1 QBE European Operations Portal extension Guidance document June 2013 Ministry of Justice extension to the claims protocols Maximising Opportunities
2 Portal extension Guidance document June 2013 Ministry of Justice extension to the claims protocols Maximising Opportunities Contents MOJ portal extension effective 31 July Fixed costs 3 Contributory negligence 4 Hints and tips 5 QBEs approach 6 Portal process overviews 7 Disclaimer 9
3 1 The Lord Justice Jackson Reforms on civil litigation costs and the extension of the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) claims portal were due to be implemented simultaneously. This did not materialise and the portal extension will now come into effect 31 July The reforms brought about by the implementation of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) became effective on 1 April They address disproportionate costs in civil litigation and include the following changes. After the event (ATE) insurance premiums are no longer recoverable from defendants Success fees in conditional fee agreements (CFAs) are no longer recoverable from defendants A 10% uplift on general damages (injury element) Qualified One Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) defendants will now pay most of their own costs even if a claim is successfully defended with exceptions for fraud and failure to beat a defendant s Part 36 offer (up to the value of damages awarded) A 10% additional penalty on damages for awards up to 500,000 (reducing to 5% for awards between 500,000 and 1,000,000) where the defendant does not accept and fails to better a claimant s Part 36 offer A proportionality test when costs are assessed by the court Costs budgeting in multi-track cases whereby the court will seek to control legal costs at an early stage Case management by Judges who will be stricter about delays and imposing court sanctions The banning of referral fees.
4 2 MOJ portal extension effective 31 July 2013 On 31 July 2013, the Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims will be introduced alongside a new portal to deal with appropriate employers and public liability claims up to 25,000. At the same time, the existing motor claims portal will be extended to cover claims worth up to 25,000 but the liability response period will remain 15 days for motor claims. The portal extension will see all employers and public liability claims valued from 1,000 up to 25,000 and with an accident date on or after 31 July 2013 (letter of claim on or after 31 July 2013 for disease claims) being transacted via an online electronic portal with the following exclusions: Public Liability (PL) claims against an individual Claims under 1,000 or over 25,000 in value Employers Liability (EL) disease claims with more than one defendant All PL disease claims Where defendant or claimant is deceased or a protected party An accident or breach of duty outside England and Wales Abuse claims, mesothelioma, clinical negligence Where the claimant is bankrupt Where the defendant is insolvent and uninsured. In addition to the above, a claim which starts in the portal may exit if: The damages value increases above 25,000 The damages value falls below 1,000 Liability is denied or contributory negligence alleged Fraud is alleged There is a failure to meet the following deadlines: 10 working days for an insurer to pay stage 1 costs after receipt of claimant s medical report/offer 15 working days for an insurer to respond to claimant s settlement offer 20 working days for an insurer to conclude quantum negotiations 20 working days for a defendant to provide earnings information following an admission of liability 30 working days to admit liability for EL claims 40 working days to admit liability for PL claims. Remember the clock starts ticking the first business day after the information is sent to the insurer/defendant so if the claims notification form (CNF) goes directly to the defendant the timeline begins the following working day and not the day after it is then sent to the insurer.
5 3 Fixed costs The benefits of keeping a claim in the portal are low fixed recoverable costs: Claim type Claims of 1k - 10k Claims of 10k - 25k Stage 1 Stage 2 Total Stage 1 Stage 2 Total RTA EL / PL ,300 1,600 Stage 3 costs for all claim types and value are: Paper Hearing and Oral Hearing For claims with damages valued between 1,000 to 25,000 that fall out of the portal a fixed costs regime (FCR) will be in place which sets costs considerably higher than those inside the portal. Recoverable costs are set on the basis of the value of the claim at issue, based upon a fixed value plus a percentage of damages, and the stage in the process at which the claim settles e.g. pre or post litigation. These predictive costs are up to six times more expensive than portal costs if the case proceeds to litigation. For example, the new base costs for an employers liability claim worth 25,000 would increase from 2,100 maximum to 13,430 if settled at a hearing. The revised fixed fees for road traffic accident (RTA) cases between 1,000 and 10,000 in value settling within the scheme will be payable on all cases where the CNF was submitted after 30 April. The current stage 1 and 2 fixed fees of 1,200 will continue to be payable on cases where the CNF is submitted before 30 April. Where a claim drops out, the current motor predictable costs and/or hourly rate regimes will apply until the wrap around predictable costs regime comes in on 31 July 2013 (see tables overleaf). The full table of costs for EL, PL and RTA claims, both inside and outside of the portal process, may be viewed at part45-fixed-costs.
