TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATHS DUE TO LEVEL CROSSING ACCIDENTS



Similar documents
Transport accident fatalities: Australia compared with other OECD countries, Cross-modal safety comparisons

The Top Ten Most Common Driving Injury Case Studies

Appendix 1: ICD 10 AM (6th Edition) Cause of Injury Code and Description

ICD-10. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th Revision. Volume 1 Tabular list.

How To Know If A Cyclist Is Safe

ROAD SAFETY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT MONOGRAPH 20. Fatal and serious road crashes involving motorcyclists

Railway Level Crossing Incident Costing Model

SECTION 3.2: MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC CRASHES

Trends in hospitalised injury, Australia to Sophie Pointer. Injury research and statistics series No. 86

Road Transport and Road Traffic Accident Statistics (Island of Mauritius)

Road Transport and Road Traffic Accident Statistics (Island of Mauritius)

ICD-10-CM External Cause of Injuries Index

Four-wheel drive vehicle crash involvement patterns

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Rail safety statistics August 2014

Characteristics of High Injury Severity Crashes on km/h Rural Roads in South Australia

FATALITIES AND INJURIES IN MOTOR VEHICLE BACKING CRASHES

MOTORBIKE RIDERS AND CYCLISTS

bulletin 60 Injury among young Australians Highlights Contents bulletin 60 may 2008

Speeding. Probability of death at different impact speeds

INJURY DEATHS, HOSPITALIZATIONS, AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS EXTERNAL CAUSE OF INJURY INTENT AND MECHANISM CLASSIFICATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS

The number of fatalities fell even further last year to below 6,000 for the first time in 54 years since 1953.

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel

A GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

Railway Accident Investigation Guidelines for Railway Network Owners, Railway Operators and Emergency Services Personnel

Car occupants intoxication and non-use of safety belts

Injury indicators: A validation tool. Road safety indicator specifications

How valid are Motorcycle Safety Data?

The Year of Living Dangerously

Q. How can we get (and keep) Britain cycling? A. Reducing risk of non-collision incidents will help make cycling more enjoyable.

Accident configurations and injuries for bicyclists based on the German In-Depth Accident Study. Chiara Orsi

Cycle safety. Monograph 17. Cycle safety: a national perspective. Cycle helmets

ICD-10-CM EXTERNAL CAUSE of INJURIES INDEX

CYCLISTS INVOLVED IN ROAD CRASHES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

How To Know If A Motorcyclist Is Safe

CHAPTER 1 Land Transport

ATSB RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT ROAD SAFETY. Characteristics of Fatal Road Crashes During National Holiday Periods

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Determinants of Claim Frequency in CTP Schemes. Raewin Davies, Jack Jiang and Rosi Winn

THE COMPANY DOES NOT ADMIT LIABILITY BY THE ISSUE OF THIS FORM. IT IS ISSUED TO ENABLE THE INSURED TO LODGE THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CLAIM.

Traffic Collision Statistics Report

Street Smart. Keeping your teen driver safe on the road. A SECURA Insurance SAFEWORKS publication

A separate form for personal finance in all eight states should be completed.

How To Understand The Safety Of A Motorcycle

Road Safety Authority Provisional Review of Road Crashes 2013

MISSOURI TRAFFIC SAFETY COMPENDIUM

Reported Road Accident Statistics

cars and buses/coaches had much lower casualty rates of 241 and 151 per billion passenger kilometres, respectively,

Claim form Motor Vehicle

DOT HS December Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Fatality Rate per 100M VMT

DOT HS May 2013

FATAL WORK INJURIES IN NEW SOUTH WALES

DOT HS October 2001

Differences between CTP Insurance Statistics and Crash Statistics

East Ayrshire Council Road Safety Plan

Traffic Safety Facts. Children Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report

Fatal motorcycle crashes in north Queensland: characteristics and potential interventions

Reported road accidents involving young car drivers: Great Britain 2011

The State Government recognises. areas, and regulates bicycle

REPORTED ROAD CRASHES

STATISTICS OF FATAL AND INJURY ROAD ACCIDENTS IN LITHUANIA,

Measuring road crash injury severity in Western Australia using ICISS methodology

AAMI THIRD PARTY PROPERTY DAMAGE MOTORCYCLE INSURANCE PREMIUM, EXCESSES & CLAIMS GUIDE

SCHOOL BUS SAFETY STOP WHAT MOTORISTS SHOULD KNOW. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Making Illinois Schools Second to None

SAFETY PROCESS. Martin Small

ALCOHOL AND DRUGS IN ROAD CRASHES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

The effect of the introduction of ICD-10 on trends in mortality from injury and poisoning in England and Wales

