School Accountability Report Card

Similar documents
Elmhurst Community Prep

River Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at

San Francisco Flex Academy

iq Academy California Los Angeles School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

California Virtual Academy at Maricopa School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

California Virtual Academy at Los Angeles School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

Kaweah High School

For South Bay High School

California Department of Education. School Accountability Report Card. Reported Using Data from the School Year. Published During

Fammatre Elementary School

Theodore Bird High School 251 S. Barretta Street Sonora, CA Grades 9-12 Mr. Roy Morlan, Principal

Yorba Middle School, Academy of the Arts School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

San Joaquin County Special Education

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory

California Department of Education. School Accountability Report Card. Reported Using Data from the School Year. Published During

Top of the World Elementary School Tree Top Lane Laguna Beach, CA (949) Grades K-5 Michael Conlon, Principal

KIPP Scholar Academy. Tiffany Moore, Principal West Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90062

Stonegate Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Richmond College Preparatory

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

County Community School

For Canyon View School

Los Angeles County Special Education

Envision Academy for Arts & Technology School

Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High

Aspire Lionel Wilson College Preparatory Academy

South Sutter Charter. Mr. Eric Schoffstall, Director El Centro Blvd. East Nicolaus, CA

Santa Clarita Valley International

Gustine Middle School

Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment Design High

Ocean Grove Charter. Eric Schoffstall, Administrator North Highway Nine Boulder Creek, CA 95006

Aspire Langston Hughes Academy

Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Brookside Elementary. William Cameron, Principal. 116 Butterfield Rd. San Anselmo, CA

Warren High School 8141 De Palma St. Downey, CA (562) Grades 9-12 Laura Rivas, Principal

San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy School

Soledad Enrichment Action Charter High

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

L.A. County High School for the Arts

School Accountability Report Card School Year

Mesa Verde Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card,

KIPP San Jose Collegiate

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at

Valencia Elementary School 541 W. 22nd Street Upland, CA / Grades TK-6 Lorrie Buehler, Principal

For Spencer Valley Elementary School

California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

K.L. Carver Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

The Guidance Charter School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Sky Mountain Charter Eric Schoffstall A o b u o t u t O u O r u r S c S h c o h o o l C n o t n a t c a t

Sacramento Charter High

Sem Yeto Continuation High School

California Virtual Kings School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC webpage at

Alliance Health Services Academy High

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC webpage at

Rocklin Elementary School 5025 Meyers St. Rocklin, CA Grades K-6 Amanda Makis, Principal

Hanna Ranch Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Shelly Baird School -1-

PA Walsh STEAM Academy School

Oak Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Mineral Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Main Street Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Warren High School 8141 De Palma St. Downey, CA (562) Grades 9-12 Laura Rivas, Principal

De Anza Senior High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Fremont Elementary School 1255 E. Market Street Salinas CA, (831) Grades K-6 John J. Jimenez, Principal

Visions In Education Charter School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card,

Bassett Senior High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Template

For Farragut Elementary School

Biggs Elementary School 300 B St. Biggs, CA (530) Grades K-8 Minden King, Principal mking@biggs.org

Central High (Continuation) School

California Connections Ripon

Kensington Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Sierra Academy of San Diego

Kings County Special Education School

Hemmerling Elementary School 1928 W. Nicolet St. Banning, CA (951) Grades K-5 Alisha Morff, Principal

North Marysville Continuation High School 1949 B St. Marysville, CA (530) Grades 9-12 Rocco Greco, Principal rgreco@mjusd.

Redwood High School Clifton Way Castro Valley, CA (510) Grades 9-12 Erica Ehmann, Principal

Jackson Academy of Music and Math (JAMM) School

Livermore Valley Charter School

School Accountability Report Card

Ball Junior High School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card,

Montgomery Elementary School 1

Mission View Public Charter School 1

School Accountability Report Card

Ralph Waldo Emerson Junior High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Westlake Elementary School 1000 High St. Santa Cruz, CA (831) Grades K-5 Clyde Curley, Principal

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at

Top of the World Elementary School Tree Top Lane Laguna Beach, CA (949) Grades K-5 Ron La Motte, Principal

Willard Middle School 2425 Stuart Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades 6-8 Robert Ithurburn, Principal

Tularcitos Elementary School

North Star Academy 400 Duane Street Redwood City, CA (650) Grades 3-8 Leslie Crane, Principal

School Accountability Report Card

Transcription:

Lake County International Charter California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year Published During 2014-15 Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

About This School Contact Information - Most Recent Year Contact Information - Most Recent Year School District School Name Lake County International Charter District Name Middletown Unified Street 15850 Armstrong St. Phone Number (707) 987-4100 City, State, Zip Middletown, Ca, 95461 Web Site www.middletownusd.org Phone Number 707-987-3063 Superintendent First Name Korby Principal Ms. Gwendolyn Maupin-Ahern, Director Superintendent Last Name Olson E-mail Address gwendolyn@lcics.org E-mail Address korby.olson@middletownusd.org Web Site http://www.lcics.org County-District- 17640550108340 School (CDS) Code Last updated: 1/12/2015 School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year) School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year) Middletown is a rural community in the southeastern corner of Lake County, seventeen miles north of Calistoga and seventeen miles south of Clearlake. Lake County International Charter School (LCICS) is a K-8 with approximately 80 students, located at 15850 Armstrong St. in Middletown, CA. The campus serves students from across Lake County. The mission of LCICS is to educate students in grades K-8 to be literate, knowledgeable, principled, local, national, and global citizens. Students will participate in an enriched and nurturing learning environment that honors the whole child intellectually, emotionally, creatively, physically, socially and culturally. LCICS students will become competent and self-motivated individuals with a commitment to life-long learning that enables them to reach their fullest potential. Last updated: 1/12/2015 Page 2 of 14

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 14 Grade 1 5 Grade 2 9 Grade 3 8 Grade 4 9 Grade 5 5 Grade 6 10 Grade 7 7 Grade 8 6 Total Enrollment 73 15.0 12.5 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 KindergartenGrade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Last updated: 1/12/2015 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 1.4 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 Asian 0.0 Filipino 0.0 Hispanic or Latino 8.2 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1.0 White 74.0 Two or More Races 14.1 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 79.0 English Learners 0.0 Students with Disabilities 0.0 14% Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or More Races 1% 8% 1% 74% Page 3 of 14

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 With Full Credential 3 4 4 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 2014-15 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Last updated: 1/12/2015 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 0 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 1.0 0.5 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions 0.0-0.5-1.0 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Last updated: 1/12/2015 Page 4 of 14

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14) Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100 0 All Schools in District 93 High-Poverty Schools in District Low-Poverty Schools in District 12 88 1 99 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Lowpoverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Last updated: 1/12/2015 Year and month in which data were collected: January 2015 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts Zaner Bloser Oxford Rigby Readers Various literature and leveled books Software: Starfall and various online programs. Yes 0.0 Mathematics Envision Chicago Khan Academy Yes 0.0 Science Variety of souces, non text-book specific Foss kits Yes 0.0 History-Social Science Various literature, media and Archival sources TCI Yes 0.0 Foreign Language 0.0 Health 0.0 Visual and Performing Arts Science Lab Eqpmt(9-12) 0.0 0.0 Last updated: 1/15/2015 Page 5 of 14

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year The main school building is divided in to three combined grade classrooms composed of our K-5 student population. Our middle school (6th-8th grades) is housed in a leased facility across from the main campus. Over the past two summers we have been able to replace our chain link fence with redwood, build and then upgrade our outdoor stage, enclose our raised bed gardens with wood fencing. We also replaced all of our windows and doors. In the coming years we look forward to replacing our kitchen equipment, adding more garden areas and upgrading our heating/cooling systems. School Facility Repair Status - Most Recent Year System Inspected Rating Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Last updated: 1/15/2015 Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer All systems work well. We are looking forward to upgrading our heating and cooling systems to be more energy efficient. Interior: Interior Surfaces Minor damage to small sections of some internal walls due to door knobs etc. Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical We are looking toward replacing current florescent light fixures with ones that are more similar to the suns natural light. Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Fair The bathroom sinks on occasion pull away fromt he wall when students lean heavily and consitently upon them. These are repaired when this occurs. Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Current equptment is good, but there is limited play equiptment. Overall Facility Rate - Most Recent Year Overall Rating Last updated: 1/15/2015 Page 6 of 14

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program); The Academic Performance Index; and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/ Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/ Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science Three-Year Comparison Students in Science Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State Subject 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 45 67 65 64 61 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Last updated: 1/15/2015 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14) Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced All Students in the LEA 61 All Students at the School 67 Male Female Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 69 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 67 English Learners Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: Science assessments include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades 5, 8, and 10. Page 7 of 14