6 4 Contributory negligence The cost implications of allowing a claim to exit the portal are particularly apparent when considering arguments of contributory negligence. The below table and graphs highlight the tipping points where it becomes more expensive to argue contributory negligence rather than to admit liability within the portal. Employers liability Contributory Negligence Tipping Points Contributory Negligence Award Public liability Contributory Negligence Award ,000 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Damages award EL Tipping points - All settled pre-litigation EL Tipping points - 20% settled in litigation Contributory Negligence Tipping Points 1,000 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Damages award EL Tipping points - All settled pre-litigation EL Tipping points - 20% settled in litigation Damages value EL 1,000 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Costs if claim settles in Portal 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 2,670 2,670 2,670 Costs if claim settles at first post-issue stage 4,006 4,306 4,806 5,306 5,806 6,806 7,806 8,806 Tipping points - All claims settled pre-litigation 24% 20% 19% 19% 18% 11% 10% 10% Tipping points - 20% settled in litigation1 66% 37% 28% 25% 23% 14% 13% 13% Damages value PL 1,000 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Costs if claim settles in Portal 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 2,670 2,670 2,670 Costs if claim settles at first post-issue stage 3,765 4,028 4,465 4,903 5,340 6,215 7,090 7,965 Tipping points - All claims settled pre-litigation 24% 20% 19% 19% 16% 9% 10% 10% Tipping points - 20% settled in litigation1 62% 35% 26% 24% 21% 12% 12% 12% General notes: All costs include: VAT, disbursements at 550 where damages below 10k, disbursements at 1,100 to include expert evidence and specialist legal advice fee where damages over 10k. 1Assumes across a portfolio of claims that of those falling outside of the portal process, 20% settle in litigation.
7 5 Hints and tips Prompt reporting of claims and early supply of all relevant accident documentation is essential in order to enable prompt liability decisions and compliance with the very tight portal timescales. If the portal timescales are not complied with then claims will not be kept within the portal and the opportunity for significant costs savings will be lost. By following the simple advice below you will help maximise the opportunities presented by the reforms: Carry out proactive and thorough investigation of accidents Retain accident and investigation documentation in an organised way Make your insurer details easily accessible Ensure all your locations are on the look out for CNFs and know what to do upon receipt Acknowledge CNFs immediately to the claimant s solicitor and notify your insurer at the same time, preferably by When notifying QBE of a claim provide points of contact and details for investigation purposes Notify your insurer pre-claim of accidents which you believe are likely to give rise to a claim In addition, for those organisations who process your own low value personal injury claims you should register with the portal and submit a structure to allow new claim portal notifications to be sent to your organisation directly. You may also wish to ensure that your claim handling agents have similarly registered. For more information on registering with the portal please visit: For more information on the low value injury pre-action protocols and associated documents please click on the bullets below or visit: civil-justice-reforms/personal-injury-claims/ extending-the-road-traffic-accidentpersonal-injury-scheme Draft protocols EL CNF EL Defendant only CNF PL CNF PL Defendant only CNF Disease CNF Stage 2 Settlement Pack Interim Settlement Pack Court Proceedings Pack Medical Report Form. Ensure key personnel are aware of the changes and timescales Work closely with your insurer, broker and claim handling agents to develop an efficient process Respond promptly and fully to any requests for information or site investigation by QBE Develop standardised acknowledgements.
