The Economic Benefits of International Education to the United States for the 2010-2011 Academic Year: A Statistical Analysis

Similar documents
Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

Licensure Resources by State

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

State Tax Information

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

American C.E. Requirements

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1

********************

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

State Tax Information

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota

$7.5 appropriation $ Preschool Development Grants

State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide

PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF

Acceptable Certificates from States other than New York

Impact of the House Full-Year Continuing Resolution for FY 2011 (H.R. 1)

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA

Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?

Overview of School Choice Policies

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006

Current State Regulations

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2011

Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA (619)

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013]

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State

Employment and Earnings of Registered Nurses in 2010

State Tax Deductions for Contributions to 529 Plans Presented by Advisor Name

Use of "Mail Box" service. Date: April 6, [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015]

States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon)

Model Regulation Service July 2005 LIFE INSURANCE MULTIPLE POLICY MODEL REGULATION

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009

Facing Cost-Sensitive Shoppers, Health Plan Providers Must Demonstrate Value

FELONY DUI SYNOPSIS. 46 states have felony DUI. Charts 1 and 2 detail the felony threshold for each of the 46 states analyzed.

2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report. Section 3 Billing Rates. Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter 2014

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011

Broadband Availability in America. With Rural Americans Looking for High-Speed Services, Adequate Broadband Speeds Remain Out of Reach for Many

Model Regulation Service January 2006 DISCLOSURE FOR SMALL FACE AMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES MODEL ACT

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435

I have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans

The Economic Benefits of International Education to the United States: A Statistical Analysis

The Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012)

State Corporate Income Tax Rates As of December 31, 2006 (2006's noteworthy changes in bold italics)

Please contact if you have any questions regarding this survey.

THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014

State Agency Name Link to and/or Information about Complaint Process

Education Program Beneficiaries

Full Medical Benefits**

THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY

Question by: Karon Beyer. Date: March 28, [LLC Question] [ ]

HECM MIC Endorsement Report WELLS FARGO BANK NA As of July 2010

Note: This Fact Sheet outlines a Proposed Rule. Any of the specifics of this fact sheet could change based on the promulgation of a Final Rule.

A-79. Appendix A Overview and Detailed Tables

Subject: Military Personnel Strengths in the Army National Guard

Intercountry Adoptions Finalized Abroad

Sample/Excerpts ONLY Not Full Report

The Economic Benefits of International Students to the U.S. Economy Academic Year

COMPARE NEBRASKA S BUSINESS CLIMATE TO OTHER STATES. Selected Business Costs for Each State. Workers Compensation Rates

Summary of Laws Regarding International Adoptions Finalized Abroad 50 States and 6 U.S. Territories

2014 Tax Changes. This document currently reflects only tax changes of which ADP was notified by tax agencies as of January 2, 2014.

FOREIGN LANGUAGE ENROLLMENTS IN K-12 PUBLIC SCHOOLS: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society?

Transcription:

The Economic Benefits of International Education to the United States for the 2010-2011 Academic Year: A Statistical Analysis NAFSA: Association of International Educators estimates that foreign students and their dependents contributed approximately $20.23 billion to the U.S. economy during the 2010-2011 academic year. This conservative figure is based on tuition figures from Wintergreen Orchard House, enrollment figures from the Institute of International Education's Open Doors 2011 report, living expenses calculated from Wintergreen Orchard House figures, and analysis of the data by Jason Baumgartner at Indiana University Bloomington s Office of International Services. NAFSA's annual Economic Impact Statements estimate the amount of money foreign students bring to the United States to support their education. This report does not rely on a multiplier effect. Although this might provide a more accurate estimate of actual economic impact, there is no consensus on the appropriate size of such a multiplier. NAFSA and its partners are committed to continuing efforts to improve our data and methodology. By any measure, international education makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy. 1307 New York Avenue, NW, Eighth Floor, Washington, DC 20005-4701 Tel: 202.737.3699 Fax: 202.737.3657 http://www.nafsa.org