Injuries. Manitoba. A 10-Year Review. January 2004

Railroad Safety Data Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan Revised April Objective 3 Reduce casualties and the dangers associated with travel

Alcohol. Alcohol SECTION 10. Contents:

DOT HS April 2014

Off-road Motor Vehicle-related Injuries in Massachusetts

How To Study The Effects Of Road Traf C On A Person'S Health

RISER. Roadside Infrastructure for Safer European Roads

How To Be Safe

Contributory factors to road accidents

Motorcycle and Scooter crashes Recorded by NSW Police from January to December 2011

ICD-10-CM: Changes Ahead For the Clinical Work Process

MOTORCYCLE CLAIM FORM ACCIDENT DAMAGE (The issue of this form is not an admission of liability)

Drink driving European Commission Guidelines

Motor Accident Personal Injury Claim Form

Appendix VIIA: Assigning E-codes, Posted December

Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD)

Transcription:

LEVEL CROSSING ACCIDENT FATALITIES The purpose of this publication is to provide an overview of level crossing fatalities in Australia. The information provided is based on unpublished data obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics but responsibility for the analyses presented here rests solely with the ATSB. TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATHS DUE TO LEVEL CROSSING ACCIDENTS The total number of deaths in Australia due to level crossing s each year in the period 1997-2002, the period for which data are currently available, ranged from 19 to 44 (Table 1). Table 1 Level crossing fatalities, Australia: year of death by State / Territory of registration of death, 1997-2002 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Australia 1997 19 15 5 1 4 0 0 0 44 1998 22 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 38 1999 5 9 1 0 4 0 0 0 19 2000 10 11 4 3 8 0 0 1 37 2001 20 13 6 1 2 0 0 0 42 2002 14 11 6 4 3 0 2 1 41 Note: These are fatalities due to collisions between trains and road vehicles or persons on public streets. Deaths due to collisions between trains and road vehicles or persons on private roadways are excluded. Note also that suicides are excluded. A suicide is defined here as a death that a coroner has found to be a suicide. Each jurisdiction has a different number of level crossings. It is not possible to compare level crossing safety in each of the jurisdictions without first standardising the data by relating the number of fatalities to the number of level crossings in each jurisdiction. The ATSB has asked the rail safety authorities in each State and Territory for data on the number of level crossings. From 1997 to 2002, pedestrians and car occupants accounted for the bulk of fatalities arising from level crossing s (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Level crossing fatalities by their mode of transport, Australia, 1997-2002 Per cent of crossing fatalities 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 66 Pedestrians 0 3 Pedal cyclists Motorcycle riders 25 Occupants of cars 2 1 1 0 Occupants of heavy trucks Occupants of buses Occupants of trains Others Note: Percentages rounded. One pedal cyclist and one other person (mode of transport unknown) were fatally injured in level crossing s in the period. Level crossing fatalities can be divided into two groups: deaths due to collisions between trains and pedestrians, pedal cyclists or trams at level crossings and deaths due to collisions between trains and motor vehicles at level crossings. The ATSB counts the first group as part of the rail toll and the second group as part of the road toll (please see the explanatory notes below). DEATHS DUE TO COLLISIONS BETWEEN TRAINS AND PEDESTRIANS, PEDAL CYCLISTS OR TRAMS AT LEVEL CROSSINGS From 1997 to 2002, there was one pedal cyclist killed due to being hit by a train at a level crossing. There were no occupants of trams killed due to a collision between a tram and a train either at a level crossing or elsewhere. From 1997 to 2002, a total of 146 pedestrians were killed due to being hit by a train at a level crossing (Table 2). These 146 deaths represented around 60 per cent of the national rail toll in the same period. Table 2 Pedestrians on public streets killed due to being hit by a train at a level crossing, Australia: year of death by State / Territory of registration of death, 1997-2002 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Australia 1997 13 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 21 1998 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 1999 3 6 1 0 4 0 0 0 14 2000 9 9 2 3 5 0 0 1 29 2001 14 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 30 2002 11 7 5 0 2 0 1 1 27 Note: Suicides are excluded. A suicide is defined here as a death that a coroner has found to be a suicide.

