SADCAS Experiences- Medical Laboratories Accreditation Programme. Presented by. Maureen P Mutasa (Mrs) SADCAS CEO



Similar documents
The Changing Nature of SANAS Accreditation

Gap Analysis of ISO 15189:2012 and ISO 15189:2007 in the field of Medical Testing

Africa-China trading relationship

Accreditation and Competence?

NABL accreditation is a formal recognition of the technical competence of a medical testing laboratory

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems

IAF Informative Document. IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Management System Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17021:2011 from ISO/IEC 17021:2006

CRITERIA FOR PERFORMING CALIBRATION AND INTERMEDIATE CHECKS ON EQUIPMENT USED IN ACCREDITED FACILITIES

Application of ISO/IEC for the Accreditation of Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) Certification Bodies

International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation. Laboratory Accreditation or ISO 9001 Certification? global trust. Testing Calibration Inspection

NVLAP Assessor Training. Assessor Qualification & Training Requirements

Raad voor Accreditatie (Dutch Accreditation Council RvA) Assessment of Conformity Assessment Schemes

IAF Mandatory Document for the Transfer of Accredited Certification of Management Systems

COMBINE. Part B. Manual for Marine Monitoring in the. Programme of HELCOM. General guidelines on quality assurance for monitoring in the Baltic Sea

IMPLICATIONS OF OVERLAPPING MEMBERSHIP ON THE EXPECTED GAINS FROM ACCELERATED PROGRAM FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (APEI)

BIOPAMA - EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA TERMS OF REFERENCE: CONSULTANT, DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR EI DEVELOPMENT IN THE SADC REGION

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:2013 from ISO/TS 22003:2007

AUDITOR GUIDELINES. Responsibilities Supporting Inputs. Receive AAA, Sign and return to IMS with audit report. Document Review required?

policy brief Learner preschool exposure and achievement in South Africa Introduction Sampling Background Number 4 (April 2011)

Introduction to the budget process

DEFINITION OF THE CHILD: THE INTERNATIONAL/REGIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK. The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 1990

1 For more information T: / E: DAP@ul.com / W: ul.com/dap

PUBLIC POLICY COURSE 2015

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:201X from ISO/TS 22003:2007

INVITATION TO TENDER

TG TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC :2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES

ISO and SANAS guidelines for use of reference materials and PT scheme participation Shadrack Phophi

Dutch Accreditation Council (RvA) Policy rule Nonconformities. Corrective action

IAF Mandatory Document

JOINT COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR. 2nd Edition

IAF Informative Document. Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015. Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015)

EA IAF/ILAC Guidance. on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020:1998

IAF Mandatory Document

ASCLD/LAB-International

Network Certification Body

PROCEEDINGS KIGALI 3-4 NOVEMBRE,

RULES FOR THE PARTICIPATION IN INTER- LABORATORY COMPARISONS AND PROFICIENCY TESTING SCHEMES

LAB 37 Edition 3 June 2013

(Draft) Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015

ISO/IEC QUALITY MANUAL

AID FOR TRADE CASE STORY: ZIMBABWE

IAF Mandatory Document for the use of Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques ( CAAT ) for Accredited Certification of Management Systems

COMESA Activities in the Field of International Trade Statistics

EA-7/01. EA Guidelines. on the application. Of EN Publication Reference PURPOSE

List of EA Publications. And International. Documents

OIML D 18 DOCUMENT. Edition 2008 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

OD-2017-Ed.1.5 CHECK LIST FOR TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES

IAF Mandatory Document. Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation of Management Systems Certification Bodies. Issue 1, Version 2 (IAF MD 17:2015)

Client information note Assessment process Management systems service outline

REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD

FSSC Q. Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008. Quality module REQUIREMENTS

Certification Process Requirements

NIST HANDBOOK 150 CHECKLIST

Info 15:2 TRAINING 2015/2016. Info 13:19

UK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme

January PwC Research Services Survey on Retrenchment and Redundancy Practices

Financing Education for All in Sub Saharan Africa: Progress and Prospects

Steps to ISO/IEC Accreditation

ARSO President Forum. Introduction. ARSO Presidents.

