European Product Liability Review



Similar documents
European Product Liability Review Issue 40 - September 2010

European Product Liability Review Issue 39 - June 2010

International Product Liability Review

International Product Liability Review (incorporating European Product Liability Review) Issue 46 - March Contents. Overview

International Product Liability Review

International Product Liability Review

International Product Liability Review

International Product Liability Review

International Product Liability Review

Insurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system

International Product Liability Review

Hazardous substances. Our capabilities in Paris

Employee monitoring in France. January Contents. Legal Framework 1

International Product Liability Review

Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation

Knowledge. Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK

South Australia LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY) ACT 2001

Justice Committee. Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Clydeside Action on Asbestos

Regulation and Product Liability The European Approach

A new milestone in the Spanish insurance sector: the reform of the Scale

How To Write A Letter To The European Commission On A Number Of Issues

Cyber security: A major issue for Australian business

International Asbestos Liability

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Merger Control Issues and Private Equity Transactions

Briefing on Amendments 132AA and 132AB to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS (AMENDMENT) ORDER No. [Draft]

UK Human Rights Abuse - Overview of the Bribery Act, 2005

Contents. Table of Cases Irish Cases EC Cases United Kingdom Cases United States Cases Australian Cases Miscellaneous Legislation

HARMONISATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAW IN THE EU

WikiLeaks Document Release

Making a cross border claim in the EU

Spill Control. Annual Meeting

The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013

Asbestos Disease Claims

Chapter Two Liability Coverage

Final text for the Amended EU Regulation on Insolvency proceedings

Civil Justice Council response to Insurance Task Force interim report. May 2015

PEOPIL The Pan-European Organisation of Personal Injury Lawyers

Chapter 4 Crimes (Review)

An Enhanced European Patent System

E-Justice and E-Law Conference. Rome October Corte di Cassazione. Madalina Adam (Ministry of Justice, Romania)

PRIORITY RULES ON COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION

Jackson reforms to civil litigation

Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill

Legal Implications of Defective Hip Implants. Carolien van Weering and Antoinette Collignon 1. Introduction

Latham & Watkins Litigation Department

Knowhow briefs Statute of limitation - EMEA comparative table

Typical Scenario. The Impact of Barker v Corus (UK) PLC in Mesothelioma Cases. Barker v Corus the emergence of a new tort?

Evidential Issues in Alpine Sports Injury Claims

Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee. An interlocking package of reforms

Mesothelioma Act 2014

DEALING WITH INTERNATIONAL PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS KATHERINE ALLEN IRWIN MITCHELL SOLICITORS

Product Liability: strategies for avoidance and management

The criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales

Information sheet Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims

1.2 Distinguish between civil law and criminal law. 1.3 Distinguish between common law and equity

Insurance Update. FSA proposals for implementing the Reinsurance Directive. Contents. FSA proposals for implementing the Reinsurance Directive

This is the author s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source:

How To Change The Law In Germany

Limitation and Exclusion of Liability in CISG Contracts: validity issues. Prof. Lauro Gama Jr. Pontifical Catholic University Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Implementing and Developing the Law of Medical Errors: the role of judicial and legislative bodies

Tuesday July 12th Gerard McDermott QC

Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction

Workers Compensation: USA and California

Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Beyond the unitary patent: nothing new under the sun?

Williams v. University of Birmingham [2011] EWCA Civ 1242 Court of Appeal, 28 October 2011

The Role of the Judicial and Legislative Bodies in Implementing and Developing the Law of Medical Errors 1

Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2012, Volume 14, Number 1:

Global Real Estate Outlook

Claims Management Regulation. Who Needs to be Authorised Guidance Note

Cloud Computing: A Primer on Legal Issues, Including Privacy and Data Security Concerns. Privacy and Information Management Practice / Washington, DC

Information Gathering Exercise on Pre- Action Protocol The Law Society of Scotland s response May 2014

QBE European Operations. Portal extension. Guidance document June Ministry of Justice extension to the claims protocols Maximising Opportunities

Key aspects of the Jackson review and related reforms - progress update as at 3 rd September 2012

Fraudulent Insurance Claims A Mucky Present and a Murky Future

Skeletons in the Cupboard - Latent claim developments in General Insurance, Why they have happened and Possible inferences for healthcare

