Power Capacitors Ltd. Supported Technical Documentation. The Effect of PFC on Losses and CO2 Emissions

Similar documents
Carbon Footprint Report

Design Guide. Managing Peak Energy Demand In Live Performance Venues

NERA Analysis of Energy Supplier Margins

Domestic energy bills and costs of implementing environmental measures

US Natural Gas Statistics

UNDERSTANDING YOUR UTILITY BILL A GUIDE FOR BUSINESSES IN INDIANA

Energy consumption forecasts

Electricity Terminology. Simplifying energy management

How To Use Crc

Understanding Power Factor and How it Affects Your Electric Bill. Presented by Scott Peele PE

Electricity North West Carbon Footprint Report

UTILITY RATE STRUCTURE

Reporting criteria for selected key performance indicators in the 2014 Responsible Business Report

Greenhouse Gas Implications of HVAC Upgrades in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings

SA Power Networks Network Tariffs - Residential APPLIES TO USAGE FROM 1 JULY 2015

Conservation Voltage Reduction (CVR)

UNDERSTANDING ENERGY BILLS & TARRIFS

TARIFF AND GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT

RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS

Greenhouse gas emissions in Winchester District: Part IV Estimates and trends ( )

Committee on the Northern Territory s Energy Future. Electricity Pricing Options. Submission from Power and Water Corporation

Fixed + Protect Electricity supply contracts explained for large business customers

Gas terminology for business. Gas Terminology. Simplifying energy management.

Fixed + Protect Electricity supply contracts explained for large business customers

Carbon Path to Alan Aldridge Executive Director Energy Services and Technology Association

Fixed + Reflective Electricity supply contracts explained for large business customers

factor max Delivering Electrical Efficiency INFORMATION PACK factor max

INTRODUCTION Tariff Objective Factors

BGE/BG/FVTT/1010. Business Natural Gas Tariff guide October 2011

Fuel cell microchp: Greener and cheaper energy for all

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK ANNUAL ENERGY REPORT

City Light Rates 101. Communications & Public Affairs.

Effectively Harnessing Data Analytics to Maximize Utility and Customer Benefit

Statement of Charges for Use of Energetics Electricity Ltd s Distribution System

Energy Tutorial: Energy Usage. Reading meters and understanding fuel bills

HOUSEHOLD SMART METERS DEVELOPING A DEMAND-SIDE

Monitoring your Energy Bills in Your Business

Power factor correction. An introduction to technology and techniques

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Electricity No. 4 North Carolina Fourth Revised Leaf No. 78 Superseding North Carolina Third Revised Leaf No.

Prudential plc. Basis of Reporting: GHG emissions data and other environmental metrics.

SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE

Energy Price Fact Sheet

Michael Colijn Project Development & Strategic Advice Energy Economics Environment

DATA CENTRE DESIGN AND

THE TRADABLE VALUE OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION

Fixed + Peace of Mind Electricity supply contracts explained for large business customers

SMARTGRID Roadmap 1.

Technical Paper E1 (a) Energy Consumption in Cornwall. Cornwall Council January N.B. This is a live document that will be updated.

STANDARD ELECTRIC PRICE PLANS SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT. Corporate Pricing

4. Comparison with DECC (2014) Estimated impacts of energy and climate change policies on energy prices and bills

Germany's renewable energy sector in the context of energy transition.

SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE

Business Energy Efficiency. Webinar August 29, 2012

Standard Electricity Prices and Charges*

Tariff Category (1 June 2011) (1 January 2014)

WP1 Task 1 The Drivers of Electricity Demand and Supply

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui

Energy Benchmarking City of New Westminster: Corporate Facilities

Six steps to an Energy Efficient Business

Electricity prices explained

SP Energy Networks Business Plan

A Gazprom A Energy Gazprom whitepaper Energy Guide. Energy. What are you paying for?

El Paso Electric Company

110. PROFILE ON PRODUCTION OF GLASS BOTTLES AND TUMBLERS

Level 1 Energy Audit Report. For: Gladstone Regional Council

M2M The measure of efficiency

Understanding what is happening to electricity demand

Non Domestic energy consumption 2013 Kent Local Authorities (Previously Industrial & Commercial energy use)

STANDARD ELECTRICITY PRICES AND CHARGES *

Standard Electricity Prices and Charges *

Four of the twelve Kent districts (Dartford, Gravesham, Shepway and Thanet were below the National average (4,099 kwh) for electricity

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-33 EXPERIMENTAL PRICE PLAN FOR SUPER PEAK TIME-OF-USE GENERAL SERVICE

2011 Business Carbon Footprint (BCF) Report Commentary & Methodology

How could big smart grid and smart metering data reduce our energy bills?

Category 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2

South African Distribution Code

Electricity Supply. Monthly Energy Output by Fuel Type (MWh)

Tariff Development II: REVIEW of Basic Allocation and Rate Design Principles

Energy efficiency improvement and environmental protection have ranked first priorities in utility policies, in developed and developing countries.