In the six years 1997-2002, over 84 per cent of the pedestrians who died as a result of being hit by a train at a level crossing were males, with over 60 per cent being males between 15 and 49 years of age. Males in this age range constituted less than 30 per cent of the Australian population in the period and it is clear that they are disproportionately represented among pedestrians killed due to being hit by a train at a level crossing. The ATSB has sought to use the National Coronial Information System (NCIS) to examine cases of pedestrians fatally injured as a result of being struck by a train at a level crossing (those cases that coroners did not find to be suicides). The NCIS is a system being developed by the Monash University National Centre for Coronial Information (see www.vifp.monash.edu.au/ncis) and information from the system is made available to selected organisations, such as the ATSB, under strict confidentiality arrangements. A search for cases in the years 2000 to 2002 was undertaken (2000 is the earliest year covered by the NCIS). As the system is still in its infancy, not all of the cases were on the system and for many cases the relevant information was still to be loaded on to the system. However, some 18 cases were examined and it was possible to make a few observations that provide some preliminary insights into the nature of the problem. In none of the 18 cases did the police or coroners find the train crew or rail safety equipment to be at fault. Police often breath tested the train crew and in all cases where this was done the results were negative (0.00 blood alcohol level). In all cases the level crossing warning systems (for example, lights, bells, boom gates, warning signs) were found to be working properly or undamaged. The major factors in evidence were the use of alcohol or drugs by the pedestrian prior to the (6 cases), a history of mental illness of the pedestrian (4 cases), or the tragic misjudgment of the pedestrian involved (8 cases). It needs to be stressed again that these are merely preliminary observations rather than findings that can lead to any definitive conclusions about pedestrian deaths at level crossings. Hopefully, more details on this issue will become available as the National Coronial Information System develops further. DEATHS DUE TO COLLISIONS BETWEEN TRAINS AND MOTOR VEHICLES AT LEVEL CROSSINGS From 1997 to 2002, there were 74 deaths in Australia due to collisions between trains and motor vehicles at level crossings (Table 3). These 74 deaths represented less than 1 per cent of the national road toll in the same period. Table 3 Deaths due to collisions between trains and motor vehicles on public roadways at level crossings, Australia: year of death by State / Territory of registration of death, 1997-2002 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Australia 1997 6 9 5 1 2 0 0 0 23 1998 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 13 1999 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2000 1 2 2 0 3 0 0 0 8 2001 6 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 11 2002 3 4 1 4 1 0 1 0 14 From 1997 to 2002, there were 7 motorcycle riders, 4 occupants of heavy trucks, 3 bus occupants, 3 occupants of trains and 1 other person (mode of transport unknown) killed in collisions between trains and motor vehicles at level crossings. On the other hand, there were 56 car occupants killed in collisions with trains at level crossings (Table 4).

Table 4 Occupants of cars on public roadways killed due to being hit by a train at a level crossing, Australia: year of death by State / Territory of registration of death, 1997-2002 NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NT ACT Australia 1997 4 8 2 1 1 0 0 0 16 1998 5 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 1999 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2000 1 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 7 2001 5 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 10 2002 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 7 Note: Occupants of pick-up trucks or vans are included. To date in this time series, there have been only three such fatalities. Nearly 70 per cent of the car occupants who died as a result of level crossing s were males, but no particular age group stands out. In another study conducted by the ATSB, using a different data source and a larger sample, one of the findings was that older drivers, drivers in the 60+ age group, both male and female, were particularly at risk of being involved in a fatal level crossing. For more detail on this and other aspects of fatal level crossing s involving trains and motor vehicles, see the publication Level crossing s on the ATSB web site. EXPLANATORY NOTES The figures on level crossing fatalities presented here are based on an analysis of unpublished data obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Importantly, the ABS data exclude suicides on a nationally consistent basis, ie only on the basis of a coroner s finding of suicide. Since 1997, the ABS has classified deaths due to transport s in accordance with the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), published by the World Health Organization. The key ICD definitions relevant to level crossing s can be summarised as follows:

transport railway or railroad public highway or street railway train or road vehicle motor vehicle Any involving a device designed primarily for, or being used at the time primarily for, conveying persons or goods from one place to another. Excludes s occurring during transportation but unrelated to the hazards associated with the means of transportation. Excludes s involving persons engaged in the maintenance or repair of transport equipment or a vehicle not in motion, unless injured by another vehicle in motion. A right-of-way designed for traffic on rails, which is used by carriages or wagons transporting passengers or freight, and by other rolling stock, and which is not open to other public vehicular traffic. The entire width between property lines (or other boundary lines) of land open to the public as a matter or right or custom for purposes of moving persons or property from one place to another. A roadway is that part of the public highway designed, improved and customarily used for vehicular traffic. Any device with or without cars coupled to it, designed for traffic on a railway. Includes funicular railway train, monorail or other vehicle designed to run on a railway track and operated chiefly on its own right-of-way, not open to other traffic. Excludes electric cars, streetcars, trams or light rail operating on a right-ofway that forms part of the public street or highway. Any device in, on, or by which any person or property may be transported on a roadway. Any mechanically or electrically powered device, not operated on rails, upon which any person or property may be transported or drawn upon a roadway.

