IP protection: keeping up with developments and raising awareness

Similar documents
Supported by. World Trademark Review. Anti-counterfeiting. Poland. Contributing firm Patpol Patent & Trademark Attorneys.

Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Taking a ride on the Birthday Train. KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm Christian Thomas

Intellectual Property Rights In China

Designs. Denmark Mette Bender Awapatent A/S. A Global Guide

Intellectual Property Rights in the USA

SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE BILL

Patents in Europe 2013/2014

An Enhanced European Patent System

INTRODUCTION TO TRADE MARKS INTRODUCTION TO TRADE MARKS

Intellectual property experts SPAIN

How To Protect Your Website From Copyright Infringement

A guide to trademarks

How To Amend The Civil Procedure Rules

Local expertise & multinational deals & fresh ingredients & brand innovations & added value in regulation & from raw materials to consumer products &

Greece. Eleni Lappa. Drakopoulos Law Firm

Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Beyond the unitary patent: nothing new under the sun?

ANNEX II. General Overview of the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and Their International Registration.

Intellectual Property Rights in Vietnam

Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks. adopted by

Franchising: a growing opportunity in India

DECREE THE GOVERNMENT

WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM ON EFFECTIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT BY SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (SMEs)

INDONESIA Trademark Law as amended by Law No. 15 on August 1, 2001

Chapter I: Anti-counterfeiting measures

Intellectual Property & Data Protection 2015: Legal developments you need to know about

A guide to applying for your trade mark overseas

Finland. Contributing firm Roschier Brands, Attorneys Ltd

Conclusions and suggestions

Parasitic copying is unfair play

Guidance on the requirements of consumer law applicable to the sale and advertising of flights and holidays CAP 1014

Domain Name Transfer Policy Change of Registrant

Research, innovation and intellectual property in Luxembourg Lecomte & Partners Wildgen Partners in Law

Nigeria - Issues in Intellectual Property Law in Nigeria

The revival of crossborder

Efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for intellectual property disputes

Guidelines for the National IP Strategy of the Republic of Macedonia ( ) Version 2

Response of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission on the Health and Social Care (Control of Data Processing) NIA Bill 52/11-16

Proposed changes to the Registered Designs Act 1949

Intellectual Property. Litigation and. Enforcement PATENT, TRADEMARK COPYRIGHT. 360 IPR Management and IPR Audit

Patents in Europe 2015/2016

Option Table - Directive on Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts

PRIORITIES TURKEY MAY 2013

DRAFT DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

Designs: How to Protect your Design

Public Consultation: Expanded use of automated processes by IP Australia

Knowhow briefs The Brussels regulation at a glance

Strategies of G8 Industry and Business to Promote Intellectual Property Protection and to Prevent Counterfeiting and Piracy

World Book. Protection of IP Canada TRADE-MARKS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 REGISTERED TRADE-MARKS

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office

discover the secret Intellectual Property Legal Services in Russia and the CIS

IP-Litigation in Germany. German and European Patent, Trademark and Design Attorneys Lawyers

Implementing Regulations under the Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (Trademarks and Designs) *

Intellectual Property

Teaching Intellectual Property in Spanish Universities: The experience of the Magister Lvcentinvs.

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS ONLINE JOURNALS: INSTITUTIONAL ONLINE AGREEMENT

Intellectual Property Rights (IP-Box) in Luxembourg

ICCS Convention No. 28 Only the French original is authentic

Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy Healthy, safe and productive working lives

Definitions used in these Grant Conditions can be found at paragraph 13.

Advertising Law. Chapter I General Provisions

Securities markets regulators in transition

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword The Unidroit Governing Council Members of the Study Goup Executive Summary

d. Members shall not conduct their business in a manner which tends to bring either BRBA or the BMF or its membership into disrepute.