Aerospace Guidance Document

How Does Your Organisation Measure Up? Salary Survey

The SADC Programme on Harmonization of International Merchandise Trade Statistics (IMTS) SADC Secretariat, Botswana

ISO Registration Guidance Document

NABL NATIONAL ACCREDITATION

IAS CALIBRATION and TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS DEFINITIONS

SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS

BOBS COURSES OVERVIEW

JANUARY 2015 VACANCIES

International Accreditation Forum, Inc.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR LABORATORIES AND INSPECTION BODIES

ISO 9001:2000 Gap Analysis Checklist

DOCUMENT CS/1: SCHEME DESCRIPTION AND BENEFITS

AFFECTED PERSON means a body corporate, foundation, trust or partnership operating in the Republic, or an estate, in respect of which:

ISO/IEC Registration Guidance Document

R103 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: PROFICIENCY TESTING FOR ISO/IEC LABORATORIES

Methods verification. Transfer of validated methods into laboratories working routine. Dr. Manuela Schulze 1

Nonconformities (NCs) and Observations (OBs)

AIO Life Seminar Abidjan - Côte d Ivoire

IMQ RULES. Contents. IMQ Rules - Product certification

Rules for the certification of Food Safety Management Systems

GENERAL INFORMATION BROCHURE FOR ACCREDITATION OF MEDICAL IMAGING SERVICES

Laboratory medicine as one of the pharmacists competencies

Procedures and General Requirements

country profiles WHO regions

Checklist. Standard for Medical Laboratory

SADCA DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURE

State Meat and Poultry Inspection (MPI) Program Laboratory Quality Management System Checklist

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION THE 8TH NAFISAT SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING (Mahe, Seychelles, March 2013)

OHSAS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Libreville Declaration on Health and Environment in Africa

How To Teach Online Business Skills

Content Sheet 10-1: Overview of External Quality Assessment (EQA)

KIGALI DECLARATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN EQUITABLE INFORMATION SOCIETY IN AFRICA

Asset Management Systems Scheme (AMS Scheme)

General Rules for the Certification of Management Systems Code: RG

Title: Rio Tinto management system

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

Transcription:

SADCAS Experiences- Medical Laboratories Accreditation Programme Presented by Maureen P Mutasa (Mrs) SADCAS CEO 1

Presentation Overview Overview of SADCAS The SADCAS MLAP Accreditation process Trends from initial assessments Lessons learnt Conclusion 2

Overview of SADCAS Accreditation bodies (ABs) are established in many countries with the primary purpose of ensuring that conformity assessment bodies (Laboratories, certification and inspection bodies) are subject to an oversight by an authoritative body. SADCAS is a multi - economy AB established to meet the accreditation needs of SADC Member States especially those without own national accreditation body. Within the SADC region of 15 countries only 2 countries namely South Africa and Mauritius have their own national ABs, SANAS of South Africa and MAURITAS of Mauritius. The remaining 13 countries namely: Angola; Botswana; Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Lesotho, Madagascar; Malawi; Mozambique; Namibia; Seychelles; Swaziland; Tanzania; Zambia; and Zimbabwe do not have national accreditation bodies hence serviced by SADCAS. 3

Overview of SADCAS 4

Overview of SADCAS Incorporated in December 2005 in Botswana. Office was set up in October 2008 Launched in April 2009 Started offering services in October 2009. The set up and operationalization of SADCAS was funded by the Norwegian Government Governments of Member States that are serviced by SADCAS now support SADCAS operations with some governments (Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Namibia and Swaziland) having already paid their contributions/part contributions towards SADCAS sustainability. 5

Overview of SADCAS Launch of SADCAS in April 2009 6

Overview of SADCAS Accreditation services and training in accreditation associated activities SADCAS Accreditation programmes Calibration laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 Testing laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 Medical laboratories to ISO 15189 Management systems certification bodies to ISO/IEC 17021 Product certification bodies to ISO/IEC 17065 Personnel certification bodies to ISO/IEC 17024 Inspection bodies to ISO/IEC 17020 SADCAS will broaden scope of accreditation as needs arise Accreditation programmes comply with ISO/IEC 17011 7

Overview of SADCAS SADCAS is now in its 6 th year of operation and has up to date Accredited 28 facilities in 7 SADC Member States. Has 46 accreditation applications from 9 countries at various stages of processing. Has cumulatively conducted 81 training courses in 11 SADC Member States in order to promote accreditation and an understanding of the accreditation requirements with over 1100 participants benefiting from the SADCAS training courses. 8

Overview of SADCAS Accreditation services kick started through a twinning Partnership Arrangement (TPA) with the SANAS. In an effort to address the accreditation needs of French speaking SADC Member States, a TPA was signed in February 2014 with TUNAC. Both the SADCAS/SANAS and the SADCAS/TUNAC TPAs which involve joint assessments are in line with international best practice so as to facilitate SADCAS development and to give confidence on the market whilst SADCAS works towards signatory status in international accreditation arrangements. 9

Overview of SADCAS Efforts are now underway to enable SADCAS to service the accreditation needs of SADC countries where Portuguese is the official language. Great strides made towards international recognition, with SADCAS successfully undergoing a joint pre - peer evaluation by the ILAC and AFRAC in June 2014 and is due to undergo the peer evaluation in June 2015. SADCAS is therefore well on its way towards signatory status and aims to achieve the said status in the 2015/16 financial year. 10