pedestrian traffic Any person involved in an who was not at the time of the riding in or on a motor vehicle, railway train, streetcar or animal-drawn or other vehicle, or on a pedal cycle or animal. Any vehicle occurring on the public highway. A person is counted as a transport fatality if the death occurs up to 12 months after the. In classifying s which involve more than one kind of transport vehicle, the following order of precedence is used in ICD: aircraft or spacecraft, watercraft, motor vehicle,, other road vehicle. In other words, if an aircraft hits a boat, for example, the is classified as an air transport ; if a train and a motor vehicle collide, the is classified as a motor vehicle ; if a train hits a pedestrian, the is classified as a railway. By adopting this rule, fatalities can be counted in one or other of the types of transport and not counted more than once in the overall transport death toll. ICD-10 does not specifically identify level crossing s. However, fatalities due to collisions at level crossings between trains and road vehicles or persons on public highways can be identified using ICD-10. The ATSB uses the following ICD-10 codes to identify persons who died following such level crossing s: Categories Description Sub-categories V05 pedestrian injured in collision with railway train or railway vehicle.1 traffic V15 V25 pedal cyclist injured in motorcycle rider injured in.3 person injured while.4 driver injured in traffic.5 passenger injured in traffic.9 unspecified pedal cyclist injured in traffic.3 person injured while.4 driver injured in traffic.5 passenger injured in traffic.9 unspecified motorcycle rider injured in traffic

Categories Description Sub-categories V35 occupant of three-wheeled motor vehicle injured in injured in traffic.9 unspecified occupant of three-wheeled motor vehicle injured in traffic V45 V55 V65 car occupant injured in occupant of pick-up truck or van injured in collision with railway train or occupant of heavy transport vehicle injured in collision with railway train or injured in traffic.9 unspecified car occupant injured in traffic injured in traffic.9 unspecified occupant of pick-up truck or van injured in traffic injured in traffic.9 unspecified occupant of heavy transport vehicle injured in traffic

Categories Description Sub-categories V75 bus occupant injured in injured in traffic.9 unspecified bus occupant injured in traffic V81.1 occupant of railway train or injured in collision with motor vehicle in traffic V87.6 person injured in collision between railway train or and car (traffic) N/A N/A Use of these codes is based on the assumption that a collision between a train and a person / mode of transport type in a traffic is a collision at a level crossing. State Rail Safety Authorities in Australia define a level crossing as a location where a public or private roadway, footpath, or both, crosses one or more railway tracks at grade. ICD-10 can provide data on: s involving collisions at level crossings between trains and motor vehicles or other road vehicles (except trams) on the public highway. s where a pedestrian on the public highway (ie on a public road or on a public footpath alongside a public road) is struck by a train at a level crossing. but not on: s involving collisions at level crossings between trains and pedestrians on a footpath or pedestrian crossing that is not alongside a public road. Hence the term level crossing is restricted in this publication to s involving a collision between a railway train or other and a road vehicle (other than a tram) or pedestrian on a public street. However, we know that: the number of deaths due to collisions between trains and motor vehicles on private roadways at level crossings is small (fewer than five in the six years from 1997 to 2002), as the total number of deaths each year from 1997 to 2002 due to a collision between a train and a motor vehicle (all circumstances) was either equal to or only a few above the total each year for deaths due to collisions between trains and motor vehicles on public roadways at level crossings. there were no deaths from 1997 to 2002 due to collisions between trains and trams at level crossings, as there were no deaths recorded against code V82.8 ( occupant of streetcar injured in other specified transport - collision with train or other nonmotor vehicle ).

there were no deaths from 1997 to 2002 due to collisions between trains and animal-riders at level crossings, as there were no deaths recorded against code V80.6 ( animal-rider or occupant of animal-drawn vehicle injured in ). there was only one death from 1997 to 2002 due to collisions between trains and pedal cyclists off the public highway, as there was only one death recorded against codes V150, V151 and V152 ( pedal cyclist injured in in nontraffic ). In this publication, year of death is the year that the death occurred, not the year the death was registered. All figures presented are preliminary only. It is possible that they will be revised upwards as delayed death registrations are received by the ABS. A certain percentage of deaths occurring in any given year are not registered by coroners until the following year or later. In Australia, deaths are registered in accordance with the State or Territory in which the death occurred. It is sometimes the case that a transport casualty is admitted to hospital, and subsequently dies, in a State or Territory other than that in which the occurred. For reasons of confidentiality, the ABS releases age data in the data source used here in 5-year groupings: 0-4, 5-9 and so on. The ATSB is consequently unable to provide age data here in any groupings other than these groupings or aggregates of these groupings.