Mixed grazing - the benefits

Similar documents
Reducing methane emissions through improved lamb production

Economic and environmental analysis of the introduction of legumes in livestock farming systems

Level II Agricultural Business Operations - Assessment Booklet

Practical Beef Cattle Nutrition

Leaving Certificate Higher Level Sheep Production Questions

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Supplementary information on the Irish Dairy sector in support of

What Is Holistic Planned Grazing?

primefacts Yield and digestibility of legume and oat forages Dr Brian Dear Principal Research Scientist

Forage Sorghum Production Guide

MANAGEMENT OF MEADOW FESCUE PASTURE FOR HIGH-PRODUCING DAIRY COWS IN NORTHERN JAPAN

GROSS MARGINS : HILL SHEEP 2004/2005

Fayette County Appraisal District

Opportunities and Challenges for Developing Small Ruminant Systems

LELY VOYAGER. Automatic grazing system. Frontal grazing: the innovative way. innovators in agriculture.

Created by the industry, for the industry. Feed planning for cattle and sheep

USE OF OVERSEER AS A TOOL TO IDENTIFY MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING NITRATE LEACHING FROM FARMS AROUND LAKE TAUPO

GRAZING AND FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR NATIVE PERENNIAL GRASS RESTORATION IN CALIFORNIA GRASSLANDS

What is Nitrite Toxicity? Georgia Cattleman, June 2002 John Andrae, Forage Extension Specialist

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

THE ASSOCIATION OF ANIMAL FEED PRODUCERS IN THE UK INDUSTRY REPORT FOR 2014 AND BEYOND

Goat Program at Langston University Web site www2.luresext.edu Research Nutrient Requirements Vegetative Mgt Internal Parasites Quarterly newsletter F

Endophytes of perennial ryegrass and tall fescue

FORAGE NEEDS, GRAZING MANAGEMENT AND FEEDING PROGRAM FOR MEAT GOATS AND SHEEP IN THE HUMID SOUTHEAST

DETERMINING YOUR STOCKING RATE

SECTION 6. The Codex code of practice on good animal feeding

MOT your sheep or beef enterprise and discover the route to better returns

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste

R E S T R I C T E D B R E E D I N G A N D R O T A T I O N A L G R A Z I N G

Total Income from Farming in the United Kingdom. First estimate for 2015

SOIL HEALTH COVER CROPS RELAY CROPPING

agricultural economy agriculture CALIFORNIA EDUCATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE I Unit I Cultivating California I Word Wall Cards 426WWC

Annual Winter Pastures for East Texas

Feeding Dairy Cows. A manual for use in the Target 10 Nutrition Program. Edited by Joe Jacobs with Ann Hargreaves. Third Edition

Everything you need to know about the practical coursework assessment

WATER HARVESTING AND AQUACULTURE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION TO AQUACULTURE

The ABCs of Pasture Grazing

Supplementation guide for sheep: Central and southern NSW

CHAPTER 20 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY

Feeding Flood-Damaged or Sprouted Crops to Livestock

Farming. In the Standard Grade Geography exam there are three types of farming you need to know about arable, livestock and mixed.

Report on the AgriProFocus Zambia Dairy Learning Lab conducted by PUM Netherlands Senior Experts.

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Science of Life Explorations

EBLEX SHEEP BRP MANUAL 5. Growing and finishing lambs for Better Returns

Animal Health Management on Organic Farms

Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction

Liquid Biofuels for Transport

PASTURE AND GRAZING MANAGEMENT FOR PARASITE CONTROL

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

Effects of Climate Change on Grasslands. Jeff Thorpe Saskatchewan Research Council June 27, 2012

Sheep Nutrition. Sheep Nutrition. Nutrient Needs. Sheep Nutrition Water. Products Produced. Use of Pasture\Range and Forages.

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

San Jacinto County Appraisal District PO Box 1170 Coldspring, Texas (Fax)

MIDAS Insights on Profitably utilising Perennial Plants in Hamilton, Victoria.

