Welcome to the H1 software



Similar documents
Self Assessment Exercise

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

Electronic Reporting to BTS

Marsa Thermal Treatment Facility Yearly Emissions Statement

A GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE BEST PRACTICABLE MEANS FOR ELECTRICITY WORKS BPM 7/1 (2014)

Energy from waste. Introduction. Legal status of this guideline. What is energy from waste? Draft guideline

ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES FROM LANDFILL DISPOSAL AND INCINERATION OF WASTE

6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

CHAPTER 9 PERMITTING. 9.2 Scotland Exemption Waste management licence PPC permit 102

Slide 1. Enviros Consulting Ltd

Guidance notes on part C2 General varying a bespoke permit

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

Official Journal of the European Communities

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT This report fulfils the requirements of Article 12(2) of the Waste Incineration Directive regarding the:

Treatment and Disposal Technologies for Medical Wastes in Developing Countries

The PPC Permit. Simon Holbrook SPG Manager - Warrington

Guidance notes on part B2 General New bespoke permit

Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) Environmental Impact Assessment Report Sludge Treatment Facilities

Pollution and health impacts of waste incinerators

Questions and answers about energy from waste facilities

National Planning Policy for Waste

ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR PETROLEUM OIL REFINERIES EMISSIONS. Standards for emissions from furnaces, boilers and Power Plant

Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

GUIDELINES FOR PROCESSING AND USING REFUSE DERIVED FUEL (RDF) IN CEMENT INDUSTRY

BP Texas City Refinery

Guidance for developments requiring planning permission and environmental permits. October 2012 UNCLASSIFIED

Guidance on applying the waste hierarchy to hazardous waste November 2011

AQ19(06) Additional Guidance from Defra and the Welsh Assembly Government - Nov 2006

Physical flow accounts: principles and general concepts

Air Quality Appraisal Damage Cost Methodology

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

How To Run A Power Plant In Celje

As of: September Waste Incineration A Potential Danger? Bidding Farewell to Dioxin Spouting

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY FIBERIGHT, LLC HAMPDEN, MAINE

Emissions estimate from forest fires: methodology, software and European case studies

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Nu G Medical Waste System Technology (Pyrolysis / Thermal Decomposition)

NEBOSH National Diploma in Environmental Management Unit ED1. (Material correct at 1/11/2011)

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

Annex B. Waste Sites and Proposed Waste Facilities

Guidance for the Landfill Sector Technical requirements of the Landfill Directive and Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC)

Impact of utilised bottom ash

Date: 12 th December 2013

Introduction to Waste Treatment Technologies. Contents. Household waste

Environment Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plant for Sustainable Development

Sludge Treatment Facility Stack Gas Monitoring Report February 2016

Waste to Energy in Düsseldorf. for a clean city.

Environmental problems and responses

Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2010

Identifying Environmental Aspects

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT

Air quality and biomass installations. A briefing for local authorities

PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

IFC ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH CARE FACILITIES Effective May 8, 2003 Page 1. Environmental and Social Guidelines for Health Care Facilities

INCINERATION IN JAPAN

Terms Used in the following Tables 1 3

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities an updated assessment

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES REFERENCE DOCUMENT ON WASTE INCINERATOR BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON WASTE INCINERATOR

GUIDELINE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS (CEMS) AND THEIR USE FOR REPORTING UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF

Alternative fuels in cement manufacturing

2x800 MW Thermal Power Project Near Village Paraspani, Tehsil Pathargama, Godda- District By Adani Power (Jharkhand) Limited

Guidance and Reporting Instructions on Temporary E-reporting for the MATS Rule

Wolverine Clean Energy Venture

Comparison of Select Materials and Energy Recycling Scenarios

A STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION

INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY MENDIS ROAD, HUDSON CREEK DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR A PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Consultation response: PPC Technical Guidance Note 35 Anaerobic Digestion

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Sludge Treatment Facilities

Pollution inventory reporting - guidance for operators of waste transfer stations

Holcim EMR List of EN Standards and VDI Guidelines usable for Discontinuous Measurements in Cement Plants

Oil and Gas Air Quality Regulations and Permitting

1. Waste management Prevention of waste Reduced landfilling of waste together with increased sustainable recycling of waste

LCA EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF RECYCLING OF PLASTICS FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE

Ecological Sustainability

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

2.0 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT & CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Coke Manufacturing. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Application for Controlled Trade Waste Discharge Approval

Hackney Biomass Boiler Information Request Form

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE RAPID EIA STUDY FOR SHIVKAR LIGNITE BLOCK, DIST. BARMER, RAJASTHAN

