Supplier and External Manufacturer Requirements Manual



Similar documents
Food Safety and Quality Management System

BRC Food Safety and Quality Management System. New Issue 7

IFS Food Safety and Quality Management System

SQF SYSTEMS PRACTICE TEST / OCTOBER, 2012 American Food Safety Services Division, Technical and Business Services, LLC

BRC Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

GLUTEN-FREE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM

ISO Food Safety Management System

Schweppes Australia Head Office Level 5, 111 Cecil Street South Melbourne Victoria

Global Food Safety Systems Food-Borne Pathogen Control

Contents 1.0 FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE 2.0 QUALITY COMMITMENT

SQF Level 2 Proposed Preventive Controls Comparison Modules 2 & 11

HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT PLAN SUMMARY SETHNESS PRODUCTS COMPANY LIQUID CARAMEL COLOR

Level 4 Award in HACCP Management for Food

FSSC Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II

FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (FSMS): REQUIREMENTS FOR ANY ORGANISATION IN THE FOOD CHAIN (ISO 22000:2005)

CONCEPTS OF FOOD SAFETY QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. Mrs. Malini Rajendran

RTP s NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Leila Kakko Tampere University of Applied science TRADITIONAL FOOD IN COMBATING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS 2011

Audit Standard. Issue 4, June 2015

CONTROL PLANS IN FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

BRC/IoP Global Standard

General Guidance for Developing, Documenting, Implementing, Maintaining, and Auditing an SQF System. Module 2: System Elements. SQF Code, Edition 7.

FSSC Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II

SQF 2000 Guidance. Guidance for Developing, Documenting and Implementing SQF 2000 Systems for General Food Processing. 6th Edition NOVEMBER 2008

HACCP: Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points. Dr. Angela Shaw Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition Extension and Outreach

Global Food Safety Initiative. Food Safety Auditor Competencies

Surgi Manufacturing Quality Manual

European Guide to good practice for the industrial manufacture of safe feed materials

Contaminated Products Insurance Application Form

GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMTING GMP IN FOOD PROCESSING

UNDERSTANDING THE FSSC FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION STANDARD

UNICEF s Quality Assurance System for Procurement of Micronutrient Powders (MNP)

Base Recall Program September 2003

AS9100 Quality Manual

PRODUCT CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Checklist. Standard for Medical Laboratory

NSF Dietary Supplement

Quality, GMPs & Food Safety Principles

Introduction to AS 9100

BRC GLOBAL STANDARDS SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL

April BSI HACCP & GMP Self-Assessment Checklist. Australia and New Zealand Version

Section 3-9: Principle 7: Record- Keeping Procedures

SUPPLIER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE

ISO/IEC QUALITY MANUAL

BRC/IOP A new standard for the Food Packaging Sector Siobhan Walsh Bsc., Food Supply Chain Specialist, Team BDS

Comparison between FDA QSR and ISO 13485

FOOD DEFENSE STRATEGIES: Four Ways to Proactively Protect Your Brand

Kraft Foods Supplier Quality and Food Safety Forum. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.

Welcome! DeLaval Cleaning Solutions Dallas Customer Training Session (GFSI) November 2012

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2003/94/EC

Safe%Feed/Safe%Food% Overview of Certification Programs: Why Should a Feed Mill Get Certified?

Revision Date Author Description of change Jun13 Mark Benton Removed Admin. Manager from approval

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points

Company Quality Manual Document No. QM Rev 0. 0 John Rickey Initial Release. Controlled Copy Stamp. authorized signature

Questionnaire Layout:

Quality Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL SIGNATURE PAGE AMENDMENT RECORD SCOPE EXCLUSIONS 2.1 3

Industry Best Practices for Holding Tested Products

EUROPEAN CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE PREMIXTURES OPERATORS FOR FEED ADDITIVES AND. Version

FSSC Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART I

SAMPLE EXAMINATION. If you have any questions regarding this sample examination, please

PPG SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT

Supplier Quality Agreements

Specialties Manufacturing. Talladega Castings & Machine Co., Inc. ISO 9001:2008. Quality Manual

This document includes (click to skip to content): BRC Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 7 Draft 4 for Consultation

PMO Inspection - HACCP Audit Comparison Table

It allows you to replace your manual paper based system and have real time oversight of all food safety programs.

HACCP Compliance Audits: The Role of the Regulator

1. Scope This SOP covers requirements for PHARMCO-AAPER s Quality Management System

DRAFT ISSUE 6. July 2011 British Retail Consortium London: TSO BRC Food i6 TEXT V0_3.indd 1 04/07/ :44

Rx-360 Supplier Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)

Quality Management System Manual

Decree N 152 (24 January 2013) Administrative Measure on Inspection, Quarantine and Supervision of Imports and Exports of Dairy products

Storage and Distribution of Food Products SQF Code Modules 2 and 12 Food Sector Categories 25 and 26

QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL JPM OF MISSISSIPPI, INC.