8 6 QBEs approach In order to ensure that we are fully prepared and ready to take advantage of the opportunities presented by the civil justice reforms QBE has: Embedded the new timescales in our claims handling processes Made our claims processes more proactive and efficient Ensured panel loss adjusters are working to the new timescales Implemented more robust fraud identification procedures Ensured a disciplined approach to liability decision making and contributory negligence arguments in accordance with our philosophies Instigated more monitoring and performance review procedures to ensure high levels of customer service and quality standards are maintained Introduced new technology to enable even more efficient claims handling Initiated a review of all claims handling arrangements with policyholders to identify where these might be improved to best operate within the new claims regimes Kept policyholders and brokers updated on the reforms via presentations, workshops and briefing documents. For access to our past updates and to register for updates in the future please visit:
9 7 Portal process overviews Stage 1 Process flow One day CNF Issued through portal to insurer CNF Issued to defendant (via portal or by post) One day CNF received CNF received One day 30/40 days (EL/PL) Insurer acknowledges to claimant Defendant admits liability1 Defendant acknowledges to claimant and sends to insurer Claimant resubmits claim through portal to insurer One day 1Defendant has 20 days from this point to provide earnings information (EL) Yes No Stage 2 Claim exits portal
10 8 Stage 2 Process flow 10 business days Stage 2 settlement pack received including medical evidence and schedule of special damages2 Pay stage 1 costs 15 days 35 business days (15+20)3 No Offer accepted? Make counter offers Yes 20 business days Offer accepted? Yes Pay damages and stage 2 costs and disbursements No Stage 3 Failure to meet any of the deadlines shown on this flow results in the claim exiting the portal 2 Where a subsequent medical report or non-medical expert report is needed then the parties should agree to stay the process in the protocol for a suitable period. The claimant may then request a 1,000 interim payment (more if reasonable pecuniary losses in excess are requested) and this must be paid by the defendant within 10 working days. 3 Where a party makes an offer 5 days or less before the end of the total consideration period (including any extension to this period), there will be a further period of 5 days after the end of the total consideration period for the relevant party to consider that offer. During this period no further offers can be made by either party.
11 9 Disclaimer This publication has been produced by QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd ( QIEL ). QIEL is a company member of the QBE Insurance Group. Readership of this publication does not create an insurer-client, or other business or legal relationship. This publication provides information about the law to help you to understand and manage risk within your organisation. Legal information is not the same as legal advice. This publication does not purport to provide a definitive statement of the law and is not intended to replace, nor may it be relied upon as a substitute for, specific legal or other professional advice. To the fullest extent permitted by law, QIEL and the QBE Group disclaim any responsibility or liability for any loss or damage suffered or cost incurred by you or by any other person arising out of or in connection with you or any other person s reliance on this publication or on the information contained within it and for any omissions or inaccuracies. QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited and QBE Underwriting Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. QBE Management Services (UK) Limited and QBE Underwriting Services (UK) Limited are both Appointed Representatives of QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited and QBE Underwriting Limited. QIEL has acted in good faith to provide an accurate publication. However, QIEL and the QBE Group do not make any warranties or representations of any kind about the contents of this publication, the accuracy or timeliness of its contents, or the information or explanations given. QIEL and the QBE Group do not have any duty to you, whether in contract, tort, under statute or otherwise with respect to or in connection with this publication or the information contained within it. QIEL and the QBE Group have no obligation to update this report or any information contained within it. QBE European Operations Plantation Place 30 Fenchurch Street London EC3M 3BD tel +44 (0) /QBE/MOJExtensionToClaimsProtocols/MaximisingOpportunities/June2013 QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited, QBE Re (Europe) Limited and QBE Underwriting Limited, all of which are authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority, are part of QBE European Operations, a division of the QBE Insurance group.
