Cibola High School Standards-Based Grading

Similar documents
APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

December 7, Dear Parents of Students in Grades 6-12,

Section III. An Excellent Christian Teacher. Characteristics and Expectations. GRCS Handbook 1

Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles

Graduate Student Handbook of the Mathematics Department

INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 29/07/2015 Grade: B Score: % (35.00 of 41.00)

INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 09/06/2015 Grade: A Score: % (38.00 of 41.00)

ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION, AND COMMUNICATION OF STUDENT LEARNING POLICY

REGULATION ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Graduate Handbook of the Mathematics Department. North Dakota State University May 5, 2015

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Online Teaching and Learning

Program: Speech Pathology and Audiology B.S. Department: Speech Pathology and Audiology. Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 220

Trumbull Career & Technical Center Teaching Academy Syllabi

Salt Lake City School District Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Writing Template

Curriculum Management Plan

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

Division: Career Studies Course name: Business 38: Business Computations Section: 8279 / Semester Spring 2016

Portfolio Evaluation Rubric Guide

INSTRUCTION AT FSU THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF DISTANCE LEARNING. A Guide to Teaching and Learning Practices

Teachers Demonstrate Leadership

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

The University of Akron Department of Mathematics. 3450: COLLEGE ALGEBRA 4 credits Spring 2015

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

EDUC 1301: INTRODUCTION TO THE TEACHING PROFESSION COURSE SYLLABUS

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Assessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Why is it important to use multiple methods? What are direct and indirect methods of assessment?

Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success

Principal Performance Review

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System. Frequently Asked Questions. General Questions

MATH 1310, SECTION 17086

A Guide. to Assessment of Learning Outcomes. for ACEJMC Accreditation

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

MAC2233, Business Calculus Reference # , RM 2216 TR 9:50AM 11:05AM

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

SYLLABUS. 6. Office Phone and or

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

INTRODUCTION TO THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY RECR 250 (3 Units) Spring 2011

Teacher Guidebook

St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents

FORENSIC SCIENCE SYLLABUS. August 2013-June 2014

Japanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy

Rygaards International Secondary School Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

TOWARDS THE PATHWAYS VISION MODEL OF INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING. Michael S. Wilson, PhD, CPA, CGMA

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA DOCUMENT

Designing Writing Assessments & Rubrics. 11th LARC/CALPER Webinar on Assessment November 14, 2013 Deborah Crusan, Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Northeastern State University Online Educator Certificate

EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

REQUIRED TEXT: Slavin, R. E. Educational Psychology, Ninth Edition. Allyn and Bacon, 2009.

University of Florida at Gainesville Linguistics Program 4131 Turlington Hall LIN Introduction to Graduate Research

Core Goal: Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

leaders Master of Education Leadership in Reading UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Reference Guide

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Best Practices in School Budgeting

Signature Assign 3. Course Grade. Course Grade. Research. Course Grade. Research. Project, ED 613. Political Concepts. Course Grade.

Assessment Policy. 1 Introduction. 2 Background

EDTC Program Assessment Framework

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

Master of Arts in English Language Learning for Grade PreK 12 Teachers

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

CONTENT SPECIFIC SGO SAMPLES CAREER and TECHNICAL EDUCATION

Highly Qualified Teacher Component JUNE 2016

Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview

Key Assessments School Library Media Specialist

Speech 101-Los Angeles Harbor College Oral Communication

GENERATION SAFE 360 SELF ASSESSMENT: PRINTABLE VERSION. Page 1

Examples of Proficiency-based Learning Options

Professionals Responsible for Campus Turnaround Plan Development: Name:

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Paralegal/042 Workers Compensation for Paralegals Spring 2016 Section 1660 CE 206 Saturdays 9:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. March 12 June 4, 2016

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

21ST CENTURY STUDENT OUTCOMES:

Goals: The goal of this course is to prepare Vermont educators to meet state and national educational technology standards as follows:

About the Finalist. Cumberland County Schools North Carolina DISTRICT PROFILE

KIN 323 Methods of Teaching Secondary Physical Education Spring 2016

International Baccalaureate Diploma Assessment Policy Holy Heart of Mary High School

Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System

Central Texas College. Menu Management Semester Hours Credit: 2

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

How to Upload Artifacts to MyLearningPlan.com

Division of Arts, Humanities & Wellness Department of World Languages and Cultures. Course Syllabus. 한국어 2 Korean II LAN 265

Transcription:

Cibola High School Standards-Based Grading Guiding Principles and Expectations Standards-based grading is a system of assessing and reporting that promotes accuracy and content mastery through the assurance of research-based grading practices. In order to ensure an equitable and transparent grading system, teachers who implement standards-based grading will adhere to the following guiding principles and expectations. Teachers and students will engage in a process of reteach and reassess to ensure ALL students master the essential content standards. Teachers will emphasize the most recent evidence as a means to assess and report a student s level of proficiency. Students will be assigned practice as a means of formative feedback. Student mastery will be assessed through the use of a consistent and well-defined proficiency scale. Students will be assigned a zero only as a result of no or insu of learning. cient evidence Teachers and administration will engage in consistent and ongoing communication with parents and students. 1