PRODUCT LIABILITY (AMENDMENT) ACT (NORTHERN IRELAND) 2001

Patents in Europe 2013/2014

How To Protect Road Users In Germany

Maintenance Repair Overhaul (MRO) and Supply Chain Contracts

A Bill Clarifying a Workers Compensation Insurer s. Subrogation Interest in Third-Party Claims

The Incorporated Law Society of Cardiff and District. Members Forum 30 January 2013 JACKSON REFORMS WHERE ARE WE NOW? Michael Imperato Simon Cradick

EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND THE ENTERPRISE AND REGULATORY REFORM ACT 2013

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015

Our mission is to work closely with you around the World creating and defending robust agreements that can be easily understood by your team;

Update from UK asbestos and deafness working parties Robert Brooks, Brian Gravelsons and Gabriela Macra

Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales

Employers Liability Trigger Litigation

CRS Report for Congress

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001

Patents in Europe 2015/2016

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER No. 689

JUDGMENT ON THE SPANISH TAX LEASE SYSTEM

American Tort Reform Association 1101 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC (202) Fax: (202)

GIRO October, Edinburgh

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

TABLE OF CONTENTS INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO. Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW

Clearer rules for international couples frequently asked questions

Transcription:

European Product Liability Review March December 2008 Issues 30-33 Contents CONSOLIDATED INDEX Index by date 3 Index by country 6

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 3 By date ISSUE 30 MARCH 2008 2 In pursuit of harmless fun European Commission proposes revised Toy Safety directive Matthew Hibbert and Amelia Hulme (London) 5 New draft Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines unveiled by European Commission Rod Freeman (London) 7 European Parliament moves to clarify European product safety rules Cédric Grolleau (Brussels) 8 European Commission seeks input into collective action benchmarks Rod Freeman and Matthew Hibbert (London) 10 Opt-out class action procedures recommended for the UK Rod Freeman and Daniel Armstrong (London) 11 The new Italian law on class actions and its impact on product liability litigation Francesca Rolla and Adriana Tilve (Milan) 13 English High Court allows legal challenge to REACH to proceed Christopher Norton (London) 14 Product manufacturers and vendors have limited ability to be granted interim measures against a decision of the European Commission Cédric Grolleau (Brussels) 17 Proposals to amend Polish tort law in death cases Ewa Rutkowska (Warsaw) 19 Car manufacturer sentenced to pay a fine of 200,000 for manslaughter and involuntary bodily harm Virginie Adam and Jean-François Le Gal (Paris) 20 Asbestos litigation in France: current trends and possible reforms Cécile Derycke and Sylvie Gallage-Alwis (Paris) 23 The Erika Judgment: Paris Criminal Court reaching for deeper pockets in order to compensate environmental damage Christine Gateau and Nadège Huart (Paris) 26 Caveat fumator: Italian court holds that smokers awareness of risks exempts tobacco manufacturers from liability Francesca Rolla and Adriana Tilve (Milan) 28 Court of Appeal confirms that a defendant can be substituted after expiry of the limitation period Rebecca Wales (London) 29 What constitutes de minimis exposure to asbestos? Oli Goldman (London) 31 Mesothelioma claims in the UK: a stricter quicker approach Matthew Hibbert (London) 33 Causation in English law: could Fairchild be extended beyond asbestos cases? Siobhan Thomson (London) ISSUE 31 JUNE 2008 2 The role of the national judge in the European judicial system Cédric Grolleau (Brussels) 4 New requirements for manufacturers of machinery: switching from Directive 98/37/EC to Directive 2006/42/EC Christophe Garin and Nadège Huart (Paris) 6 Harmonising EU product safety laws: the Commission s Goods Package Rod Freeman and Heather Gagen (London) 10 BERR proposals to simplify UK consumer law Matthew Hibbert and Heather Gagen (London) 12 Replacement free of charge means just that: a consumer cannot be required to pay for his use of faulty goods Claire Taylor (London)