Easier management systems for sheep

A comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from the New Zealand dairy sector calculated using either a national or a regional approach.

MEAT INDUSTRY OPTIONS FEEDBACK SURVEY

Water Footprint Calculations for Pasture Based Beef Production

suscon Green One application. 3 years control against grass grub. Grass grub damaged pasture

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

JAPANESE KNOTWEED. What is Japanese Knotweed?

Practical Sheep Breeding

Ecosystem services in grasslands: evidence, trade-offs and restoration. James Bullock NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

Integrated Pest Management

INTRODUCTION. The 3-year upper primary syllabus development was guided by the RNPE, 1994, which called for the review of the Primary curriculum.

How Do I Select Quality Hay?

Status of the World s Soil Resources

Feeding Corn to Beef Cows

Lesson Overview. Biodiversity. Lesson Overview. 6.3 Biodiversity

Section 5.1 Food chains and food webs

The A to Z of Meat Goat Production

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

African Organic Agriculture Manual Booklet Series No. 4 Soil organic matter management HOW DO I IMPROVE THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER?

1. About dairy cows. Breed of dairy cows

A diet fit for a pig: seven basic rules

Management of goats at pasture. Barry W Norton School of Land and Food, University of Queensland, Australia

Let s Learn About Plants and Animals!

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

Guidelines for Minimum Standards Property Management Planning. Financial Management Module

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Introduction to Ecology

Creep Feeding Beef Calves Dan E. Eversole, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

CALCULATING AVAILABLE FORAGE

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands

Eastern Kentucky Meat Goat Budget Analysis

Nepalese organic baby clothing

Available study programs at Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

Management Strategies for Rangeland and Introduced Pastures

6. JOINING MANAGEMENT

Livestock Rental Lease

Beef Cow Share Lease Agreements

Transcription:

Mixed grazing - the benefits The Beef and Sheep Development Centre, run by Hybu Cig Cymru, is managed by the Welsh Assembly Government as part of Farming Connect.

About HCC Hybu Cig Cymru - Meat Promotion Wales (HCC) is the strategic body responsible for the promotion and development of Welsh red meat and the development of the Welsh red meat industry. Its mission is to develop profitable and sustainable markets for Welsh lamb and Welsh beef for the benefit of all stakeholders in the supply chain. HCC s five strategic goals are: Effective promotion of Welsh Lamb and Welsh Beef and red meat products in Wales Build strong differentiated products Improve quality and cost-effectiveness of primary production Strengthen the red meat supply chain Effective communication of HCC activities and industry issues This booklet forms part of a series of publications produced by HCC s Industry Development team. The Industry Development team deal with a range of issues that include: Technology Transfer Research and Development Market Intelligence Training Demonstration Farms Benchmarking This booklet was produced as part of the Farming Connect Sheep and Beef Development Programme. Hybu Cig Cymru - Meat Promotion Wales PO Box 176, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 2YA Tel: 01970 625050 Fax: 01970 615148 Email: info@hccmpw.org.uk www.hccmpw.org.uk May 2008 HCC would like to thank ADAS Pwllpeiran for their help in producing this booklet. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the prior written consent of the company. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken in its preparation, no warranty is given as to its accuracy, no liability accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance upon any statement in or omission from this publication.

Contents Forage utilisation Mixed grazing Sequential grazing Cattle and sheep in extensive management systems Utilisation of conserved forages Forward Increasingly, livestock producers in Wales are looking at enterprise returns and concluding that cattle, particularly in hill and upland situations, are unprofitable. The decisions to reduce or initiate enterprises on livestock farms rightly include financial budgets of each enterprise. However, these budgets often overlook the additional advantages that cattle and sheep bring to these enterprises because often these benefits are difficult to separate out, difficult to quantify and in most cases, difficult to put a financial value on. Agriculture in Wales has contributed to the natural environment, landscape and habitat diversity which without continued agricultural land-use may be adversely affected. Mixed farming (cattle and sheep) in the hill and mountain areas of Wales delivers a number of benefits that include environmental benefits, complimentary grazing resulting in better efficiency and is also a key feature in combating internal parasite resistance to anthelmintics. Between 2005 and 2007 the total number of breeding beef females in Wales dropped by 5.5% from 370,000 to 350,000 cattle. A continuation with this trend could not only impact on efficiencies of production on the farm but also have a detrimental effect on the Welsh landscape. This booklet outlines some of the benefits of keeping cattle and sheep on the same holding. Mixed grazing - the benefits 1

