1
2 Massimo CORRADI Milan Airports
Malpensa Airport Railway connections: state of the art and prospects 3
SUMMARY 4 1. The framework of reference
SEA Società per azioni Esercizi Aeroportuali 5 SHAREHOLDERS 29,75% 0,88% 54,81% 14,56% City of Milan Province of Milan F2i fund Other minor shareholders
Milan and Northern Italy are the business heart of Italy and one of the richest areas in Europe Switzerland (Canton Ticino) Main indicators 120 km % on Italy 1 step High Speed Rail Florence- Bologna Others 250-300 Km TOTAL % on Italy Area (km 2 ) 49.324 16,4 7.216 19.607 76.147 25,3 TURIN MILAN VERONA VENICE Population No. of companies GDP (EUR MM) 14.025.593 1.226.306 450.364 23,4 23,1 28,8 1.960.838 182.663 66.763 6.047.104 568.799 186.505 22.033.535 1.977.768 703.632 36,7 37,2 45,0 GENOA BOLOGNA FLORENCE Work force Exports ('000 EUR) 6.170.547 137.513.223 26,4 38,3 890.050 2.668.861 9.729.458 18.902.357 61.936.311218.351.891 41,6 60,8 Imports ('000 EUR) 149.299.814 42,6 11.128.808 47.576.900208.005.522 59,4 Malpensa 120 km catchment area 250-300 Km catchment area 1 step HSR from September 2010 (1h40 BLQ, 2h20 FLR)
The framework of reference Lombardy is at the crossroad of main primary European corridors Blue banana area ( 1 ) and the Trans European Network links Key facts concerning Lombardy: third EU 27 region in terms of GDP and per capita GDP, after London and Paris, and by far the first in Italy one of the main logistics platform in Europe Corridor V London area Ile de France Rhone Alpes Catalunia "Two seas" corridor Corridor I Baden- Wurtemberg Lombardy Corridor VIII strongly involved by the development of TEN (Trans European Network) multimode links generates, together with the rest of Northern Italy, 5.2% of EU GDP 1) Blue banana is the area where European production and consumption are mostly concentrated Lisbon Kiev (Corridor V) Bari Varna (Corridor VIII) Rotterdam Genoa ("Two seas" corridor) Berlin Palermo (Corridor I) South Europe Sea "highways"
Milan Airport System: traffic volumes 2011 vs 2010 8 Pax [.MM] Movements [.000] Freight [.000, tons] +2% -2% +4% +9% +3% 18,7 19,0 190 187 433 450 8,3 9,0 91 94 +3% 19 20 2010 LIN 2011 MXP LIN MXP LIN MXP
The framework of reference 9 Air traffic scenario New models of traffic distribution between airports TRADITIONAL MODEL NEW MODEL Hub & Spoke Constant growth of LCC traffic in Europe, between point to point systems Big Point Point to Point Interline agreements between long-haul and LCC carriers VIA MILANO program Model providing coordination and integration of LCC and legacy carriers
SUMMARY 10 1. The framework of reference 2. Current scenario (What has been done)
Master plan (1985) 11
TERMINAL 1 the existing Railway Station 12
TERMINAL 1 Baggage claim hall Signage & Pictogram 13
Rail Accessibility network 14 Starting from September 2010 Malpensa is a High Speed Rail Terminal Network interconnections with Milan Suburban railway system
Service offer Milan Central - Malpensa 15 Offer details Total 51 trains MILAN CENTRAL Stops (other than MI Garibaldi e MI Bovisa) Jouney time (minutes) Trains Direction MXP Trains Direction MI All trains Only few trains MI Garibaldi MI Bovisa Saronno Rescaldina Castellanza Busto Arsizio FN Ferno-Lonate No-stop 43 7 7 Saronno, Busto A., Ferno, Rescaldina, Castellanza, Ferno-L. 52 19 18 Total service 26 25 Timetable (departures from the terminus) Trains Direction MXP Trains Direction MI First 5.25 5.43 Last 23.25 22.43 Frequency 60 30 MALPENSA MXP APT Additional trains 7 trains (9.55-16.55 except 15.55) 7 trains (9.22-16.22 except 12.22)
Service offer Milan Cadorna - Malpensa 16 Only few train MILANO CADORNA MI Bovisa Saronno Busto Arsizio FN MALPENSA MXP APT Stops Offer details Journey time (minutes) Trains Direction MXP Trains Direction MI No-stop 29 22 24 Mi Bovisa, Saronno, Busto A. 36 19 15 Total service 41 38 Replacement bus service (no stop) 50 0 1 Timetable (departures from the terminus) Trains Direction MXP Trains Direction MI First 4.28 5.26 Last 0.28 23.56 Frequency 30 30 Replacement bus service (departure) Total 80 trains N.A. 1.30
Mxp express: Milan central station 17
Quality of service: Malpensa Express new rolling stock CORADIA Technical data Train configuration 5 units Length 82,2 mt. Width 2,95 mt. N. of passengers 230 Maximum speed 160 Km/h TOTAL On-board ITALY services: 129,038,593 CCTV 100 cameras, 776,040 automatic passengers 100 announcements, Braille signs, 220V Plugs
