MuCell Proven lightweighting technology for automotive applications

Similar documents
Foam Injection Molding:

Lightweighting Custom enewsletter

Gas Assist and Microcellular (MuCell ) ) Molding Process. Vishu Shah Consultek

Facts About. Industrial gases for better injection molding. This article appeared in the trade journal Kunststoffe plast europe, issue 12/2004.

Foaming with CellForm For lightweight and cost-effective parts

AN OVERVIEW OF GAS ASSIST

Solid shape molding is not desired in injection molding due to following reasons.

INJECTION MOLDING PROCESSING GUIDE Polymer

Gas-Assist Injection Molding: An Innovative Medical Technology

What is a mold? Casting. Die casting. Injection Molding Machine. Injection Molding Design & Manufacturing II. Spring 2004

Two-Shot Silico e Thermoplastic Medical Molding

Injection Molding. Materials. Plastics Outline. Polymer. Equipment and process steps. Considerations for process parameters

A Guide to Thermoform Processing of Polypropylene. Introduction

Effects of the MuCell Molding Process

Accurate Simulation Results on MuCell Technology Enables Adoption of Moldex3D Solution

Why Plastic Flows Better in Aluminum Injection Molds

PLASTIC/METAL HYBRID TECHNOLOGY. Innovative Design Solutions for Structural Performance with Weight and Cost Reduction

August 2007 Rapid Prototyping Consortium. Changing the way plastics parts and molds are analyzed and optimized

3D Printed Injection Molding Tool ("PIMT") Guide. Objet Ltd.

INNOVATIVE PLASTICS HIGH & LOW SHEAR RATE RHEOLOGY

Verification Experiment on Cooling and Deformation Effects of Automatically Designed Cooling Channels for Block Laminated Molds

DESIGN IMAGINEERING DESIGNING YOUR PLASTIC PART KEY DEFINITIONS DESIGNING YOUR PLASTIC PART KEY DEFINITIONS IDEAL CONDITIONS IN PART DESIGN

the premium valve gate hot runner solution

Troubleshooting Guide. PS Injection moulding. Splay marks. Burning (Black streaks) Cool feed zone. Dry material, check source of moisture.

INJECTION MOULD DESIGN: MARPLEX PVC RESINS

medical application products

How t o to do do E ffective Effective Color Changes Changes

RRIM DESIGN MANUAL ADDENDUM FOR EXTERIOR BODY PANELS

PVC in automotive. Examining the trends and drivers behind the growth of PVC for dashboard applications

Gas-Injection Moulding with DuPont engineering polymers

Plastic Injection Molding

PROCESSING OF VARIOUS MATERIALS

CHAPTER 2 INJECTION MOULDING PROCESS

Part and tooling design. Eastman Tritan copolyester

Polyolefin Heat Shrink Tubing for Tight-Tolerance Medical Applications

Reaction Injection Molding (RIM)

DIESEL EFFECT PROBLEM SOLVING DURING INJECTION MOULDING

Wear Resistant Thermoplastic Compounds

INJECTION MOLDING COOLING TIME REDUCTION AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSIS

Back Molding Technology. Decorated parts in one process step

High performance thermoforming materials from Penn Fibre Plastics, Inc

Injection molding equipment

Investigation of process parameters for an Injection molding component for warpage and Shrinkage

NAN YA NYLON 66 Engineering Plastics. Flame Retardant.High Toughness.Heat Resistant. Impact Resistant.Moldability.Low Warpage

INNOVATIVE PLASTICS ULTRASONIC WELDING

ROHACELL Triple F. Complex shaped PMI Foam Cores for highly efficient FRP Composite

TWIN-SCREW COROTATING EXTRUDER A FLEXIBLE SOLUTION FOR ADVANCED RECYCLING

Physical Dry Conditioned Unit Test method

Fundamentals of Design for Plastic Injection Molding. Kelly Bramble

EXTERIOR LONG GLASS FIBER POLYPROPYLENE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS. Abstract

Welding of Plastics. Amit Mukund Joshi. (B.E Mechanical, A.M.I.Prod.E)