Forage utilisation Cattle and sheep are both ruminants but their physical differences in terms of size and their method of consumption lead to differences in their dietary selection, dietary intake and subsequent utilisation, and in their ability to tolerate plant and microbial toxins. Cattle Sheep Grazing method Use tongue to pull and tear Use teeth to nibble Minimum Sward Height 4cm 2cm Plant parts Not selective - consume all plant parts Very selective consume particular plant parts Sward species Select patches of ground Select individual plants This means that cattle and sheep have different grazing behaviours which will affect the same ground in different ways: Sheep Will graze closer to cattle dung pats Utilise pasture that is not normally grazed by cattle Ensure areas of the sward remain productive and reduce need for topping Ensure that sward digestibility remains high throughout the season Reduce pasture burdens of cattle gastrointestinal worm larvae reducing drench costs Cattle Avoid areas around dung pats Are less selective graziers Consume and utilise pastures that are low in digestibility Can help to control invasive grasses such as molinia Increase sward clover content Increase diversity in sward structure Create bare ground through trampling which allows seeds to germinate Reduce pasture burdens of sheep gastrointestinal worm reducing drench costs 2 Mixed grazing - the benefits

Mixed grazing Under an extensive or continuous grazing regime, cattle and sheep need not be in competition for grazing. Indeed research has shown that when grazing availability is sufficient, mixed grazing systems actually result in a 10% improvement in animal performance compared to grazing with sheep or cattle alone. This increase was in daily weight gain by both species and was partly explained by a higher utilisation of the pasture. The sheep were grazing much closer to cattle dung pats and so were using pasture that was not normally grazed by the cattle. This in turn ensured that these areas of the sward remained productive and did not become stemmy. This helped to ensure that the sward digestibility remained high, particularly during the later part of the season. Another contributing factor was the reduction in gastrointestinal worm burdens. Most parasitic worm species (Nematodirus being one exception) are host-specific so grazing cattle and sheep in alternate years will help reduce the worm challenge. Grazing cattle alongside sheep on the same pasture will also reduce parasite burdens as the stocking rate of each species will normally be reduced, and cattle will certainly consume and destroy a proportion of the sheep worms on a pasture and vice-versa. Mixed grazing - the benefits 3

Sequential grazing On mixed swards of perennial ryegrass/white clover, cattle tend to select less clover than sheep leading to a higher sward clover content. Grazing trials at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research s Bronydd Mawr field station showed that the clover content of fields grazed by cattle was higher than fields grazed by sheep. Weaned lambs which were then grazed on the fields that had been grazed by cattle achieved an additional liveweight gain of 30g per day compared to weaned lambs grazing after sheep (Davies1, 1997). Effect of cow or ewe grazing on sward clover content and subsequent lamb performance Species grazing from May to July Clover content by August Subsequent weaned lamb performance in August to September Suckler cows + calves 10% 116 g/day Ewes + lambs 4% 86 g/day 1 Davies, D.A. (1997) Improved upland pasture: The Bronydd Mawr Story, IGER Technical Advisory Report No.2. 4 Mixed grazing - the benefits

Grazing of cattle swards by ewes in the autumn therefore has obvious benefits; Helps with flushing ewes at tupping Helps to avoid grass winter kill Increases grass tillering Ensures a high grass quality in the subsequent year. Under sheep only grazing, as grass growth accelerates, the grass can get ahead of sheep. If this is not prevented, subsequent grass growth is reduced and the increased stem and flower heads can impair herbage quality. When this happens, the application of cattle can quickly get the sward back under control. Mixed grazing - the benefits 5