QBE European Operations UK Casualty Claims Policyholder guide March 2013 2013 Jackson reforms and Ministry of Justice Claims Extension UK Casualty Claims Policyholder guide March 2013 2013 Jackson reforms
QBE European Operations Technical claims brief Monthly update June 2015 Technical claims brief Monthly update June 2015 Contents FCA sets out their findings after looking at delegated authority arrangements
Access to Justice Civil Litigation Reforms & AIG Start The reforms AIG Response day 1-5 day 6-20 day 21-25 AIG process map Overview and key Changes For more details of the reforms click here > The Jackson
HIGHLIGHTS AND LOWLIGHTS OF THE EL/PL PORTAL PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS Colin Richmond 11/04/2013 www.zenithchambers.co.uk
T&Lbulletin CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL & LEGAL BULLETIN FEBRUARY 2013 2013 JACKSON REFORM UPDATE From the beginning of April this year, Employers Liability (EL), Public Liability (PL) and Motor Injury Claims
Extending the RTA Portal to Disease claims May 2013 1. Introduction In July 2013 the existing RTA PI protocol will be extended to EL and PL claims. In addition, the value of claims captured by the protocol
Technical claims brief Monthly update February 2013 Contents News 1 Ministry of Justice Claims Portal Extension put back 1 Solicitors Regulatory Authority stands by April 1 2013 implementation of referral
CLAIMSadvisor RISK PRACTICE JULY 2013 Employers & Public Liability Claims Jackson Reforms update We recently provided an overview of the Jackson Reforms and the key changes in relation to Employers Liability
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1
MOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS Introduction By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012 Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.com The protocol for Low Value
An Update on the Ministry of Justice Reforms to Personal Injury Procedures In terms of scale, the changes to the claims process for personal injury claims that interested parties have been expecting since
Contents Foreword 2 3 Foreword: Why has LASPO come about 4 Changes to funding and implications 6 Changes in practice 7 Track limits 8 The RTA and EL/PL Protocols 11 Referral fees 12 Contact information
Key aspects of the Jackson review and related reforms - progress update as at 3 rd September 2012 In brief Lord Justice Jackson s key task was to address disproportionate costs in civil litigation i.e.
QBE European Operations Technical claims brief Monthly update June 2013 Technical claims brief Monthly update June 2013 Contents Costs 1 Limiting the cost of medical agency fees Charman v Reilly (May 2013)
Information sheet Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims You have received this information sheet as it is likely that your claim will proceed
CHANGES AND EXTENSION TO THE PORTAL PROPOSED OR OTHERWISE By Chris Rafferty & Colin Richmond INTRODUCTION The reforms of the RTA Portal Scheme have been relatively few to date, but are nevertheless worthy
1 1. Introduction The Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July 2012 The aim of the presentation is to look at the basic steps from the taking instructions
Welcome: The Zurich Jackson & MOJ Reforms Webinar will begin shortly If you do not get a chance to raise a question during the Webinar, you can use our MOJ advice centre, simply e mail your query to: Mojhelpline@uk.zurich.com
Implementing Jackson: reform of 'no win, no fee' claims & related changes - 6 th November 2012 Alistair Kinley Partner & Head of Policy Development t: 020 7865 3350 e: email@example.com construction
http://websvr/textimagecreator (Text image creator to change heading) Pre action protocol for low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph
Community Housing Cymru update Leon Lloyd Hugh James 6 November 2013 New EL/PL claims procedure From 1 August 2013 Fast track claims EL/PL claims between 10k and 25k issued pre-1 April 2013 handled outside
Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee An interlocking package of reforms March 2012 Briefing for Members of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders
The 2013 Ministry of Justice Reforms: A Practical Guide for Clients Garwyn Group 1 What are the reforms? The Ministry of Justice Reforms are an interlocking package of measures designed to accelerate the
T&Lbulletin CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL & LEGAL BULLETIN JUNE 2013 2013 JACKSON REFORM UPDATE PART TWO Since our February 2013 Jackson Reforms update, we have seen the claimant lobby s Judicial Review proceedings
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013 Title Number I INTRODUCTION Definitions Para 1.1 Preamble Para 2.1 Aims Para 3.1 Scope Para 4.1 II GENERAL
Frequ quentl tly asked questio tions Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents Stage 1 General Q1. When will the Rules be drafted and ready? A1. The Civil Procedure Rule Committee approved
The Incorporated Law Society of Cardiff and District Members Forum 30 January 2013 JACKSON REFORMS WHERE ARE WE NOW? Michael Imperato Simon Cradick Agenda Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders
QBE European Operations The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Issues Forum The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Issues Forum Contents History 1 A time of reform 2 Strict liability 2 The
Frequently asked questions Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents Stage 2 Medical Reports Q35. Can insurers question the medical report? A35. The defendant/insurer cannot question the