Recycling & Energy Recovery Facility

NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT FLUE GAS TREATMENT PLANT OPTIONS

Notice of variation with introductory note

Examination syllabuses for Manual Stack emissions monitoring. Environment Agency Version 9 January 2015

Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety

Feasibility Study of a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator

Environmental Project No Miljøprojekt. Waste Indicators. Ole Dall, Carsten Lassen and Erik Hansen Cowi A/S

MOLES AND MOLE CALCULATIONS

Estimated emissions and CO2 savings deriving from adoption of in-place recycling techniques for road pavements

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BATNEEC GUIDANCE NOTE. Class 4.1 PROCESSING OF ASBESTOS AND THE MANUFACTURE AND PROCESSING OF ASBESTOS BASED PRODUCTS

Regulating Water Pollution in Ontario s Municipalities Windsor s Sewer Use By-law Prepared by Derek Coronado

State of the Nation Report

Transcription:

Welcome Introduction Welcome to the H1 software This version of the database tool accompanies the IPPC Guidance version H1v6 July 2003. This software tool is for use with the IPPC guidance note H1 "Environmental Assessment & BAT Appraisal". The H1 guidance provides a structured methodology to demonstrate that an activity uses the Best Available Techniques, by: - assessing the the costs and environmental benefits of options for pollution prevention and control techniques; and - conducting an environmental assessment to demonstrate that no significant pollution is caused. Important Notes: This software tool can be used to complete most of the modules within H1. However, further information may need to be provided in the following areas: - detailed assessment of fate and effects, where required - decision-making trails for the comparison and ranking of options This software provides a general structure for assessing costs and environmental impacts. You may need to decide the best way to apply this structure to fit the nature and pattern of your operation, in particular: - where load is variable, such as seasonal or demand-led operations - where a number of processes are conducted at the same time, such as integrated operations - where a number of products are made, with possible differences in unit operations and release points employed - where fugitive or potential emergency releases are of particular interest Information in this database will be used to determine your PPC permit, therefore to get the most from this software tool, you should: - read the introduction to the H1 guidance, to understand the basic principles, module structure and methods - use the HELP boxes and refer to the H1 guidance as you progress to ensure that the data you input is representative and accurate - use the comments boxes to clarify assumptions and data sources Some basic instructions for using the software tool are provided in Appendix I of the H1 Guidance The application has been optimised for a screen resolution of 800 x 600 Version 1.8.2 31 August 2007 www.ability-software.co.uk

Welcome

Reference Information Reference Information Please complete the following information: Company Name: Location: Viridor New England Quarry Resource Recovery Centre - EfW Permit Number: SLR Reference: 407.0036.00463

Introduction, Module 1 module 1 Introduction to Module 1 Module 1: Describe the Scope and Options The aim of this module is to: - state the OBJECTIVES of the assessment - in the case of ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT of the whole installation, describe the scope of the activities to be included in the assessment; - in the case of OPTIONS APPRAISALS, identify candidate options for BAT by considering all relevant techniques to prevent and minimise pollution and the scope of activities covered by the techniques. Depending on the reason for the assessment, you will need to complete different modules of the guidance. The software will automatically select the required modules according to the responses you enter. NOTE: If you are going to complete more than one assessment or appraisal, make sure that you create a copy of the H1 file for each new assessment BEFORE you begin to input data. This is because Microsoft Access automatically saves changes to the current file you are using, rather than allowing you to save your changes at the end of your work. TO CONTINUE WITH MODULE 1, PRESS "NEXT".

Describe the Objectives module 1 1.1 Describe the Objectives Depending on the reason for the assessment, you will need to complete different modules of the guidance. Select the type of assessment: a) to conduct a costs/benefits OPTIONS APPRAISAL to determine BAT for selected releases from an installation Do modules 1,2, 3 and 4 and continue with 5 and 6 if necessary b) to carry out an ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT of the emissions resulting from the installation as a whole Do modules 1, 2 and 3 only 1.1 Briefly summarise the objectives and reason for the assessment in terms of the main environmental impacts or emissions to be controlled: Submitted with an Environmental Permit application to operate a non hazardous Resource Recovery Centre (Energy From Waste Facility) at New England Quarry, Devon. This assessment is being undertaken to assess the potential point source emissions to air, surface water, sewer, groundwater and land as appropriate. The EfW will accept 275,000 tonnes of non hazardous waste.