ADVANCED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS SERVICE NUMBER

INFUSE Olefin Block Copolymers Injection Molding Processing Guide

PRECISION PROTOTYPING THE ROLE OF 3D PRINTED MOLDS IN THE INJECTION MOLDING INDUSTRY

CHEMICAL FOAM EXTRUSION PROCESSING GUIDE

INJECTION MOLDING FRACTIONAL MELT INDEX, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE MATERIALS

NetShape - MIM. Metal Injection Molding Design Guide. NetShape Technologies - MIM Phone: Solon Road FAX:

Metal Injection Molding (MIM) of components made of Titanium and its alloys

Understanding Plastics Engineering Calculations

Characterization of Polymers Using TGA

Machine nozzle with needle shut-off type HP pneumatically or hydraulically controlled

Effect of Sterilization Techniques on Polymers

Determining the Right Molding Process for Part Design

THREE-DIMENSIONAL INSERT MOLDING SIMULATION IN INJECTION MOLDING

Amodel AS-1133 HS. polyphthalamide. Technical Data Sheet

DUPONT PERFORMANCE POLYMERS Joint Design: A Critical Factor in Strong Bonds GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR ULTRASONIC, VIBRATION AND SPIN WELDING

Contact Hueson Corporation for additional information or details Sutton Street Northbridge, MA

MIT Manufacturing Processes and Systems. Homework 6 Solutions. Casting. October 15, Figure 1: Casting defects

How to reduce the cure time without damaging the rubber compound during injection molding?

Craft and Design Application of Injection Moulding (Mobile Phone)

Quick Guide to Injection Molding

Glossary of Terms Used in Plastic Injection Mold Manufacturing

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET GRILON BG-15 S

Measurement of Residual Stress in Plastics

1. Injection Molding (Thermoplastics)

* Corresponding author:

STENCA PIPE. High quality pipe insulation.

Novel biobased thermoplastic foams

Kursus i Produktions- og materialeteknologi

Prefabricated building PVC vertical sliding window

Increased flexibility and greater cost-efficiency in profile extrusion 32D twin-screw extruders profile series. Engineering Value

Design for Manufacturability Rapid Prototyping Mold Making Production Injection Molding

Influence of material data on injection moulding simulation Application examples Ass.Prof. Dr. Thomas Lucyshyn

Rapid Prototyping Technologies. May, 2016

MICRO PLASTICS MOLDED NYLON 6/6 FASTENERS MECHANICAL TEST DATA - UNC - UNF SECTION

NYLON 6 RESINS CORRECTING MOLDING PROBLEMS A TROUBLE SHOOTING GUIDE

SOLUTIONS FOR MOLD DESIGNERS

Naue GmbH&Co.KG. Quality Control and. Quality Assurance. Manual. For Geomembranes

High-Performance Polymers for. Automotive E/E Systems SPECIALTY

Philosophy of Troubleshooting Injection Molding Problems

Factsheet. UP Resins

Sample Feasibility Study XYZ Company Widget Part Design

Jetfine talcs for high performance polypropylene and engineering thermoplastics

3M Products for Solar Energy. Designed for efficiency. Built to last.

Nylon 612: Viable Alternative Tubing Constructions in Fuel Systems

A Look at Accelerated Photostability Testing for Packaged Food and Drinks

Machine needle shut-off nozzle type-a

A Systematic Approach to Diagnosing Mold Filling and Part Quality Variations

Product Information. Tel: x2426 or x2443 Fax:

Technical Brief. Thermoforming Processes. Vacuum Forming and Methods

Transcription:

MuCell Proven lightweighting technology for automotive applications

MuCell Molding Technology The most significant plastic processing innovation in the last 20 years The MuCell microcellular foam injection molding process for thermoplastics materials provides unique design flexibility and cost savings opportunities not found in conventional injection molding. The MuCell process allows for plastic part design with material wall thickness optimized for functionality and not for the injection molding process. The combination of density reduction and design for functionality often results in material and weight savings of more than 20%. By replacing the pack & hold phase with cell growth, lower stress parts are produced which have enhanced dimensional stability and substantially reduce warpage. Cell growth also results in the elimination of sink marks. Unlike chemical foaming agents, the physical MuCell process has no tempertature limitation and does not leave any chemical residue in the polymer; making consumer products perfectly suitable for recycling within the original polymer classification and allowing re-grind material to reenter the process flow. The numerous cost and processing advantages have led to rapid global deployment of the MuCell process in automotive, consumer electronics, medical device, packaging and consumer goods applications. Lightweighting 8-12% material density reduction 20-30% total part weight reduction by designing for MuCell Reduced Costs Reduced resin consumption Faster molding cycle time Increased yields Smaller molding machine Use of lower cost filled polyolefin material Sustainability Reduced petroleum based material consumption Reduced molding machine energy consumption Ability to re-grind / re-use molded parts Reduced carbon footprint versus solid molding Design Freedom Thin to thick wall flow 1:1 wall thickness rib structure Material where needed for function versus flow Improved dimensional stability Less warpage

FOUR TECHNOLOGY STEPS 1 2 4 3 1 During plasticization, precisely metered amounts of supercritical fluid (SCF), typically Nitrogen or CO2, are introduced into the polymer through injectors mounted on the plasticizing barrel. 2 Homogeneous mixing and disbursing of the supercritical fluid into the polymer through the specially designed mixing section of the plasticizing barrel, creates a single phase solution of SCF and molten polymer. 3 Injection of polymer into mold cavities. Cells start to nucleate once exposed to lower pressure in the mold cavity. Molecular dispersion of SCF provides for a homogeneous closed cell structure with a solid skin layer. 4 Low pressure filling of mold cavities. Pack & hold phase is replaced by controlled cell growth, which ceases once the mold cavity is filled. Cell growth results in a uniform pack pressure throughout the mold cavity. MuCell / Polymer Value Match Good Value Great Value HDPE Acrylic HDPE Glass PVC HIPS PVC PP Glass TPE HIPS TPE PPO Blends ABS PA6/6.6 Unfilled ABS PSU TPV GPPS TPV PIE PP Unfilled POM PP Unfilled PA6/6.6 Glass TPO TPO PBT Glass Virtually all polymers will develop a cellular structure with the MuCell process except for LCP. Filled materials tend to offer the greatest value as fillers act synergistically with the supercritical fluid to provide the best combination of weight reduction and cycle time reduction. Unfilled amorphous materials also foam very well and can provide good weight reductions but with less cycle time benefits than filled materials. High temperature materials such as PEEK, PEI and PSU also provide significant cost reduction based on material price.

The MuCell Application Advantage: The freedom to design for functionality and not for plastic process limitations By replacing the tradition pack & hold phase of the solid molding process with cell growth, the MuCell process allows for uniform and locally applied pack pressure through cell growth. This allows part design to be optimized with material thickness in those areas that require strength and reduced wall thickness in areas that are not structural. Gate locations are then placed in the thin cross sections for optimized filling patterns while allowing the cell growth to provide packing in the thicker cross sections at the end of fill. Using the same principle, nominal wall thickness can be reduced while using thicker ribs to meet structural requirements. The cell expansion will eliminate sink marks and the cell structure will prevent the formation of vacuum (shrink) voids. Rib to wall thickness ratios of 1:1 can be used with the MuCell process. Differences in Wall Thicknesses Filling from thin to thick Recommended injection with MuCell Injection in solid (with MuCell still possible) A part molded with the MuCell process has a solid skin layer and microcellular foamed core which is a closed cell structure. The cell growth is more effective at packing the part than the solid pack phase which allows for increased rib to nominal wall thickness without sink marks. In most cases, it is possible to produce a sink free part with a rib thickness equal to the nominal wall thickness. Wall to rib ratio 1:1 possible Conventional Design MuCell Design TYPICAL CYCLE TIME REDUCTION WITH MUCELL Solid Molding Total 30 Seconds 3 sec 4 sec 17 sec Total 22 Seconds Injection Pack & Hold MuCell 1.5 0.5 14 sec 6 sec Cooling Motions sec sec

