CHP PLANTS FOR CITIES AND INDUSTRIES BENEFICIAL FOR THE ECONOMY AND THE ENVIRONMENT



Similar documents
ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN POWER PLANTS

BIOMASS LOOKING FOR EFFICIENT UTILIZATION THE REHEAT CONCEPT. Jaroslav Lahoda Olaf Arndt Walter Hanstein. Siemens Power Generation (PG)

Efficiency Metrics for CHP Systems: Total System and Effective Electric Efficiencies

Industrial Gas Turbines

How To Evaluate Cogeneration

SRS: THE STANDARDIZED REPOWERING SOLUTION FOR 300MW STEAM POWER PLANTS IN RUSSIA. Matthias Fränkle Siemens Power Generation (PG), Germany

Good Practice Form

Systematic implementation of CHP plants in Frankfurt am Main

Allocation of Fuel Energy and Emissions to Heat and Power in CHP

Power Island. Industrial Power Plants. / energy

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Making Coal Use Compatible with Measures to Counter Global Warming

THE EUROPEAN GREEN BUILDING PROGRAMME. Technical Module on Combined Heat and Power

Dual Fuel Medium Speed Product. Presenter Name Date

Natural Gas Information Contents

Western Forest Economists 43 rd Annual Meeting May, 7, 2008

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

Approved baseline and monitoring methodology AM0056

EFFICIENT ENERGY SUPPLY (ELECTRICITY AND DISTRICT HEAT) FOR THE CITY OF LINZ

Siemens turbine solutions for urban cogeneration

Making power plants energy efficient

EVALUATION OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY AS HEAT SOURCE OF DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEMS IN TIANJIN, CHINA

Design Exercises and Projects in Energy Engineering Course

Combined Heat & Power (CHP) UGI Webinar. Presented By: Barry Wentzel, UGI Utilities Eric Burgis, Energy Solutions Center June 18, 2013

Siemens Power Generation Innovationstrends bei Anlagen und Komponenten in der Energieerzeugung

Torino Nord. Cogeneration Plant. The gas turbine. The steam generator. The Torino Nord cogeneration plant produces electricity and heat for district

Growing your greenhouse business faster with gas engines.

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Boiler efficiency for community heating in SAP

Effects of a White Certificate trading scheme on the energy system of the EU-27

CSP-gas hybrid plants: Cost effective and fully dispatchable integration of CSP into the electricity mix

Waste to Energy in Düsseldorf. for a clean city.

Combined Heat & Power. Discussion with Connecticut Energy Advisory Board. February 23, 2010

A Weissenbach AUSTRIA Tel. +43/2672/890-0, Fax: Internet: office@polytechnik.at

Electrical infrastructure serving the city of London CITY OF LONDON Corporate Energy Consumption Report

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY

Industrial Gas Turbines utilization with Associated Gases

Making power plants energy efficient ABB, integrated power and automation solutions

Loviisa 3 unique possibility for large scale CHP generation and CO 2 reductions. Nici Bergroth, Fortum Oyj FORS-seminar

Implications of Abundant Natural Gas

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Utilities & Energy Services

NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT IN FINLAND ACCEPTED BY THE FINNISH PARLIAMENT

Heating technology mix in a future German energy system dominated by renewables

MHI s Energy Efficient Flue Gas CO 2 Capture Technology and Large Scale CCS Demonstration Test at Coal-fired Power Plants in USA

CAT CG132. Series Gas Generator Sets

Micro-Turbine Combined Heat & Power Generators (CHP) Cold Climate Applications 2014 Polar Technology Conference Richard S.

THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY FROM WOOD AND OTHER SOLID BIOMASS

Evaluation of mobile storage systems for heat transport. G. Storch, A. Hauer, A. Krönauer ZAE Bayern, Walther-Meißner-Str. 6, Garching, Germany

V. ENERGY SAVINGS IN INDUSTRY

Technologies for small scale Biomass CHP-Plants an actual survey

Energy consumption. Environmental indicators

On June 28, 2011, the Municipal Services Committee recommended that the City Council adopt the recommendations stated in the subject agenda report.