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Last updated: 1/15/2015 Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State Subject 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 English-Language Arts 53% 64% 60% 58% 59% 61% 54% 56% 55% Mathematics 30% 55% 53% 44% 47% 48% 49% 50% 50% History-Social Science N/A N/A N/A 45% 46% 46% 48% 49% 49% Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012 13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks Three-Year Comparison Academic Performance Index Ranks Three-Year Comparison API Rank 2011 2012 2013 Statewide 3 6 5 Similar Schools Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced. Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group Three-Year Comparison Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group Three-Year Comparison Group Actual API Change 2011 Actual API Change 2012 Actual API Change 2013 All Students at the School -23 68-23 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Note: N/D means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. B means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. C means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information. Page 8 of 14

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14) Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade level Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards 5 1.0% 3.0% 0.0% 7 N/A 3.0% 4.0% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 9 of 14

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year LCICS encourages parents to be involved in their children s education. Prior to the opening of the school we hold a Parent Orientation Evening, a Back-To-School- Night, and Student Led Conferences take place at least twice per year. We also hold many school and greater community events including fundraisers such as our annual Live and Give event, and Spaghetti Feast, as well as in house gatherings including our Science Fair, Career Day and International Day celebration. In addition, parents are always encouraged to help support classroom activities and help to chaperone on our many fieldtrips. State Priority: Pupil Engagement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Engagement State Priority (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates. Page 10 of 14

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Suspensions 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.30 3.10 7.10 5.70 5.10 4.40 Expulsions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Suspensions Expulsions 8 7 6 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.25 0.20 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 5 0.15 4 3 0.10 2 0.05 1 0 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 0.00 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year LCICS safety plan is a collaboration of Charter Council, administration, teachers, support staff, Red Cross trainings and our insurance carrier. All of our teachers and most of our staff have received training in positive discipline techniques. All staff are current in First Aid and CPR. Teachers have received training in emergency preparedness and have information on site at their disposal. Emergency procedures and drills are practiced school wide on a regular basis. The Lake County Transit Company buses, which a number of our students utilize, are equipped with video camera to monitor behavior and ensure safety. Staff and Aids are on duty before school, during breaks, at lunch and after school to help ensure the student s safety. LCICS is a drug free and smoke free campus. Rules are consistently explained and enforced. Safety procedures are in place to provide a safe environment for students to learn. Page 11 of 14

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14) Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14) AYP Criteria School District Made AYP Overall N/A N/A Met Participation Rate - English-Language Arts N/A N/A Met Participation Rate - Mathematics N/A N/A Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts N/A N/A Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics N/A N/A Met Graduation Rate N/A Yes Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2012-2013 Year in Program Improvement * Year 2 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 2 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 66.7% Note: Cells with NA values do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process. Page 12 of 14

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 12.0 1 0 0 7.0 1 12.0 1 1 10.0 1 6.0 1 10.0 2 2 12.0 1 4.0 2 8.0 1 3 12.0 1 0 0 7.0 1 9.0 1 4 12.0 1 3.0 1 9.0 1 5 12.0 1 11.0 1 10.0 1 6 8.0 1 0 0 4.0 1 10.0 1 Other 17.0 1 17.0 1 * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental/Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic/Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site N/A N/A N/A N/A District N/A N/A N/A $60,396 Percent Difference School Site and District N/A N/A N/A N/A State N/A N/A $4,690 $57,912 Percent Difference School Site and State N/A N/A N/A N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $39,585 $38,152 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $55,130 $55,573 Highest Teacher Salary $64,108 $71,908 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) N/A $87,660 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $81,226 $92,424 Average Principal Salary (High) $95,031 $93,606 Superintendent Salary $119,880 $116,538 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 40.0% 34.0% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 6.0% 7.0% Page 13 of 14

For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 70000 100000 60000 80000 50000 40000 60000 30000 40000 20000 20000 10000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Professional Development Most Recent Three Years Professional Development Most Recent Three Years LCICS is committed to continued staff development andcurriculum improvement. The Charter school staff have regularly scheduled meetings at least twice per month and a minimum of 4 professional development days each year that focus on differentiated instruction and how to implement such strategies into each classroom. All staff members also participate in Positive Discipline trainings. LCICS is an active participant in the Beginning Teachers Program (BTSA) for the induction of new teachers. All newly credentialed LCICS teachers participate in this program. Page 14 of 14