New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business Department of Accounting Intro to Credit, Credit Analysis, and Credit Ratings November 6, 2014 Mark Adelson Chief Strategy Officer The BondFactor Company Neri Bukspan Partner Ernst & Young Credit Ratings and Fixed-Income Credit Analysis ACCT-GB.3108.10 Fall-2 2014 (Nov. 6 Dec. 18, 2014)
What is Credit (Debt)? $1,000 Bond Money owed ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not an equity interest ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Principal and Interest only Not as much upside as equity A traditional corporate bond is an IOU or a promise to pay from a company Credit relationships are everywhere May be secured or unsecured or carry preferences 2
U.S. Domestic Non-Financial Debt Debt Outstanding as of 6/30/2014 ($ Trillions) 4.27 7.37 0.26 3.17 12.57 2.93 Federal Gov't State & Local Gov't Home Mortgage Consumer Credit Other Household Corporate Other Business 9.86 Source: Federal Reserve, Flow of Funds Accounts of The United States, Table L.2 3
Comparative Amounts as of 6/30/2014 ($ Trillions) 60 50 40 30 Financial Sectors, 13.95 Rest of World Financial Sectors, 37.15 20 10 Domestic Non-Financial, 40.44 Rest of World 23.59 0 7.37 Debt Owed by Debt Held by U.S. Equity Market Cap Sources: Federal Reserve, Flow of Funds Accounts of The United States, Table L.1; Bloomberg WCAUUS <index> 4
U.S. Capital Market Debt as of 6/30/2014 ($ Trillions) U.S. Treasury Securities Federal Agency Debt Agency RMBS Corporate Bonds (financial) Corporate Bonds (non-financial) Municipal Bonds ABS (incl. CDOs) Non-agency RMBS 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Sources: Federal Reserve, Flow of Funds Accounts of The United States; SIFMA 5
Credit Process Basics Lending money out Whether to lend/invest How much to lend/invest What is the risk premium (i.e., spread) Getting it back Paid as due Collecting on defaulted debts Dealing with bankruptcy 6
What is Credit Quality? How close is a borrower to defaulting (miss making required payments)? Likelihood/probability approach Scenario approach (e.g., recession, depression, etc.) If the borrower does default, will the lender's loss be large or small? Expected loss approach How stable is the borrower's credit quality over time? What are the drivers of each of the above items? Multi-dimensional 7
Drivers of Credit Quality Ability to pay Sources of repayment Future cash flows from operations Future cash flows from specific assets Liquidation of assets Guarantees or other support arrangements Competing claims on available resources You can t get blood from a stone Willingness to pay Enforcement is expensive Enforcement is not always possible 8
Analyzing Credit Quality Quantitative and qualitative factors Part science, part art Consider scenarios: probable, reasonably likely, unlikely, remote Probable Reasonably Likely Unlikely Remote 9
Analyzing Credit Quality Example: Residential Mortgage Loan Credit reputation FICO score Credit history Stability factors (time in home/job) Capacity Monthly debt payments vs. stable monthly income Financial reserves Collateral Amount of loan vs. value of the property 10
Analyzing Credit Quality Example Business Exposures Corporates Country risk Industry risk Competitive position Cash flow Profitability Leverage Diversification Capital structure Liquidity Management Financial firms Country risk Asset quality Reserves Leverage Capital structure Off-balance sheet Maturity matching Regulation Reputation 11
What Comes after Credit Analysis? Mitigate risk Price risk Consider opportunity cost Decide 12
What is a Rating? Dictionary Definition A position assigned on a scale; a standing a. A classification according to specialty or proficiency, as of a member of the armed forces. b. Chiefly British An enlisted person in the navy An evaluation of the financial status of a business or person: a credit rating A specified performance limit, as of capacity, range, or operational capability: the power rating of a light fixture The popularity of a television or radio program as estimated by a poll of segments of the audience 13