SADCAS/SANAS and SADCAS/TUNAC TPA Ceremonies 11

The SADCAS MLAP The SADCAS Medical Laboratories Accreditation Programme (MLAP) Established in June 2010 A multi-disciplinary accreditation programme operated in accordance with ISO/IEC 17011 The fields of accreditation under the SADCAS MLAP include: Biochemistry; Cytology; Hematology; Histopathology; Immunology; Microbiology; Pathology; Virology; Serology; and Andrology 12

The SADCAS MLAP Accreditations as at 24 November 2014 SADCAS has accredited 6 medical laboratories Breakdown of accredited laboratories by country Tanzania (4) Swaziland (1) Zimbabwe (1). Medical laboratories constitute 21% of the accredited facilities Breakdown of accreditations by scope Chemistry (5) Microbiology (4) Serology (3) Haematology (3) Virology (2) Immunophenotyping (1) Blood Bank (1). 13

The SADCAS MLAP Number of Accredited ML by Country Accreditations by Scope 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 4 1 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 3 2 1 1 0 Tanzania Swaziland Zimbabwe 0 14

The SADCAS MLAP Accreditations applications as at 24 November 2014 SADCAS has 19 applications from medical laboratories under process Medical laboratories constitute 41% of the applications under process Breakdown of applications by country Botswana (11) Tanzania (2) Zimbabwe (6). Breakdown of applications by scope Microbiology (15) Serology (13) Hematology (12) Biochemistry (12) Virology (8) Blood Bank (6) Cytology (3) Histopathology (2) Immunology (1) 15

The SADCAS MLAP Applications by Country Applications by Scope 12 10 11 14 12 12 13 12 8 6 4 2 2 6 10 8 6 4 2 4 8 3 6 1 2 0 Botswana Tanzania Zimbabwe 0 16

SADCAS Accreditation Process The SADCAS accreditation process involves 5 main stages namely: Application and documentation review Pre-assessment Initial assessment Surveillance Re-assessment Assessments undertaken by a team of assessors 11 SADCAS qualified and registered assessors 3 Lead assessors 8 Technical assessors 11 SANAS assessors 4 Lead assessors 8 Technical assessors 17

SADCAS Accreditation process Accreditation applications by stage of processing Completeness check stage (4) Approval of quotation stage (5) Documentation review stage (1) Initial assessment stage (8) Accreditation approval stage (1) Accreditation timelines Range of time taken to process from application to accreditation 12 to 30 months with some facilities undergoing initial assessment twice Average time taken to process from application to accreditation approval 22 months 18

Accreditation Costs ML A (Zimbabwe) Scope: Serology, Haematology, Chemistry Application fees(including DR) USD 840 Pre - assessment (optional) USD 2,325 Initial assessment USD 7,040 Total USD 10,205 ML B (Tanzania) Scope: Chemistry, Microbiology, Parasitology, Molecular Biology Application fees(including DR) USD 870 1 st Initial assessment USD 16,384 2 nd Initial assessment USD 19,390 Total USD 36,664 19

Trends from Initial Assessments Based on SADCAS experiences from 13 initial assessments undertaken, high numbers of nonconformities are recorded in the following areas and applicable clauses of ISO 15189: Clause 5.6: Ensuring quality of examination results (44); Clause 5.5: Examination Procedures (37); Clause 5.3: Laboratory Equipment (34); Clause 4.14: Internal audits (16); Clause 5.8: Reporting of results (16); Clause 4.15: Management review (13); and Clause 5.1: Personnel (13). Clause 4.9: Identification and control of nonconformities (10) Clause 4.1: Organization and management (7); Clause 4.6: External services and supplies (7); Clause 4.10: Corrective actions (7) 20

No of NCs Trends from Initial Assessments NCS vs Clause of ISO 15189 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 44 37 34 16 16 13 13 10 7 7 7 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.9 4.14 4.15 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.8 Clause of ISO 15189 21

Trends from Initial Assessments Clause 5.6 of ISO 15189 : Ensuring quality of results covers the following areas: Internal quality control analysis and review; Inter-Laboratory Comparison/EQA participation; and Analysis and review of performance. 22

Trends from Initial Assessments Clause 5.5 of ISO 15189: Examination procedures covers the following areas: Selection, verification and validation of examination procedures; Measurement uncertainty; and Documentation of examination procedures. 23

Trends from Initial Assessments Clause 5.3 of ISO 15189: Laboratory Equipment, reagents and consumables is broad and it covers the following areas: Equipment acceptance testing Equipment calibration and metrological traceability Equipment maintenance and repair Equipment records Reagents reception, acceptance testing, Reagents inventory management Reagents and consumables records 24