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 4 14 Law against Science: French Civil Supreme Court opens the doors to compensation in product liability cases involving the Hepatitis B vaccine Cécile Derycke and Agnès Roman-Amat (Paris) 20 Product recalls in Germany: Do manufacturers have to provide a free replacement? Markus Burckhardt (Munich) 24 Blood Derivative Products: Supreme Court resolves the debate regarding causation and statute of limitation in civil liability claims Francesca Rolla and Adriana Tilve (Milan) 26 Spanish Supreme Court overturns Health Ministry s food alert as disproportionate Bernardino Muñiz (Madrid) 28 Court of Appeal upholds awards of costs against defendant s non-party insurer Angela Carazo-Gormley (London) 29 Improbable truths proof of defect in product liability cases Rod Freeman (London) 31 Toxic torts claims for personal injury in public nuisance actions Siobhan Thomson and Peter Owen (London) 34 Federal pre-emption of US state law in product liability claims Christina Taber-Kewene (New York) ISSUE 32 SEPTEMBER 2008 2 Nanotechnology: recent interest Marion Palmer, Scientist (London) 6 European Commission consults on Consumer Product Risk Assessment Guidelines Rod Freeman and Matthew Hibbert (London) 9 European Commission seeks input into EU wide classification of consumer complaints Germaine Gillen (London) 11 Product safety cannot be guaranteed by final product testing alone Claire Taylor (London) 14 Proposed introduction of class actions in Poland Ewa Rutkowska (Warsaw) 16 CJC recommendations bring US-style class actions one step closer to England Rod Freeman and Dan Armstrong (London) 18 Pleural plaques: the battle is not over yet Rod Freeman and Matthew Hibbert (London) 20 Limitation: whose knowledge of an injury counts? Matthew Hibbert and Heather Gagen (London) 22 Asbestos and Smoking: contributory negligence Ewa Holender (London) 24 US Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 Joe Cyr and Carolyn Kruk (New York) 25 The perils of corporate control: US court takes personal jurisdiction over German management holding company Christina Taber-Kewene (New York) ISSUE 33 DECEMBER 2008 2 Impact of the Chinese melamine scandal Eugene Chen (Shanghai) and Joy McElroy (London) 6 EU US China co-operation on product safety: three heads are better than two Matthew Felwick (London) 8 Green Paper suggest opt-out collective redress mechanism may be suitable for European consumers John Meltzer and Dan Armstrong (London)

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 5 11 Third party funding the wolf at the door Rod Freeman and Libby Hannan (London) 15 Civil Justice Council supports introduction of US-style contingency fees and abolition of the loser-pays costs rule John Meltzer and Dan Armstrong (London) 17 Proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights Akima Paul (London) 19 Electromagnetic fields recent developments Thomas Rouhette and Delphine Lapillonne (Paris) 22 Asbestos litigation: How far will the French courts go? Cécile Derycke and Sylvie Gallage-Alwis (Paris) 27 Non-patrimonial damage: Italian Supreme Court settles the meaning of existential damage Francesca Rolla (Milan) 29 Insurance coverage: status quo preserved in asbestos cases Matthew Hibbert (London) 31 Causation: application of asbestos law principles to other personal injury cases Matthew Hibbert and Declan McKeever (London) 35 Claimants must prove actual loss Hannah Gregory (London) 37 South African Consumer Protection Bill Monique du Preez DLA Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (Johannesburg) 41 FDA Preemption-related regulatory initiative Eric Statman (New York) 46 Brand name manufacturer liable in the US to users of generic equivalents Eric Statman (New York) and Ina Brock (Munich) 48 The harmonisation of Australia s consumer protection laws Clayton Utz (Australia)