Examples of Ratings (Credit & Non-Credit) MPAA movie ratings (child suitability) Roger Ebert's movie ratings Gasoline octane ratings (87, 91, 93) Underwriters Laboratories (est. 1894) Good Housekeeping Seal, GHRI FICO consumer credit ratings Consumer Reports National Baseball Hall of Fame Value Line Timeliness Ranking System Miss America, Miss Universe Morningstar Ratings Broker-dealer buy/hold/sell ratings Bond ratings (today's topic) 14
Attributes of Rating Systems Prospective vs. historical Grading/ranking scale vs. pass/fail Relative vs. absolute Multi-dimensional vs. one-dimensional Factor weightings Designed for specific purpose Defined by their related rating organizations 15
Why Have Credit Ratings? Reduce information asymmetry Tool for decision-making Investment policy or regulatory standard Division of labor Specialized expertise Comparative advantage Reduced cost Increased efficiency 16
Desirable Features of a Rating System Understandable Reliable, accurate Timely Useful (to whom, for what) Comparison Qualification Decision-making Rating organization must try to meet the needs of its customers 17
U.S. Bond Rating Agencies (registered with the SEC) A.M. Best Company, Inc. DBRS Egan-Jones Ratings Fitch HR Ratings de México Japan Credit Rating Agency Kroll Bond Rating Agency Moody s Investors Service Morningstar Standard & Poor s NRSRO Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization 18
Rating Agency = Publishing Company Each has its own definition of credit quality Each defines its own ratings Each defines its own rating scale and rating symbols Each defines its own criteria or methodology Rating is an editorial Bond rating is an opinion about the future Compare to lawyers or accountants, who give opinions about the past and present Rating analyst is a financial journalist 19
Competing Philosophies (Oversimplified) Expected Loss (Frequency & Severity) Probability of Default (Frequency only) 20
Expected Severity of Default Relative Frequency and Expected Severity of Defaults within Moody's Rating Grades Aaa Aa1 Aa2 Aa3 A1 A2 A3 Expected Frequency of Default 21
Comparing Ratings of Different Rating Agencies Do the corresponding symbols on the rating scales of two rating agencies connote the same degree of credit quality? If so, the scales are congruent To what degree do the ratings of two different rating agencies tend to agree or disagree? The degree of agreement is correlation 22
What a Rating Agency Wants in a Rating System Market impact Prices/yields/spreads Yields -- 1919 to 2014 Aaa Baa Liquidity Get embedded in regulations and investment policies Easy to implement and administer Perception of congruence and correlation with Moody s and S&P 23
Credit Ratings of Blue Chip Companies Credit Ratings of Dow Jones Industrial Average Components (10/14/2014) Name Moody s S&P Name Moody s S&P 3M Aa2 AA- Johnson & Johnson Aaa AAA American Express A3 BBB+ JPMorgan Chase A3 A AT&T A3 A- McDonald's A2 A Boeing A2 A Merck A2 AA Caterpillar A2 A Microsoft Aaa AAA Chevron Aa1 AA NIKE A1 AA- Cisco Systems A1 AA- Pfizer A1 AA Coca-Cola Co. Aa3 AA Procter & Gamble Aa3 AA- DuPont A2 A Travelers Cos. A2 A Exxon Mobil Aaa AAA United Technologies A2 A General Electric Aa3 AA+ UnitedHealth Group A3 A Goldman Sachs Baa1 A- Verizon Baa1 BBB+ Home Depot A2 A Visa Inc A1 A+ Intel A1 A+ Wal-Mart Stores Aa2 AA IBM Aa3 AA- Walt Disney A2 A 24
Notches Average Difference in Ratings between Moody's and other Rating Agencies in 1990 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5 MCM DBRS IBCA S&P Fitch D&P CBRS NIS JBRI Source: Richard Cantor and Frank Packer, The Credit Rating Industry, 19 FRBNY Q. Rev. 1 (Summer-Fall 1994) 25
What About Within a Rating Agency? Must have a common definition of credit quality Cross-sector comparability Rating analysts are specialists Need to overcome departmental silos Rating committees Narrow or broad composition 26
Illustration of Weak Cross-sector Comparability B B B B B B B B B BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB A A A A A A A A A AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA CDO ABS CMBS RMBS U.S. Munis Sovereigns Insurance Banks Corporate Creditworthiness 27
and Stronger Cross-sector Comparability B B B B B B B B B BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB BBB A A A A A A A A A AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA CDO ABS CMBS RMBS U.S. Munis Sovereigns Insurance Banks Corporate Creditworthiness 28
