Programme Priorities: Logistics has three main priorities for 2010 / 2011 and onwards. These are:

Similar documents
The total budget is CHF 5.3m (USD 5.2m or EUR 3.5m) (Click here to go directly to the summary budget of the plan).

International Disaster Response Tools

Global Logistics Service

Costa Rica Annual Report 2012

Annex - Resolution 1 Declaration: Together for humanity

"youth" "young people"

Emergency Plan Of Action update

Human resource management strategy

National Society leadership and management development (supporting National Society development) Executive summary This is one of four sub-plans of

Security Unit Appeal MAA00026 Mid-Year Report

Peru Mid-Year Report

Emergency Appeal Revision Honduras: Drought

Lebanon: Plane Crash. DREF operation n MDRLB002 GLIDE n OT LBN 18 August 2010

IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee

Disaster Management:Operations technical advice

Emergency appeal operations update Cameroon: Population Movements

Principles and Rules for. Humanitarian Assistance. Saving lives, changing minds.

Human Resource (HR) Management Strategy

The Core Humanitarian Standard and the Sphere Core Standards. Analysis and Comparison. SphereProject.org/CHS. Interim Guidance, March 2015 (version 2)

Annual report Human Resource (HR) Management Strategy

Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement Strategy [ ]

Long-term Planning Framework Peruvian Red Cross 2012

Human Resource (HR) Management Strategy

How we work. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva 2012

SOS Children s Villages

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/64/L.43 and Add.1)]

Core Humanitarian STANDARD. Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability

EN 31IC/11/R7 Original: English Adopted

part B DISABILITY INCLUSION: DISASTER MANAGEMENT Key facts

The INEE Minimum Standards Linkages to the Sphere Minimum Standards

TERMS of REFERENCE (ToR)

Candidate Brief. Governance Business Manager

Web Annex 6: Output indicators and targets

Guatemala: Food Crisis

HUMANITARIAN. Food 11. Health 4 Shelter 4 Other 7 OECD/DAC

Antigua and Barbuda: Hurricane Earl

Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for Local Impact

Cash transfer programming and the humanitarian system

Logical Framework Planning Matrix: Turkish Red Crescent Organisational Development Programme

The ICRC Corporate Support Group. An exclusive partnership with selected companies. Help today, make a commitment to tomorrow.

Ensuring Accountability in Disaster Risk Management and Reconstruction

Ensuring WHO s capacity to prepare for and respond to future large-scale and sustained outbreaks and emergencies

HIV/AIDS policy. Introduction

GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE (GACSA)

Multi-Hazard Disaster Risk Assessment (v2)

<click here for the DREF budget, here for contact details or here to view the map of affected areas>

FINAL. World Education Forum. The Dakar Framework for Action. Education For All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. Revised Final Draft

TRANSITION FROM RELIEF TO DEVELOPMENT: Key Issues Related to Humanitarian and Recovery/Transition Programmes

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and Strategy. GAVI Alliance

Centre International de Droit Comparé de l Environnement CIDCE. Comments on the Zero draft of the Post 2015 framework for disaster risk reduction

Disaster Risk Reduction and Building Resilience to Climate Change Impacts

How To Help The Ecuadorian Red Cross

Terms of Reference. Food Security. Sector Coordination-Lebanon

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies PLAN AND BUDGET Saving lives, changing minds.

Chapter 7: Japan s humanitarian assistance

Disaster relief emergency fund (DREF) Democratic Republic of Congo: Population Movement

We welcome your support in realizing Strategy Suggestions and enquiries to

Joint UN Statement 1 st Preparatory Committee Meeting (PREPCOM) for the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, July 2014, Geneva

Candidate Brief. Syria Project Coordinator

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Post Disaster Need Assessment (PDNA) Training Manual

WHO Consultation on the Zero Draft Global Mental Health Action Plan International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Submission

Disaster relief emergency fund (DREF) Costa Rica: Dengue

Instruction note for ECHO staff on Remote Management

Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Kiribati: Tropical Cyclone Pam

LIST OF RELIEF ORGANIZATIONS

Multilateral Aid Review: Assessment of International Organisation for Migration

Castrol India Limited Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy

The IASC Principals Commitments on Accountability to Affected Populations (CAAP) Tools to assist in meeting the commitments 1

reflected and translated into policy orientations and priorities as well strategy documents and a management plan.