Reseller Agreement. Domain Central Australia Pty Ltd (ACN ) Level 27, 101 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 AUSTRALIA

Vocational Education and Training (Commonwealth Powers) Bill 2012

Marketers must: The Political, Legal, and Regulatory Environments of Global Marketing. Nation-States and Sovereignty. The Political Environment

HSC: All My Own Work. Copyright. Introduction. Module Outline

Checklist. davies.com.au

Model disclosure document for franchisee or prospective franchisee

Competence. Key services include:

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: KEY LEGAL ISSUES

Creative Industries Workshop Key IPR Issues

Recognition. Awards & Top Trademark Law Firm World Trademark Review 1000, U.S. Trademark Case of the Year: In re Bose

AD 13/15 CONF-RS 2/15 1

SINO-RUSSIAN BUSINESS: FIVE TIPS ON RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

A guide to investing. Appendix 11 Protecting your business intellectual property rights

Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition Law Law No. 15 for the Year *

[Contractor] and. [European Space Agency] ESA Intellectual Property Licence for the Agency s Own Requirements

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 September /09 LIMITE PI 93

SECOND READING SPEECH

32Red Plc ( 32Red or the Company )

Information security due diligence

How To Run A Successful International Business

CYPRUS: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CHECKLIST

Higher Education Institution Act No. 63/2006

China IPR SME Helpdesk Protecting your IPR in China & How the Helpdesk can Assist you. Beijing, 28 April 2014 Valentina Salmoiraghi, IP Expert

PATENT ATTORNEY PRIVILEGE IN NEW ZEALAND

LEGAL BRANDSTOCK LEGAL EXPERT ADVICE FOR ALL IP MATTERS

OFFICIAL STATE GAZETTE. No. 269 Tuesday, November 8, 2011 Section 1 Page I. GENERAL PROVISIONS MINISTRY OF THE PRESIDENCY

Contractor s Obligations and Liability when Work is Contracted Out

Fiskars Code of Conduct

Registered and Accredited Individual Non-government Schools (NSW) Manual

Federal law on certification services in the area of the electronic signature

TRANSCRIPT FROM THE RECORD OF JUDGMENTS OF THE MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL COURT IN COPENHAGEN RULING

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

Consultation on the technical legislative implementation of the EU Audit Directive and Regulation

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FOR MOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPERS

Regulators Code July 2013

Fact Sheet Intellectual Property considerations for business websites

Transcription:

Albania IP protection: keeping up with developments and raising awareness By Ekflodia Leskaj and Jonida Beqiri, Over the past five years in Albania, significant legal amendments, government decisions, orders and regulations, and court cases have raised the awareness of Albanian businesses and consumers regarding the importance of IP protection. The Albanian General Directorate of Patents and Trademarks (ALPTO) is responsible for IP protection in Albania. Its activities include: examining and registering industrial designs, trademarks and geographical indications; issuing patents and utility models; preparing draft laws and regulations regarding intellectual property; and representing the Albanian state before the courts, other institutions and international organisations in respect of IP matters. New national strategies National Strategy on Intellectual and Industrial Property The implementation of legislation protecting IP rights has been a key element in the development of fair competition in Albania. Based on the National Strategy for Development and Integration 2007-2013, the Council of Ministers implemented the National Strategy on Intellectual and Industrial Property 2010-2015, which was approved on September 1 2010. This strategy is based on a long-term study of intellectual property within Europe. Albania adheres to the international conventions and agreements related to intellectual property, including the European Partnership Document and the Association Stabilisation Agreement. The main institutions responsible for the implementation and protection of IP rights are ALPTO and the Inspectorate of Market Monitoring. The vision of the Albanian government regarding the protection of IP rights focuses on guaranteeing and developing a contemporary system, which offers equal rights and opportunities and which is in line with EU law. The strategy is focused on four objectives: completing and improving the regulatory and legislative framework; developing and strengthening the public institutions responsible for the implementation and protection of IP rights; strengthening cooperation and coordination between national and local institutions in order to improve the protection of IP rights; and enhancing public awareness of IP rights in Albania. A government group overseen by the minister of economy, trade and enterprise is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the strategy. Strategy for the Protection of Intellectual Property by the Albanian Customs Authorities The Strategy for the Protection of Intellectual Property by the Albanian Customs Authorities 2013 was drafted in cooperation with ALPTO and embodies the government s commitment to protect rights holders and consumers in general. The objective of the strategy is to minimise piracy, counterfeiting and IP rights infringement in general by: improving the mechanisms that ensure the protection of IP rights; IP Value 2014 62

