Antonio Colombo MD on behalf of the SECURITY Investigators



Similar documents
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting

DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY. Dr Robert S Mvungi, MD(Dar), Mmed (Wits) FCP(SA), Cert.Cardio(SA) Phy Tanzania Cardiac Society Dar es Salaam Tanzania

University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center on behalf of the REAL-LATE and the ZEST-LATE trial

LEADERS: 5-Year Follow-up

Cilostazol versus Clopidogrel after Coronary Stenting

Apixaban Plus Mono vs. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights from the APPRAISE-2 Trial

Presenter: Marco Valgimigli, MD PhD, FESC Erasmus MC, Thoraxcenter Rotterdam The Netherlands

EXAMINATION trial. Manel Sabaté Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (On behalf of the Examination Investigators)

PRECOMBAT Trial. Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy. Stephen Monroe, MD FACC Chattanooga Heart Institute

Is There A LIfe for DES after discontinuation of Clopidogrel

MEDICAL POLICY No R1 DRUG-ELUTING STENTS FOR ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark

Clinical Study Synopsis

Ostial LAD: Single stent approach is the best. Antonio A. Pocoví, MD, FSCAI, MTSAC, Advisory Council Member, CACI

A Post-market Study to Assess the STENTYS Self-exPanding COronary Stent In AcuTe myocardial InfarctiON in Real Life APPOSITION III

Main Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT

BRIGHT Trial. Bivalirudin versus Heparin and Heparin plus Tirofiban in Patients with AMI Undergoing PCI. Thirty-Day and One-Year Outcomes of the

Rivaroxaban for acute coronary syndromes

Antiaggreganti. STEMI : cosa c è di nuovo? Heartline Genova Novembre 2015

Description of problem Description of proposed amendment Justification for amendment ERG response

Intracoronary Stenting and. Robert A. Byrne, Julinda Mehilli, Salvatore Cassese, Franz-Josef Neumann, Susanne Pinieck, Tomohisa Tada,

Prognostic impact of uric acid in patients with stable coronary artery disease

The Bioresorbable Vascular Stent Dr Albert Ko

JUL Ms. Kendra Basler Regulatory Affairs Associate Abbott Vascular Cardiac Therapies 3200 Lakeside Drive Santa Clara, CA

Clinical Research Intracoronary Stenting with Crushing in Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: Initial Results and Medium-Term Follow Up

The Minvasys Amazonia Pax & Nile Pax Polymer Free Paclitaxel Eluting Stent Program

Early healing after treatment of coronary lesions by everolimus, or biolimus eluting bioresorbable polymer stents

Majestic Trial 12 Month Results

WOEST TRIAL- NO ASPIRIN IN STENTED PATIENTS REQUIRING ANTICOAGULATION. Van Crisco, MD, FACC, FSCAI First Coast

None. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Plus Systemic Anticoagulation: Bleeding Risk and Management. 76 year old male LINGO 1/5/2015

OCT STEMI: OCT guidance during stent implantation

Marco Ferlini Struttura Semplice di Emodinamica, UO Cardiologia Dipartimento Cardiotoracovascolare Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo

Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Long term anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of stroke: a new scenario after RE-LY trial

ANESTHESIA FOR PATIENTS WITH CORONARY STENTS FOR NON CARDIAC SURGERY. Dr. Mahesh Vakamudi. Professor and Head

Therapeutic Approach in Patients with Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease

Is Stenting or Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting the Better Treatment for This Patient?

STROKE PREVENTION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals. OBJECTIVE: ABBREVIATIONS: BACKGROUND:

Getting smart about dyspnea and life saving drug therapy in ACS patients. Kobi George Kaplan Medical Center Rehovot

CARDIAC RISKS OF NON CARDIAC SURGERY

L'aspirina è diventata obsoleta nell'era dei nuovi inbitori P2Y12? Leonardo Bolognese MD, FESC, FACC Cardiovascular Department, Arezzo, Italy ISO 9001

Drug-Eluting Balloons. Klaus Bonaventura Department of Cardiology and Angiology Heart Thorax Vascular Center, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam

Addendum to Clinical Review for NDA

Steven J. Yakubov, MD FACC For the CoreValve US Clinical Investigators

FULL COVERAGE FOR PREVENTIVE MEDICATIONS AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IMPACT ON RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES

Antiplatelet and Antithrombotics From clinical trials to guidelines

Como mejorar el manejo médico de los diabéticos con SCA

ADVANCE: a factorial randomised trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Repeat Coronary Revascularization Procedures after Successful Bare-Metal or Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Clinical Programs. Medtronic Coronary Stent Systems. driver BMS

06 Validation of risk prediction model

Antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment of patients undergoing carotid and peripheral artery angioplasty