Advertising 19 Free shuttle-bus service T1-T2
Access modes 20 Terminal 2 Terminal 1 Source: SEA Milan Airports surveys 2011
SUMMARY 21 1. The framework of reference 2. Current scenario (What has been done) 3. Future scenario (What is being done)
Mid-long term projects 22 Simplon Luino Gotthard Malpensa North Rail Access link with Gallarate- Domodossola(CH) /Luino/Varese Malpensa T1 works in progress works under design phase Junction Y Improvement Gallarate-Rho Rho-Fiera Link Milan C.le - Malpensa Mi Cadorna Mi Centrale RFI network FNM network New line
HSL Milan-Venice 23 INNSBRUCK Brennero FREJUS SEMPIONE GOTTARDO Domodossola Luino Chiasso AOSTA Novara MILANO Brescia " " Treviglio TRENTO VERONA Padova UDINE VENEZIA VILLACH Tarvisio LJUBLJIANA Gorizia " TORINO GENOVA NICE Ventimiglia " Parma La Spezia BOLOGNA FIRENZE ROMA NAPOLI Conventional network HSL operating HSL MI-VR Section Treviglio - Brescia HSL MI-VR Section Brescia - Verona Other HSL planned
SUMMARY 24 1. The framework of reference 2. Current scenario (What has been done) 3. Future scenario (What is being done) 4. Rail link T1-T2 (MXPT2LINK-UP)
Malpensa North Rail Access (The Global Project) PROJECT TIMELINE 2001 Included in the first Government Strategic Infrastructure Program of the State Lawn. 443/01, known as the Objective Law, specifically in the Multimodal Padanian Corridor Malpensa Rail Access 2003 Included in the Institutional Agreement between the Government and Lombardy Region 2004 Approved by airport operator (SEA Milan Airports) and by ENAC (Italian Civil Aviation Authority) 2005 Preliminary design submitted by RFI (the Italian Rail Network Infrastructure Manager) was approved by Lombardy Region with limitations (only Phase1 concerning the railway link Terminal 1 Terminal 2 ) and was submitted to CIPE (Economical Planning Interministerial Committee) within the Objective Law, but the CIPE approval was postponed until priority phases would be precisely defined. 2007 Phase 1 was given priority within the Infrastructure Network design for the Milan EXPO 2015 site accessibility ( Jointed Works and Needed Works ). 2008 Pre-feasibility Study conducted by FERROVIENORD (Regional rail manager) 2010 Application for the EU granting (TEN-T Call2010) promoted jointly by FERROVIENORD and SEA, as advocated by Lombardy Region, to co-financing the rail link T1-T2 (MXPT2LINK-UP) Final Design, Phase1 of the Global Project. 2011 European Commission Decision C (2011) 944
MXPT2LINK-UP 26 The Final Design of the rail link T1-T2 has been financed by the European Union within the TEN T 2010 call
Rail link T1-T2 (MXPT2LINK-UP) 27 MILAN MALPENSA AIRPORT Towards Milan, Regional and National network 35R/17L RW Station T2 Terminl 2 35L/17R Existing Rail link New Rail link Terminl 1 RW Station T1 CARGO CITY
MXPT2LINK-UP: Design overview 28
MXPT2LINK-UP: Cost estimate 29 Preliminary cost estimate, including: - Rail link (3 km), - T2 rail station - T2 multi-storey car park 140 Mio
TEN-T Call2011: Priority 4 - Support to Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and innovative financial instruments Title: PPP MXPT2LINK-UP 30 Subject: Study of possible innovative forms of financing, based on Public-Private Partnership (PPP) and on the user-pays principle Applicants: FERROVIENORD (Coordinator), Lombardy Region SEA Milan Airports Total cost: 1,05 mio Request EC support: 0,525 mio (50% total cost) Time action: start: 05/2012 end: 12/2012
SUMMARY 31 1. The framework of reference 2. Current scenario (What has been done) 3. Future scenario (What is being done) 4. Rail link T1-T2 (MXPT2LINK-UP) 5. Lesson learned
Lesson learned 32 Limits (not mistakes) to be solved MXP through RFI national network (vs. FNM regional network) MXP Express to Central Station (vs. FNM Cadorna downtown) Missing link to Terminal 2 Dedicated rolling stock (vs. start with low profile commuters trains Absolute no-stop (vs. Bovisa, Saronno, Busto intermediate stops) Mistakes High speed through MXP (vs. parallel to highway) Competion with subsidized buses Castellanza tunnel (max 2 trains/h; 5 min more for 12 years; 80 M more)
Thanks for your attention 33 Massimo Corradi TEN-T Projects Coordinator tel. +39 02 7486 3276 mob. +39 335 720 6793 e-mail: massimo.corradi@seamilano.eu The real voyage of discovery begins not in seeking New landscapes but in having new eyes. - Marcel Proust
34