NC SBI QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION GUIDELINES ADOPTED. August 14, 1997

Karas Engineering AS9100 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL

Supplier Quality Assurance

Criteria for SQF Consultants

Product Liability Risk Control Checklist

NCA Best Practice: Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)

The Top 5 Software Capabilities for Ensuring Food Safety

The Four Elements of an Effective Food Safety Management System

Enterprise Information Management for the Food and Beverage Industry

rtech laboratories began working toward ISO 9002:1994 in ISO 17025: Practical Benefits of Implementing a Quality System STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

MSC Group Chain of Custody (CoC) Guidance for Non-Reduced Risk Groups

HACCP BASED FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM

SQF Code. 7th Edition. A HACCP-Based Supplier Assurance Code for the Food Industry J U L Y

Example of a food company quality

GHPGMP HACP. Are You Confused? Aditya Birla Retail Limited

An Introduction to Internal Audits

Cartel Electronics. AS 9100 Quality Systems Manual

Contents. Management Policy Manual SEM USA Page 2 of 12

High Level Importance: ISO Microbiology compliance

ASTRAZENECA GLOBAL POLICY QUALITY AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 2015

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) 1 Overview

Quality Agreement Template

Level 4 Award in Food Safety Management for Manufacturing

Transcription:

Supplier and External Manufacturer Requirements Manual

I am glad to be able to speak with you about our new Supplier and External Manufacturer Management Program. At Ardent Mills we are dedicated to delighting our customers with every load from every manufacturing location every day we are in operation. In order to live up to these high expectations for our company we must form strong bonds with our business partners to ensure the safety and regulatory compliance of our products. We want to include in our supply chain only those businesses who truly care about the safety and health of the consumer and so we want to partner with you to protect that which is most important. Note to Our Suppliers and External Manufacturers Through our combined efforts we can mitigate food safety risks, reduce quality incidents, and ensure that both of our brands are protected. This manual serves as minimum expectations of Food Safety Programs that we believe will allow you to control risks at your facility. On behalf of Ardent Mills, our customers, and the families of every person who consumes our products, I want to thank you for your continuing hard work and compliance with our expectations. Sincerely, Elizabeth Uriyo VP for Research, Quality & Technical Solutions Ardent Mills 2

Introduction Ardent Mills is the trusted partner in nurturing our customers, consumers and communities through innovative and nutritious grain-based solutions. Our values are Trust, Serving, Simplicity and Safety. We require full cooperation and support from our suppliers and external manufacturers (SEMs), in order to meet the expectations of our customers. This requires Ardent Mills to ensure our SEMs are aligned with our values and operate in full compliance with Ardent Mills food/feed safety, quality and regulatory requirements. It is Ardent Mills desire to partner with SEMs to share best practices in the areas of food/feed safety, quality, regulatory compliance and continuous improvement. Our Supplier and External Manufacturer Management Process or SEM Process allows us to verify that our suppliers and external manufacturers can provide safe, healthy finished products and ingredients. The current scope of the SEM Process is human and animal food finished products, ingredients, food contact packaging, and food contact processing aids. This manual is designed for use by our SEMs and provides information on (i) food/feed safety, quality and regulatory compliance requirements for SEMs and (ii) Ardent Mills qualification and management processes for SEMs. 3

Ardent Mills Required Programs To be an SEM for Ardent Mills a facility must first meet applicable Legal and Regulatory Requirements and implementation of Codex Pre-requisite Programs and HACCP. The list below outlines the specific programs that Ardent Mills expects all SEMs to have in place. Required elements for Food Safety program: 1. HACCP or equivalent risk based process controls Risks in the process and from all inputs must be evaluated and controlled. 2. Food Safety and Quality Management System The Quality management system shall manage regulatory compliance, customer complaints, internal auditing, and, shall involve a cross functional team. 3. Management of Change Any changes to the process or facility must be analyzed for risk and documented. 4. Control of Documents and Records All documents that are part of the processing and quality control of the product shall have a method to ensure that completion and changes are tracked. 5. Supplier / External Manufacturer Qualification The use of outside companies by the SEM for ingredients, co-packing, or production of finished products will be evaluated for risk and controlled. All SEMs must have approval and monitoring programs for their own suppliers which, at a minimum, consist of a combination of appropriate programs, specifications, policies and procedures described in this document. 6. Facility Security and Product Defense The facility must control access and have plans for emergency situations. 7. Training All employees, permanent and temporary, will have job specific safety and quality training that has regular refreshers 8. Environmental Monitoring / Pathogen Testing If applicable based on risk, the program will monitor microorganisms and ensure product is not contaminated. 9. Foreign Material Control Metal, glass, and brittle plastics will be controlled in the facility to prevent their entry into the process. 10. Personal Hygiene There will be a formal list of personal hygiene practices to prevent employees and visitors from bringing contaminants into the process. 11. Allergen Control All allergens appropriate for the country of consumption will be included in the raw ingredient evaluation and their presence in the facility will be controlled. All employees must be aware of these allergens even if they are not present in the facility. Legal and 4