Geography Geography Four Dimensions of Comparability There is a trade-off between recalibrating to maintain cross-sector comparability and maintaining comparability over time 29
Delivering Comparability (S&P) Retrospective Gini coefficients (rank ordering power) Comparing default rates across sectors, regions, and over time Prospective Common approaches to risk analysis (harmonization) Stress scenarios for criteria calibration Criteria Calibration Stress Scenarios Key Parameters AAA AA A BBB BB B ΔGDP -26½% -15% -6% -3% -1% -½% Unemp. 25% 20% 15% 10% 8% 6% Equities -85% -70% -60% -50% -25% -10% 30
Understanding S&P Rating Definitions (3 Jun 2009) Ratings are forward looking and reflect views on relative ranking of overall creditworthiness S&P ratings are not just opinions of likelihood of default Likelihood of default Payment priority Recovery Credit stability New stress scenarios adopted to further our goal of comparability across sectors, geographies and time 'AAA' ( extreme ) stress scenario is based on the Great Depression AAA face greater possibility of default under extreme scenario AAA are likely to face more transitions with increasing decline in economy Stress scenarios used as a calibration tool for criteria 31
Rating Process Information collection Analysis Committee action Publication of the rating Surveillance Withdrawal 32
Focus on Analysis Quantitative aspects Qualitative aspects 33
Information Quality A rating is only as good as the information upon which it is based The rating process is not an audit Rating agencies do not independently verify information from sources that they believe to be reliable Information filed with the SEC generally should be the most reliable and complete Differing views about the benefit of using other information 34
Credit Rating vs. Audit Credit rating is an opinion supported by a rationale Credit ratings are on a scale with gradations Scale and methodology vary from one rating agency to another Audit is a pass/fail test Audit standards are uniform within a country 35
So, Does It Actually Work? Well, it depends 36
Percent S&P Corporate Average Cumulative Default Rates (1981-2013) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Years 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 37
Percent Moody s Corporate Avg. Cumulative Default Rates (1920-2013) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Years 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 38
But Sometimes Ratings Disappoint Original S&P Rating Adverse Credit Migrations of 2005-2007 Vintages of U.S. RMBS, CDOs of ABS, and SIV Lites Default + Near Default Status as of 31 Dec 2010 Default Near Default Any Downgrade No. of Ratings AAA 60.1% 22.7% 37.4% 77.3% 4,043 AA 78.2% 45.8% 32.4% 87.6% 8,340 A 88.5% 59.7% 28.8% 93.4% 7,456 BBB 94.0% 69.4% 24.7% 95.2% 7,806 Inv. Grade 82.8% 52.8% 30.0% 89.8% 27,645 Note: 'AAA' ratings from the same transaction are treated as a single rating in this table's calculation. Multiple rating actions are aggregated to calculate a security's cumulative rating performance. Near default means rated 'CCC+' or lower. Source: Erturk, E., Global Structured Finance Securities End 2010 With Rising Credit Stability, Standard & Poor s research report (7 Feb 2011) (Table 6a). 39
Competition and Business Model Demand drivers Price Service Reliability/accuracy Timeliness Regulatory passport Criteria Rating Shopping Competitive laxity Who pays: issuers or investors Public availability of ratings 40
What is the Optimal Organization of the Credit Rating Industry? Few companies, each with a high level of coverage Many companies, each with a low level of coverage Few companies, each with a high level of coverage, and many companies, each with a low level of coverage Many companies, each with a high level of coverage 41
Conclusion Credit relationships are everywhere Credit analysis supports effective credit decisions Credit analysis has quantitative and qualitative aspects Emphasizing quantitative analysis to the exclusion of qualitative factors is very dangerous Rating agencies define their own rating systems Rating agencies generate important efficiencies for the fixed-income capital markets Investors want ratings that are useful by being timely, reliable, and informative 42