Smart Storage and Control Electric Water Heaters. Greg Flege, Supervisor, Load Management Midwest Rural Energy Conference March 3, 2011

Metering for today s systems

Managing Rising Energy Costs for Seniors in the ACT

STATEMENT OF CHARGES FOR USE OF SP MANWEB s ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-26 STANDARD PRICE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL TIME-OF-USE SERVICE

Overview 3 Electricity price increases 4 Capital and operating expenditure 6 Demand side management 7 Issues with sales/demand forecasts 8

e-factsheet Feed-in Tariffs what we have to offer

Power Factor The Basics

ELENA Application Form

CITIPOWER PTY S 2015 PRICING PROPOSAL. CitiPower Pty Pricing Proposal

Understanding Power Flow and Naming Conventions In Bi-directional Metering Applications

Corporate Procurement of the Council s Electricity and Gas Supplies

2012 Guidelines to Defra / DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting

3. Onshore Gas Distribution Gas Compressors

red zone management white paper Making the most of Distribution Use of System (DUoS) Charges

Half the cost Half the carbon

ENERGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Electricity Market Review : Electricity Tariff

Comparison of Electricity Supply and Tariff Rates in South Asian Countries

Micro cogeneration. Affordable, efficient and innovative

Germany's energy transition: Status quo and Challenges.

How To Get Energy Efficiency Certificates In Australia

Transcription:

Power Capacitors Ltd Supported Technical Documentation The Effect of PFC on Losses and CO2 Emissions

As a result of various market activities, driving forces and technical considerations in Industry over a number of years, there is a quantity of existing Power Factor Correction (PFC) equipment installed and operational across the UK. This existing PFC equipment is providing significant benefit to the UK Transmission and Distribution network, as: - the power factor is being improved from its natural, uncorrected level of 0.887 to a higher level of 0.941 - the Transmission and Distribution systems are being off-loaded by approx. 6% - losses in the Transmission and Distribution networks are being reduced by some 2,269GWh per annum - CO 2 emissions are being reduced by some 1.24 million tonnes per annum - A reduction in CO 2 emissions for the whole of the Electrical System in the UK of 0.6% of all power generated is being achieved With the appropriate incentives in place to further promote the uptake of PFC equipment by raising the nominal target power factor from 0.95 to 0.97, additional benefits would be achieved, as: - the power factor would be further improved from its present level of 0.941 to 0.982 - the Transmission and Distribution systems would be off-loaded by approx. 10% - a further reduction in system losses of 1,479GWh would be achieved - a further reduction in CO 2 emissions of 0.81 million tonnes would be achieved - a total reduction in system losses of 3,748GWh would be achieved - a total reduction in CO 2 emissions of 2.04 million tonnes would be achieved - the reduction in CO 2 emissions for the whole of the Electrical System in the UK attributable to PFC equipment would be 1.0% of all power generated The effect of each kvar of PFC equipment presently installed on the UK Electrical System is - a reduction in network losses of 267kWh per annum - a reduction in CO 2 emissions of 146kg (1) per annum Without the appropriate incentives, the installation of PFC equipment will continue to decline, resulting in an increase in system losses and CO 2 emissions of over 1.8million tonnes per annum. In light of the projected increase in demand for Electricity in the coming years, these benefits should be viewed as conservative estimates of the total benefits available in the future. To implement this positive change would be very straightforward, as - the mechanisms are already in place ( half-hourly tariffs ) - the existing PFC industry in the UK has the capacity to support the increase in demand PAGE 1 OF 4

Notes (1) This figure supersedes previous, less well documented, figures published by the BCMA. Calculation The procedure by which these results are obtained (with data as published for 2009) is: 1a by sector values of natural or un-corrected power factors agreed by the BCMA, based on over a collective century of practical industry experience and testing. 1b figures taken from the DUKES report for 2009, 311-DUKES-2010-Ch5, indicating the by sector consumption of electricity. Results: the uncorrected power factor for the whole system is 0.887 the existing power factor for the whole system is 0.942 the improved power factor for the whole system (with the target raised from 0.95 to 0.97) would be 0.982. see table 1 below table 1 DUKES 2009 energy consumption by sector and BCMA estimates of natural and 'existing corrected' power factors from DUKES report BCMA estimate and subsequent calculation Natural Power Corrected Power Target Power natural natural corrected corrected existing Sector %age GWh Factor Factor Factor GVAh GVArh GVAh GVArh GVArh(C) target GVAh target GVArh additional target GVARh(C) Industry 26.00% 98079 0.800 0.910 0.970 122599 73559 107779 44686 28873 101112 24581 20105 Domestic 32.00% 122543 1.000 1.000 1.000 122543 0 122543 0 0 122543 0 0 Transport 2.00% 8764 0.950 0.950 0.970 9225 2881 9225 2881 0 9035 2196 684 Public Admin. 5.00% 19073 0.900 0.970 0.970 21192 9237 19663 4780 4457 19663 4780 0 Commercial 19.00% 70191 0.870 0.900 0.970 80679 39779 77990 33995 5784 72362 17592 16404 Agriculture 1.00% 3766 0.850 0.850 0.970 4431 2334 4431 2334 0 3882 944 1390 Energy Ind. 8.00% 29386 0.750 0.870 0.970 39181 25916 33777 16654 9262 30295 7365 9289 0 0 losses 7.00% 26912 1.000 1.000 1.000 26912 0 26912 0 0 26912 0 0 0 0 Total 100.00% 378714 0.887 0.941 0.982 426762 153706 402320 105330 48377 385804 57458 47872 2 Figures taken from the National Grid Seven Year Statement 2009 Results: the average of winter and summer power factors for the whole system is 0.942 (agreeing closely with (1) above) 3 Calculation of the existing reactive power consumption and apparent power consumption, enabling the reactive power being supplied by existing PFC equipment to be calculated. Similarly, calculation of the apparent and reactive power consumption for the improved power factor condition proposed, enabling the additional reactive power required to be calculated. PAGE 2 OF 4