MuCell Molding Technology The complete process solution providing for lighter and more accurate plastic parts at lower production costs Climate Control Bezel Material: Glass filled ABS Elimination of sink marks 1:1 ribs to nominal wall Machine clamping force reduced from 250 tons to 75 tons 23% cycle time reduction 10% weight reduction Airbag Cover Material: TPO Uniform shrinkage across different wall thicknesses, enhanced dimensional stability Elimination of readthrough on the tear seam Improved living hinge functionality down to temperatures of minus 30 C Weight / material savings of 9% Engine Cover Material: Appearance Grade GF PA6 7% weight reduction Improved flatness Black sections molded in color Mirror Assembly Case Frame Material: 50% GF PBT 10% cycle time reduction (5 seconds) 10% (84 Gram) weight reduction Reduction of warpage Machine clamping force reduced from 650 tons to 420 tons Cam Cover Material: Glass Filled PA Machine clamping force reduced from 500 tons to 350 tons Improved cycle times (allows for simultaneous production and assembly process) Lighter part and improved flatness Maintain solid surface apprearance

AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS HVAC System Material: 20% talc filled PP 9-12% weight reduction 10-15% cycle time reduction Flatter parts and better fit Improved long term reliability and better sealing Front Lamp Housing Material: PP GF10 T20 9% weight reduction Machine clamping force reduced by 50% Improved screw boss behaviors by elimination of voids (as compared to conventional molding) Improved material flow and easier cavity filling Instrument Panel Material: LGF PP 8% weight savings 20% cycle time reduction Machine clamping force reduced by 42% Significantly reduced warpage Fan Shroud Material: PA 66 Glass filled, PP Glass filled Weight / material reduction of 11% Cycle time reduction of 30% Machine clamping force reduced by 50% 200% improvement in fatigue resistance Cpk values improved >50% Door Module Material: Glass filled PP Expansion molded for increased stiffness Selective expansion from 2 mm to 3 mm 40% weight reduction

IMPLEMENTING THE MUCELL PROCESS The MuCell capable injection molding machine consists of Nitrogen or CO2 supply, a SCF metering and control system, and a specialized plasticizing unit including positive screw control and a shut off nozzle. Front non-return valve Back non-return valve Shut off nozzle SCF injector SCF metering system The technology can be easily integrated into new (OEM Model) or existing (MMU Model) molding machines: MODULAR MUCELL UPGRADE (MMU) OEM SYSTEM Field retrofit of existing injection molding machines by qualified Trexel technicians. The upgrade consists of a new, MuCell capable plasticizing unit, positive screw position control, installation and training. For new injection molding machine applications, the following licensed Trexel OEM partners can provide a turnkey MuCell injection molding system.

About Trexel The exclusive provider of the MuCell Microcellular Foam Injection Molding Technology As a leader in providing lightweighting solutions to the plastics injection molding industry, Trexel, Inc. has extended its MuCell processing solution to blow molded automotive components. There are several highly desirable attributes of foamed versus solid blow molded parts: Weight savings The microcellular material structure improves thermal insulation and acoustical properties The MuCell technology, a physical foaming process, also has several advantages over the use of chemical foaming agents: No chemical reaction at narrow processing window No chemical additive residue in final parts MuCell foamed parts can be recycled in their original polymer designation; the process does not alter the chemistry of the polymer The MuCell Microcellular foaming technology was originally conceptualized and invented at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and in 1995 Trexel was granted an exclusive worldwide license for the further development and commercialization of the technology. Today, Trexel is the exclusive provider of the MuCell microcellular foam technology for injection molding and maintains an extensive global patent portfolio. Trexel provides world-class engineering support, training and other design and processing services, as well as the equipment and components integral to the MuCell process. From the global headquarters in Boston, Massachusetts, Trexel operates a state of the art plastics processing development laboratory, supporting plastics processors with the definition and implementation of leading and differentiating plastic molding technologies. In support of a global client base, Trexel operates subsidiaries in Europe, Japan and Southeast Asia with competent plastics processing engineering capabilities. Trexel s worldwide subsidiaries are augmented by a network of competent independent representatives and distributors. HEADQUARTERS SUBSIDIARIES MuCell blow molded polyethylene air duct with 41% density reduction compared to solid. TECHNICAL CENTERS Trexel, Inc. 100 Research Drive Wilmington, MA 01887 USA Tel.: 781-932-0202 www.trexel.com EUROPE CHINA JAPAN KOREA NORTH AMERICA AUSTRALIA