2001 Calgary Region EXTERNAL TRUCK SURVEY STUDY



From this document you will learn the answers to the following questions:

What form was used to obtain information on truck ownership?

Where was the 2001 Calgary Truck Survey Study?

What is the name of the survey?

Similar documents
Roadside Truck Survey in the National Capital Region

The Number of Businesses in Alberta is Gaining Momentum

GTA Cordon Count Program

American Fast Freight

Contingent Liability Application (Bobtail & Deadhead)

2015 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review. Employment. Unemployment. Economic Regions. Migration. Indigenous People. Industries

Recreational Vehicle Towing Guide

Distribution Services Handbook

Chapter 9: Transportation

Highway Motor Transportation

GUIDELINES FOR MOVEMENT OVER SOUTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS OF OVERSIZE AND OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES AND LOADS

The Colorado State Patrol Commercial Vehicle Safety Units January 2011

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

THE INFLUENCE OF POLICY ON CRASH RATE OF LONG COMBINATION VEHICLES

Railway Demand Forecasting and Service Planning Processes. Prepared for: Rail Freight Service Review

Leicestershire County Council Transport Trends in Leicestershire Transport Data and Intelligence (TDI)

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda

Pros and Cons of Alternative Origin- Destination Passive Data Collection Methods

ENGINEERING LABOUR MARKET

The Preservation of Local Truck Routes: A Primary Connection between Commerce and the Regional Freight Network

Appendix B. NAICS Codes, Titles, and Descriptions

Truck Application DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS. LIABILITY COVERAGE Complete for desired coverages by indicating limits of insurance.

MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE

SECTION 12: VETERANS AFFAIRS NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION MEMORIAL PROGRAM CEMETERY MONUMENTS (SUPPLEMENTAL TL RATES) ROUTE ORDER SUBMISSION...

Primer on Transportation Funding and Governance in Canada s Large Metropolitan Areas

To separate a composite load into individual shipments and route to different destinations.

Surface Transportation Board

Transportation Terminology

INNOVATIVE USE OF A CORPORATE SURVEY TOOL FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION FOR THE SUSTAINABLE RURAL ROADS MASTER PLAN FOR STRATHCONA COUNTY, ALBERTA

Working Alone (Part 28 of the Occupational Health and Safety Code) Questions and Answers

Freight (Rail) Transportation in the State of Michigan

Class I Railroad Statistics

MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE

2012 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

Info Source. Sources of Federal Government and Employee Information Vancouver Fraser Port Authority. Table of Contents

Design Simulations Deliver Measurable Performance

Appendix. Value for Money? Teacher Compensation and Student Outcomes in Canada s Six Largest Provinces

APPENDIX 7 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

MICHIGAN S TRUCK-WEIGHT LAW And TRUCK-USER FEES

9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015

The case for rail transportation of hazardous materials

VERMONT TRAFFIC MONITORING STANDARDS

Nashville Freight Model. Max Baker, Nashville MPO Rob Bostrom, WSA July 17, 2008 Tennessee MUG

SUMMARY OF STATE MOTOR-VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE SCHEDULES 1/

Personnel Position Name Years % of Ownership President Operations Manager Safety Director Loss Control Contact Insurance Contact

Commercial Automobile Insurance Manual

Network Monitoring Plan. Executive Summary

APPLICATION FORM MANITOBA SAFETY FITNESS CERTIFICATE (SFC) for Regulated Vehicles

NAME: POWER UNIT ID: NAME OF APPLICANT (RESPONSIBLE MOTOR CARRIER) REGISTRATION/VIN STATE. Meet At: Meet Date: Meet Time:

Application for Umbrella Quotation

Site Selection Profile

Statistical Profile of Lunenburg County

Rail 2030: Preparing Today for Tomorrow s Challenges

TRANSPORTATION MODELLING IN CALGARY

Professional Truck Driver Training Course Syllabus

Canadian Rail: Gearing Up in the West

Toronto Employment Survey 2014

11. Monitoring Performance monitoring in LTP2

Why build the Silvertown Tunnel?

National Retail Report Canada FALL 2015 EDITION. Accelerating success.

