Alberta Tier 2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Guideline Calculation Software



Similar documents
Frequently Asked Questions on the Alberta Tier 1 and Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines. February 2008

Alberta Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines

ALBERTA TIER 2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION GUIDELINES

SOIL GAS MODELLING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETERS FOR J&E EQUATION

Alternate Concentration Limits/Groundwater Cleanup Levels. Title slide

Innovative Solutions Using Risk Assessment Tools as a Map for Site Portfolio Management

STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT - 008

Use of Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs) to Determine Cleanup or Regulatory Levels Under RCRA and CERCLA

Soil Cleanup Goals. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division. Guidance Document 19

1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Prof. Charles Harvey Lecture Packet #2: Aquifers, Porosity, and Darcy s Law. Lake (Exposed Water Table)

PREDICTIVE MODELLING AND MONITORING NATURAL ATTENUATION TO SAVE REMEDIAL COSTS

USEPA Risk-Based Standards for Controlling Contaminated Sites Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) April 2, 2007 Aaron Yeow, USEPA

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Defence College of Technical Training. Former RAF Lyneham Geo-Environmental Report Appendix D: Preliminary Qualitative Risk Assessment

SWAT INPUT DATA:.GW CHAPTER 24

Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form

Presented by: Craig Puerta, PE, MBA December 12, 2012

BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION/REMEDIAL SECTION GUIDANCE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION OF SALT (CHLORIDE)- IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER

A Federal Approach to Contaminated Sites

Principles of groundwater flow

Barometric Effects on Transducer Data and Groundwater Levels in Monitoring Wells D.A. Wardwell, October 2007

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

Evaluation of Site-Specific Criteria for Determining Potability

Focus on Developing Ground Water Cleanup Standards Under the Model Toxics Control Act

INTEGRATED METHODS IN COST EFFECTIVE AQUIFER REMEDIATION: 3 FIELD EXPERIENCES

Review of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods Unsaturated Zone. Dept. of Earth Sciences University of the Western Cape

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT

Manag.

Environmental Guideline. for. Contaminated Site Remediation

Matt Harris, Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd. The value of geophysics as a non-intrusive method for site characterisation

In-Situ Remediation Strategies as Sustainable Alternatives to Traditional Options. Ryan Bernesky, B.Sc., P.Ag. February 26, 2013

WATER SUPPLY WELL RECEPTOR SURVEY GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist

New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting

PROGRAM AT A GLANCE 12

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

Focus on Developing Surface Water Cleanup Standards Under the Model Toxics Control Act

FINAL GUIDANCE FOR CONDUCTING BENEFICIAL WATER USE DETERMINATIONS AT ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP SITES

Chapter 22: Overview of Ecological Risk Assessment

Well gauging results LNAPL in Benzol Processing Area

In-situ Bioremediation of oily sediments and soil

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant.

HISTORICAL OIL CONTAMINATION TRAVEL DISTANCES IN GROUND WATER AT SENSITIVE GEOLOGICAL SITES IN MAINE

Risk Management Procedure For The Derivation and Use Of Soil Exposure Point Concentrations For Unrestricted Use Determinations

Site Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point

Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination

September September Consulting Structural and Civil Engineers. 100 St John Street London EC1M 4EH. akt-uk.com

For Water to Move a driving force is needed

TECHNICAL REVIEW OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY FOR ALASKA

Groundwater flow systems theory: an unexpected outcome of

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS WHERE ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ARE PROPOSED

Directive 001: Requirements for Site-Specific Liability Assessments in Support of the ERCB s Liability Management Programs

Addendum. Use Attainability Analysis for Site Specific Selenium Criteria: Alkali Creek. February 23, 2009

Environmental Remediation Examples and Remediation Strategic Planning

PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE

Guidelines For Sealing Groundwater Wells

Periodical meeting CO2Monitor. Leakage characterization at the Sleipner injection site

STATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Landfill Leachate Induced Arsenic Contamination in Maine, US - Intro GIS Term Project Final Report

Letter Health Consultation

Environmentally Friendly Drilling Systems. Technology Integration Program. Case Study Chalk Hill Ranch/Dewitt County Field Trial 2, Texas June 2013

APPENDIX D RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

This document contains the Connecticut regulations concerning the Remediation Standard Regulations and the Environmental Land Use Restriction

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Targeted Risk Assessment Addendum to the User Guide for the Standalone Consumer Tool Version 3.1 -

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER JUNE INTERIM FINAL GUIDANCE (UPDATE No. 2.