12. Pest Control A program must be in place to prevent and control pests. This includes those entering the facility from outside and those that may be present in the raw ingredients. 13. Manufacturing records All records that monitor the process will be included in the document control program and monitored by management for accuracy. 14. Rework, Reprocessing, Reconditioning and Waste Management If any product is removed from the process for rework or for waste it must be treated in a way that it does not pose a risk to the final product or facility sanitation. 15. Calibrations All equipment that monitors final product quality/food safety including in process and in the laboratory shall be regularly calibrated by a qualified person/company. 16. Maintenance All equipment in the facility must be on an inspection and maintenance cycle. Also a system must be in place to find and fix equipment breakdowns in a timely manner. Any temporary fixes shall not compromise food safety and shall also be fixed in a timely manner. 17. Cleaning and Sanitation Based on the risks identified in the process there will be a program to remove materials from the equipment and facility that controls these risks. 18. Product Traceability and Labeling Every step of the process shall be labeled so that there is complete traceability from raw ingredient to finished product. Final product labels and packaging shall be checked for accuracy on a regular basis. 19. Receiving, Storage, and Shipping All incoming and outgoing products must be inspected for quality. Any finished or in process product shall be inspected on a regular basis to prevent contamination while in storage. 20. Good Laboratory Practices Systems must be in place to ensure reliability of laboratory results for testing done on products or materials manufactured for Ardent Mills. This includes use of recognized test methods, documented procedures, trained and competent technicians, calibrated and maintained equipment. Regulatory Requirements 5

6

4 Steps to Qualification of SEMs Outline of Qualification Process The initial qualification of SEMs has four basic components: Step 1: initial information and document request, audit and/or verification, Step 2: pre-qualification corrective action plans, Step 3: determination and communication of food/feed safety status and Step 4: plant trials (if applicable). STEP 1: Initial Information, Document Request, Audit and/or Verification Each prospective SEM must undergo a food/feed safety, quality and regulatory compliance review. Ardent Mills will designate a person to collect and evaluate information on the SEM to determine if their programs are sufficiently managing risk. Below is a list of the possible documents or visits the SEM might be requested to provide. Based on the risk posed by the material and SEM facility to Ardent Mills one or any number may be needed before qualifying an SEM. A Questionnaire on facility Programs Product food safety documents (e.g. MSDS, letter of guarantee, country of origin, etc.) 3rd Party audit certificates, reports and corrective actions (GFSI preferred) Ardent Mills 2nd party audit of manufacturing facility Ardent Mills 2nd party targeted audit or visit Product samples, testing, or trials Review of specifications and/or packaging Step 2. Pre-Qualification Corrective Action Plans If Ardent Mills identifies any failure to comply with the outlined Food/Feed Safety Requirements in Step 1, the SEM must develop a proposed Corrective Action 7