Use of cattle and sheep in extensive management systems In semi natural pastures, cattle will tolerate much lower quality forages like Nardus and Molinia and, because they have a longer retention time in the rumen, cattle can actually achieve a greater digestibility of plants than sheep. Cattle also have a higher intake relative to their metabolic rate. This allows them to be less selective and to compensate for low nutrient values in forages by consuming more. There are also physical differences created by cattle and sheep. Cattle graze in patches and reject areas around dung pats, making the sward structure more variable. By removing biomass and dead vegetation, cattle grazing encourages new plant growth which is more attractive to sheep. In addition, due to their physical size, cattle trample vegetation creating bare ground which allows plants such as dwarf shrubs to germinate from seed. These factors combine to increase biodiversity of flora and fauna. Cattle can also reduce the ingress of scrub vegetation such as gorse and trees which can assist in extensive land management systems. Cattle and sheep have varying tolerances to plant toxins. It can prove beneficial to selectively use both livestock species to allow appropriate management of areas known to contain poisonous or potentially harmful plants such as bracken, ragwort, St John s wort and horse tails. 6 Mixed grazing - the benefits

Utilisation of conserved forages Hay making depends on the removal of water from herbage to a level sufficient to allow the grass to be stored in a safe condition with minimum losses from leaf shatter and microbial spoilage. The length and effectiveness of the drying will determine the subsequent nutrient value, palatability and digestibility of the hay. Ensilage is a naturally occurring process which effectively pickles grass and is brought about by naturally occurring epiphytic bacteria fermenting plant sugars to lactic acid. The nutrient value, palatability and digestibility of silage is dependant on the maturity of the crop, crop constituents, crop dry matter at harvest, the method of ensiling, the efficiency of sealing and contamination with animal manures or soil. Good preservation of conserved forages is much more important for sheep than cattle. Poorly conserved forages are rejected by sheep whilst cattle appear more tolerant. Wet forage is less palatable to sheep but has little effect on intake in cattle. Silage contaminated by soil or manure is likely to contain Listeria and should never be fed to sheep. Mouldy silage should never be fed to pregnant animals of either species as it could cause abortion. Mixed grazing - the benefits 7

In clamps, spoilage is frequently seen and is usually the result of inadequate sealing and/or lack of consolidation. With big bales, damage to the wrap can also lead to microbial spoilage. Once opened, the silage is exposed to air and microbial activity starts again. If silage is not consumed within a few hours, the silage may start to heat adversely affecting the animal s intake. With sheep only enterprises, this material would be wasted whilst with adult cattle particularly, much will be consumed without adverse health effects although animal performance is likely to be reduced. Benefits of combining cattle and sheep on your enterprise Cattle and sheep play an important role in the management of grasslands and landscapes in Wales. There are many benefits to retaining a mixture of cattle and sheep which should be considered when looking at enterprise restructuring on livestock farms: Mixed grazing systems result in a much higher utilisation of the pasture than sheep or cattle alone When grazing availability is sufficient, mixed grazing systems result in a 10% improvement in animal performance Cattle are less selective in their grazing this removes biomass and dead vegetation and encourages new plant growth Cattle can digest low quality forage much better than sheep which helps to improve the utilisation of marginal land Sheep will graze pasture that is not normally grazed by cattle Sheep graze close to the ground and prefer more nutritious plants or leafy parts of the plant. This helps the sward remain productive and reduces need for topping Mixed grazing helps to reduce worm burdens reducing drench costs Finally it must be remembered that with only one enterprise, risk is increased and generally if the financial returns from one enterprise is constrained the other could be more buoyant. Further Information For further information on any of the content in this booklet or on the work undertaken by HCC please contact HCC on tel: 01970 625050, email: info@hccmpw.org.uk or visit www.hccmpw.org.uk. 8 Mixed grazing - the benefits