Using Freight Advanced Traveler Information Systems to Promote Urban Freight Mobility

Economic Impacts of MLS Home Sales and Purchases in Canada and the Provinces

PROVINCIAL OUTLOOK UPDATE February 6, 2015

Rapid Transit Backgrounder

Big Data for Transportation: Measuring and Monitoring Travel

Load Planning for Less-than-truckload Carriers. Martin Savelsbergh

6 REGIONAL COMMUTE PATTERNS

Engineering Labour Market Conditions

The Tech Model Railroad Club Operations Scheme

TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND INTERMODAL RAIL

Canadian Vehicle Use Study: Electronic Data Collection

Fleet Vehicle Licensing and Registration What a fleet Manager should know

Introduction to Ontario's Physical Markets

FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005

SUMMARY OF SERVICES

4-Step truck model: SCAG case study

Funds for Fleets. A guide to government funding opportunities for employers in Canada s trucking industry

Overview of Requirements for Using Overweight Vehicles to Ship Spent Nuclear Fuel 8472

STATISTICAL PROFILE OF CAPE BRETON. Prepared By: Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture

CONTENTS LEVY. (Prepared by Ian G. Heggie, revised March 1999) 1. Weight-Distance Charges Exempting Non-Road Users...3

How To Rank Canadian Engineers

Hamilton Truck Route Study

Streamline Accessorial Charges

Overview: Section A: Business Environment Employment and Unemployment Numbers and Rates. 2. Industry s Growth. 3. Facts, Trends and Outlook

BYRON HILLS RESOURCES LTD. OPPORTUNITY OVERVIEW

COMMERCIAL VEHICLE CERTIFICATE AND INSURANCE REGULATION

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Annexation Proposed by the Town of Beaumont. Leduc County FINAL REPORT

Appendix 1 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)

September 2008 AFC (2) Page 1 of 5. Maximum Size and Aggregate Capacities of Aboveground Storage Tank Systems at Fuel Dispensing Stations

Lesson 1 Introduction to Classification

The National Road Traffic Act 93 of 96

Snow Operations and Fleet Management Best Practices Study Results

Transcription:

2001 Calgary Region EXTERNAL TRUCK SURVEY STUDY Forecasting Division November 2001

1.0 Introduction The External Truck Survey was undertaken, in the Fall 2000, to obtain information on the movement of goods to and from the Calgary Region. This survey supplements a more extensive survey of commodity flow conducted within Calgary and region, from 2000 October to 2001 January. The external survey was administered at 16 different highway locations to approximately 5,000 trucks. Truck traffic in both directions of travel was surveyed during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The surveys were supplemented with 24 hour vehicle classification counts. Approximately 77% of all truck drivers were interviewed during the survey period. The study was designed and administered in association with Alberta Transportation and the City of Calgary. 2.0 Survey Methodology The survey was administered via an interview with a stopped truck driver. Trucks were pulled off the highway into vehicle inspection stations, rest areas, or other areas deemed by Alberta Transportation to be safe for the survey activities. All signing and enforcement was handled by Inspection Service of Alberta Transportation. Figure 1 shows the region with the interview locations. The survey form (Appendix A) obtained information on: type of truck truck information (type, # axles, GVW) occupancy ownership (owned, leased, for hire) origin(today s and original) destination(today s and final) commodity quantity and value stops(location, reason, commodity/amount/value delivered/picked up). The interview required between 60-90 seconds to administer. Lost time for trucks including deceleration from and acceleration to the highway was approximately 8-12 minutes. 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 1

Trucks were classified into five categories: a. Single unit, single axle b. Single unit, dual axle c. Semi, no trailer d. Semi, one trailer e. Semi, multi trailer. Figure 1 Study Area and Survey Locations 24 22 2 806 9 2 1A 21 840 564 1 8 1 561 22X 901 1 22 2 542 541 534 22 533 2 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study

Table 1 shows the completed interviews for each survey location. Approximately 77% of all truck drivers were interviewed during the survey period. Table 1: Survey Completions (8:00 AM to 4:00 PM) Highway Locations Completed Interviews TCH East 700 TCH West 632 1A 123 2 South 532 2 North 1,597 9 133 21 173 22 South 97 22 North 160 23 204 534 39 541 253 542 30 561 59 806 114 901 123 Total 4,969 Completion Rate 76.9% TCH: Trans Canada Highway 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 3