Disease: solving disputes post 1 April 2013 This update examines the impact made by the Jackson reforms since their implementation on 1 April 2013 and looks forward to the extension of the RTA portal due
RTA Portal Update Lesley Proctor www.rtapiclaimsprocess.org.uk Presentation Objectives How the RTA Portal works History Process Performance Impact How it would work for EL / PL Claims The future Building
Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales Consultation Paper Response of JUSTICE February 2011 Q 1 Do you agree that CFA success fees should no longer be recoverable
The four year assessment evaluating the outcome of The Jackson Review and LASPO on ATE, BTE and more Tony Buss, Managing Director ARAG (UK) 1 Comments on Jackson [The Government s] are seeking to strike
Consultation Document Extension of the RTA scheme to include employers and public liability claims up to the value of 25,000 Response from: British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association River Lodge Badminton
Consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation This consultation begins on Thursday 4 September 2014 This consultation ends on Wednesday 1 October 2014 Consultation on independence
Claims Reporting Procedure This document includes:- An introduction to the claims reporting process Your Belmont contacts The life of your claim A review of the Ministry of Justice Reforms Introduction
AIG Casualty Risk Consulting Accident Response Pack Start INTRODUCTION What to do before an accident Risk Management Keys Health and Safety online system What to do when an accident happens Accident Investigation
ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS Standard of competence for Portal Claims Handlers INTRODUCTION Standards of occupational competence Standards of occupational competence are widely used in many fields
The Impact of the Jackson Reforms on Costs and Case Management Civil Justice Council Conference 21 st March 2014 Written Submission of the Law Society The Law Society 2014 Page 1 of 9 2014 The Law Society.
- The Defendant Costs Specialists Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton The Court of Appeal s decision last week in Lamont v Burton  EWCA Civ 429 is likely to have serious costs implications for defendants
Disclaimer In all cases solicitors must ensure that any agreement with a client is made in compliance with their professional duties, the requirements of the SRA and any statutory requirements depending
Civil litigation reforms Jackson one year on Introduction 1 April 2013 saw a number of civil litigation reforms come into force. The reforms were spearheaded by Lord Justice Jackson and were heralded to
Track Limits and Personal Injury Claims Process Department Of Constitutional Affairs Consultation With effect from 20 April 2007, the Department of Constitutional Affairs has entered into a period of consultation
Briefing on Amendments 132AA and 132AB to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill Kennedys advocates the repeal of Amendments 132AA and 132AB added to the Legal Aid, Sentencing
Report to Finance and Property Committee REPORT OF SERVICE DIRECTOR, FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT 25 February 2013 Agenda Item: 5 PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS: JACKSON REFORMS TO THE CIVIL JUSTICE PROCEDURES Purpose
June 2013 MARSH INSIGHTS: OUTLOOK: PERSPECTIVES ON TOPICAL RISK AND INSURANCE ISSUES FOR UK CORPORATES Over recent months we have profiled several developments in relation to insurance claims specifically
FIXED COSTS PART 45 PART 45 Contents of this Part I FIXED COSTS Rule 45.1 Scope of this Section Rule 45.2 Amount of fixed commencement costs in a claim for the recovery of money or goods Rule 45.2A Amount
CLAIMS FOCUS RISK PRACTICE BULLETIN JULY 2014 Jackson Reforms The Changing Claims Landscape: one year on A number of months have now passed since the legal milestones of 2013 which changed the way civil
The extended RTA Protocol Claims submitted from 31 July 2013 Guide for claims handlers Introduction This guide provides an at a glance review of the updated Protocol. The original Pre-Action Protocol for
1. Are the stated aims and purposes of the current voluntary pre-action protocols adequate to comply with the recommendations of the Scottish Civil Courts Review if made compulsory? (Please tick as appropriate)
Whiplash and the cost of motor insurance: what s behind the insurance industry claims Submission to the Transport Committee by Thompsons Solicitors April 2013 About Thompsons Thompsons is the UK s most
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
GUIDE TO NEW COSTS IN CIVIL CASE RULES GOVERNMENT REFORMS MAKE SURE YOU GET INSURANCE Introduction Landlords faced with claims from tenants have also in the past had to often pay success fees where tenants
Technical claims brief Monthly update October 2012 Contents News 1 Court of Appeal to review decision on damages increase 1 Police officially recognise Mandate Fraud as new crime 2 US Popcorn Lung sufferer
QBE European Operations Technical claims brief Monthly update August 2015 Technical claims brief Monthly update August 2015 Contents Occupiers liability of a homeowner Pollock v Cahill  1 Qualified
Information Gathering Exercise on Pre-Action Protocols May 2014 INFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Are the stated aims and purposes of the current voluntary pre-action protocols adequate to
Frequently asked questions Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents Stage 3 Q72. Will paper hearings be allowed for child claims? A72. No. All child claims will require an oral hearing.