Scope of Environmental Assessment module 1 1.2 Scope of Environmental Assessment List the activities included in the assessment This should include all the activities in your permit, broken down into the basic process steps, such as: raw materials storage, handling, processing, emission control, waste treatment etc. as appropriate. See section 1.2 of H1 for guidance and use the comments box below to provide any additional information. Number Activity 1 Delivery of Residual Municipal Solid Waste (rmsw) and / or Commercial and Industrial (C&I) Waste at the EfW 2 Waste Storage at the EfW 3 Waste Charging at the EfW 4 Incineration at the EfW 5 Energy Generation at the EfW 6 Flue Gas Treatment at the EfW 7 Bottom Ash Management at the EfW 8 Fly Ash Handling at the EfW 9 Raw Materials Storage and Handling at the EfW 10 Comments:

Module 2 - Emissions Inventory module 2 Introduction to Module 2 Module 2: Emissions Inventory The aim of this module is to produce an inventory of sources and releases of polluting substances from each option. This is used as the basis for the subsequent evaluation of environmental impacts. For this module you will require information on: - release points and sources of emissions to all media - concentration and mass rate of emitted substances - frequency and duration of emissions and how these relate to long term and short term effects IMPORTANT NOTES - you may need to consider a suitable method for assessment of groups of pollutants, such as VOCs, heavy metals, uncharacterised liquid effluents, etc (see H1 guidance for details). TO CONTINUE WITH MODULE 2, PRESS "NEXT".

Air Release Points Base Option module 2 Air Release Points Please define your Release Points for Releases to Air Are there any Air emissions? Yes Number Description Location or Grid Reference Activity or Activities Effective Height Efflux Velocity Total Flow metres m/s m3/hr 1 A1 259518, 54726 Line 1 Incinerator Stack 90 20.25 94716 2 A2 259520.8, 54726.9 Line 2 Incinerator Stack 90 20.25 94716 Comments: In reality, flares and spark ignition engines would be installed at the landfill as required based on the quality and flow of landfill gas. Due to the unknown nature of the parameters no details are presented in this assessment for landfill gas flares and engines. Total flow for stacks - normalised flow used - 273, 11%, dry.

Air Emissions Inventory Base Option, Release Point: 1 'A1' module 2 Air Emissions Inventory Please list all Substances released to Air for each Release Point identified in the previous page. Number Substance Meas'ment Method Operating Mode (if relevant) Data relating to Long Term effects Data relating to Short Term effects Conc. Release Rate Meas'ment Basis Conc. Release Rate Meas'ment Basis Annual Rate ELV Conc. mg/m3 g/s mg/m3 g/s tonne/yr mg/m3 1 Particulates (PM10) Continuous 94.2% 10 0.263 WID Daily 10 0.263 WID Daily 8.2939 10 2 Nitrogen dioxide (human health Continuous 94.2% 200 5.263 WID Daily 200 5.263 WID Daily 165.973 200 receptor) 3 Carbon monoxide Continuous 94.2% 50 1.316 WID Daily 50 1.316 WID Daily 41.501 50 4 Sulphur dioxide (human health Continuous 94.2% 50 1.316 WID Daily 50 1.316 WID Daily 41.501 50 receptor) 5 Hydrogen chloride Continuous 94.2% 10 0.263 WID Daily 10 0.263 WID Daily 8.2939 10 6 Hydrogen fluoride (as F) Periodic* 94.2% 1 0.026 WID Daily 1 0.026 WID Daily 0.819 1 7 Ammonia (human health receptor) Estimated* 94.2% 6 0.158 Manufacture 6 0.158 Manufacture 4.9826 6 Guidance Guidance 8 Benzene Continuous 94.2% 10 0.263 WID Daily 10 0.263 WID Daily 8.2939 10 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) Periodic* 94.2% 0.05 0.000658 WID Spot 0.05 0.000658 WID Spot 0.0208 0.05 Measureme nt Measureme nt 10 Mercury and compounds, except Periodic* 94.2% 0.05 0.00132 WID Spot 0.05 0.00132 WID Spot 0.0416 0.05 mercury alkyls, (as Measureme nt Measureme nt 11 Arsenic and compounds (as As) Periodic* 94.2% 0.5 0.00146 WID Spot 0.5 0.00146 WID Spot 0.046 0.5 Measureme nt Measureme nt 12 Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) Continuous 94.2% 200 5.263 Daily 200 5.263 Daily 165.973 200 13 Ammonia (ecological receptor) Periodic* 94.2% 6 0.158 Manufacture 6 0.158 Manufacture 4.9826 6 r Guidance r Guidance 14 Particulates (PM2.5) Continuous 94.2% 10 0.2631 WID Daily 10 0.2631 WID Daily 8.2939 10 15 Sulphur dioxide (ecological receptor) Continuous 94.2% 50 1.3155 WID Daily 50 1.3155 WID Daily 41.501 50

Air Emissions Inventory Base Option, Release Point: 1 'A1' 16 Dioxins and Furans Periodic* 94.2% 1E-07 2.63E-09 WID Spot 1E-07 2.63E-09 WID Spot 6.3E-08 0.0000001 Measureme Measureme nt nt Measurement method: * provide detail in comments box Comments: Benzene modelled as worst case scenario for Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Cadmium (EAL 0.005) has been modelled as the worst case representative of WID Group 1 metals, comprising cadmium and thallium. Arsenic (EAL 0.02) has been modelled as worst case represenative of WID Group 3 metals, comprising antimony, arsenic, lead, chromium, cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and vanadium.