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML Personnel Some laboratories fail to provide exhaustive training in all areas stated in ISO 15189 for all personnel. Quality management systems Health and safety Applicable laboratory information systems Ethics (5.1.5). Laboratories seem to concentrate on equipment/analyser operator trainings only Some laboratories would only provide evidence of competence assessments without training records. The standard separates the two. Competence evaluation is done to check effectiveness of training. 25

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML Internal audits are conducted to determine whether all activities in the quality management system, including pre-examination, examination and post examination procedures conform to ISO 15189 and are implemented, effective and maintained (Clause 4.14.5). It is not uncommon to see laboratories conducting internal audits on just part of the system and neglecting the rest. It is also not uncommon to see laboratories conducting internal audits and then fail to Undertake root cause analysis on nonconformities raised Close the nonconformities within the stated time frame Follow up on outstanding issues. 26

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML ML seeking accreditation from SADCAS should be aware of the following SADCAS requirements It is mandatory to understand SADCAS documents Downloadable on SADCAS website www.sadcas.org Documents detail accreditation process, technical requirements, technical guidance and SADCAS policy Validation/Verification of methods Some laboratories could not distinguish between verification of examination procedures and validation of examination procedures Did not set acceptance criteria for approval of validation/ verification reports. Laboratories are required to validate nonstandard methods, laboratory designed and standard methods modified or used outside their intended use. If a laboratory uses standard methods (without modifications), such methods shall be subject to independent verification before being introduced into routine use 27

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML Vertical Assessment Lack of understanding why assessors have to do a lot of writing and ask a lot of questions during the assessment. There is a general perception that assessors only record negative observations about the laboratories. Assessors are required to record every observation (positive or negative) in a way that can be understood by the SADCAS AAC. The AAC determines whether a thorough and complete assessment was performed based on the documents and forms submitted by the assessment team. This follows that assessors must ensure assessment forms/documents are comprehensive so that the AAC would arrive to the same conclusion as then. It is the AAC that grants accreditation. The assessment team can only give a recommendation. 28

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML Nonconformities (NCs) Some laboratories view raising NCs negatively The purpose of raising NCs is continuous improvement. Laboratory staff perceive signing the corrective action and clearance report as admission of guilt. Signing the form is acknowledging that the finding has been recorded accurately and the wording is understood. It is not accepting the responsibility for the NC The finding recorded during the assessment is not necessarily an NC but a comment recorded by an assessor when noting a situation or action which may prejudice the organisation s ability to meet SADCAS accreditation requirements. The assessment team will convert the finding to an NC ONLY if the subject of the particular finding is deemed to cast doubt on the organisation s ongoing ability to meet SADCAS accreditation criteria. The NC will only be classified as Major if it indicates that the technical competence of the organization to continually perform work within the limits of its proposed/approved accreditation schedule/scope has either been or is in imminent danger of being seriously compromised. 29

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML Management requirements There is a general perception in laboratories that technical requirements are more important than management requirements and that accreditation will be granted as long as technical requirements are met. The truth of the matter is accreditation cannot be granted if the organization cannot demonstrate that it has the ability to consistently produce results that meet the requirements of customers (patients and clinician). This ability can be demonstrated by developing and implementing a Quality Management System and continually improving its effectiveness. 30

Lessons Learnt for the benefit of ML Transition to ISO 15189 ISO 15189: 2007 was revised and the new edition of the standard was published on 1 November 2012. TR 10 outlines SADCAS Policy for ISO 15189 transition for those medical laboratories that had implemented a system based on ISO 15189: 2007. TR 10 is available and can be downloaded from the SADCAS website According to TR 10 applications for accreditation received after 30 June 2014 are assessed based on the new version of the standard. The agreed transition period to the new version of the standard is 3 years and is concluded on 1 March 2016. If by 1 November 2015 SADCAS cannot confirm compliance to the new version then accreditation to the 2007 version shall be suspended on 1 March 2016. Five of the accreditation certificates issued by SADCAS were to the 2007 version of the standard whilst CIMAS is the only one accredited to the 2012 version of the standard. 31

Conclusion Throughout the world many countries now rely on accreditation as a means of independently evaluating competence. Accreditation is the strategy for a medical laboratory to achieve this. SADCAS was established to meet the accreditation needs of 13 SADC Member States. A lot has been invested in SADCAS. In line with its value proposition, SADCAS is there to deliver confidence, assure competency and guarantee quality SADCAS is ready to meet your accreditation needs. 32

Home What is Accreditation? Accreditation Accredited Organizations Publications Latest News Events Calendar Contact us Extranet Links Southern African Development Community Accreditation Service (SADCAS) http://www.sadcas.org/ I THANK YOU! 33