relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates

Similar documents
Expenditure and Outputs in the Irish Health System: A Cross Country Comparison

TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division

With data up to: May Monthly Electricity Statistics

NERI Quarterly Economic Facts Summer Distribution of Income and Wealth

What Is the Total Public Spending on Education?

What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education?

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD By Kyle Pomerleau

What do we know about income inequality in NZ? (Bryan Perry, MSD) Income inequality: summary indicators

Preventing fraud and corruption in public procurement

International comparisons of obesity prevalence

How many students study abroad and where do they go?

Delegation in human resource management

41 T Korea, Rep T Netherlands T Japan E Bulgaria T Argentina T Czech Republic T Greece 50.

Insurance corporations and pension funds in OECD countries

Trends in Digitally-Enabled Trade in Services. by Maria Borga and Jennifer Koncz-Bruner

The U.S Health Care Paradox: How Spending More is Getting Us Less

GfK PURCHASING POWER INTERNATIONAL

Higher education institutions as places to integrate individual lifelong learning strategies

On What Resources and Services Is Education Funding Spent?

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

4 Distribution of Income, Earnings and Wealth

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD

Waiting times and other barriers to health care access

Foreign Taxes Paid and Foreign Source Income INTECH Global Income Managed Volatility Fund

PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY WORKERS

Transfer issues and directions for reform: Australian transfer policy in comparative perspective

SF3.1: Marriage and divorce rates

PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA. Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D Economist, Montreal economic Institute CPBI, Winnipeg June 15, 2007

PUBLIC & PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA

AMADEUS: Analyse MAjor Databases from EUropean Sources - A financial database of 4 million European companies, including Eastern Europe MODULE.

ANNUAL HOURS WORKED. Belgium:

Early Childhood Education and Care

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Internationalization and higher education policy: Recent developments in Finland

International Women's Day PwC Women in Work Index

Updated development of global greenhouse gas emissions 2013

THE LOW INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON INSURANCE MARKETS. Mamiko Yokoi-Arai

CO1.2: Life expectancy at birth

INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH CARE SERVICES UTILISATION IN OECD COUNTRIES

International investment continues to struggle

How To Calculate Tertiary Type A Graduation Rate

World Consumer Income and Expenditure Patterns

Hong Kong s Health Spending 1989 to 2033

Development aid in 2015 continues to grow despite costs for in-donor refugees

Bahrain Telecom Pricing International Benchmarking. April 2014

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments

Country note China. More than 255 million people in OECD and G20 countries have now attained tertiary education (Table A1.3a).

Ageing OECD Societies

Eliminating Double Taxation through Corporate Integration

Mapping Global Value Chains

How To Tax On Pension Income For Older People In European Countries

Broadband Mapping 2013

Current Trends & Analysis of ACBS. Completion of Accredited Courses & Recognition of Prior Learning in ACBS

Cross-national data on child maltreatment, policy and legislation across the OECD

Configuring DHCP for ShoreTel IP Phones

Development aid stable in 2014 but flows to poorest countries still falling. Detailed summary

How Does Educational Attainment Affect Participation in the Labour Market?

PF2.3: Additional leave entitlements for working parents

Education at a Glance. OECD Indicators. Annex: UOE Data Collection Sources

Alcohol Consumption in Ireland A Report for the Health Service Executive

- 2 - Chart 2. Annual percent change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates,

Social security: Iceland

Bahrain Telecom Pricing

Appendix 1: Full Country Rankings

July Figure 1. 1 The index is set to 100 in House prices are deflated by country CPIs in most cases.

PISA FOR SCHOOLS. How is my school comparing internationally? Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills OECD. Madrid, September 22 nd

LMF1.2: Maternal employment rates

How Many Students Finish Secondary Education?

Among the 34 OECD countries, Belgium performed above the OECD average in each of

IMD World Talent Report. By the IMD World Competitiveness Center

Culture Change in the Workforce in an Aging America: Are We Making Any Progress?

Analysis of statistics 2015

Review of R&D Tax Credit. Invitation for Submissions

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF HOURLY COMPENSATION COSTS

Government at a Glance 2015

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 102 February 2016

Global Economic Briefing: Global Inflation

How Many Students Will Enter Tertiary Education?