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

It s time for H.E.R.O. Energy Saving Strategy for. Tunnel & Shuttle Kilns

Top Technology for Industry, Agriculture, Business and Communities

Annual Electricity and Heat Questionnaire

High Efficiency Low Emissions: The first way forward for clean coal technology. Dr Andrew Minchener OBE General Manager IEA Clean Coal Centre

Reducing CO2 emissions for Offshore oil and gas Operations under ETS. Margaret Christie, Environmental Advisor, UK Business Unit, Premier Oil UK Ltd

Feasibility Study for Mobile Sorption Storage in Industrial Applications

Applicability of Trigeneration Systems in the Hotel Buildings: The North Cyprus Case

Energy Efficiency Indicators for Public Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels

Siemens Steam Turbine SST-600

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

IEA Workshop Copenhagen Small scale biomass co-generation with modern steam engines

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NGCC AND COAL-FIRED STEAM POWER PLANTS WITH INTEGRATED CCS AND ORC SYSTEMS

Houweling s Greenhouse CHP Case Study

Our financing of the energy sector in 2013

DATA CENTRE DESIGN AND

The new Gas Turbine Portfolio to meet the market requirements for Distributed Generation

Nuclear Power s Role in Enhancing Energy Security in a Dangerous World Al Shpyth, B.A., M.E.S. Director, Government Relations Cameco Corporation

Half the cost Half the carbon

Bioenergy. A sustainable energy source.

Clean Energy Systems, Inc.

COMPETITIVENESS COMPARISON OF THE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ALTERNATIVES (PRICE LEVEL MARCH 2003)

Appendix 5A: Natural Gas Use in Industrial Boilers

English version. Manual for Determination of Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

How To Reduce Coal Power Plant Emissions

Energy Options in a Carbon Constrained World. Martin Sevior, School of Physics, University of Melbourne

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

Gas-Fired Power HIGHLIGHTS

Siemens Gas Turbines over 100 MW

COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION COSTS

The Future of Coal-Based Power Generation With CCS UN CCS Summit James Katzer MIT Energy Initiative web.mit.edu/coal/

University of Maryland College Park District Energy System. IDEA Campus Energy Conference February 9, 2012

Source: EIA Natural Gas Issues and Trends 1998

California Air Resources Board s Distributed Generation Program

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Voluntary Carbon Market in Turkey. 1. Introduction. Fehiman Ciner 1 and Aydemir Akyurek 2

97 MW of Cat coal seam methane power in New South Wales, Australia

Steam turbines for solar thermal power plants. Industrial steam turbines. Answers for energy.

University of Melbourne Symposium on ICT Sustainability Dan Pointon 25 November 2008

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

Station #1 Interpreting Infographs

Work package 3 Comparison of member state approaches

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

Energy Projections Price and Policy Considerations. Dr. Randy Hudson Oak Ridge National Laboratory

NATURAL GAS IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR

Hot water supply, distribution and use

OUTCOME 2 INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE PERFORMANCE. TUTORIAL No. 5 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

Neighbourhood Energy in Vancouver Sewage Heat Recovery within a city-wide strategy

Transcription:

CHP PLANTS FOR CITIES AND INDUSTRIES BENEFICIAL FOR THE ECONOMY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Introduction: Harald Dichtl, Business Development Manager, Siemens Power Generation China faces a great challenge to secure the electricity supply for a steadily growing economy and at the same time use environmentally friendly technologies. One way to improve the environmental efficiency of power generation is the simultaneous production of electric power and heat (Combined Heat and Power = CHP, synonymous with cogeneration). It is a prerequisite for CHP plants that there are users for the waste heat, as heat cannot be stored or transported over distances. In China there are more than 300 cities with a district heating infrastructure and a daily growing number of industrial facilities with power and heat demand. Therefore China can benefit substantially from the advantages of CHP plants: fuel saving, fewer emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants. CHP Technology CHP plants can be based on different technologies. Each technology has different properties in terms of fuel, power to heat ratio, electrical efficiency and heat quality. In the small power range (less than 10 MW) piston engines are the widest spread technology. In the higher power range (more than 10 MW) steam and combustion turbines are the dominant technology. Generally the boundary conditions like the availability of fuel (such as coal, natural gas, waste gases and oil), fuel prices, power and heat demand curve define the power generation technology. The standard solution for CHP in China is coal-fired power plants, which use the waste heat from the steam process. This process is well proven and profits from advanced combustion and turbine technology.