Air Emissions Inventory Base Option, Release Point: 2 'A2' module 2 Air Emissions Inventory Please list all Substances released to Air for each Release Point identified in the previous page. Number Substance Meas'ment Method Operating Mode (if relevant) Data relating to Long Term effects Data relating to Short Term effects Conc. Release Rate Meas'ment Basis Conc. Release Rate Meas'ment Basis Annual Rate ELV Conc. mg/m3 g/s mg/m3 g/s tonne/yr mg/m3 1 Particulates Continuous 94.2% 10 0.2631 WID Daily 10 0.2631 WID Daily 8.2939 10 2 Nitrogen dioxide (human health Continuous 94.2% 200 5.262 WID Daily 200 5.262 WID Daily 165.973 200 receptor) 3 Carbon monoxide Continuous 94.2% 50 1.3155 WID Daily 50 1.3155 WID Daily 41.501 50 4 Sulphur dioxide (human health Continuous 94.2% 50 1.3155 WID Daily 50 1.3155 WID Daily 41.501 50 receptor) 5 Hydrogen chloride Continuous 94.2% 10 0.2631 WID Daily 10 0.2631 WID Daily 8.2939 10 6 Hydrogen fluoride (as F) Periodic* 94.2% 1 0.02631 WID Daily 1 0.02631 WID Daily 0.819 1 7 Ammonia (human health receptor) Estimated* 94.2% 6 0.2631 Manufacture 6 0.2631 Manufacture 4.9826 6 r Guidance r Guidance 8 Benzene Continuous 94.2% 10 0.2631 WID Daily 10 0.2631 WID Daily 8.2939 10 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) Periodic* 94.2% 0.05 0.001316 WID Spot 0.05 0.001316 WID Spot 0.0208 0.05 Measureme nt Measureme nt 10 Mercury and compounds, except Periodic* 94.2% 0.05 0.001316 WID Spot 0.05 0.001316 WID Spot 0.0416 0.05 mercury alkyls, (as Measureme nt Measureme nt 11 Arsenic and compounds (as As) Periodic* 94.2% 0.5 0.013155 WID Spot 0.5 0.013155 WID Spot 0.046 0.5 Measureme nt Measureme nt 12 Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) Continuous 94.2% 200 5.262 Daily 200 5.262 Daily 165.973 200 13 Ammonia (ecological receptor) Periodic* 94.2% 6 0.158 Manufacture 6 0.158 Manufacture 4.9826 6 r Guidance r Guidance 14 Particulates (PM2.5) Continuous 94.2% 10 0.2631 WID Daily 10 0.2631 WID Daily 4.9826 10 15 Sulphur dioxide (ecological receptor) Continuous 94.2% 50 1.3155 WID Daily 50 1.3155 WID Daily 41.501 50

Air Emissions Inventory Base Option, Release Point: 2 'A2' 16 Dioxins and Furans Periodic* 94.2% 1E-07 2.63E-09 WID Spot 1E-07 2.63E-09 WID Spot 6.3E-08 0.0000001 Measureme Measureme nt nt Measurement method: * provide detail in comments box Comments: Benzene modelled as worst case scenario for Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Cadmium (EAL 0.005) has been modelled as the worst case representative of WID Group 1 metals, comprising cadmium and thallium. Arsenic (EAL 0.02) has been modelled as worst case represenative of WID Group 3 metals, comprising antimony, arsenic, lead, chromium, cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and vanadium.

