HIGHLIGHTS: Heights in Residential Zoning Districts



Similar documents
Division Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations.

Neighborhood Planning Guide To Zoning

Industrial Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Churches and Schools Development Standards

Article 20. Nonconformities

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

FILING REQUIREMENTS EXCERPTS FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

Three ordinances for different TOD conditions are included:

Neighborhood Business. Neighborhood Mixed Use. Community Business. Factoria Land Use District 1 2A 2A 2A 30 (23) 15 (23) 30 (23) 30 (23)

Zoning Most Frequently Asked Questions

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

CHAPTER VIII. HARDSHIP RELIEF

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012

d. Building permits may only be approved if consistent with the approved development plan and land division for all units with common walls.

Kirkland Zoning Code

ARTICLE II. INTERPRETATIONS AND DEFINITIONS. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following rules apply in interpreting this chapter:

TYPES OF PROPERTIES ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THE T3 TRANSECT DESIGNATION?

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

R-40 Single-Family Residential

Division S-37. PD Subdistrict 37.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION DECEMBER 8, 2015

Residential Accessory Buildings

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services SECOND DWELLING UNIT

AREA: 2.37 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF. Single-family, Non-conforming machine shop

Section 13 Urban Residential Zones

Solar Planning and Zoning Implementation Guide

SEEKING COMPLETENESS WAIVERS AND PRELIMINARY & FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

EXHIBIT B. Color-Keyed Legend for Tracking Categories of Proposed Ordinance Amendments

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT. BOA File No West Avenue- Multifamily Building

CHARLOTTE CODE. PART 1: PURPOSE AND PART 2: MIXED USE DISTRICTS (MX-1, MX-2, and MX-3) CHAPTER 11: CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS PART 1: PURPOSE

FILE NO.: Z LOCATION: Located on the Northeast and Southeast corners of West 12 th Street and Dennison Street

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations. Table of Contents

LAND USE PLANNING FEES EFFECTIVE July 1, 2014 Adopted May 20, 2014 by Council Resolution No. 66,598-N.S.

DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 48 SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS ORDINANCE FOR THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA

building_inspection_faqs

ARTICLE IV - RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

ORDINANCE: #01 of 2013 CITY OF MARGATE

AREA: 0.16 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD ORDINANCE NO. 3491

ORDINANCE NO

Zoning Nonconformities

CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

For Sale Apartment Site

LAND USE CODE CHAPTER GENERAL REGULATIONS

Sec Home occupation.

CITY OF NORMANDY PARK MANHATTAN VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA STRATEGY AND CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN

CITY OF VAUGHAN SCHEDULE O LOT GRADING DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

SECTION 5 RESIDENTIAL R1 ZONE

CHAPTER 51A ARTICLE XIII: FORM DISTRICTS

PART 12: TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS

SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES ZONING AMENDMENTS

QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY BUILDING CODE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN

Community Planning Development Overview of Development and Entitlement Processes. April 20, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

CHAPTER 3 MANUFACTURED AND MOBILE HOMES

Section 801 Driveway Access Onto Public Right-of-Ways

ARTICLE 22. AKB ARTHUR K. BOLTON PARKWAY OVERLAY ZONE

STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Planning Commission Staff Report

BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT

ARTICLE 305. PD 305. Cityplace

This satellite photo was taken on October 29th, 2011 and locates the project neighborhood and site for the project.

Engineering Comments will be available at the DRC Meeting.


ARTICLE VIII SECTION 8.1 O-I OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT

FOR SALE. The Friedman Building th Avenue South, Seattle Nicholas T. Gill Allan Friedman

CONFORMITY WITH PLANS; DRAINAGE.

Assisted Living & Memory Care

5 March 12, 2014 Public Hearing

ARTICLE 323. PD 323. Urbandale Area Special Purpose District

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: September 24, 2012 Planning Board Case No. 1248Q

Single Family Residential Building Permit Questions & Answers

Zoning Guide* Contents. Section I Introduction page 2. Section II Residence Districts page 3. Section III Commercial Districts page 5

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended

CITY OF FAIRFAX September 2, 2014 City Council Work Session. Patient First. The Rebkee Company Fairfax Boulevard SU and SE

Restoration. a brief look at

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting Date: February 6, 2014 Zoning Board of Appeals Case No. 3302

ZONING DISTRICT TYPES AND REGULATIONS

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

Comparison Business District (CB)

BOROUGH OF OAKLAND COUNTY OF BERGEN STATE OF NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE 13-CODE-685

Burnette Capital Self Storage CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR OCTOBER 20, 2015

Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments

Residential Decks. Planning and Development Services Department

Residential Plan Routing Information

PERMITTED USES: Within the MS-1 Medical Services District the following uses are permitted: Apothecaries, drug stores, and pharmacies;

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application

A bill to be entitled

BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT

CITY OF BELOIT REPORT TO THE BELOIT LANDMARKS COMMISSION

Transcription:

HIGHLIGHTS: Heights in Residential Zoning Districts Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission March 7, 2011

PROJECT BACKGROUND 1. A rezoning petition (#2008-32) was initiated by the Myers Park Neighborhood Association to rezone 40.9 acres from R-22MF to R-8MF 2. The Petition was filed to respond to concerns about the height and scale of development proposed in the area 3. The petition went to hearing and City Council directed Planning staff to examine existing regulations that control height in residential areas 4. The rezoning petition has since been deferred by the Zoning Committee for several months as staff review options for addressing heights in residential districts

PROCESS FLOWCHART Planning Commission Meeting January 11, 2010 Planning Commission Exec Committee Meeting January 19, 2010 Meeting #6 September 30, 2010 Meeting #7 October 5, 2010 Meeting #8 December 1, 2010 Meeting #5 December 2, 2009 Meetings with Consultant March August, 2010 Meeting #1 September 3, 2009 Planning Commission Update Meeting #4 November 5, 2009 Meeting - Educational Session Meeting #2 September 17, 2009 Planning Commission Request To File October 22, 2009

GOAL To ensure that the height of buildings in residential districts is compatible with the scale of single family neighborhoods in which they are located.

EXISTING REGULATIONS Buildings above 40 must increase side and rear yards by 1 foot for every foot increase in height when abutting a residential district or use. Buildings above 40 abutting any other district or use are required to increase side yards by 1 foot for every 2 feet increase in height.

STAKEHOLDER PRIMARY CONCERNS There are no maximum height limits Height compatibility requirements for buildings are inadequate Loss of development rights Creating nonconforming buildings

HIGHLIGHTS OF RECOMMENDATION Improves compatibility with single family neighborhoods Minimizes creation of non-conforming structures and extends time period for non-conforming structures to rebuild Some decrease in development rights when adjacent to sf zoning but potential increase in development rights when not adjacent to sf zoning If proposed development exceeds permitted height, rezoning to another district is an option

RESIDENTIAL ZONING Residential Zoning Districts Single Family R-3, R-4, R-5, R-6 and R-8 Multi-Family R-8MF, R-12MF, R-17MF, R-22MF and R-43 MF Urban Residential UR-1, UR-2 and UR-3 Mixed Use MX-1, MX-2 and MX-3 Manufactured Housing R-MH Transit Oriented TOD-R Residential Zoning Districts also includes any of the above districts with CD after the designation. TOD R revision completed

DEFINITION New Definition of Height The vertical distance between the average grade at the base of a structure along each building line and the highest part of the structure Does not include chimneys, firewalls, sky lights, and roof structures for elevators, stairways, tanks, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, or similar equipment

DEFINITIONS Required Setback A building must be located at least this amount (example - 30 ) of distance from the street.

DEFINITIONS Required Side Yard The minimum distance required by this ordinance between the side lot line and the side building line, extending from the established setback to the established rear yard. Required Rear Yard The minimum distance required by this ordinance between the rear lot line and the rear building line.

SETBACK AND YARD REQUIREMENTS

DEFINITIONS Building Line Lines that are tangent to the exterior surface of buildings or structures. Building Envelope A three-dimensional area on a lot that remains for placing a structure on a site after setbacks, yard, height, and bulk regulations are observed

AVERAGE GRADE Calculated by adding the lowest point and highest point along the base of the structure and dividing the total by two. May also be calculated by adding all points, at five foot intervals, starting at the corner along the base of the building and dividing the total by the total number of points. Each building elevation will have an average grade.

Questions?

RECOMMENDATIONS NUMBER 1 Single Family/Lower Density Multi-Family Residential Structures NUMBER 2 Higher Density Multi-Family/Nonresidential Structures

COMPARISON RECOMMENDATION #1 SINGLE FAMILY & LOW DENSITY MF CURRENT No max height of building Max base height at side and rear yards Increase yards for portion of building over 40 PROPOSED Max height at front building line Max base height at side yards No height maximum at rear Increase yards for portion of building over 40

SINGLE FAMILY R-3 & R-4 R-8MF,AND R-12MF Requirement Current Proposed Base Max Height at front N/A 40 48 building line Height at required side yard 40 * 40 40 ** Height at required rear yard 40 * N/A N/A *Increase required side yard 1 for every 1 height increase over 40 if abutting residential use or zoning. Otherwise increase side yard 1 for every 2 height increase. ** Increase height 1 for every 1 increase portion of building is from required side yard.