3.0 Survey Results 3.1 Total Number of Trips on Highways The total number of trucks inbound to and outbound from the Calgary region is 13,360 vehicles/day. The primary highways (Highway 2 North and South, and Trans Canada Highway East and West) accounted for 70% of the trucks on the highway system. Highway 2 North accounted for one third of all the trucks reflecting the link it provides between the two largest urban centres in Alberta Calgary and Edmonton. Table 2: 24 Hour Truck Volumes Highway Location Vehicles 1A 234 21 489 22 North 337 22 South 457 23 517 2 North 4,531 2 South 1,416 534 77 541 566 542 66 561 191 806 304 9 326 901 380 TCH East 1,870 TCH West 1,599 Total 13,360 Figure 2 shows the distribution of trucks by time of day. Unlike urban road systems where there is a distinctive peak hour, either in the AM or PM peak periods, truck travel on the highway system does not have a high peak hour and the profiles for inbound/outbound are very similar. 4 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study

Figure 2 Distribution of External Trucks by Time of Day 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 % 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time of Day (Hours) OUTBOUND INBOUND For inbound truck traffic the peak hour is 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM with 3.0% of the trucks while the outbound peak hour is 11:00 AM to 12:00 Noon with 3.4% of the trucks. Table 3 shows the total number of trucks by type for the 8 hour and 24 hour periods. Nearly 50% of trucks of the 24 hour truck volume occurs between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Although over 70% of the trucks on the highway system are semi trailer trucks, these units have the lowest percentage occurring between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. This may be due to a desire to travel during periods of less congestion. Table 3: Trucks types by Time Period Time Period (8:00 AM ~ 4:00 PM) 24 Hour Rate Vehicle Type (8hour/24hour) Single Axle, Single Unit 914 1,396 65.4% Dual Axle, Single Unit 1,081 2,136 50.6% Semi, No Trailer 91 200 45.5% Semi, One Trailer 3,069 6,400 47.9% Semi, Multi Trailer 1,285 3,228 39.8% Total 6,440 13,360 48.2% 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 5

3.2 Distribution Patterns for Truck Trips The survey recorded truck origins and destinations based on today s travel and also based on the original/final origin and destination. These can be distinguished as follows: Today s origin/destination: This records where the truck was located at the start of the survey day (origin) and at the end of the day (destination). It is possible for todays origin and destination to be the same. This occurs for a truck that starts the day at a business in Calgary or a town in the region and ultimately returns after deliveries at the end of the day. The truck driver in this case would provide the stop(s) made on the trip and these stops would be recorded on the survey form. Original origin/ Final destination: For a long distance truck this information provides where the trip began and where it will ultimately end. Therefore as an example a truck may have an original origin of Toronto and a final destination of Seattle. Again, it is possible for this origin and destination to be the same. An example of this is a truck that started at a business located in the study area (Calgary, Airdrie, High River etc.) and makes a delivery to an out of region location (eg. Edmonton, Lethbridge, Canmore etc.) and returns to its origin by the end of day. The survey will have the same location name in both origin and destination categories with the stop locations, for deliveries and pickups documented. Table 4 provides the distribution of trucks based on today s origin and destination. The areas are defined as follows: 1. Calgary includes the area within Calgary corporate limits. 2. Calgary Region (excluding Calgary) includes the Municipal District of Rocky View and Foothills, part of the County of Vulcan (to Vulcan), and the County of Wheatland ( to Standard). (see Figure 1) 3. Edmonton region includes the City of Edmonton, all cities/towns in the vicinity (eg. Sherwood Park, Leduc, Fort Saskatchewan etc) and Nisku. 6 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study