<click here for the DREF budget, here for contact details, or here to view the map of the affected area>

Disaster relief emergency fund (DREF) Philippines: Typhoon Utor

Guidelines for humanitarian aid

IFRC Framework for Community Resilience

HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS THINK TANK

Water and Sanitation Manager IWSM Western Equatoria State - Southern Sudan

GLOBAL CONSULTATION GENEVA, OCTOBER 2015 CO-CHAIRS SUMMARY

Quantifying Sustainability in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters

Working with volunteers The importance of communication for group cohesion and resilience. B. Juen University of Innsbruck Austrian Red Cross

5-2. Dissemination of Earthquake Risk Reduction and Recovery Preparedness Model Programme

National Standards for Disability Services. DSS Version 0.1. December 2013

National Society Development Framework 2013

Shelter and Settlement Impact Evaluation Tool (SSIET)

Ukraine. In brief. Appeal No. MAAUA002 31/08/2009. This report covers the period 01/01/2009 to 30/06/2009

Security Risk Assessment Tool

Job Profile. Component Manager, Deepening Democracy Democratic Governance Facility (Senior Adviser (N1)) Uganda

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA DISASTER MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT BILL

Dublin Declaration. on Partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia

Disaster risk reduction & emergency response for WASH

Central African Republic Country brief and funding request February 2015

Compilation of Principles and Recommendations on Preparedness from a series of Workshops and Meetings

WHO HEALTH EMERGENCY PROGRAMME RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS May 2016

MIDDLE EAST: POPULATION DISPLACED FROM IRAQ

EVERYONE COUNTS STRATEGY

Project/programme planning Guidance manual

Child Selection. Overview. Process steps. Objective: A tool for selection of children in World Vision child sponsorship

Mental Health Declaration for Europe

How Humanitarian Logistics Information Systems Can Improve Humanitarian Supply Chains: A View from the Field

Vacancy Announcement Program Manager

GENERIC TERMS OF REFERENCE Environmental Field Advisor (EFA) OCHA Environmental Emergency Section (EES)

Transcription:

Logistics Executive summary Introduction: The International Federation is finalizing its zonal structure and has set a priority to enhance support to National Society activities. In addition, the International Federation s Strategy 2020 is being created and as previously planned, it is time to align the logistics structure and activities so they support the delivery of the International Federation s overall objectives for Strategy 2020. This will centre on re-enforcing the logistics capacity and capabilities of National Societies (NS) with membership and value adding services. These will be delivered using a coordinated network of resources that includes standing NS capacities. Programme Aim: This programme will be part of Strategic Aim 1 of the International Federation s 2020 plan, that is Save lives, protect livelihoods, and prepare for and recover from disasters and crises and more specifically supporting enabling action 1: Build strong National Red Cross Red Crescent Societies and enabling action 3: Function effectively as the International Federation Programme Priorities: Logistics has three main priorities for 2010 / 2011 and onwards. These are: Ensure the delivery of membership services to NS through the Zone network. Provide value added services to NS on a cost recovery basis. Provide value added services to external agencies on a cost recovery basis. Programme Deliverables: The priorities will form the basis of the programme which will produce three key deliverables. These are: Alignment of the logistics structure with Zones to deliver membership services Availability of value adding logistics services to all NS Provision of value adding logistics services to external agencies, utilising the volume to generate funds to subsidise the membership and NS supplied services Programme Cost: The total 2010-2011 budget is CHF 7.2m (USD 7.0m or EUR 4.7m) (Click here to go directly to the summary budget of the plan). Context The increasing frequency of disasters, coupled with a number of emerging threats and trends, are leaving more people vulnerable to the effects of disasters and inflicting greater damage, loss, and dislocation on vulnerable people worldwide. According to the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), in 2008, more than 235,000 people were killed by disasters, 2.14 million affected, while the cost of disasters was over 190 billion US$. While the number of disasters recorded in 2008 was lower than 2007, over recent years there has been an increase in the number of small and medium scale disasters, especially storms, floods and epidemics, which National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies respond to under their mandate as auxiliaries to the public authorities. The first half of 2009 saw a continuation of this trend, with the Red Cross Red Crescent responding to a high number of smaller-scale, local level disasters. 1