NEW PASSENGER CAR REGISTRATIONS BY ALTERNATIVE FUEL TYPE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 Quarter

Encouraging Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)

Belgium (Fr.) Australia. Austria. England. Belgium (Fl.) United States 2. Finland 2. Norway 2. Belgium (Fr.) Australia. Austria Norway 2, 4.

Percent of adults with postsecondary degree. Japan. Mexico. Canada. Poland. Denmark. Greece Germany. Italy. Austria. Korea.

(OECD, 2012) Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools

Taxing Wages 2014 SPECIAL FEATURE: CHANGES IN STRUCTURAL LABOUR INCOME TAX PROGRESSIVITY OVER THE PERIOD IN OECD MEMBER COUNTRIES

VULNERABILITY OF SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

FDI gains momentum in second half of 2014

Health and welfare Humanities and arts Social sciences, bussiness and law. Ireland. Portugal. Denmark. Spain. New Zealand. Argentina 1.

Fluoride and Dental Health in Europe

THE WORLD S LEADING CAR DESIGN MAGAZINE

Health Care in Crisis

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the First Quarter of 2016

Corporate Office Von Karman Ave Suite 150 Irvine, California Toll Free: Fax:

Global AML Resource Map Over 2000 AML professionals

Topic 1: The learning and school environment in primary and secondary education

DEMOGRAPHICS AND MACROECONOMICS

168/ November At risk of poverty or social exclusion 2 rate in the EU28, (% of total population)

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

Employee eligibility to work in the UK

2011 ICT Facts and Figures

Transcription:

Gini Coefficient The Gini Coefficient is a measure of income inequality which is based on data relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates perfect income equality, whereas a coefficient of one indicates perfect inequality. The Gini Coefficients for the OECD countries for the late 2000 s are shown in table 1 below, along with a corresponding ranking (with 1 being the most equal). Table 1: Gini Coefficients and rankings for OECD countries for late 2000 s 1 Country Gini Coefficient (Total Population) Rank Slovenia 0.236 1 Denmark 0.248 2 Norway 0.25 3 Czech Republic 0.256 4 Slovak Republic 0.257 5 Belgium 0.259 6 Finland 0.259 7 Sweden 0.259 8 Austria 0.261 9 Hungary 0.272 10 Luxembourg 0.288 11 France 0.293 12 Ireland (2009) 0.293 13 Netherlands 0.294 14 Germany 0.295 15 Iceland 0.301 16 Switzerland 0.303 17 Poland 0.305 18 Greece 0.307 19 Estonia 0.315 20 Korea 0.315 21 Spain 0.317 22 Canada 0.324 23 Japan 0.329 24 New Zealand 0.33 25 Australia 0.336 26 Italy 0.337 27 Ireland (2010) 0.339 27 United Kingdom 0.345 28 Portugal 0.353 29 Israel 0.371 30 United States 0.378 31 Turkey 0.409 32 Mexico 0.476 33 Chile 0.494 34 OECD - Average 0.316 - Source: OECD; http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=inequality# 1 Late 2000 s can refer to years from 2007-2009 depending on the country. For more information see http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/30/49147697.pdf. The 2010 Gini Coefficient for Ireland is also included in the table. This comes from the CSO 2010 SILC Survey.

As we can see, Ireland s Gini Coefficient in 2009 was 0.293 2, which was below (i.e. more equal than) the OECD average of 0.316. However, the latest Gini Coefficient reported for Ireland in 2010 is 0.339 3. This indicates that from 2009-2010, there was a sharp rise in income inequality in Ireland. In 2009, Ireland ranked 13 out of the 34 OECD countries in terms of income equality. However, the revised Gini Coefficient of 0.339 in 2010 sees Ireland slide down to number 27 in the rankings. To put it another way, Ireland is the eighth most unequal country in the OECD in terms of income. Figure 1 below graphs the Gini Coefficients over time for Ireland, the UK, the US and the OECD average. Notes: 1) Source; OECD, http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=inequality#) 2) The 2010 Gini coefficient for Ireland is taken from the CSO SILC survey 2010.This can be accessed at http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/silc/2010/pr elimsilc_2010.pdf 3) For the mid 1980 s, data is unavailable for Australia, Chile, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Korea, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Switzerland. 4) For the mid 1990 s data is unavailable for Estonia, Iceland, Korea, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Switzerland. 2 Figures taken from OECD; http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=inequality# 3 Source; CSO SILC survey 2010 http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/silc/2010/prelimsilc_2010.pdf