Water Discharge Locations module 2 Water Discharge Locations Please define the Final Discharge Locations for Releases to Water Are there any Water emissions? No Use the 'Add' button below to list all final discharge points. For releases to sewer, this should be the point of discharge from the sewage treatment works. Number Description Final Discharge Category 1 N 0.192 2 N 0.192 3 N 0.192

Energy Consumption Base Option module 2 Energy Consumption Please list all Energy Sources and Annual Consumption Select energy sources by Clicking on 'Add' and using the pull-down list. Number Energy Sources Delivered Conversion Factor Primary CO2 Factor CO2 MWh/yr MWh/yr tonne/yr 1 Electricity from public supply indirect emissions 23.5 2.60 61 0.17 10 2 Gas oil direct emissions 1350 1.00 1,350 0.25 338 3 Other Fuel direct emissions Comments: 713000 1.00 713,000 0.25 178,250

Raw Materials Base Option module 2 Raw Materials Please list all Raw Materials Consumed: Number Material Annual Consumption Units 1 rmsw and / or C&I waste 275000 tonnes/year 2 Slaked Lime 3850 tonnes/year 3 Urea Prills 1100 tonnes/year 4 Activated carbon 124 tonnes/year 5 Low sulphur Fuel Oil 0.5 tonnes/year 6 Oil 0.5 tonnes/year 7 Grease 0.5 tonnes/year 8 Hydrochloric Acid 120 cubic m/year 9 Phosphate 15 tonnes/year 10 Demineralised water cubic m/year 11 Potable water 8000 cubic m/year 12 Non potable water 65000 cubic m/year 13 Oxygen Scavenger 4 tonnes/year 14 Caustic Soda 80 tonnes/year Comments:

Noise Sources Base Option

Odour Inventory Base Option module 2 Odour Inventory List all emissions of odorous substances below: Are there any Odour emissions? No Number Source Compounds 1 Comments: It is not considered that there will be any point source emissions of odour which require assessment in this H1 Part 2 arising from the EfW.

Waste Hazard Inventory Base Option module 2 Waste Inventory Please list all Waste Streams emitted: Are there any Waste Hazard emissions Yes Number Waste Stream Hazard Category Mass tonne/yr 1 Incinerator Bottom Ash & Fly Ash (IBA & FA) non-hazardous 60,500 2 Air Pollution Control Residues (APCR) + fly ash hazardous 13,200 3 Recovered Metals inert 5,500 Comments:

Performance Indicators Base Option module 2 Performance Indicators Enter consumption data to determine your performance indicators Which of the following parameters do you use for calculating your performance: Product Please describe and justify your choice: Power Generation Per Unit Waste Basic Consumption Data: Specific Consumption per MWh of Electricity (net export to Nation Name Annual Quantity Units Amount of Product: Electricity (net exp 172,380 MWh Main Raw Material: Waste (Non Hazar 275,000.00 tonnes per year Production Efficiency: 0.63 MWh/tonnes per y Potable Water: 8,000.00 m3 Potable Water: 0.05 m3 Non Potable Water: m3 Non Potable Water: m3 Energy: 714,373.50 MWh Energy: 4.14 MWh Waste: Inert: 5,500.00 tonne Waste: Inert: 0.03 tonne Hazardous: 13,200.00 tonne Hazardous: 0.08 tonne Non Hazardous: 60,500.00 tonne Non Hazardous: 0.35 tonne

Module 3 - Quantify Impacts module 3 Introduction to Module 3 Module 3: Quantify Impacts The aim of this module is to quantify the effects on the environment of the emissions listed in the inventory in module 2. This guidance provides methods for assessing the ten main environmental considerations of most relevance to the PPC regime. Your emissions may not result in effects to all ten of these considerations, and the module allows you to screen out any that are not relevant. The emissions you entered in module 2 are automatically brought forward for assessment into each environmental consideration that is relevant for that type of emission (e.g. an emission may have more than one type of effect). This module allows you to screen out any emissions that are insignificant, and to identify those emissions where further, detailed assessment of the potential environemtnal impact may be required. IMPORTANT NOTE This software tool only completes PART of the requirements for module 3, as described above. Depending upon the degree of risk to the environment presented by the emissions, the operator may need to do further, detailed assessment of the potential effects using methodologies that are not provided here. This information should be submitted separately, as indicated within this module. TO CONTINUE WITH MODULE 3, PRESS "NEXT".

Identify relevant Impacts module 3 3.1 Identify Relevant Impacts Identify any environmental impacts that are not relevant to this assessment by deselecting from the list below: Emissions in Module 2? Yes Yes No No No Yes - Yes Yes Yes Justification for omission Air Deposition from Air to Land Water No Point Source Emissions to Water - see 407.0036.003463/H1P1 Noise Noise assessed as part of the Planning Application (Section 6) Odour No Point Source Emissions of odour from the EfW - see 407.0036.003463/H1P1 Waste Hazard Accidents See 407.0036.003463/H1P1 and 407.0036.00463/BAT & AMP Visual See Section 5 of EP application (Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment) Ozone Creation Global Warming If you have deselected an environmental impact as not relevant to this assessment, no further assessment of this impact will be carried out and associated assessment pages will be hidden