The Anti coagulated Patient: The Cardiologist s View. February 28, 2015

PCI vs. CABG for Left Main Disease

FFR CT : Clinical studies

6/5/2014. Objectives. Acute Coronary Syndromes. Epidemiology. Epidemiology. Epidemiology and Health Care Impact Pathophysiology

Post-MI Cardiac Rehabilitation. Mark Mason Consultant Cardiologist Harefield Hospital Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Objectives. Preoperative Cardiac Risk Stratification for Noncardiac Surgery. History

Déjeuner/Repas Débat ABBOTT «Docteur, je veux un stent qui se dissout» ABSORB,la oui, mais chez quel Les dernières données ABSORB

on behalf of the AUGMENT-HF Investigators

Status of Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

Using Clinical Registries to Create Evidence-based Health Care Policy : Experiences from Ontario, Canada

rivaroxaban 2.5mg film-coated tablets (Xarelto ) SMC No. (1062/15) Bayer plc.

Stent for Life Initiative How can we improve system delay and patients delay in STEMI

The Pantera Lux Paclitaxel DEB Device Description and Clinical Studies. Christoph Hehrlein, University Clinic Freiburg i.br.

Impact of Massachusetts Health Care Reform on Racial, Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cardiovascular Care

MANAGEMENT AKUTES KORONARSYNDROM: RISIKOSTRATIFIZIERUNG UND THERAPIE. Peter Wenaweser Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie

OPINION OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON

Listen to your heart: Good Cardiovascular Health for Life

Do método diagnóstico ao terapêutico: a História da Hemodinâmica e da Cardiologia Intervencionista, em 15 minutos. Eulógio E Martinez

ABOUT XARELTO CLINICAL STUDIES

New Approaches to, and Indications for, Antiplatelet Therapy

Cardiac Assessment for Renal Transplantation: Pre-Operative Clearance is Only the Tip of the Iceberg

SAMPLE. Asia-Pacific Interventional Cardiology Procedures Outlook to Reference Code: GDMECR0061PDB. Publication Date: May 2014

A Patient s Guide to Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Using Blood-Thinning (Anticoagulant) Drugs

ESC PCI Guidelines: / Sigmund Silber et al. 1

CHAPTER 9 DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY SYSTEM (I00-I99)

Measure #257 (NQF 1519): Statin Therapy at Discharge after Lower Extremity Bypass (LEB) National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Journal Club: Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy by the AIM-HIGH Investigators

Transcription:

Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation Followed by Six Versus Twelve-Month - Dual Antiplatelet Therapy - The SECURITY Randomized Clinical Trial Antonio Colombo MD on behalf of the SECURITY Investigators

Disclosures: Antonio Colombo is a Minor shareholder of Direct Flow Inc. All faculty disclosures are available on the CRF Events App and online at www.crf.org/tct

Methods The SECURITY trial [NCT00944333] was a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, investigator-driven, multicenter, international study. 3 Countries, 38 centers (Italy: 31; Spain: 6; the Netherlands: 1) Second-generation DES used in the study were the Endeavor Resolute (Medtronic, MA), Xience (Abbott Park, Illinois), Promus (Boston Scientific, MN), Nobori TM (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and the Biomatrix TM (Biosensors Europe S.A.).

Inclusion Criteria Diagnosis of angina pectoris / unstable angina pectoris / documented silent ischemia, all treated with a second generation drug eluting stent Presence of one or more de novo stenosis equal or greater than 70% in a native coronary artery, treated with a drug eluting stent Patient is > 18 years of age (or minimum age as required by local regulations). The patient has consented to participate by signing the Patient Informed Consent Form. Any type of lesion or number of lesions can be included in this trial unless specifically detailed in the exclusion criteria. No other DES implanted before the target procedure No BMS implanted in the 3 months before the target procedure

Exclusion Criteria Patients treated for lesions in venous or arterial grafts / instent restenosis / Unprotected Left Main lesions / ST elevation myocardial infarction in the 48 hours prior to the procedure / Non ST elevation myocardial infarction in the previous six months Patients with LVEF 30% Patients with hypersensitivity or allergies to study drug or devices. Patients with chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine >2mg or mg or 180 mol/l) Current medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 24 months. The subject is participating in another device or drug study.

Primary Endpoint Study Objectives Composite of cardiac death, MI, stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis or bleeding academic consortium criteria (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 months. Secondary Endpoints Composite of cardiac death, spontaneous MI, stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis or BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 and 24 months. MI, Urgent Target Vessel Revascularization (coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention because of acute cardiac ischemia), All-bleeding events and All-cause mortality at 30 days, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Statistical Methods Powered to test the non-inferiority of the primary composite endpoint between 6 and 12 months DAPT following 2 nd -generation DES Implantation. To validate the incidence of the primary endpoint, a Safety Interim Analysis was conducted by an independent statistician when the first 1000 randomized patients completed 12 months follow-up. Results of the interim analysis were evaluated by the data monitoring committee. The incidence of the primary endpoint at 12 month after randomization was of 4.5%. Considering this low incidence and keeping the absolute non-inferiority margin of 2.0%, a power of 0.80 and a significance level of 0.05 (one-tail) it was estimated that 1,370 patients were needed in each group instead of the first sample size of 1.800 estimated on a prevalence basis of 6%.