QBE European Operations Professional liability Disclosure of insurance details revisited QBE Professional Liability Disclosure of insurance details revisited/november 2013 1 Disclosure of insurance details
highways express Helping you manage your Highways claims Introduction Highway authorities are facing increasing pressure to provide high quality highway services while maintaining tight control of costs
The New CFA and DBA Regime Simon Edwards CFAs post 1 April 2013 Section 58A (6) Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (CLSA) provides that a costs order made in proceedings may not include provision requiring
Impact of Civil Justice reforms on disease claims Nick Pargeter Partner, BLM construction & property corporate risks healthcare insurance & indemnity leisure public sector retail technology, media & telecoms
PROTOCOLS Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims Contents 1 Introduction 2 Notes of guidance 3 The protocol 4 Rehabilitation 5 Resolution of issues A Letter of claim B Pre-action personal injury
Surveyors Professional Liability Surveyors Professional Liability Underwritten by a member of the QBE Insurance Group (QBE) This insurance is an annual contract unless stated otherwise in the quotation
Bar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales
Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). MASS is a society of solicitors acting for the victims of motor accidents, including those involving Personal
Introduction CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT Submission by the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) March 2014 1. This response is prepared on behalf
IOSH Midland North District 26 th February 2015 The Civil Case Housekeeping Fire Safety please follow signs exit via stairwell and front door. Assembly point on car park. Toilets located on each landing.
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
UK MOTOR [POLICYHOLDER]: [POLICY NUMBER]: EXAMPLE BESPOKE CLAIMS PROCEDURE IN ASSOCIATION WITH [BROKER DETAILS] 2008 QBE European Operations is a trading name of QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited, no. 01761561
DEFENDING AND SETTLING A CIVIL/PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM 14 May 2015 Toby Scott, Partner How a claim is started and progressed Traditional Approach see Law Society Website http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/personal-injury-claim/
Title: Mesothelioma Pre-Action Protocol and Fixed Cost Regime IA No: MoJ 200 Lead department or agency: Ministry of Justice Other departments or agencies: Impact Assessment (IA) Date: 23 May 2013 Stage:
Conditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond! CFAs, ATEs, DBAs Let s de-mystify the acronyms! 1. Conditional Fee Arrangements 1.1. What is a Conditional Fee Arrangement A conditional
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: General Principles 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Overview of civil litigation process 1.2 Introduction to the civil courts 1.2.1
QBE European Operations Technical claims brief Monthly update July 2015 Technical claims brief Monthly update July 2015 Contents Judgment on additional liabilities Coventry v Lawrence  1 Law on foreseeability
PROTOCOLS Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims Contents 1 Introduction 2 Notes of guidance 3 The protocol 4 Rehabilitation 5 Resolution of issues A Letter of claim B Pre-action personal injury
Personal Injury /Clinical Negligence After-The-Event Insurance Proposal Form Clients Details Client First Name Client Surname Litigation Friend Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Date of Birth Is it likely
Low value ersonal injury i claims: Extended ortal rules key facts The 65 th udate to the Civil Procedure Rules comes into force on 31 July 2013. Full details of the changes can be found below but the major