reforming the inspection and control of products that enter or exit the Albanian territory; improving the management and processing of information on IP rights; consolidating national inter-institutional collaboration; and increasing awareness, transparency, information and training related to intellectual property. Under this strategy, the competence of the customs authorities extends to protecting businesses and consumers against counterfeit products and minimising possible losses in government income deriving from infringing products. In the context of the strategy, the customs authorities can propose amendments and additions to the legal framework in accordance with EU regulations. Furthermore, the customs authorities shall secure an electronic module for the processing of customs service applications and other customs service procedures related to IP protection. Other responsibilities of the customs authorities include: developing an effective risk management system for the protection of IP rights; setting down guidelines and instructions for customs personnel in accordance with EU regulations; undertaking awareness campaigns; and increasing national and international institutional collaboration. Legislative developments in 2013 London Agreement Albania is a signatory to the European Patent Convention of October 5 1973 and is keen to strengthen its collaboration with other EU countries in order to protect patents. In light of this, and considering Article 65 of the European Patent Convention and the importance of keeping costs to a minimum, Albania also joined the London Agreement on the application of Article 65 of the European Patent Convention, by virtue of Law 118/2013. Albania submitted its instrument of accession on May 31 2013 and the agreement entered into force on September 1 2013. The London Agreement exempts member states from the obligation to translate patents. Such exemption applies to states that have one of the official languages of the European Patent Office (EPO) as their official language. A member state that does not have an EPO official language as its own official language shall not require the translation of the patent if that patent is issued in one of the EPO official languages. Law on Industrial Property The Law on Industrial Property (9947/2008) was amended by Law 10/2013, which specifies that the State Inspectorate of Market Monitoring is responsible for monitoring the market. The inspectorate is also responsible for punishing parties which infringe the applicable industrial property legislation. Council of Ministers Decision on State Inspectorate of Market Monitoring The Council of Ministers issued Decision 475/2013 on the State Inspectorate of Market Monitoring, under which the inspectorate began operations on June 1 2013. The inspectorate protects industrial property in accordance with Albanian legislation. The inspectorate is organised as a ministry directorate and has three local branches. The head of the inspectorate reports directly to the minister of economy, trade and enterprise on any IP-related activity. Order on the Internal Regulation of ALPTO On August 21 2013 the minister of economy, trade and enterprise issued Order 691/2013 on the Internal Regulation of ALPTO. By virtue of this order, ALPTO shall guarantee the protection of industrial property within Albania. ALPTO performs the following tasks: undertaking initiatives to improve the legislation on industrial property; undertaking initiatives to bring Albanian legislation into line with international conventions and agreements on industrial property; undertaking initiatives to improve collaboration between institutions involved in the protection of industrial property; 63 IP Value 2014