Local Environmental Quality module 3 3.2 Local Environmental Quality Describe the Quality of the Environment: Provide a brief description of the main local factors that may influence the importance of the impact of emissions in the surrounding environment Air Quality Are there any Environmental Quality Standards relating to substances released from the activities, which may be at risk due to additional contribution from the activity? (Environmental Quality Standards for air and water are described in IPPC Technical Guidance Notes) Are there any Local Air Quality Management Plans applicable to releases from the activity? Relevant EQSs that have been considered during detailed modelling are as detailed in the Air Quality Assessment which is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT No Water Quality & Resources Are there any Environmental Quality Standards relating to substances released from the activities, which may be at risk due to additional contribution from the activity? Are proposals to abstract water satisfactory in order to obtain an abstraction licence? Is the activity located in a groundwater vulnerable zone (for activities with direct releases to land only)? Proximity to Sensitive Receptors Is public annoyance likely to be an issue for noise, odour or plume visibility? Are there any wildlife habitats, eg Special Areas of Conservation,or Special Protection Areas, likely to be affected by releases from the activity? (Description of requirements of Habitats Directive is provided in IPPC Technical Guidance Notes) Any process water generated at the facility will be treated on site, taken off site by tanker to a suitably licensed facility or discharged to sewer. Clean surface water from hard standing areas and from the landfill cap will be attenuated in the surface water lagoons. From here the water will be discharged to the River Yealm. Not Applicable Not Applicable Fugitive emissions and impact on sensitive receptors are addressed in the H1 Part 1 Environmental Risk Assessment - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/H1P1. A list of nearby SSSI and European Sites including SPA is included in the H1 Part 1 Environmental Risk Assessment - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/H1P1.

Air Impacts Base Option module 3 3.3.1 Air Impacts Calculate Process Contributions of Emissions to Air This table estimates the Process Contribution (PC), calculated as the maximum ground level concentration for each emission listed in the inventory, according to the release point parameters input earlier. If you have more accurate data obtained through dispersion modelling, this may be entered as indicated and will be used instead of the estimated PC. Long Term Short Term * Modelled Modelled Number Substance EAL PC PC EAL PC PC µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 1 Particulates 40 0.0404 0.03 50 2.92 0.09 2 Nitrogen dioxide (human health receptor) 40 1.62 0.38 200 116 9.26 3 Carbon monoxide 350 0.404 10000 29.2 3.7 4 Sulphur dioxide (human health receptor) 50 0.404 0.13 267 29.2 1.08 5 Hydrogen chloride 20 0.0807 0.03 800 5.83 1.14 6 Hydrogen fluoride (as F) 0.00803 250 0.579 0.34 7 Ammonia (human health receptor) 180 0.0646 0.684 2500 4.67 0.018 8 Benzene 16.25 0.0807 0.03 208 5.83 3.36 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 0.005 0.000303 0.000067 1.5 0.0219 0.0084 10 Mercury and compounds, except mercury alkyls, (as 0.25 0.000405 0.000134 7.5 0.0292 0.01852 11 Arsenic and compounds (as As) 0.2 0.00225 0.000149 15 0.162 0.01667 12 Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) 30 1.62 0.38 116 9.26 13 Ammonia (ecological receptor) 8 0.0485 0.684 3300 3.50 0.018 15 Sulphur dioxide (ecological receptor) 20 0.404 0.13 29.2 1.08 Note that the Process Contribution shown for each substance is the sum of the individual process contributions of each point from which the substance is emitted. Process Contributions obtained from modelling data should incorporate all relevant release points and flow conditions. * State the location of any detailed air dispersion modelling and also the main assumptions: Comments: Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT

Air Impact Screening Base Option module 3 3.3.2 Screen out Insignificant Emissions to Air Air Impact Screening This page displays the Process Contribution as a proportion of the EAL or EQS. Emissions with PCs that are less than the criteria indicated may be screened from further assessment as they are likely to have an insignificant impact. Long Term Short Term Long Term Short Term > 1% of > 10% of Number Substance EAL EAL PC % PC of EAL EAL? PC % PC of EAL EAL? µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 % µg/m3 % 1 Particulates 40.0 50.0 0.0301 0.0751 No 0.0901 0.181 No 2 Nitrogen dioxide 40.0 200 0.381 0.951 No 9.27 4.63 No (human health receptor) 3 Carbon monoxide 350 10,000 0.404 0.116 No 3.71 0.0371 No 4 Sulphur dioxide 50.0 267 0.131 0.261 No 1.09 0.405 No (human health receptor) 5 Hydrogen chloride 20.0 800 0.0301 0.151 No 1.14 0.143 No 6 Hydrogen fluoride - 250 0.00803-0.341 0.137 No (as F) 7 Ammonia (human 180 2,500 0.685 0.381 No 0.0180 0.000721 No health receptor) 8 Benzene 16.3 208 0.0301 0.185 No 3.36 1.62 No 9 Cadmium and its 0.00500 1.51 0.00006700 1.35 Yes 0.00840 0.561 No compounds (as Cd) 10 Mercury and 0.251 7.51 0.000135 0.0537 No 0.0186 0.247 No compounds, except mercury alkyls, (as 11 Arsenic and 0.201 15.0 0.000150 0.0745 No 0.0167 0.112 No compounds (as As) 12 Nitrogen dioxide 30.0-0.381 1.27 Yes 9.27 - (ecological receptor) 13 Ammonia 8.00 3,300 0.685 8.56 Yes 0.0180 0.000546 No (ecological receptor) 15 Sulphur dioxide 20.0-0.131 0.651 No 1.09 - (ecological receptor)