If natural gas is available for power generation, the most efficient CHP solution in terms of environmental efficiency is a combined cycle power plant. This type of power plant is very flexible in terms of the ratio of power and heat output. In terms of total efficiency (the sum of electricity and useful heat divided by fuel input) all cogeneration technologies can reach very high efficiencies of up to 90% and more, provided the boundary conditions like heat level, return condensate temperature and heat load curve are appropriate for the respective technology. The following table shows a range of CHP technologies and their properties. PRIME MOVER EXTRACTION TURBINE BACK PRESSURE TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE TURBINE OPEN CYCLE TURBINE COMPRESS. IGNITION ENGINE SPARK IGNITION ENGINE FUEL USED SIZE RANGE (MWe) HEAT: POWER RATIO ANY FUEL 1 to 300+ 3:1 to 8:1+ ANY FUEL BIO OIL LFO LPG NAPHTHA BIO OIL HFO LFO LPG NAPHTHA BIO OIL HFO LHO NAPHTHA BIO LHO NAPHTHA 0.5 to 500 3:1 to 10:1+ 3 to 300+ 1:1 to 3:1* 0.25 to 50+ 1.5:1 to 5:1* 0.2 to 20 0.5:1 to 3:1* 0.003 to 6 Alfa value 0.9-2 1:1 to 3:1 Alfa value 0.9-2 ELECTRICAL GENERATING EFFICIENCY TYPICAL OVERALL EFFICIENCY HEAT QUALITY 20 35% UP TO 90% AT MULTIPLE PRESSURE LEVELS 20-35% UP TO 90% AT MULTIPLE PRESSURE LEVELS 35 55% 70-90% MEDIUM GRADE HIGH TEMPERATURE HOT WATER 25 42% 65 90% HIGH GRADE HIGH TEMPERATURE HOT WATER 35 45% 65-90% LOW PRESSURE LOW AND MEDIUM TEMPERATURE HOT WATER 25-43% 70 90% LOW AND MEDIUM TEMPERATURE HOT WATER * Highest heat to power ratios for these systems are achieved with supplementary firing. From this chart it can easily be seen that there is no right or wrong CHP technology, all technologies cover a market segment which is defined by fuel, size or heat level. One of the main differentiators for environmental efficiency of a plant is the heat to power ratio. This ratio describes how much electrical power a plant produces in relation to the heat output. The

following chart shows in an example, what kind of output can be produced with three typical CHP plants of different technologies. For the example a fuel input of 100 MW for each plant was assumed. Typical Power and Heat Output of CHP Power Plant Concepts Industrial Applications With the same heat input, GT and CC power plants yield more electric power 120 100 MW 80 60 40 20 Losses Heat El. Power 0 Steam Turbine GT Cogen CC Cogen All fuels Gas/Oil Gas/Oil 06.06.2005 PG I5 Presentation Power Generation 12 PG I5BD The appropriate heat to power ratio for a specific application is defined by the demand profile for heat and power. Demand profiles are characterized by a full load demand and daily or seasonal load variations. Therefore it is necessary to choose carefully the right plant type and specifications with regard to the load profile. With the same total efficiency, the plant with the lower heat to power ratio has the better environmental efficiency due to the higher exergy value of electricity compared to heat. The benefit of CHP plants can be seen if the CO2 emission of a CHP plant is compared to the separate generation of electricity and heat by means of the best available technology. If natural gas is available, the best available technology for power generation is a large-scale combined cycle power plant with a net efficiency of 57.5%. The best available technology for heat generation is a gas fired boiler with 90% efficiency. In order to produce the same amount of electricity and heat, a typical modern Combined Cycle CHP plant (50% electrical efficiency and 85% total efficiency) uses 20% less fuel and consequently emits 20% less CO2