The situation of vulnerable people is now aggravated by evolving, complex threats such as climate change, new patterns of marginalisation, demographic growth and a rising proportion of older people, unplanned urbanisation, high levels of violence, involuntary migration, emerging infectious disease and the growing burden of non-communicable disease, environmental degradation, and insecurity of access to food, water, and natural resources. The humanitarian sector is further challenged by of the recent financial crisis and the increasing involvement of military and political actors in humanitarian response. The complexity of the humanitarian environment has led to demands for improved coordination. At the same time, improved forecasting and technology for early warning call for improvements in our capacity for early action and for information management in disasters. There are also calls for greater innovation and more inclusive ways of delivering assistance, with a strong focus on accountability, good partnership and good donorship. All of the above reinforces the need for a strong International Federation, flexible enough to adapt to a fast changing world. In this context, the International Federation needs to have the capacity to mitigate, prepare for and respond to disasters worldwide and across all levels household, community, national, regional and international. The International Federation is committed to achieving its Global Agenda Goal 1: to reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters and to the three strategic aims of Strategy 2020: 1: Save lives, protect livelihoods, and prepare for and recover from disasters and crises 2: Enable healthy and safer living 3: Promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence The International Federation, and the National Societies as auxiliary to the public authorities, are among the leading providers of assistance globally and are responsible to provide relief to people affected by disaster. Depending on their capacity to respond and the scale of the disaster, National Societies can call upon international assistance through the International Federation s secretariat. The International Federation secretariat is committed to ensuring the institutional capacity in preparedness for response, response and recovery to provide that support in a timely manner. The secretariat has a constitutional obligation to organise, coordinate, and direct international relief action as a core service to its members and calls upon its membership to provide additional human resources, technical, material and financial assistance to sister societies in affected countries. With the increase in the number of small and medium scale disasters, the work of National Societies to assist communities to mitigate, prepare for or respond to disasters at a local level is an important added value of our Red Cross Red Crescent network. The effects of food insecurity can also be mitigated at local level through long-term community projects supported by National Societies. The Geneva secretariat will provide support to Nationals Societies in building more resilient communities, mitigation and risk reduction, and food security and livelihoods. Geneva headquarters will maintain a strong strategic oversight in all areas of disaster management. As stated in the Logistics 2009 / 2011 global strategy, logistics is central to the International Federation successfully fulfilling its mandate. In 2007, Logistics activities accounted for more than 60% of the International Federation s 404 million CHF spend. The efficiency and effectiveness of the Logistics to provide logistics support has a direct impact for National Societies effective response to assist those affected by disasters. The International Federation is finalizing its zonal structure and has set a priority to enhance support to National Society activities. In addition, the International Federation s Strategy 2020 is being created and as previously planned, it is time to align the logistics structure and activities so they support the delivery of the International Federation s overall objectives for Strategy 2020. This will centre on re-enforcing the logistics capacity and capabilities of National Societies (NS with membership services delivered or value adding services delivered through the Zone structure. 2

Having reviewed a number of operations and reports 1 where Logistics has provided support, there are 3 key areas where improvements would have a significant impact for NS Establishing equitable access to membership services for NS, delivered through the Zone structure. Increasing NS access to value adding services that can be provided quickly to operations in the immediate aftermath of a disaster without having the burden of investing in and maintaining a large national logistics structure. Offering services to external actors at a fair price, so Logistics will be able to maximise the use of its network, and utilise the increased volumes to keep NS services at lowest cost and invest in continuous improvement. Priorities and current work with partners Logistics has three main priorities for 2010 / 2011 and onwards. The results will help to meet the challenges outlined in the context. These are noted below: Logistics Work Priority 1 - Ensure the delivery of membership services to NS through the Zone network. Membership services pertaining to logistics, as specified in Strategy 2020 are (i) to facilitate international response coordination (coordination of the delivery of goods using a mobilisation table) and (ii) promote standards and norms through logistics standards tools and accountability mechanisms. These will be delivered as close to point of use as possible, the NS site(s) Logistics Work Priority 2 Provide value added services to NS on a cost recovery basis. Value added services are (i) procurement (ii) warehousing (iii) receipt and despatch of goods (iv) international transport (v) distribution transport (vi) fleet provision (vii) specialist operational support. Direction and leadership for these services will be provided centrally, planned and managed from each Zone and delivered locally through an enhanced global logistics network. NS can access these services through pre-agreement or on an as needed basis. Logistics Work Priority 3 Provide value added services to external agencies on a cost recovery basis. Value added services are (i) procurement (ii) warehousing (iii) receipt and despatch of goods (iv) international transport (v) distribution transport (vi) fleet provision (vii) specialist operational support. Direction and leadership for these services will be provided centrally, planned and managed from each Zone and delivered locally through an enhanced global logistics network. Agencies will be able to access these services through the Humanitarian Procurement Centre (HPC) set up. Work is ongoing to make sure Logistics is in a position to address these priorities from January 2010. The 5 phase process is described below, and the work plan is shown in Figure 1. 1 Main Reports considered: Hisham Khogali, Senior DM Officer "Pakistan Floods can we learn", 20.09.2007, Hakan Karay, Senior Relief Officer "Bangaldesh End of Mission Report" 03.01.2008, AliaKsandr Kulikov, Head of Operation, "Swot analysis of the Flood Operations in Southern Africa", 26.06.2008 Rob McEwan, FACT Team Leader, "End of mission presentation Ghana", 19.10.2007 3