Air Impact Screening Base Option

Air Impact Modelling Base Option module 3 3.3.3 Identify need for Detailed Modelling of Emissions to Air Number Air Impact Modelling This page displays the Process Contributions in relation to the backgound pollutant levels and the EAL or EQS. You should use this information to decide whether to conduct detailed modelling. Note that releases that are insignificant are not shown as they are screened from further assessment. Also complete this page if you have already done detailed modelling. Substance Air Bkgrnd Conc. µg/m3 PC µg/m3 Long Term % PC of headroom (EAL - PEC % PEC of EAL µg/m3 % PC µg/m3 Short Term % PC of headroom (EAL - Bkgrnd) 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 0.00008 0.00006700 1.37 0.000148 2.95 0.00840 0.561 12 Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) 6.78 0.381 1.64 7.17 23.9 9.27-13 Ammonia (ecological receptor) 1.2 0.685 10.1 1.89 23.6 0.0180 0.000546

Air Impact Modelling Assessment module 3 3.3.3 Air Impact Modelling Assessment See guidelines in H1 section 3.3.3 and respond to the following Describe here the justification for whether detailed modelling is, or is not required for any of the releases. Refer to the quidelines in H1 section 3.3.3 Describe source of background information: Detailed Modelling is required to gain a better understanding of actual ground level concentrations of invidiaul contaminants. Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT Document Reference of detailed modelling work: Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT

Deposition to Land from Air Base Option module 3 3.4 Deposition to Land from Air With reference to H1 Section 3.4, describe assessment of deposition below: Decision whether to screen as insignificant Number Substance % PC of EAL Insignificant? Reason (See section 3.4.1 of H1) % 1 Particulates (PM10) - Yes 1 Particulates 0.0751 Yes 2 Nitrogen dioxide (human health receptor) 0.951 Yes 3 Carbon monoxide 0.116 Yes 4 Sulphur dioxide (human health receptor) 0.261 Yes 5 Hydrogen chloride 0.151 Yes 6 Hydrogen fluoride (as F) - Yes 7 Ammonia (human health receptor) 0.381 Yes

Deposition to Land from Air Base Option 8 Benzene 0.185 Yes 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 1.35 No Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT. Inn addition, a Human Health Review has been undertaken as part of the assessment which specifically looks at deposition to l 10 Mercury and compounds, except mercury alkyls, (as 0.0537 Yes 11 Arsenic and compounds (as As) 0.0745 Yes 12 Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) 1.27 No Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT. Inn addition, a Human Health Review has been undertaken as part of the assessment which specifically looks at deposition to l 13 Ammonia (ecological receptor) 8.56 No Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT. Inn addition, a Human Health Review has been undertaken as part of the assessment which specifically looks at deposition to l 14 Particulates (PM2.5) - No 15 Sulphur dioxide (ecological receptor) 0.651 No 16 Dioxins and Furans - No

Deposition to Land from Air Base Option For those emissions not screened as insignificant, describe the location of any further assessment here: Detailed air dispersion modelling has been undertaken and is appended to the BAT document - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/BAT. In addition, a Human Health Review has been undertaken as part of the planning which specifically looks at deposition to land.