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 6 By country AUSTRALIA The harmonisation of Australia s consumer protection laws Clayton Utz (Australia)...Issue 33, p48 CHINA Impact of the Chinese melamine scandal Eugene Chen (Shanghai) and Joy McElroy (London)...Issue 33, p2 EU In pursuit of harmless fun European Commission proposes revised Toy Safety directive Matthew Hibbert and Amelia Hulme (London)...Issue 30, p2 New draft Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines unveiled by European Commission Rod Freeman (London)...Issue 30, p5 European Parliament moves to clarify European product safety rules Cédric Grolleau (Brussels)...Issue 30, p7 European Commission seeks input into collective action benchmarks Rod Freeman and Matthew Hibbert (London)...Issue 30, p8 Product manufacturers and vendors have limited ability to be granted interim measures against a decision of the European Commission Cédric Grolleau (Brussels)...Issue 30, p14 The role of the national judge in the European judicial system Cédric Grolleau (Brussels)...Issue 31, p2 New requirements for manufacturers of machinery: switching from Directive 98/37/EC to Directive 2006/42/EC Christophe Garin and Nadège Huart (Paris)...Issue 31, p4 Harmonising EU product safety laws: the Commission s Goods Package Rod Freeman and Heather Gagen (London)...Issue 31, p6 European Commission consults on Consumer Product Risk Assessment Guidelines Rod Freeman and Matthew Hibbert (London)...Issue 32, p6 European Commission seeks input into EU wide classification of consumer complaints Germaine Gillen (London)...Issue 32, p9 EU US China co-operation on product safety: three heads are better than two Matthew Felwick (London)...Issue 33, p6 Green Paper suggest opt-out collective redress mechanism may be suitable for European consumers John Meltzer and Dan Armstrong (London)...Issue 33, p8 Proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights Akima Paul (London)...Issue 33. p17 FRANCE Car manufacturer sentenced to pay a fine of 200,000 for manslaughter and involuntary bodily harm Virginie Adam and Jean-François Le Gal (Paris)...Issue 30, p19 Asbestos litigation in France: current trends and possible reforms Cécile Derycke and Sylvie Gallage-Alwis (Paris)...Issue 30, p20 The Erika Judgment: Paris Criminal Court reaching for deeper pockets in order to compensate environmental damage Christine Gateau and Nadège Huart (Paris)...Issue 30, p23

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 7 Law against science: French Civil Supreme Court opens the doors to compensation in product liability cases involving the Hepatitis B vaccine Cécile Derycke and Agnès Roman-Amat (Paris)...Issue 31, p14 Electromagnetic fields recent developments Thomas Rouhette and Delphine Lapillonne (Paris)...Issue 33, p19 Asbestos litigation: How far will the French courts go? Cécile Derycke and Sylvie Gallage-Alwais (Paris)...Issue 33, p22 GERMANY Product recalls in Germany: Do manufacturers have to provide a free replacement? Markus Burckhardt (Munich)...Issue 31, p20 ITALY The new Italian law on class actions and its impact on product liability litigation Francesca Rolla and Adriana Tilve (Milan)...Issue 30, p11 Caveat fumator: Italian court holds that smokers awareness of risks exempts tobacco manufacturers from liability Francesca Rolla and Adriana Tilve (Milan)...Issue 30, p26 Blood Derivative Products: Supreme Court resolves the debate regarding causation and statute of limitation in civil liability claims Francesca Rolla and Adriana Tilve (Milan)...Issue 31, p24 Non-patrimonial damage: Italian Supreme Court settles the meaning of existential damage Francesca Rolla (Milan)...Issue 33, p27 POLAND Proposals to amend Polish tort law in death cases Ewa Rutkowska (Warsaw)...Issue 30, p17 Proposed introduction of class actions in Poland Ewa Rutkowska (Warsaw)...Issue 32, p14 SOUTH AFRICA South African Consumer Protection Bill Monique du Preez DLA Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (Johannesburg)...Issue 33, p37 SPAIN Spanish Supreme Court overturns Health Ministry s food alert as disproportionate Bernardino Muñiz (Madrid)...Issue 31, p26 UK Opt-out class action procedures recommended for the UK Rod Freeman and Daniel Armstrong (London)...Issue 30, p10 English High Court allows legal challenge to REACH to proceed Christopher Norton (London)...Issue 30. p13 Court of Appeal confirms that a defendant can be substituted after expiry of the limitation period Rebecca Wales (London)...Issue 30, p28 What constitutes de minimis exposure to asbestos? Oli Goldman (London)...Issue 30, p29 Mesothelioma claims in the UK: a stricter quicker approach Matthew Hibbert (London)...Issue 30, p31 Causation in English law: could Fairchild be extended beyond asbestos cases? Siobhan Thomson (London)...Issue 30, p33 BERR proposals to simplify UK consumer law Matthew Hibbert and Heather Gagen (London)...Issue 31, p10 Replacement free of charge means just that: a consumer cannot be required to pay for his use of faulty goods Claire Taylor (London)...Issue 31, p12

