6 4 Vol. 6 20108 Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering Aug. 2010 AHP 3 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 (1., 200092; 2., 200092; 3., 213003) :,,,,,,A rcgis, : ;;; ; A rcgis : TU990. 3: A : 1673-0836 (2010) 04-0688 - 07 Evalua tion for the Suitability of Underground Space Exploitation and Utilization Based on AHP Peng J ian 1, 2, L iu Kun 1, 2, Zheng Futao 3, L i Xiaojun 2, Peng Fangle 1, 2 (1. Research Centre for U nderground Space of Tongji U niversity, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. U nderground Construction and Engineering D epartm ent of Tongji U niversity, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Changzhou City Planning and D esign Institute, Changzhou, J iangsu 213003, China) Abstract: Underground space is one of the important natural resources. The evaluation of the suitability of its exp loitation and utilization is a significant and one of basic conditions of constituting p lanning of urban underground space. This paper, considering the multi2fountainhead and comp lexity of influencing factors of underground space exp loitation and utilization, based on the data of geotechnical engineering investigation, adop ting the analytical hierarchy p rocess (AHP) and expert questionnaire survey method with selecting a mathematic model of multi2targets linear weighted function method, an evaluation model of zoning of the suitability of one city s underground space exp loitation and utilization is set up, and the final evaluation figure of the suitability with A rcgis is gained, for the purpose of p roviding theoretic basis for the p lanning of underground space. Keywords: Underground Space Exp loitation and U tilization ( USEU ) ; suitability; AHP; evaluation model; A rcgis 1,,,,,, ;,, 3 : 2010202201 () : (19852),,,, E2mail: p j53129544@163. com : (2006BAJ27B02)
2010 4,: AHP 689,,,, 2,,,,,, ( analytical hierarchy p rocess, AHP) 1980 [ 1 ] : 2. 1, (1),, (2), (3),(4) (8), (4)T. L. Saaty 19 - ( 1) (5),,,, (6),, (7), (8),,, [ 2 ] 1 Table 1 Iden tif ica tion and mean ing of judg ing ma tr ix in the expert2ana lytic h ierarchy we ighting process 1. 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 4, 6, 8, ij b ij, ji b ji = 1 /b ij 2. 2 A, A = max A,A, ( ),, max, C I max - n n - 1, CR = C I R I, (1) : C I ; max ; n ; R I, 2; CR. CR < 0. 10,, [ 3 ] 2 Table 2Average stocha stic con sistency index in the ana lytic h ierarchy process ( n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 52 0. 89 1. 11 1. 25 1. 35 1. 40 1. 45 R I
690 6 3 3. 1,,,(2) S = 6 m 6 n A i B i C j, (2) j =1 i =1 : S (0S 1) ; A i i ; B i i ; C j j 3. 2,,,, 1 1 [ 47 ] Fig. 1Index system of evaluation for the suitability [47 ] of urban USEU 3. 3 3. 3. 1,,,,, [ 8 ], 3 ( a) 3. 3. 2,,,,,, ; 10%30%,,,,,;,,,,,,, 3 ( b) 3. 3. 3,,, [ 9 ] 3 ( c) 3. 3. 4,,,,;,, [ 10 ], ( 0-20 m) ( - 20-40 m ) ( - 40 m
2010 4,: AHP 691 ),,,, 3 ( d) 3. 3. 5 :( ),, ;,,, [ 11 ] ( ),,,, [ 12 ],3 ( e) 3. 3. 6,,,,,, [ 13 ],,,,, 3 ( f) 3. 3. 7, [ 10 ],,, 3 ( l), 3. 3. 13 3 ( g) 3. 3. 8, CO 2 ; SO 2-4 Cl - H +, [ 10 ] 3 ( h) 3. 3. 9,,,, [ 10 ] 3 ( i) 3. 3. 10, (, ) 3 ( j) 3. 3. 11,,,,,,:,,,,,, 3 ( k) 3. 3. 12,,,, 3. 3. 14,
692 6 3 Table 3Index qua lif ica tion for the su itab ility of USEU ( a) 3. 9 m < 3. 9 m 1 0 ( b) 010% 10% 30% 30% 50% 50% 1 0. 67 0. 33 0 ( c) 1 0 ( d) 180 kpa 130180 kpa 0130 kpa 180 kpa 130180 kpa 0130 kpa 60 90 Mpa 90 Mpa 3060 Mpa 0 30 Mpa 1 0. 5 0 ( e) 6 m 46 m 24 m 02 m 1 0. 67 0. 33 0 ( f) < 0 m 0 m 1 0 ( g) 20 m 1420 m 814 m 08 m 40 m 3440 m 2834 m 028 m 1 0. 67 0. 33 0 ( h) 1 0. 5 0 ( i) 1 0. 67 0. 33 0 ( j) 1 0. 67 0. 33 0 ( k) 1 0 ( l) 1 0. 67 0. 33 0 3. 4,,,( ): V = 1 1 /3 1 /5 1 1 /3 3 1 1 /3 1 1 5 3 1 3 3 3 1 1 /3 1 1 3 1 1 /3 1 1 : V 3 = V 1 = 1 1 1 1 V 2 = 1 3 1 /3 1 1 1 /3 1 /3 3 3 1 1 5 3 1 1 5 1 /3 1 /5 1 /5 1 V 4 = 1 1 /3 3 1 V 5 = 1 1 /3 3 1 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8), V i i,,,,, 4 3. 5 S,, 5