NOTE: Measurement at side yard does not change from existing code (R- 3, R-4 and multi-family). Measurement at side yard = 40

R-3, R-4, R-8MF, AND R-12MF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING EXISTING REGULATION

R-3, R-4, R-8MF, AND R-12MF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PROPOSED REGULATION

R-3, R-4, R-8MF, AND R-12MF RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED REGULATIONS

Requirement Current Proposed Base Max Height at front N/A N/A 40 building line Height at required side yard 40 * 35 35 ** Height at required rear yard SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-5, R-6, R-8 40 * N/A N/A *Increase yards 1 for every 1 height increase over 40 if abutting residential use or zoning. Otherwise increase side yard 1 for every 2 height increase. ** Increase height 1 for every 1 increase portion of building is from required yard.

R-5, R-6, AND R-8 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING EXISTING REGULATION

R-5, R-6, AND R-8 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PROPOSED REGULATION

R-5, R-6, AND R-8 PROPOSED REGULATIONS

Questions?

COMPARISON RECOMMENDATION #2 HIGH DENSITY MF & NONRESIDENTIAL CURRENT No max height of building Increase yards for portion of building over 40 No measurement of height at setback PROPOSED Max height Measurement from lowest to highest point Adjacent district and use dictates height at building setback, side and rear yards

Requirement Current Proposed Height when adjacent to single family residential district - At required setback - At required side/rear yard Height adjacent to a district other than single family residential - At required setback - At required side yard - At required rear yard MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS N/A 40 * NA 40 *** NA Base 40 ** 40 ** 100 100 100 Max 100 100 100 100 100 * Increase yards one foot for every additonal foot of height when abutting any residential use or district **Increase yards two feet in distance for every additonal foot of height the portion of the building is from the required setback/yard (s) adjacent to single family zoning district *** Increase side yard one foot for every additional two foot of height the when abutting use or district other than residential

COMPARING NONRESIDENTIAL EXISTING TO PROPOSED

MULTI-FAMILY & NONRESIDENTIAL EXISTING REGULATION

MULTI-FAMILY & NONRESIDENTIAL PROPOSED REGULATION

MULTI-FAMILY & NONRESIDENTIAL PROPOSED REGULATION

NONRESIDENTIAL USE IN SF AND MF DISTRICT ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL

NONRESIDENTIAL USE IN SF AND MF DISTRICT ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL 80

NONRESIDENTIAL USE IN SF AND MF DISTRICT ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL

ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Modify the current definition of height to: Exclude chimneys and firewalls from the measurement Clarify how average grade is calculated Change yard requirements Nonresidential abutting single family district Side 20 Rear = 35 (R-6 & R-8), 40( R-4) & 45 (R-3) Update Section 11.205 (2) & (3) to clarify that residential and nonresidential developments within the MX Districts (MX-1, MX-2 and MX-3) will comply with the height requirements of the corresponding districts as referenced in these two sections.

ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS If an accessory structure exceeds a height of 24 in the single-family, multi-family, urban residential and mixed use districts, it must be located at least 15 feet from the rear and side property lines. In all zoning districts, except as provided for in Section 12.108, if the accessory structure exceeds the height of the principal structure, it must meet the minimum side yard of the principal structure and be located at least 15 feet from the rear property line.

ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Modify Section 11.208 (MX Districts) to add building height as a standard that can be modified through the innovative development process. Modify section 7.103(7) regarding the time period for when a building permit is required to repair or restore a nonconforming residential structure, based on height, after it is destroyed or damaged from 12 months to 24 months. Delete shadow requirement

ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Height ratio adjacent to single family district not required when development across major thoroughfare

RECAP Create a system that encourages compatible structures Height requirements based on: Zoning District Use If adjacent to Single Family Zoning Minimize creation of height non-conforming structures and extend time period for those nonconforming structures to be rebuilt Limit heights in residential districts

Questions?

NEXT STEPS Tentative Timeline for Text Amendment March 7, 2011 March 14, 2011 March 21, 2011 April 4, 2011 June 20, 2011 June 29, 2011 July 18, 2011 Present Text Details To PC Final Proposed Text Amendment PC Executive Committee Full Commission City Council Public Hearing Zoning Committee City Council Decision