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 8 Court of Appeal upholds awards of costs against defendant s non-party insurer Angela Carazo-Gormley (London)...Issue 31, p28 Improbable truths proof of defect in product liability cases Rod Freeman (London)...Issue 31, p29 Toxic torts claims for personal injury in public nuisance actions Siobhan Thomson and Peter Owen (London)...Issue 31, p31 Product safety cannot be guaranteed by final product testing alone Claire Taylor (London)...Issue 32, p11 CJC recommendations bring US-style class actions one step closer to England Rod Freeman and Dan Armstrong (London)...Issue 32, p16 Pleural plaques: the battle is not over yet Rod Freeman and Matthew Hibbert (London)...Issue 32, p18 Limitation: whose knowledge of an injury counts? Matthew Hibbert and Heather Gagen (London)...Issue 32, p20 Asbestos and Smoking: contributory negligence Ewa Holender (London)...Issue 32, p22 Third party funding the wolf at the door Rod Freeman and Libby Hannan (London)...Issue 33, p11 Causation: application of asbestos law principles to other personal injury cases Matthew Hibbert and Declan McKeever (London)...Issue 33, p31 Claimants must prove actual loss Hannah Gregory (London)...Issue 33, p35 USA Federal pre-emption of US state law in product liability claims Christina Taber-Kewene (New York)...Issue 31, p34 US Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 Joe Cyr and Carolyn Kruk (New York)...Issue 32, p24 The perils of corporate control: US court takes personal jurisdiction over German management holding company Christina Taber-Kewene (New York)...Issue 32, p25 FDA Preemption-related regulatory initiative Eric Statman (New York)...Issue 33, p41 Brand name manufacturer liable in the US to users of generic equivalents Eric Statman (New York) and Ina Brock (Munich)...Issue 33, p46 OTHER Nanotechnology: recent interest Marion Palmer, Scientist (London)...Issue 32, p2 Civil Justice Council supports introduction of US-style contingency fees and abolition of the loser-pays costs rule John Meltzer and Dan Armstrong (London)...Issue 33, p15 Insurance coverage: status quo preserved in asbestos cases Matthew Hibbert (London)...Issue 33, p29

European Product Liability Review Consolidated Index March December 2008, Issues 30-33 9 Lovells has a comprehensive product liability practice covering all aspects of product safety as well as civil and criminal liability. We have experience of acting for clients in respect of a wide range of products including food, pharmaceuticals, cars, tobacco, mobile phones, cosmetics, electrical and electronic products, toys, sporting goods, blood products, aircraft and trains. Lovells product liability lawyers are supported by a dedicated Science Unit and Project Management Unit. If you would like more information about Lovell s products liability practice, please visit our website at www.lovells.com or contact any of the following: John Meltzer (London) T +44 (0) 20 7296 2276 john.meltzer@lovells.com Rod Freeman (London) T +44 (0) 20 7296 5256 rod.freeman@lovells.com Klaas Bisschop (Amsterdam) T +31 (0) 20 55 33 714 klaas.bisschop@lovells.com Christopher Thomas (Brussels) T +32 2 647 06 60 christopher.thomas@lovells.com Francesca Rolla (Milan) T +39 02 7202 5249 francesca.rolla@lovells.com Ina Brock (Munich) T +49 89 290 12-0 ina.brock@lovells.com Joe Cyr (New York) T +1 212 909 0600 joe.cyr@lovells.com Thomas Rouhette (Paris) T +33 1 53 67 47 47 thomas.rouhette@lovells.com Gian Paolo Zanchini (Rome) T +39 6 6758231 gianpaolo.zanchini@lovells.com Doug Clark (Shanghai) T +00 8621 6138 1688 doug.clark@lovells.com Lloyd Parker (Tokyo) T +81 3 5157 8256 lloyd.parker@lovells.com Ewa Rutkowska (Warsaw) T +48 22 5292 2914 ewa.rutkowska@lovells.com Lovells European Product Liability Review is distributed worldwide free of charge to clients and others with an interest in international product liability issues. If you would like additional copies of this publication, or if you wish to be added to our mailing list for future editions, please return the form enclosed with this edition, or contact a member of the editorial team by telephone or email: Rod Freeman T +44 (0) 20 7296 5256 rod.freeman@lovells.com Matthew Hibbert T +44 (0) 20 7296 2147 matthew.hibbert@lovells.com Siobhan Thomson T +44 (0) 20 7296 5373 siobhan.thomson@lovells.com Claire Taylor T +44 (0) 20 7296 5934 claire.taylor@lovells.com Neal Moglin (Chicago) T +1 312 832 4404 neal.moglin@lovells.com Allan Leung (Hong Kong) T +852 2219 0888 allan.leung@lovells.com José Luis Huerta (Madrid) T +34 91 349 82 00 joseluis.huerta@lovells.com