United States of America Total Number of Foreign Students: 723,277 Part 1: Net Contribution to U.S. Economy by Foreign Students (2010-11) Contribution from Tuition and Fees to U.S. Economy: $14,348,000,000 Contribution from Living Expenses: $13,207,000,000 Total Contribution by Foreign Students: $27,555,000,000 Less U.S. Support of 27.9% - $7,700,000,000 Plus Dependents' Living Expenses: + $378,000,000 Net Contribution to U.S. Economy by Foreign Students and their Families: $20,232,000,000 Part 2: Contribution to U.S. Economy by Foreign Students' Dependents (2010-11) Spouses' Contribution Percent of Married Students: Percent of Spouses in the U.S.: Number of Spouses in the U.S.: 56,679 Additional Expenses for a Spouse: (% of student living expenses) 7.8% 85.0% 25.0% Spouses' Contribution: $255,000,000 Children's Contribution Number of Couples in the U.S.: 56,679 Number of Children per Couple: 0.6 Number of Children in the U.S.: 33,884 Additional Expenses for a Child: (% of student living expenses) 20.0% Children's Contribution: $122,000,000 Net Contribution to U.S. Economy by Foreign Students' Dependents: $378,000,000 Part 3: Foreign Student Contribution from Tuition/Fees and Living Expenses (2010-11) State # of Foreign Students Tuition Living Expenses Less U.S. Total and Fees and Dependents Support Contribution (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) Alabama 6,340 $92.2 $87.4 $50.6 $129.0 Alaska 604 $7.9 $9.1 $3.7 $13.3 Arizona 11,398 $195.0 $189.3 $105.2 $279.1 Arkansas 4,172 $60.5 $61.1 $27.2 $94.4 California 96,535 $1,737.9 $2,164.6 $910.5 $2,992.0 Colorado 7,688 $164.6 $154.9 $84.1 $235.4 Connecticut 10,137 $228.5 $205.6 $134.3 $299.9 Delaware 3,825 $73.1 $66.8 $37.8 $102.1 District of Columbia 7,951 $228.8 $200.6 $147.2 $282.2 Florida 29,719 $583.3 $556.3 $302.9 $836.7 Georgia 15,359 $337.9 $274.7 $182.9 $429.8 Hawaii 4,768 $58.6 $85.5 $29.1 $115.0 Idaho 2,112 $25.9 $29.0 $10.7 $44.2 Illinois 33,766 $784.8 $650.6 $489.8 $945.7

Indiana 20,112 $487.0 $342.7 $234.0 $595.6 Iowa 10,404 $203.2 $164.1 $87.0 $280.3 Kansas 9,389 $135.2 $129.8 $64.7 $200.2 Kentucky 5,111 $79.9 $72.2 $37.5 $114.6 Louisiana 7,429 $108.1 $107.9 $61.5 $154.5 Maine 1,158 $25.3 $20.2 $8.8 $36.6 Maryland 13,422 $276.9 $290.1 $169.5 $397.5 Massachusetts 38,698 $1,103.7 $884.1 $598.0 $1,389.8 Michigan 24,668 $584.8 $411.3 $290.4 $705.7 Minnesota 12,091 $214.3 $189.5 $101.2 $302.5 Mississippi 2,537 $30.5 $34.7 $18.8 $46.4 Missouri 15,114 $276.3 $251.6 $144.5 $383.3 Montana 1,301 $21.7 $19.4 $7.4 $33.8 Nebraska 4,194 $61.2 $65.0 $29.2 $97.0 Nevada 2,795 $37.9 $47.5 $19.1 $66.3 New Hampshire 2,626 $68.6 $50.8 $32.6 $86.8 New Jersey 13,844 $290.5 $299.6 $180.8 $409.3 New Mexico 2,724 $39.7 $40.4 $25.1 $55.0 New York 78,888 $1,748.3 $1,700.5 $1,017.5 $2,431.3 North Carolina 12,824 $249.0 $208.1 $152.8 $304.3 North Dakota 3,106 $43.6 $39.6 $21.5 $61.6 Ohio 24,709 $511.0 $445.9 $294.4 $662.4 Oklahoma 8,626 $117.8 $135.0 $63.7 $189.1 Oregon 8,929 $168.7 $174.0 $69.1 $273.6 Pennsylvania 30,507 $795.2 $593.9 $424.0 $965.1 Puerto Rico 858 $5.5 $10.7 $3.3 $13.0 Rhode Island 4,911 $125.7 $96.1 $47.0 $174.8 South Carolina 4,529 $87.1 $67.9 $47.5 $107.5 South Dakota 1,254 $10.7 $15.1 $4.4 $21.4 Tennessee 6,399 $120.6 $99.3 $61.5 $158.4 Texas 61,636 $845.3 $994.6 $471.9 $1,367.9 Utah 7,203 $88.8 $100.0 $44.0 $144.8 Vermont 1,078 $27.7 $19.4 $9.5 $37.6 Virgin Islands 129 $1.1 $2.4 $0.6 $3.0 Virginia 15,056 $279.0 $235.1 $126.8 $387.2 Washington 17,811 $257.7 $300.5 $94.4 $463.7 West Virginia 2,498 $39.0 $39.4 $22.5 $55.8 Wisconsin 9,248 $189.9 $133.5 $89.6 $233.8 Wyoming 1,087 $12.2 $17.2 $8.1 $21.3