than separate power and heat generation plants. In this example it is assumed that the plant operates at full power and heat load for 8000 hours per year. CCPP Boiler Total Separate Generation CCPP CHP el. Power MW 70 70 70 Heat MW 50 50 50 Fuel Input MW 122 56 177 140 GHG emissions t/a 194783 88889 283671 224000 It has to be mentioned that these favorable results can only be reached if the heat load is constant enough to reach a high number of annual full load hours for heat delivery. If the heat load is not as constant as in the previous example, the advantage will be smaller. But with a heat load of more than 3000 full load hours per year, a CHP plant provides lower fuel consumption and CO2 emissions than separate generation. The standard solution for CHP in China is coal fired power plants, which use the waste heat from the steam process. This process is well proven and profits from advanced combustion and turbine technology. The heat to power ratio of this plant type is relatively high, i.e. most of the fuel input is converted into heat. With urban and industrial development, the power demand rises much faster than the heat demand, which means the heat to power ratio of the CHP plants should be lower to guarantee a constant heat load for the plant. One possibility to modify coal fired plants for higher efficiency and more electricity production is a so-called repowering, the addition of a gas turbine with heat recovery boiler and the use of the heat in the existing steam process. Of course this requires the availability of natural gas on site. In the following, this paper will focus on Combined Cycle Power Plants, which are, in terms of environmental efficiency, the favorable solution in the larger (> 20 MW) power scale.

Fig. 4, Combined Heat and Power Process with a Combined Cycle Power Plant Siemens offers turnkey solutions for combined cycle power plants in all power ranges. If used as a CHP plant, combined cycle power plants can generate heat levels from 50 up to 500 deg C, with a high flexibility of power and heat generation.

Fig. 4, Siemens Industrial Combined Cycle Plant Portfolio Application examples In October 2003, Göteborg Energi and Siemens Power Generation Industrial Applications signed a contract regarding the construction of a new cogeneration power plant of the combined-cycle SCC-800 at Rya, Gothenburg. The assignment pertains to a cogeneration power plant with three SGT-800 lines, plus the capability to add another line in the future. According to the project schedule, the power plant will be ready for test operations during November 2006. Behind the decision to build this plant is an increasing demand for both electricity and district heating in Gothenburg.

Fig.5, Combined Cycle Power Plant at Rya, Gothenburg In 2003, Siemens Power Generation Industrial Applications received the order for a turnkey modernization of a combined heat and power station for the Erlangen municipality (Stadtwerke Erlangen) in the south of Germany. The SCC-400 (20 MW el ) combined cycle power plant will be used as an extension of an existing coal fired district heating plant. The power and heat demand profile requires high plant operational flexibility. During the summer period only a minimum heat output is required (<10MW), whereas the peak heat demand reaches more than 25 MW. In order to increase the flexibility of power and heat output, an additionally fired heat recovery steam generator was used. The electrical efficiency of the plant is about 48%, which is very high for a plant of this size. Even more importantly, up to 90% of the fuel will be converted into power and useful heat, resulting in a considerable saving of fuel and reduction of CO2 compared to the existing plant. More than 70,000 tonnes per year CO 2 will be saved compared to the old coal fired CHP plant. Financial Benefit of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions The reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions like CO2 can be converted into a considerable economic value in the new GHG trading schemes following the Kyoto Protocol. Predictions for the future price level of GHG emission certificates vary widely in a range of 5 to 20 US$ per ton CO2 equivalent.

In China the savings of CO2 emissions can be converted into financial benefit if the project complies to the rules of the CDM (Clean Development Mechanism), one of the instruments of the Kyoto Protocol. A certified CDM project produces so called CERs (Certified Emission Reductions) which can be traded on a global basis, for example in the European Emissions Trading System. CHP projects are usually very suitable for this mechanism. In any case it is very important that every project needs to be evaluated individually for applicability for CDM. If certified, a considerable income stream for a CHP plant can come from reduced emissions, amounting to as much as 10% of the electricity sales.