Utilizing an Innovative, Effective Site Assessment and Monitoring Tool

Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION Interim Final 2/5/99 RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA750)

DIRECTIVE 055: STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UPSTREAM PETROLEUM INDUSTRY. August 2012

In-situ Chemical Oxidation via Ozone at a Multiple-Remedy UST Site

Information Request 14

2011 Operations, Maintenance, Monitoring and Rehabilitation Plan

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 Houston, TX. Energy Exchange 9:20 9:50 a.m. and 9:55 10:25 a.m. OIL AND GAS: ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE IS IT NECESSARY?

3-D Data Visualization Taking the Next Step in Data Presentation

6 Chemicals from human settlements

CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS

CHAPTER 13 LAND DISPOSAL

GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION IN SITE ASSESSMENT. Technical Guidance for Contaminated Sites

The Role of Groundwater in Alberta s Tight Water Supply Environment. Ken Baxter, M.Sc., P.Geol. Dan R. Brown, M.Sc., P.Geol.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Water Permeability vs Waterproof

Vulnerability Assessment

Summary of A Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human Health Soil Quality Guidelines (CCME 2006)

Quality Assurance Project Plan Performance Assessment Model Version 2 Clive, Utah. Prepared by Neptune and Company

BIOREMEDIATION: A General Outline Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.

Assessment of Natural Biodegradation at Petroleum Release Sites Guidance Document 4-03

June 29, 2012 Version 1.2

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

THE APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE 3 RD CANADIAN EDITION BUSI 330

FARM A SYST Farmstead Assessment System. Drinking Water Well Condition

DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA750)

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Site Remediation. Policy Memo 95-01

Florinel ªuþoiu*, Argentina Tãtaru*, Bogdan Simescu* RIGLESS JOBS IN GAS WELLS

Understanding Tight Oil

Hydrogeological Data Visualization

UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

Transcription:

PTAC Soil and Groundwater Forum and Poster Session Alberta Tier 2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Guideline Calculation Software Presented by Anthony L. Knafla M.Sc., DABT Sunita Ranganathan M.Sc. March 22, 2011

Software Tool Agenda Background Software Architecture Basis Uses Tier 2 Assumptions / Parameters Live Demo 2

Acknowledgements Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada (PTAC) AUPRF (Alberta Upstream Petroleum Research Fund) Distributed with direction from, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) Small Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (SEPAC) Mike Morden Suncor Energy Project champion Miles Tindal (MEMS) Peer reviewer review to be completed April/May 2011 3

Background AENV Tier 2 framework for guideline calculation for PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) and other substances Tool developed based entirely on AENV Tier 2 Framework, Equations, and Parameters, except Algorithm added to allow for the calculation of subsoil gas (vapour) guidelines in anticipation of upcoming Canadian guidance NOT an AENV endorsed program PTAC tool Will be available for download from the PTAC website Validity recalculation of Tier 1 guidelines for all PHCs, all receptors and exposure pathways Peer Review by an expert involved with the development of Tier 2 guidelines 4

Software Architecture Code Visual Basic Front end Microsoft Excel back end Can be installed on end user computers as a stand alone Visual Basic User Manual PDF file & context help button for basic instructions Optional Training Course Consistency Accuracy No exam not an AENV endorsed tool 5

Uses for the Calculator Application for the Upstream, Midstream, and Downstream Oil and Gas Sectors Data gap analysis Explore modification of input parameters Mandatory triggers for a Tier 2 assessment Sizeable or deep impact suggesting exploration of a Tier 2 guideline with greater parameter refinement may be of value for remediation volume estimation Support of risk management strategies Explore risk limiting pathways and receptors Tier 2 Soil, Groundwater, and Soil Gas Guidelines 6