Confirming the mandatory and value added services to be provided Assessing the volume and type of services to be provided Identifying options with potential partners to plan optimal supply solutions (NS, Donors, other Agencies, Commercial Partners) Finalising a solution showing what services should be supplied from where, including IT, infrastructure, staff and process requirements. Identifying tasks / funding needed to change form current to required state. This work is co-funded by an ECHO capacity building programme, which started in January 2009 and finalises in June 2010. 2009 2010 August February January December November October September Prepare outline 2010 2011 plan and research framework ID service requirement and finalise research with RLU & NS Carry out research on best way to carry out role and deliver services, consult NS, Zones, Donors, other agencies etc. Finalise analysis and design solution. Consultation. Logistics team brief followed by NS brief. Ready to implement Figure 1: Work Plan to 2010 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Secretariat programmes in 2010-2011 Logistics a) The purpose and components of the programme Given that the bulk of the current work plan is complete by January 2010, logistics will then commence delivery of the 3 work priorities described earlier. The programme components described in this section will facilitate the necessary enhancement and changes required in the Logistics structure. The ongoing provision of logistics services will be funded with core and cost recovery funding, as in 2009. Programme purpose This programme is an enabler for Strategic Aim 1 of the International Federation s 2020 strategy that is Save lives, protect livelihoods, and prepare for and recover from disasters and crises and more specifically supporting enabling action 1: Build strong National Red Cross Red Crescent Societies and enabling action 3: Function effectively as the International Federation The programme budget is CHF 7.2m (USD 7.0m or EUR 4.7m). Component 1: Aligning the Delivery of Mandatory Services to NS through the Updated Zonal Structure Outcome: The realignment of the Logistics structure and resources to deliver mandatory services to NS through the Zones enhanced logistics structure. Activity 1: Define Logistics provided membership logistics services and ensure all users are aware Activity 2: Ensure each Zone has logistics resources to deliver the membership services to the NS Activity 3: Maintain norms and standards to promote and support high quality NS logistics services Component 2: Global Provision of Cost Effective Value Adding Services to NS on a Cost Recovery Basis Outcome: NS have increase their capacity through access, as needed, to commercially competitive cost effective and measurable logistics services, without the burden of capital investment and ongoing cost of building and maintaining a full time structure and resources. 4

Activity 1: Define likely NS demand for value adding logistics services Activity 2: Augment Logistics network using increased infrastructure and existing NS capacities Activity 3: Through a feasibility study consolidate and map available NS capacities and optimize its use and access to it. Activity 4: Increase NS logistics capacity by providing access to services at less than commercial cost Activity 5: Reduce Investment requirement for NS to deliver logistics services Activity 6: Develop a global network of stocks, resources and personnel to meet demand Component 3: Provision of Cost Effective Value Adding Services to External Agencies on a Cost Recovery Basis Outcome: Logistics will meet the donor requirements of increased efficiency in logistics services through cooperation and coordination by offering measurable logistics service delivery to external agencies. This will in turn become income generating (non-profitable) and so support the sustainability of Logistics service provision as a whole. Activity 1: Define logistics services for external actors and likely demand Activity 2: Provide logistics services to external actors through HPC at less than commercial cost Activity 3: Ensure cost effective services provided to other humanitarian responders Activity 4: Increased logistics service volumes ensures Logistics is self sustaining Activity 5: Ensure Logistics department is identified as significant logistics service provider in humanitarian arena b) Potential risks and challenges There are a number of risks and advantages associated with this programme. The advantages are: (i) The approach has a net increase for NS capacity to deliver assistance in line with Strategy 2020 objectives, without having to find unrealistic amounts of capital to invest in national structure. (ii) In an environment where donors are increasingly funding consolidated supply chains, and encouraging agencies to use service providers, the International Federation will retain control of its own supply chain, maintaining performance and avoiding neutrality issues. (iii) The International Federation will maintain its surge capacity if NS logistics capacity is overwhelmed. There are, of course associated risks. These are largely a threat to the objectives described in Strategy 2020. These are (i) Perceived potential to affect the NS capacity building by maintaining a strong Logistics department. (ii) Delivery to external agencies could affect the International Federation s neutrality. (iii) Perceived increase in the International Federation s financial exposure through increased volumes. The following actions should be taken to mitigate the risks: (i) the network and scale of value added services will be increased, including linking NS logistics resources, for improved global access, increasing NS capacity (ii) the services provided to external agencies will be carefully regulated and managed, (iii) the cost recovery from the increased volumes will in fact reduce the financial risk, making the service self sustaining. This course of action reduces the risks associated with simply increasing NS capacity to a negligible level. Role of the secretariat a) Technical programme support 5