Essential Categories The Cibola High School SBG Committee, consisting of teachers, administration, and instructional coaches, developed a list of essential categories in the area of standards-based grading. Each category is accompanied by a list of campus and PLC expectations. Essential Category Page Number Reassessment 3 The Role of Practice 4 Levels of Proficiency 5 The Role of the Zero 6 Communication and Common Language 7 Most Recent Evidence 8 2

Reassessment Diversity in assessment Teachers will utilize a variety of methods to assess student proficiency (e.g., paper-pencil, projects, presentations, etc.) Students have the opportunity to earn full credit on reassessments Most recent evidence is reflected in the gradebook Attempts and Timeframes Assessments will remain open throughout the semester to allow for redo/retake opportunities Reassessment Practice PLC teams determine the procedures students must follow in order to reassess a particular content target (e.g., attend tutoring, complete test corrections, make appointments, etc.) Retakes are open to all students, even those with passing grades Standardized retake form Reassessment opportunities PLC teams determine when and how reassessments will be administered 3

The Role of Practice Terminology The term homework is replaced with practice to emphasize its true purpose in the classroom Practice is recorded but not graded Teachers can mark assignments and provide feedback, but practice can not be factored into the overall student grade Procedures will be established at the PLC level for lack or absence of formative evidence (e.g., teachers will communicate with students and parents if practice is not being done) Formative feedback Occurs regularly and in various forms Assessed by teachers, peers, and self Individual feedback component when students are working in a collaborative environment Practice alignment All practice should align to content targets and assessments Exemplifies the rigor and mastery expected on assessments Practice is embedded in the instructional process Procedures are determined at the PLC level Amount, type, and evidence of practice Focus on differentiated practice How often practice is assigned and feedback is provided 4

Levels of Proficiency 0-4 grading scale Teachers will use the 0-4 grading scale provided by Synergy Proficiency-based, not points-based PLC teams will assess content targets based on mastery through the use of the proficiency-based rubrics 0-4 scores will not be assessed from points/# correct Practice may reflect points/# correct Assessment scores will reflect the level of mastery based on the 0-4 scale Conversion scale 0-4 grades will be converted to percentages in accordance with the campus conversion scale. This will be communicated in the syllabi CHS Conversion Scale Summatives Curriculum teams will continue to design assessments through a standards-based mindset Assessment questions will align to essential standards and appropriate level of rigor Clearly defined proficiency levels PLCs will determine a distinct definition for each proficiency level and communicate this on the syllabi PLCs will determine increments used between 0-4 (e.g., whole numbers, half points, decimals) but still must define EACH level Common language to be used: 4 - Highly Proficient 3 - Proficient 2 - Developing 1 - Beginning 0 -Insu cient Evidence Rubrics PLC teams will develop common rubrics that align to proficiency levels 5

Role of the Zero Consistent definition of a zero A zero is used when A student shows insu cient evidence of learning No understanding of learning target Student output is insu cient A student s evidence is missing Consistent language in syllabi The zero (along with all proficiency levels on the 0-4 scale) is clearly defined in the syllabus. This language is common across all teachers implementing SBG at Cibola High School Non-punitive A zero is never used as a punitive measure. This includes giving a zero or deducting points for Late evidence Behavior and participation Communication and delivery of expectations PLC teams determine how to communicate the role of the zero in their classroom with students and families Examples include: Syllabus Canvas Course Gradebook logistics The SBG Committee will determine how to communicate and input missing or incomplete targets in the gradebook (e.g., incomplete, missing, excused, etc.) Deadlines PLC Teams decide when missing or insu cient evidence gets reported as a zero. 6

Communication and Common Language Syllabi must be consistent within PLC using SBG and include the following: Summary of grading practices Assessments will be 100% of student s overall grade Generic rubric and proficiency scales/levels Admin communication Admin provides support for SBG by communicating vision and expectations to parents/students Ongoing teacher communication Teachers communicate observations/feedback not represented in the gradebook (e.g., practice, student growth, behavior, participation, etc.) Additional Resources CHS will provide resources, references, and research that informs grading practices Additional Communication PLCs will communicate through other platforms (e.g., Canvas, Email, etc.) 7

Most Recent Evidence Most Recent Evidence The student will receive the most recent score If student reassessment is lower, teachers have the option to: Give an additional reassessment before replacing grade Consider the preponderance of evidence to determine the final score Averages Teachers will not average grades for a content target using old and new evidence Types of Evidence Determined by PLC Team 8

Glossary Terms Standards-Based Grading (SBG): Professional Learning Communities (PLC): teachers of the same course who work together to plan instruction and assessment Assessment: activities used to demonstrate student learning and mastery. Examples include, but are not limited to, traditional exams, projects, essays, presentations, etc. Formative Feedback: represents information communicated to the learner that is intended to improve learning Proficiency Scale: a table used by teachers and students to determine the student's current level of progress toward meeting the standard. Proficiency Rubric: a scoring tool for student work that clearly shows the learning target and performance criteria to meet the target 9