creating an effective system for the search and registration of industrial property; promoting industrial property rights; and ensuring that the necessary administrative infrastructure for implementing IP laws is in place. The structure of ALPTO comprises: the General Directorate; the Examination, Coordination and Training Directorate; the Administration; and the Legal Department. All appeals and claims against decisions of the Examination, Coordination and Training Directorate are reviewed by the ALPTO Board of Appeal. The appeal board is competent to issue administrative explanatory notices and to decide on appeals filed by interested parties. ALPTO also issues licences to authorised representatives of rights holders that wish to register their rights in Albania. Case law in 2013 Arseni Shpk v Bavaria NV Albanian company Arseni Shpk, holder of the Albanian trademark B-52, filed suit against Dutch company Bavaria NV, holder of the trademark B-52, which was registered originally in Benelux and later internationally, including in Albania. Arseni requested the removal of Bavaria s B-52 mark from the Albanian Trademark Register. Bavaria filed a counterclaim against Arseni, requesting the recognition of B-52 as a well-known trademark held by Bavaria and the removal of Arseni s B-52 mark from the Albanian Trademark Register. The court assessed the criteria for qualification of the B-52 trademark as a well-known trademark in Albania. The mark was registered in Albania by Arseni on April 18 2008, and by Bavaria in Benelux on February 19 2008 and in Albania on February 12 2009. In determining whether the trademark was well known in Albania before its local registration by Arseni, the court used the criteria stipulated in the Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks, adopted by the Assembly of the Paris Union for the Protection of Industrial Property and the General Assembly of the World Intellectual Property Organisation. Although Bavaria marketed its B-52 beverage in Albania between 2006 and 2010, through Arseni and two other companies with the same owner, and even though it fulfilled the condition that the mark was known to the persons involved in the distribution channels for such products, the court found that in order to be well known, the mark should be recognised in a larger circle of consumers, which was not proven during the proceedings. Given that Bavaria provided no evidence that it had fulfilled any of the criteria of the joint recommendation, which the court examined one by one, the court found in favour of the first registration of the B-52 mark in Albania by Arseni. The Tirana District Court decision was confirmed by the Court of Appeal on September 5 2013. Bavaria has appealed to the Supreme Court. Red Bull GmbH v Arseni Shpk In another decision based on the same mark, Red Bull GmbH v Arseni Shpk, the court concluded that Arseni s B-52 mark infringed the RED BULL energy drink mark due to the use of the colours blue and silver in the background. The court ordered Arseni to cease importing, distributing, advertising and trading energy drinks using the blue and silver colour combination and not to repeat such use in future, since this infringed the plaintiff s trademark and constituted unfair competition. Arseni has appealed the Tirana District Court decision. Torrefazione Portioli SpA v Brave Media Shpk Italian company Torrefazione Portioli SpA produces coffee and owns the CAFFE PORTIOLI trademark. It filed suit in the Tirana District Court against Albanian company Brave Media Shpk for using CAFFE PORTIOLI tags on its products, as well as for selling CAFFE PORTIOLI products without authorisation The court held that the use by Brave Media of the CAFFE PORTIOLI mark on the packaging of its Turkish coffee products infringed Torrefazione Portioli s trademark, as the name was identical. IP Value 2014 64

Brave Media was also found to be in breach of consumer protection law and the Civil Code in relation to fair competition, as it had used the CAFFE PORTIOLI mark without being licensed by its owner, thus exploiting the goodwill in the mark and misleading consumers as to the origin of the products bearing that mark. Torrefazione Portioli does not produce or trade Turkish coffee. SPAR International BV v Iliria DC Shpk Dutch company SPAR International BV, which owns the SPAR trademark, sued Albanian company ILIRIA DC Shpk for unauthorised use of the SPAR trademark. In SPAR International BV v Iliria DC Shpk the court found that the labelling of DESPAR shops and use of the marks DESPAR, INTERSPAR and EUROSPAR in the packaging of Iliria DC s products infringed SPAR International s trademark, as the names of the shops operated by the defendant and the packaging were significantly similar to the SPAR trademark owned by the plaintiff in Albania since September 26 2002. Moreover, in addition to the mark, Iliria DC was using a logo identical to that owned by SPAR International BV, without having the relevant licence. Therefore, the court concluded that the mark used by Iliria DC also infringed SPAR International s copyright. 65 IP Value 2014

Contributing profiles Twin Towers Business Centre, Deshmoret e Kombit Blv Tirana, Albania Tel +355 4 22 80 264 Fax +355 4 22 80 263 Web www.drakopoulos-law.com Ekflodia Leskaj Senior associate eleskaj@drakopoulos-law.com Ekflodia Leskaj is a senior associate at Drakopoulos Law Firm a regional firm offering legal services in 11 countries across Southeast Europe. Ms Leskaj graduated from the University of Paris II and joined Drakopoulos in 2008. She is an authorised representative with the Albanian Patents and Trademark Office and is registered as a patent attorney with the European Patent Office (EPO). Ms Leskaj is involved in various IP-related maters, including trademarks (registered and unregistered rights), copyright and advertising/promotional campaigns, and successfully represents local and international clients as both a consultant and a litigator. Jonida Beqiri Senior associate jbeqiri@drakopoulos-law.com Jonida Beqiri graduated from Luarasi University of Law, Tirana and is an authorised representative for patents and trademarks in Albania and an EPO agent. In addition to her extensive involvement in IPrelated work, in recent years she has participated in national and international conferences related to intellectual property. Ms Beqiri joined Drakopoulos Law Firm in 2008 and is now a senior associate IP Value 2014 66