Ozone Creation Potential Base Option module 3 3.10 Photochemical Ozone Creation Impacts Number Substance Annual Rate POCP Value POCP tonne/yr per tonne 8 Benzene 16.59 21.8 361.61 3 Carbon monoxide 83.00 2.7 224.11 12 Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) 331.95 2.8 929.45 2 Nitrogen dioxide (human health receptor) 331.95 2.8 929.45 15 Sulphur dioxide (ecological receptor) 83.00 4.8 398.41 4 Sulphur dioxide (human health receptor) 83.00 4.8 398.41 Total: 3,241.44 Comments:

Global Warming Impact Base Option module 3 3.11 Global Warming Potential Impacts Substance Source Annual Rate GWP Value Annual GWP tonne/yr per tonne C02 Energy: direct direct emissions 714,350.00 1.00 178,587.50 C02 Energy: indirect indirect emissions 23.50 1.00 10.14 Comments: Total: 178,597.64

Waste Hazard Disposal Base Option module 3 3.12 Waste Hazard and Disposal Impacts Pre-Treatment Number Waste Stream Final treatment or disposal method Transport Hazard Mass Hazard Post-Treatment Mass 1 Incinerator Botto recycling 3 1 0-10 miles non-hazardous 60,500 no residue 60,500 2 Air Pollution Contr non-inert landfill 30 5 101-200 miles hazardous 13,200 hazardous 13,200 3 Recovered Metals recycling 3 4 51-100 miles inert 5,500 no residue 5,500 Comments: The distances above are indicative of potential receipients of each waste stream. Viridor will maintain dialogue with a range of providers of waste services and recycling facilities to ensure that the most suitable option is adopted upon commencement of operations. Refer to the Residue Management Plan submitted with this Environmental Permit Application - SLR Reference 407.0036.00463/RMP.

Waste Hazard Screening Impacts Base Option module 3 3.12 Waste Hazard Screening and Impacts Number Waste Stream Screen Out? Reason for Screening Disposal / Hazard Treatment Score Score 1 Incinerator Botto Yes Recycling is the preferred option - IBA Facility on site 0 0 2 Air Pollution Contr Yes Currently no other option available 0 0 3 Recovered Metals Yes Recycling represents BAT 0 0 Comments: 0 0

Summary Tables module 3 Summary Tables Print or Preview summary tables: Choose a summary table Air Deposition from Air to Land Waste Hazard Ozone Creation Global Warming Preview Print

Air Short Term Substance Graph Base Option 120% 100% 80% 60% No Data Available 40% 20% 0% Ammonia (ecological receptor) Arsenic and compounds (as As) Cadmium and its compounds Hydrogen chloride Mercury and compounds, except Particulates module 3 Air Short Term Effects - Comparison by Substance % Contribution / EAL Substances Process Contribution Background Contribution

Air Long Term Substance Graph Base Option module 3 120% 100% 80% 60% No Data Available 40% 20% 0% Ammonia (ecological receptor) Arsenic and compounds (as As) Cadmium and its compounds Hydrogen chloride % Contribution / EAL Nitrogen dioxide (ecological Particulates Sulphur dioxide (human Air Long Term Effects - Comparison by Substance Substance Release Point: 1 Release Point: 2 Background Contribution

Ozone Creation Substance Graph module 3 Ozone Creation - Substance Comparison 3500.00 Ozone Creation Potential 3000.00 2500.00 2000.00 1500.00 1000.00 No Data Available Sulphur dioxide (human health receptor) Sulphur dioxide (ecological receptor) Nitrogen dioxide (human health receptor) Nitrogen dioxide (ecological receptor) Carbon monoxide Benzene 500.00 0.00 1 Options

Global Warming Substance Graph module 3 Global Warming - Substance Comparison 178600.00 178598.00 178596.00 Global Warming Potential 178594.00 178592.00 178590.00 178588.00 No Data Available C02 Energy: indirect C02 Energy: direct 178586.00 178584.00 178582.00 1 Options

Waste Hazard Graph module 3 Waste Hazard - Option Comparison No Data Available

Summary of Environmental Assessment module 3 Summary of Environmental Assessment You have now completed all of the steps in this software for the environmental assessment. This will provide you with: an inventory of all emissions sources and substances emitted from your activities an information trail of how the impacts of these emissions have been assessed a summary of the impacts You now need to use this information to confirm whether the emissions are acceptable, i.e. that they do not cause significant pollution to occur, by responding below: Do any of the emissions exceed any of the folllowing: Statutory Emission limit values: Environmental Quality Standards (air and water): Environmental Assessment Levels: No No No If yes, identify the substances concerned and improvements that are needed to at least meet the statutory requirement If yes, identify the substances concerned, the contribution from the activities and investigate whether further detailed fate and effect modelling and/or pollution controls are needed. Ensure that the relevant EQS reference conditions are applied. If yes, identify the substances concerned, the contribution from the activities and investigate whether further detailed fate and effect modelling and/or pollution controls are needed. Use the box below to provide further information on any of the above to which you have responded 'Yes': Finally, print all of the information and submit with your application. Remember to include any supplementary information and reports that you have had made reference to during the assessment procedure.