4. Rest of Alberta represents the balance of the Province not included in the above previously defined areas. 5. Rest of Canada excludes British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Manitoba which are aggregated seperatlely. The objective was to interview truck drivers at the perimeter of the study area cordon. However, for reasons of safety, some of the survey locations had to be located within the study area. As an example the weigh station for Highway 2 North is located south of Airdrie, however a location closer to Crossfield would have been more desirable. The consequence of this is the reader will notice some trucks have origins in Calgary and destinations in the regional study area, and vice versa. This is a result of survey locations and does not represent the total of intra-regional truck trips. The larger Commodity Flow survey will provide a more complete picture of these trips. Table 4 shows that about 49% of the trucks on the highway system originate or were destined to Calgary or Calgary Region, and nearly one third of all trucks originate or are destined to locations in the Rest of Alberta. Overall 77% of the trucks on the highway system are involved in the movements of goods within the Province of Alberta. On an average day 1714 trucks from Calgary and 791 trucks from the Calgary Region are round tripping. This indicates the role these locations are playing as distribution centres to surrounding areas as near as Canmore and as far as Edmonton. Table 4: Todays Origin/Destination for Trucks DESTINATION CALGARY CALGARY EDMONTON REST BRITISH SASK REST UNITED ORIGIN REGION REGION ALBERTA COLUMBIA MNTBA CANADA STATES TOTAL CALGARY 1714 366 453 1318 349 275 17 116 4608 CALGARY REGION 99 791 30 777 41 46 11 36 1831 EDMONTON REGION 465 52 158 170 38 19. 57 959 REST OF ALBERTA 1254 666 165 1766 209 88 10 80 4238 BRITISH COLUMBIA 485 20 49 100 50 170 30 7 911 REST OF CANADA 14.. 3 17... 34 SASK AND MANITOBA 310 31 16 57 113 17. 6 550 UNITED STATES 61 26 66 51 13 4. 8 229 TOTAL 4402 1952 937 4242 830 619 68 310 13360 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 7

Outside of Alberta, the adjacent provinces of British Columbia and Saskatchewan are the largest origin/destination areas followed by the United States. Approximately 2400 (18%) of all trucks pass through Calgary and region without stopping Although the movement of goods from the Rest of Canada to Calgary is relatively small it must be remembered that the rail system also plays a significant role in goods movement and Calgary is the location of major intermodal rail terminals. Table 5 shows original origin and final destination truck table. This table further emphazises the role of Calgary and the Calgary Region in the distribution of goods. Table 5 shows that 25% (3324) of the trucks were actually based in Calgary and 11% (1405) were based in the Calgary Region. This represents trucks that are travelling outside the Calgary area for more than one day that will eventually be returning to Calgary. Table 5: Original Origin and Final Destination of Trucks DESTINATION CALGARY CALGARY EDMONTON REST OF BRITISH SASK AND REST OF UNITED TOTAL ORIGIN REGION REGION ALBERTA COLUMBIA MANITOBA CANADA STATES CALGARY 3324 83 117 283 195 160 43 121 4326 CALGARY REGION 72 1405 24 160 21 40 15 23 1760 EDMONTON REGION 90 17 555 71 61 35 8 95 932 REST OF ALBERTA 260 117 91 2643 118 89 12 134 3464 BRITISH COLUMBIA 301 9 87 85 315 205 106 55 1163 SASK AND MANITOBA 135 19 42 39 106 336. 60 737 REST OF CANADA 71. 22 31 158 15 71 26 394 UNITED STATES 103 4 179 33 40 19 13 193 584 TOTAL 4356 1654 1117 3345 1014 899 268 707 13360 Of special interest is the trade corridor between the United States and Alberta. Table 5 indicates that 584 trucks have an original origin in the United States. The following summarizes the percentage distribution of trucks from the United States, to the highways accessing the Calgary region: Highway 2 South 27.3% Highway 22 South 23.0% Highway 23 South 22.4% Highway 1 East 24.8% Highway 1 West 2.5% 100% 8 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study

3.3 Truck Modal Split/ Occupancy Table 6 shows the percent of trucks of all vehicles (truck modal split) by each highway location. Overall trucks comprise over 15% of all vehicles on the highway system. The primary highways have truck percentages ranging from 22.3% (TCH East) to 9.7% (TCH West). The table shows that a number of the secondary highways 21, 22 South, 23 South, 541, 806 and 901 - have truck percentages exceeding 20%. Table 6: Percent Trucks of All Vehicles Highway Location Modal Split (%) TCH East 22.3 TCH West 9.7 1A 6.5 2 North 13.5 2 South 18.8 9 19.4 21 33.1 22 North 10.7 22 South 24.6 23 South 27.2 534 10.3 541 45.1 542 13.6 561 14.3 806 20.0 901 31.5 Average for All Locations 15.3% 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 9