Study Population Top 10 Enrolling Centers Center PI Patients 1 Policlinico Umberto I - Roma G. Sardella 199 (14.2%) 2 Ospedale San Raffaele - Milano A. Colombo 193 (13.7%) 3 ASL Trapani - P.O. Sant Antonio Abate- A. Frasheri 92 (6.6%) Erice 4 S. Giovanni Bosco Hospital - Torino R. Garbo 54 (3.9%) 5 Hospital Clínic, Barcelona M. Masotti 55 (3.9%) 6 Hospital del Mar, Barcelona N. Salvatella 55 (3.9%) 7 Hospital Puerta de Hierro Madrid J. F. Oteo Dominguez 50 (3.6%) 8 Hesperia Hospital- Modena A. Benassi 50 (3.6%) 9 Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova G. Tarantini 48 (3.4%) 10 IRCCS Humanitas- Rozzano P. Presbitero 46 (3.3%)

Study Population

Baseline Clinical Characteristics Characteristics 6-Month DAPT (N = 682) 12-Month DAPT (N = 717) Age (years), mean ± SD 64.9 ± 10.2 65.5 ± 10.1 Female sex, n (%) 153 (22.4) 166 (23.2) Diabetes Mellitus, n (%) 206 (30.4%) 223 (31.4%) Hypertension, n (%) 508 (74.5) 510 (71.1) Dyslipidemia, n (%) 446 (65.4) 436 (60.8) Smoker Status, n (%) Never Smoked 274 (40.5) 261 (37) Previous Smoker 239 (35.3) 238 (33.7) Active Smoker 139 (20.5) 172 (24.4) Previous MI, n (%) NSTEMI > 48 h 65 (9.5) 71 (9.9) STEMI > 48 h 80 (11.7) 73 (10.2) Previous PCI, n (%) 132 (19.4) 116 (16.2) Previous CABG, n (%) 38 (5.6) 39 (5.4) LVEF (%), mean ± SD 56.3 ± 8.7 56.6 ± 8.2 Clinical Presentation, n (%) Stable Angina 341 (61.6) 368 (61.6) Unstable Angina 213 (38.4) 229 (38.4) Baseline Medications Aspirin, n (%) 616 (90.3) 621 (86.6) Clopidogrel, n (%) 301 (44.1) 305 (42.5) Statin, n (%) 489 (71.7) 494 (68.9) Heparin, n (%) 377 (55.3) 401 (55.9)

Baseline Lesion Characteristics Characteristic 6-Month DAPT 12-Month DAPT (N = 682) (N = 717) Number of Lesions, n (%) 1-Vessel disease 383 (56.2) 424 (59.1) 2-Vessel disease 221 (32.4) 210 (29.3) 3-Vessel disease 77 (11.3) 82 (11.4) 4-Vessel disease 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) Main Branch Lesion Distribution, n (%) Left Anterior Descending Artery 402 (43) 423 (44) Left Circumflex Artery 133 (14.3) 137 (14.2) Diagonal Artery 38 (4) 32 (3.3) OM and RI Arteries 106 (11.2) 118 (12.3) Right Coronary Artery 206 (22) 207 (21.6) Bifurcation, n (%) 97 (10.4) 105 (10.9) Baseline TIMI flow < 3 140 (15.3) 145 (15.5) AHA / ACC Classification Class B 603 (64.5) 617 (64.3) Class C 197 (21.1) 201 (21) Baseline visual estimate, mean ± SD Lesion length (mm) 17.6 ± 9.8 18.1 ± 10.8 Reference vessel diameter (mm) 2.9 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.4 Minimal lumen diameter (mm) 0.6 ± 0.5 0.6 ± 0.6 Diameter stenosis, n (%) 84 ± 10.1 84.4 ± 9.7

Use of Medication During The Trial Characteristic 6-Month DAPT (N = 682) 12-Month DAPT (N = 717) DAPT Therapy at 6 Months Clopidogrel only 2 (0.3) 6 (0.9) ASA only 3 (0.5) 5 (0.7) ASA + clopidogrel 618 (97.3) 655 (97.6) ASA + prasugrel 8 (1.3) 2 (0.3) ASA + ticagrelor 4 (0.6) 3 (0.4) DAPT Therapy at 12 Months Clopidogrel only 11 (1.8) 8 (1.2) ASA only 392 (63.6) 13 (2.0) ASA + clopidogrel 208 (33.8) 622 (96.1) ASA + prasugrel 0 1 (0.2) ASA + ticagrelor 0 1 (0.2) Drug Therapy at 24 Months Aspirin, n (%) 525 (96.5) 563 (97.9)