Results: existing PFC equipment is providing 48,377GVArh per annum An additional 47,872GVArh is required to achieve the proposed improved power factor 4 From 311-DUKES-2010-CH5 5.8 and 5.13, the total losses in the system for 2009 were 26,912GWh, of which 22% occurred in the Transmission network, 74% occurred in the Distribution network, and 4% were attributed to unmetered supplies, theft and fraud. From the Ofgem Distribution Losses Consultation 2003, approx. 70% of system losses are current dependant and 30% are fixed. Consequently, (70% x 74%) + (70% x 22%) = 67.2% of the total losses are current dependant. Of the whole 26,912GWh of losses, those which are dependant on the current in the network which may be addressed by PFC equipment are 67.2% of the whole, or some 18,085GWh. 5 Consideration of the Reduction in losses and emissions due to existing PFC equipment. System losses which are current dependant vary as the square of the current. The current in the system varies as the inverse of the power factor. On a change in the power factor from PF1 to PF2, for an otherwise constant load, the current will increase by the ratio PF1/PF2. If the change is the result of an increase in power factor, this will result in a decrease in current. The losses in the system will change by the ratio (PF1/PF2) 2 With current dependant losses of 18,085GWh, PF1=0.887 and PF2=0.941, then uncorrected losses x (0.887/0.941) 2 = 18,085GWh i.e. uncorrected losses = (0.941/0.887) 2 x 18,085 = 20,354GWh i.e. the existing PFC equipment is achieving a reduction in system losses of 20,354-18,085 = 2,269GWh At the equivalence of 0.54522kg CO 2 per kwh, this corresponds to an existing reduction of 1.24 million tonnes or 11.1%. 6 Further reduction in losses due to a further improved power factor As in (5), with existing current dependant losses of 18,085GWh, PF1=0.941 and PF2=0.982, the losses with improved power factor would be: improved losses = 18,085 x (0.941/0.982) 2 = 16,606GWh A further reduction of 18,085 16,606 = 1,479GWh or 0.81 million tonnes of CO 2. PAGE 3 OF 4

The combined reduction of both the existing and proposed PFC equipment would be reductions of 3,748GWh and 2.04 million tonnes of CO 2. 7 if the PFC equipment is operational for an average of 5,694 hours a year (a load factor of 65%, typically associated with a 2 shift plus overtime working pattern), then a total of 48,377GVArh/5694 = 8.5GVAr of PFC equipment is already operational. A further 47,872GVArh/5694 = 8.4GVAr of PFC equipment would be required to achieve the improved power factor. Associating the existing reduction in losses of 2,269GWh with the existing 8.5GVAr suggests a reduction in losses of 267kWh per kvar per annum, a reduction in CO 2 emissions of 146kg/kVAr. Associating the improved power factor additional reduction in losses of 1,479GWh with the 8.4GVAr required suggests a reduction in losses of 176kWh per kvar per annum, a reduction in CO 2 emissions of 96kg/kVAr. Associating the total reduction in losses of 3,748GWh with the total 16.9GVAr suggests a reduction in losses of 222kWh per kvar per annum, a reduction in CO 2 emissions of 121kg/kVAr. Refinements The accuracy of this calculation could be improved by including consideration of: - the losses occurring within the PFC equipment - the reduction in losses achievable within a consumers network which are identified by the metering system as consumption rather than losses Previous studies by B. Oliver show that the reduction in losses within a local network is approx. 50% greater than the losses within the PFC equipment itself, suggesting that the figures proposed in this document for loss reduction and CO 2 abatement are conservative estimates. T. Brown B.Sc. B.Eng. M.I.E.T. August 2011 Based on previous work by B. Oliver F.I.E.T PAGE 4 OF 4

Power Capacitors Ltd. 30 Redfern Road Tyseley Birmingham B11 2BH T 0121-708-4511 F 0121-765-4054 sales@powercapacitors.co.uk www.powercapacitors.co.uk