Plan, including timelines for approval. The Ardent Mills employee assigned to the SEM will work with them to evaluate corrective actions and implementation dates. Step 3. Determination and Communication of Initial SEM Food Safety Status Ardent Mills will determine and communicate the initial Food Safety Status of an SEM following completion of the initial phase and, as appropriate, development and/or implementation of a Corrective Action Plan. Food Safety Status will be specific to SEM product(s)/material(s)/ service(s), production line(s), and/or plant(s). Note: this determination is of SEM FOOD SAFETY STATUS ONLY. It does not guarantee the SEM has actually been or will be awarded the final business. The statuses include Approved, Conditionally Approved, Pending, Not Approved, and Disqualified. Food Safety status will be specific to a specific SEM location. Approved: This status represents an SEM that has no pending Major Non-conformance(s). They can have Minor Non-conformance(s) of food safety system components to address, however a corrective action plan has to be developed and approved by assigned Audit Specialist. Conditionally Approved: This status represents an SEM that has no pending Major Non-conformance(s) but has Minor Non-conformance(s) stemming from an SEM audit that have not been verified as corrected by the assigned Audit Specialist but an action plan has been formed with agreed upon timeline for implementation. The SEM may be used prior to completion and verification of corrective action. This status can also represent an SEM that has been inherited from a legacy parent company (Horizon Milling and/or ConAgra Mills). They are referred to as grandfathered suppliers and have been given conditional approval based on historical performance. These suppliers will be required to complete the full SEM process as defined in the SEM Strategy. Ardent Mills can use materials from Approved, and Conditionally Approved suppliers. Pending: This status represents an SEM that is currently being evaluated with the SEM review process. These suppliers will be required to complete the full SEM process as defined in the SEM Policy before usage of the location for sourcing material is allowed. Not Approved: This status represents an SEM that has any pending Major Non-conformance(s) or multiple Minor Non-conformances that pose a significant food safety risk as determined by the SEM team. An SEM assigned this status can submit a corrective action plan for reevaluation by the SEM team. This could include additional documentation up to including a re-audit. Disqualified: This status represents SEMs that have pending non-conformance(s) that have been recorded and the SEM has indicated they are not interested in correcting. SEMs assigned this status shall not be allowed to re-apply for SEM approval without written permission from the Director of Regulatory and Strategy. Ardent Mill s shall not use materials from Pending, Not Approved or Disqualified suppliers. Step 4: Plant Trials If an SEM is required to complete a plant trial, this requirement will be communicated to the SEM during the qualification process. A plant trial may not occur in an Ardent Mills or an SEM facility until the SEM has been assigned an acceptable Food/Feed Safety Status. The results of a plant trial may or may not change a SEMs Food Safety Status. 8

9

10

Ongoing Management of Supplier and External Manufacturer Relationship The ongoing management of SEMs has five components: (i) communication of changes (ii) periodic audit and/ or verification of compliance, (ii) ongoing monitoring, (iii) triggering event management, (iv) post-qualification Corrective Action Plans and (v) updates to Food Safety Status. They are listed below so you as the SEM can be aware of your ongoing roles and responsibilities in the ongoing partnership. i. Management of Change SEMs must not change the location, specification, production process, inputs or material without prior notice to and approval by Ardent Mills. ii. Periodic Audit and/or Verification of Compliance SEMs must permit Ardent Mills to review records and obtain retained samples pertaining to that Product, Material or Service. Each SEM must permit Ardent Mills upon reasonable advance notice, to audit and inspect the facilities used to manufacture Product or Material for Ardent Mills and/or provide Services to Ardent Mills. iii. Monitoring Performance As part of its SEM program, Ardent Mills may also monitor SEMs ongoing performance through various means. Ardent Mills will advise each SEM of those documents and other information it will require for its monitoring from the SEM. Monitoring requirements may change from time to time depending on an SEMs Food Safety Status, performance, regulatory changes and other factors. Some examples of the type of documentation and other information that may be required are listed below: a. Product Data (e.g., protein, fat, fiber, ash, MDF, moisture) b. Microbiological testing results c. Monthly reports on Key Performance Indicators, d. Third Party Audits e. Product Material Safety Data Sheet f. Complaints regarding Ardent Mills products g. Management of Change records h. Batch records i. Process Control Chart (Target / Range) Examples of triggering events include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Product Retrieval Incidents e.g., Recall, Withdrawal b. Plant, Ingredient or Process Change at the SEM or Ardent Mills c. Specification Change by SEM or Ardent Mills d. Industry/Economic/Media Events e. Change in Regulations or Regulatory Enforcement f. Trends in Key Performance Indicators g. Breach of Supplier Code of Conduct h. Audit Results i. Ownership or Financial Change v. Post-Qualification Corrective Action Plans If Ardent Mills identifies any failure to comply with Food Safety Requirements as a result of a periodic audit and/or verification, ongoing monitoring or a triggering event, the SEM must promptly develop a proposed Corrective Action Plan, including timelines for approval. vi. Updates to Food Safety Status If the results of a periodic audit and/or verification, ongoing monitoring or a triggering event investigation reflect that an SEM is not meeting Ardent Mills Food Safety Requirements, this may change an SEMs Food Safety Status. If the SEMs Food Safety Status changes from Approved or Approved with Conditions to Not Approved or Disqualified, Ardent Mills has the right to immediately terminate use of the SEM and its contract with the SEM with no liability. If, for any reason, it is appropriate to change the SEM designation, Ardent Mills will promptly notify SEM of that change. Requesting Variances In rare cases, Ardent Mills may permit SEMs to deviate from one or more of the outlined Food/Feed Safety Requirements set forth in this manual. Any such deviation must be approved by Ardent Mills, in writing. iv. Triggering Event Management A Triggering Event is an event or circumstance that would require Ardent Mills to communicate with you to determine if there is an impact to the business. 11

ArdentMills.com TP1214 2014 Ardent Mills