2010 4,: AHP 693 4 Table 4The we ights of them e and index 0. 062 7 0. 164 5 0. 443 8 0. 164 5 0. 164 5 0. 5 0. 031 35 0. 5 0. 031 35 0. 25 0. 041 13 0. 75 0. 123 38 0. 152 3 0. 067 59 0. 389 9 0. 173 04 0. 389 9 0. 173 04 0. 067 9 0. 030 13 0. 75 0. 123 38 0. 25 0. 041 13 0. 75 0. 123 38 0. 25 0. 041 13 5 Table 5Rank cla ssif ica tion of eva lua ted results 0. 751 0. 50. 75 0. 250. 5 00. 25, :; : ; : ; : 4, ( GIS), : (1), (2) (2), (3),, 10 10 m (4), 6 6 Table 6Ana lysis of an area of one c ity s new town 1 3. 9 m 2 10% 3, 4, 5 2 m 6 1 m, 7 8 9 ( ) 10 11 12 13 14 (5) (2) (6),,, 2 5 (1),,, (2) A rcgis,,, (3),,
694 6 2 Fig. 2Evaluation for the suitability of USEU of one area of one city s new town (R efe re nce s) [ 1 ] Aviad Shap ira, F. ASCE, Meir Simcha. AHP2Based W eighting of Factors Affecting Safety on Construction Sites with Tower Cranes [ J ]. Journal of construction engineering and management, ASCE, 2009: 3072318. [ 2 ],,. 2[ J ]. 2, 1998, 23 ( 3) : 2992302. (Chai Hesheng, Zhou A iguo, Tang Chaohui. The experts in evaluation for geological environment2 analytical hierarchy p rocess [ J ]. Earth Science2Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1998, 23 ( 3) : 2992302. ( in Chinese) ) [ 3 ] Thomas L. Saaty, L iem T. Tran. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic H ierarchy Process [ J ]. 2007, 46: 9622975. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, [ 4 ]. [ S]. :, 2006. (M inistry of Construction of the Peop le s Republic of China. Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering [ S ]. Beijing: China A rchitecture and Building Press, 2006. ( in Chinese) ) [ 5 ],. [M ]. :, 1999. ( Fang Hongqi, Yang M inzhong. Princip les for urban engineering geological environment analysis [ M ]. Beijing: China A rchitecture and Building Press, 1999. ( in Chinese) ) [ 6 ]. GIS [D ]., 2004. ( Gu Tianfeng. U rban geo2environment assessment based on GIS2taking Xianyang city as research region [ D ]. Northwest University, 2004. ( in Chinese) ) [ 7 ],. [ J ]. 2, 1999, 24 (6) : 6482652. ( J ia Yonggang, Fang Hongqi. Analysis for geo2environment suitability system of Q ingdao city [ J ]. Earth Science2Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1999, 24 (6) : 6482652. ( in Chinese) ) [ 8 ]. [ J ]., 2008, 420 ( 10 ) : 2232229. ( Pu W eiqing. Flood p revention and countermeasures for urban underground space[ J ]. Port & W aterway Engineering, 2008, 420 (10) : 2232229. ( in Chinese) ) [ 9 ]. [ S]. :, 2004. (M inistry of Construction of the Peop le s Republic of China. Code for investigation of high building & geotechnical engineering [ S ]. Beijing: China A rchitecture and Building Press, 2004. ( in Chinese) ) [ 10 ],. [M ]. :, 2003. Guangyin. ( Gao J inchuan, Du Geotechnical investigation and evaluation [M ]. W uhan: Geological University Press of China, 2003. ( in Chinese) ) [ 11 ],,. [ J ]., 2006, 25 (2) : 3 35723 362. (L iao J iansan, Peng W eip ing, L in Benhai. Analysis and partition evaluation of geological factors affecting space development and utilization of shallow underground in Guangzhou city[ J ]. Chinese Journal of Rock M echanics and Engineering, 2006, 25 ( Supp. 2) : 3 35723 362. ( in Chinese) ) [ 12 ],. [M ]. :, 2000. (Chen Zhilong, W ang Yubei. Planning of urban underground space [M ]. South East University Press, 2000. ( in Chinese) ) Nanjing: [ 13 ],,. [ J ]., 2003, 23 ( 5) : 252 27. ( Zheng J iansheng, Zhang Kep ing, Zhang L ifeng. Up rush and its sovling meseasures at foundation p its bottom in confined water [ J ]. 2003, 23 (5) : 25227. ( in Chinese) ) Tunnel Construction,