The programme will be led and planned centrally by the Logistics team in Geneva, in conjunction with the RLU s. The existing Regional Logistics Units will be engaged along with Zones to plan and implement actions that result in relevant structures, processes and resources to support each zone and the agreed levels of activities and services. b) Partnership development and coordination As outlined in the priorities and current work with partners section, there is ongoing work with NS, Donors, and other agencies to help identify the type and scale of services that will be delivered. This will incorporate the ongoing initiatives such as service agreements with NS, work with donors and ECHO, discussions and cooperation with the Logistics Cluster and studies with academic research institutions. Logistics will seek to utilise assets and resources owned by these partners which will be considered in defining and implementing the optimal supply network. c) Representation and advocacy The Logistics main avenue for advocacy will continue to be through its work on minimum standards for relief items, largely via the standard items catalogue, and the provision of appropriate items in emergency relief through a proactive approach on communicating and managing resource mobilisation needs. In addition, the secretariat s funding relations will be strengthened to support National Societies through improved funding relations with donors who support this integrated supply chain approach. The secretariat will also profile the International Federation s concerns on improving the amount of untied aid with donor governments. Promoting gender equity and diversity The rationale for integrating a gender perspective in the activities of the International Federation lies in the Red Cross and Red Crescent mandate - to prevent and alleviate human suffering without discrimination. The International Federation's focus is on gender, rather than women. Gender equality ensures that there is no sex-based discrimination in the allocation of resources or benefits or in access to services. The goal of the International Federation is to ensure that all Red Cross and Red Crescent programmes are non-discriminatory and benefit men and women equally, according to their needs and with the equal participation of men and women at all levels within the National Societies and the International Federation's secretariat. Recognizing that often in disasters it is women, children and minority groups that are most severely affected, all programme guidance will ensure that gender is incorporated as part of the analysis of the disaster impact, the assessment and the subsequent programming. The individual plans of each sector elaborate on the specific gender-related actions in their respective areas. The International Federation will continue to ensure compliance with agreed standards and guidelines on gender and will prioritise consideration of gender and diversity as key components in any new guidelines and best practice frameworks. Quality, accountability and learning The secretariat is committed to compliance with the Federation-wide performance and accountability framework and to deliver on its accountability principles, which include explicit standard setting, open monitoring and reporting, transparent information sharing, meaningful beneficiary participation, effective and efficient use of resources, and systems for learning and responding to concerns and complaints. These will all be used to improve programme quality, performance and learning. The International Federation will use various tools such as systematic evaluation, peer review and objective lesson learning exercises to ensure the quality of secretariat services according to globally accepted DM standards and to assess the impact of those activities on the lives of disaster affected populations. The Federation-wide reporting system is another element which will aim to reliably monitor and report on key data from National Societies to show the performance and improve the accountability of the International Federation. Specific activities will also be subject to their own review and structured feedback mechanisms, or to independent reviews or evaluations when required. National Societies are 6

highlighting the lessons learned from their work in reports and incorporating learning into their planning, training and capacity building. Our actions are guided at all times by our Fundamental Principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity and universality. The International Federation also works according to our Code of Conduct, agreed with eight major disaster response agencies in 1994 and used to monitor behavior and standards in relief delivery. The International Federation also adheres to the disaster relief Sphere Standards, which also identifies minimum standards in disaster assistance in the five key sectors of water supply and sanitation, nutrition, food aid, shelter and health services. The International Federation is supporting the revision of the Sphere Standards to develop improved mechanisms to ensure good practice and accountability in the delivery of assistance. The Code of Conduct and the Sphere Standards hosted programme will be managed by the Disaster Services Department. The secretariat also promotes the use of the Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to cover the costs of monitoring and evaluating DREF funded relief operations and to measure beneficiary satisfaction. How we work The International Federation s activities are aligned with its Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to meet the International Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Contact information Global Agenda Goals: Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote respect for diversity and human dignity. For further information specifically related to this plan, please contact: In the International Federation secretariat: Birgitte Stalder-Olsen, Head, Logistics & Resource Mobilization department; email: Birgitte.olsen@ifrc.org; Tel: +41 22 730 4245; Fax: +41 22 730 4906. 7