Methodology: How We Compute Economic Impact (2011) We define economic impact as the amount of money that foreign students collectively bring into the United States to pay for their education and to support themselves while they (and in some cases, their families) are here. The goal of our economic impact formula is to use data already collected for other purposes to provide a reasonable estimate of the economic resources that foreign students import to the United States to support their education here each year. The data sets used for these reports come from two sources: 1. The Institute of International Education s Open Doors 2011 report, funded by the U.S. Department of State, provides numbers of foreign students enrolled at colleges and universities throughout the United States during the 2010-11 academic year. In many cases, this data provide separate totals for undergraduate, graduate, and non degree students. (http://www.iie.org/opendoors) 2. Wintergreen Orchard House provides cost figures for tuition, living, and miscellaneous expenses at U.S. colleges and universities for the 2010-11 academic year. (http://www.wintergreenorchardhouse.com/) The extensive data provided by these two sources (which collect it directly from surveys of the institutions involved) allow us to make our estimates sensitive to differences between institutions. However, there are still areas where our estimates and formulas could be improved. For example, we compute economic impact only for students reported in the Open Doors report. Colleges and universities that do not provide information to the Institute of International Education are not represented. Also, enrollment reports represent peak enrollment, and not necessarily enrollment levels throughout the year. Estimating Expenses Tuition, fees, living expenses, and dollar estimates are derived from Wintergreen Orchard House s data collected on surveys completed by institutions every year. We try to make our calculations sensitive not only to differing costs at institutions, but differing costs for ESL students, undergraduates, graduate students, and students on practical training. 1. Undergraduates and English Language Programs: The number of undergraduate students at an institution is specified by Open Doors data. Wintergreen Orchard House s data provide undergraduate tuition and fee amounts, oncampus room and board amounts, and miscellaneous expenses. These categories are sometimes broken down into averages for international, out-of-state, flat rate, and in-state students. When multiple averages are available, we choose averages in the order given above. 2. Graduate Students: The number of graduate students at an institution is specified by Open Doors data. Wintergreen Orchard House s data provide graduate tuition and fee amounts, on-campus

room and board amounts, and miscellaneous expenses. If there are no differentiated graduate expenses provided by an institution in the Wintergreen Orchard House s data, then the undergraduate expenses would be applied. 3. Students on Practical Training: We assume these students earn enough in their U.S. jobs to pay living and educational expenses for the year, and so import no funds for their support. Therefore, net economic impact of students in practical training is zero. Economic impact of an international student equals tuition and fees, plus room and board, plus miscellaneous figured at 50 percent of room and board, less U.S. support. We assume: (a) that spring enrollment figures are the same as the fall figures reported, (b) that all students are enrolled full time for two semesters or three quarters a year, and (c) that students live on campus for the full year. The miscellaneous expenses, enumerated in Wintergreen Orchard House s data, average about 40 percent of room and board expenses. We use a 50 percent figure as an approximation that includes all extra expenses except for travel. Estimating U.S. Support The Open Doors survey asks schools to report the percentage of their students who are selffunded, the percentage that have U.S. source income, etc. The U.S. support percentage includes funding from a U.S. college or university, the U.S. Government, a U.S. private sponsor or current employment. For this analysis the percentages are calculated based upon the institution s Carnegie classification and the academic career of the student. For example, this process will differentiate the level of support between undergraduates and graduates at a particular research institution while it also differentiates between a baccalaureate-classified institution from an associate s-classified institution. Individual Institution Enrollment Figures For institutions with fewer than 10 international students enrolled, enrollment totals are suppressed for confidentiality reasons. In the reports, this is indicated by three asterisks (***).