Table 7: Truck Occupancy Table 7 shows the average occupancy by truck type. Truck Type Occupants per vehicle Single Axle, Single Unit 1.18 Dual Axle, Single Unit 1.19 Semi, No Trailer 1.05 Semi, One Trailer 1.11 Semi, Multi Trailer 1.08 3.4 Goods & Services Movement Table 8 shows the commodities carried by the different vehicle types. The table below reflects commodities based on number of trucks and not weight, volume or number of items. The table shows that semi trailers are the dominant carrier of commodities on the highways. The most prevalent commodity types are farm/ food industry, energy related products and manufacturing/machinery. Overall 22% of the trucks are empty. Table 8: Distribution of Trucks by Commodity Type Commodity Type Vehicle Type TYPE1 : Farm, Food industry TYPE2 : Energy industry such as oil, mining, chemical, mineral, stones TYPE3 : Manufacturing, Machinery, Equipment, transportation and so on TYPE4 : Wood, lumber industry TYPE5 : Waste, hazardous materials, waste hazardous substances TYPE6 : Miscellaneous TYPE7 : Empty Sum 24hour Truck Single Units Semi Units 3.5% 17.7% 3.8% 13.3% 7.0% 12.0% 2.6% 7.6% 1.4% 0.8% 3.1% 6.6% 4.7% 15.9% 26.1% 73.9% 10 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study

3.5 Truck Ownership Table 9 shows that nearly 61% of total trucks are owned by the companies producing goods being shipped and 25% of trucks are owned by a different company or driver. Table 9: Distribution of Truck Ownership Ownership 24 Hour Vehicle % Owned by company producing goods being shipped 8,146 60.9 Leased and operated by company producing 1,822 13.6 goods being shipped For Hire: Owned by a different company or driver 3,392 25.4 4.0 Conclusion Trucks are critical to the economic vitality of urban centres. They distribute goods produced by industries and supply the materials to maintain production activities. Planning infrastructure for goods movement on the external highway system requires knowledge of the types of trucks and the origin destination patterns of these trucks. Although the highway system serves interprovincial and international goods movement, the external truck study showed the trucks on the Calgary region highway system are primarily involved in the movement of goods within Alberta. 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 11

5.0 Appendix Direction: Time: Truck Type 5.1 Survey Form Direction: Time: Truck Type # Axles: # Axles: Gross Vehicle Weight(kg): Occupancy Vehicle Ownership: o Owned by company producing Goods being shipped o Leased and operated by company Producing goods being shipped o For HIRE: Owned by a different company or driver Today s Origin: Gross Vehicle Weight(kg): Occupancy Location: Interviewer: Page #: Vehicle Ownership: o Owned by company producing Goods being shipped o Leased and operated by company Producing goods being shipped o For HIRE: Owned by a different company or driver Today s Origin: Today s Destination Original Origin: Final Destination: Commodities Carried at point of interview Commodity Quantity $ Value Stop Section : Fill Out for Each Vehicle Stop made in Calgary and Region or Planned to be in Calgary and Region Stop1: Location of Stop: Reason for Stop: Arrival time: Departure Time: Commodity Delivered: Quantity Delivered: Value of commodity Delivered: Commodity Picked Up: Quantity Picked Up: $ Value of Commodity Picked Up Stop2: Location of Stop: Reason for Stop: Arrival time: Departure Time: Commodity Delivered: Quantity Delivered: Value of commodity Delivered: Commodity Picked Up: Quantity Picked Up: $ Value of Commodity Picked Up Today s Destination Original Origin: Final Destination: Commodities Carried at point of interview Commodity Quantity $ Value Stop Section : Fill Out for Each Vehicle Stop made in Calgary and Region or Planned to be in Calgary and Region Stop1: Location of Stop: Reason for Stop: Arrival time: Departure Time: Commodity Delivered: Quantity Delivered: Value of commodity Delivered: Commodity Picked Up: Quantity Picked Up: $ Value of Commodity Picked Up Stop2: Location of Stop: Reason for Stop: Arrival time: Departure Time: Commodity Delivered: Quantity Delivered: Value of commodity Delivered: Commodity Picked Up: Quantity Picked Up: $ Value of Commodity Picked Up 12 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study

5.2 Vehicle Types Single unit, single axle: Single unit, dual axle: Semi, no trailer: Semi, one trailer: Semi, multi-trailer: 2001 Calgary Region External Truck Survey Study 13