Primary and Secondary Composite Endpoints 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% P = NS 5.3% P = NS 4.5% 4.0% 3.7% P = NS 2.2% 1.5% 0% Primary Composite Endpoint 12 Months Secondary Composite Endpoint 12 Months 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT Secondary Composite Endpoint 12-24 Months

Outcome rates at 24 months according to treatment groups Cox proportional hazards 6-Month DAPT (N = 682) 12-Month DAPT (N = 717) Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value Cardiac death 6 (0.9%) 6 (0.8%) 1.05 (0.34 to 3.26) Myocardial Infarction 21 (3.1%) 19 (2.6%) 1.16 (0.62 to 2.16) Stroke 6 (0.9%) 3 (0.4%) 2.10 (0.52 to 8.40) Definite/probabl e ST 3 (0.4%) 3 (0.4%) 1.05 (0.21 to 5.20) BARC 3 or 5 5 (0.7%) 8 (1.1%) 0.69 (0.25 to 1.96) 0.925 0.636 0.636 0.951 0.496

Secondary Endpoints Cardiac Mortality 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT BARC 3 or 5 Bleeding 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT 0.7% 0.4% 0.9% 0.8% 0.6% 1.1% 1.1% 0.7% P = NS P = NS P = NS P = NS 12 Months 24 Months 12 Months 24 Months

Secondary Endpoints Myocardial Infarction 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT 3.1% Stroke 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT 0.9% 0.9% 2.3% 2.1% 2.6% 0.4% 0.3% P = NS P = NS P = NS P = NS 12 Months 24 Months 12 Months 24 Months

Stent Thrombosis 5% Definite / Probable Stent Thrombosis 5% Possible Stent Thrombosis P = NS P = NS P = NS P = NS 0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 12 Months 24 Months 0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12 Months 24 Months 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT

Stent Thrombosis Events Timeline day 1 6-month Group day 4 day 540 0 7 30 90 180 360 720 days day 1 12-month Group day 40 day 78 0 7 30 90 180 360 720 days DAPT ASA Only No APT ST

Stent thrombosis ARC classification 6-Month DAPT (N = 682) 12-Month DAPT (N = 717) Acute 1 1 Sub-acute 1 - Late - 2 Very late 1 - All patients were under DAPT at the time of ST (but the very late case)

Urgent Target Vessel Revascularization 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% P = NS P = NS P = NS P = NS 0.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 30 Days 30 Days - 6 Months 6-12 Months 12-24 Months 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT

All-Bleedings 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% P = NS P = NS P = NS P = NS 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 30 Days 30 Days - 6 Months 6-12 Months 12-24 Months 6 Months DAPT 12 Months DAPT

KM Primary Endpoint 12 Months

Predictors of the PE at Multivariable Analysis Variables in the Model HR 95% CI p value Age 75 years 2.211 1.234 3.962 0.007 Stent Type 0.019 Endeavor Resolute Vs. Biomatrix / Xience / Promus 2.336 1.051 5.190 Mean Number of Stents (for each unit increase) 1.410 1.128 1.741 0.002 Mean Stents Length (for each 5 units increase) 1.383 1.135 1.685 0.001 Mean Stent Size (for each 2.5 units increase) 1.326 1.106 1.590 0.002 Diabetes Mellitus 0.069 NIDDM Vs. None 0.895 0.464 1.729 IDDM Vs. None 2.349 1.080 5.106 DAPT 6- vs. 12-month 1.272 0.754 2.145 0.367 Female sex 1.596 0.897 2.838 0.111

Landmark analysis

Events after 6 months 6-Month DAPT (N = 682) 12-Month DAPT (N = 717) M12 M24 M12 M24 Cardiac death - 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%) 3 (0.5%) Myocardial Infarction 2 (0.3%) 5 (0.9%) 2 (0.3%) 4 (0.7%) Stroke 3 (0.5%) - - 1 (0.2%) Definite/probable ST - 1 (0.2%) - - BARC 3 or 5 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%) 2 (0.3%) -

Conclusions Six months DAPT appeared to be non-inferior to a 12 months regimen in patients undergoing PCI with 2 nd -generation DES regarding the primary composite end point of cardiac death, MI, stroke, definite or probable ST or BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 months of clinical follow-up. Multivariable analysis found as significant independent predictors of the primary endpoint age 75 years, stent type used, mean number of stents implanted, mean stent length and mean stent size. Of note, DAPT 6 versus 12 months resulted not significant following multivariable adjustment. The 6 months DAPT appeared to be non-inferior to 12 months regarding the incidence of the secondary composite endpoints defined by the study protocol.