Mandatory Triggers for a Tier 2 (and/or SSRA) Assessment CONDITION Land/water use not captured by generic Tier 1 land uses Exposure pathway is present that is not considered at Tier 1 for the land use Human receptors spend more time at the site on average, or receive higher levels of exposure than assumed at Tier 1 for the land use (e.g. higher produce consumption from site) Ecological receptors with high sensitivity Atypical building construction (earthen floors, crawlspace, low air exchange, etc.) Surface water body within 10 m of contamination Contaminated groundwater in contact with stagnant surface water body Coarse sand/gravel soils with Darcy velocity greater than the default velocity (3 x 10-7 ). This may occur for sites with high hydraulic conductivity (> 320 m/y) or where groundwater gradients are greater than those used in the default Tier 1 guidelines (0.028 m/m). Contaminated soil source within 30 cm of existing building foundation or contaminated groundwater or capillary fringe that has potential to be within 30 cm of the building (based on potential for seasonal groundwater fluctuation). Contamination in fractured bedrock RESPONSE REQUIRED Site-specific risk assessment Add exposure pathway (Tier 1 or Tier 2) or proceed to site-specific risk assessment Tier 2 Guideline Adjustment or site-specific risk assessment or apply more conservative land use at Tier 1 Site-specific risk assessment to ensure sensitive species are protected level Generally Tier 2 Guideline Adjustment but may require more detailed site-specific risk assessment Tier 2 Guideline Adjustment or site-specific risk assessment Site-specific risk assessment Tier 2 Guideline Adjustment or site-specific risk assessment Conduct Tier 2 Guideline Adjustment for the vapour inhalation pathway using a default attenuation coefficient of 0.01 (dilution factor of 100) or proceed to site-specific risk assessment. Site-specific risk assessment Reference: Alberta Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines (December 2010). 7

Tier 2 Guideline Modification and Pathway Exclusion Covered by the Tool Pathway Comments Human Direct Soil Contact Cannot be modified or excluded. Vapour Inhalation Can be modified but not excluded. Protection of Potable Water Can be modified or excluded. For exclusion at Tier 2, DUA must be shown to be isolated from any contamination by a natural geological barrier. Ecological Direct Soil Contact Cannot be modified or excluded. Can be adjusted for Tier 2 site specific risk assessment of certain chemicals. Soil/Food Ingestion Cannot be modified or excluded. (livestock and wildlife) Protection of Aquatic Life Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Livestock Watering Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Wildlife Watering Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Irrigation Watering Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Other considerations Offsite migration Management Limits Cannot be modified but may be excluded if there is no potential for more sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the site. Cannot be modified or excluded.

Modification or Exclusions of Pathways at Tier 2 Groundwater Pathway Comments Human Vapour Inhalation Can be modified but not excluded. Protection of Potable Water Can be modified or excluded. For exclusion at Tier 2, DUA must be shown to be isolated from any contamination by a natural geological barrier. Ecological Direct Soil Contact Cannot be modified or excluded. Can be adjusted for Tier 2 site specific risk assessment of certain chemicals. Protection of Aquatic Life Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Livestock Watering Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Wildlife Watering Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. Irrigation Watering Can be modified and excluded at Tier 2. 9

Primary Tier 2 Adjustable Parameters Soil Properties Dry bulk density, particle size density Moisture content (seasonal extensive data) Total porosity (calculated) Air-filled porosity (calculated) Water-filled porosity (calculated) Change as a package Source Dimensions Source length / width Depth to bottom of contamination Thickness of contamination Change as a package Hydrogeological Parameters Saturated hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic gradient Depth to groundwater Independent Parameters Soil organic carbon fraction Soil vapour permeability (can be a more difficult challenge) Distance to receptor Distance from contamination to foundation slab 10

Secondary Tier 2 Adjustable Parameters Building Properties only if more sensitive than Tier 1 Building length Building width Effective building height Depth to foundation base Change as a package Foundation slab thickness Crack area / length Pressure differential Air exchange rate Other Mixing zone thickness Thickness of the unconfined aquifer (DUA) Note: Adjustment of building properties is not normally permissible at Tier 2, except to evaluate a building more sensitive than the Tier 1 default. 11

Soil Vapour Guidelines - Allows for guideline development and comparison against measured data still must meet soil/groundwater guidelines for other pathways - tool provides preliminary background for data collection 12

Soil Vapour Wells - Install in vadose zone - Multiple vapour wells (nested) improves understanding of vapour flow - Concentrations may decrease at shallower depths due to anaerobic degradation, correlated with depleted O 2 and evolved CO 2 Can sample soil gas with SUMA canisters SUMA CANISTER VAPOUR SCREEN AND DRIVE POINT 13