County Homeless Services Center HGAP Project Proposal Page 9 F. ESTIMATED FUNDING/MATCH FORM E A. COMMITTED/ B. PROPOSED C. TOTAL FUNDING SOURCE CONDITIONAL (A + B) HGAP $ $ 2,453,750 $ 2,453,750 OTHER STATE FUNDS (Describe and name source): 1. $ $ $ 2. $ $ $ 3. $ $ $ 4. $ $ $ FEDERAL FUNDS (Describe and name source): 1. HUD Shelter Plus Care sponsor based $ 583,750 $ $ 583,750 2. $ $ $ 3. $ $ $ 4. $ $ $ LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS (Describe and name source): 1. 2163 funds $ 1,476,000 $ $ 1,476,000 2. $ $ $ 3. $ $ $ 4. $ $ $ NONPROFIT/PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS (Describe and name source): 1. $ $ $ 2. $ $ $ 3. $ $ $ 4. $ $ $ TOTAL STATE, FEDERAL, LOCAL AND PRIVATE FUNDS: $ 2,059,750 $ 2,453,750 $ 4,513,500