In the early to mid 1990 s, Ireland s Gini Coefficient fell below that of the UK and continued to fall throughout the 1990 s and early 2000 s. It eventually dropped below the OECD average in the late 2000 s. However, following the sharp rise in 2010, Ireland is now more unequal than the OECD average and it s Gini Coefficient is very close to that of the UK. Figure 2 below shows a more detailed picture of the yearly changes in the Gini Coefficient for Ireland from 2004-2010. Source: CSO SILC Survey 2010, Again, this shows that there had been a gradual improvement in income equality in Ireland up until 2009. From 2009-2010, there was a rapid reversal which completely offset any improvements made in previous years. Interdecile Ratios Table 2 below shows a number of different interdecile ratios for each OECD country. The P90/P10 ratio is a ratio of the income of those in the highest decile to the income of those in the lowest decile. The P90/P10 ratio for Ireland of 3.702, tells us that people in the highest decile earn 3.702 times that of those in the lowest income decile.

. Table 2: Interdecile Ratio of OECD countries for late 2000 s Interdecile ratio P90/P10 Interdecile ratio P90/P50 Interdecile ratio P50/P10 Level Rank Level Rank Level Rank Denmark 2.790 1 1.557 1 1.747 4 Czech Republic 2.908 2 1.730 7 1.737 2 Norway 2.976 3 1.617 2 1.771 5 Slovenia 3.017 4 1.638 3 1.864 11 Slovak Republic 3.122 5 1.781 10 1.873 13 Hungary 3.146 6 1.749 8 1.779 6 Finland 3.162 7 1.677 5 1.859 10 Sweden 3.165 8 1.658 4 1.716 1 Austria 3.205 9 1.751 9 1.818 8 Iceland 3.208 10 1.819 11 1.746 3 Belgium 3.324 11 1.701 6 1.940 16 Netherlands 3.343 12 1.841 13 1.865 12 Luxembourg 3.442 13 1.826 12 1.857 9 France 3.447 14 1.887 17 1.809 7 Germany 3.545 15 1.844 14 1.888 14 Switzerland 3.660 16 1.871 15 1.917 15 Ireland 3.702 17 1.884 16 2.182 22 Poland 3.972 18 1.979 22 2.362 27 Greece 4.025 19 1.971 21 2.180 21 New Zealand 4.169 20 2.050 28 2.065 17 Canada 4.177 21 1.947 19 2.122 19 Estonia 4.279 22 2.018 26 2.294 25 Italy 4.301 23 2.044 27 2.113 18 Australia 4.546 24 1.982 23 2.130 20 Spain 4.551 25 1.954 20 2.320 26 United Kingdom 4.559 26 2.008 25 2.199 23 Korea 4.817 27 1.936 18 2.429 28 Portugal 4.855 28 2.277 31 2.225 24 Japan 5.024 29 1.997 24 2.430 29 United States 5.902 30 2.205 29 2.672 31 Turkey 6.153 31 2.488 32 2.672 30 Israel 6.202 32 2.272 30 2.688 32 Chile 8.518 33 3.231 34 2.730 33 Mexico 9.675 34 2.977 33 2.860 34 OECD average 4.261-1.975-2.114 - Source: OECD Factbook 2011; Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics The P90/P10 ratio for Ireland of 3.702 is lower than that of the OECD average of 4.261. This means that the gap between the income of the highest and lowest earners is not as large as the OECD average. Ireland ranks 17 out of 34 countries. The P90/P50 ratio is the ratio of the income of the highest earners to the median income. As with the P90/P10 ratio, the P90/P50 is below that of the OECD average

indicating that the gap between the highest earners and the median earners is below the OECD average. However, when looking at the P50/P10 ratio, it is quite a different story. The P50/P10 ratio indicates the gap between the median income earners and the lowest earners. Ireland s P50/P10 ratio is above that of the OECD average, which suggests that, relatively speaking, the gap between Ireland s middle earners and Ireland s low earners is quite large.