BRIEFING 661.2 Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use.

Similar documents
SODIUM CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE

Recovery of Elemental Copper from Copper (II) Nitrate

USP Plastic Packaging General Chapters: An Overview

Carolina s Solution Preparation Manual

POLYVINYL ALCOHOL. SYNONYMS Vinyl alcohol polymer, PVOH, INS No DEFINITION DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL USES CHARACTERISTICS

Physical and Chemical Properties and Changes

Preparation of frequently used solutions

Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules

PECTINS. SYNONYMS INS No. 440 DEFINITION DESCRIPTION. FUNCTIONAL USES Gelling agent, thickener, stabilizer, emulsifier CHARACTERISTICS

Experiment 7: Titration of an Antacid

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

3.2. CONTAINERS GLASS CONTAINERS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE Glass containers for pharmaceutical use EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 8.

ACID-BASE TITRATIONS: DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE BY TITRATION WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID BACKGROUND

Colorimetric Determination of Iron in Vitamin Tablets

Dissolving of sodium hydroxide generates heat. Take care in handling the dilution container.

Phenolphthalein-NaOH Kinetics

SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF SUBSTANCES LAB

Experiment 12- Classification of Matter Experiment

Dimethylglyoxime Method Method to 6.0 mg/l Ni TNTplus 856

PART I: PREPARATION OF SOLUTIONS AND STANDARDIZATION OF A BASE

Determination of the Mass Percentage of Copper in a Penny. Introduction

FerroVer Method 1 Method to 3.0, 1.0 to 30.0 and 10.0 to mg/l Fe Powder Pillows

Chemical versus Physical Changes

EXPERIMENT 5. Molecular Absorption Spectroscopy: Determination of Iron With 1,10-Phenanthroline

Mixtures and Pure Substances

CONDUCTIVITY SENSOR. Description D0382. Figure 1. The Conductivity Sensor

Esterification Method 1 Method to 2800 mg/l (as acetic acid) Reagent Solution

Spectrophotometer - Milton Roy Spectronic 21D or equivalent.

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Methyl 4-Hydroxybenzoate

USEPA 1 FerroVer Method 2 Method to 3.00 mg/l Fe Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

ATOMIC ABSORTION SPECTROSCOPY: rev. 4/2011 ANALYSIS OF COPPER IN FOOD AND VITAMINS

How To Test For Leachables

XI. Methods of Analysis DETERMINATION OF POTASSIUM CARBONATE CALCULATIONS REAGENTS PROCEDURE

CHM220 Nucleophilic Substitution Lab. Studying S N 1 and S N 2 Reactions: Nucloephilic Substitution at Saturated Carbon*

Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate)

Estimation of Alcohol Content in Wine by Dichromate Oxidation followed by Redox Titration

Nitrogen, Ammonia. Known Addition ISE Method 1 Method Minimum of 0.8 mg/l NH 3 N. Ammonia ISE. Test preparation. Instrument-specific table

HEXANES. Insoluble in water, soluble in ether, alcohol, and acetone. Neutral to methyl orange (ph indicator) Not more than 0.

OXIDATION-REDUCTION TITRATIONS-Permanganometry

EXPERIMENT 7 Reaction Stoichiometry and Percent Yield

EDTA Titrations 1: Standardization of EDTA and Analysis of Zinc in a Supplement Tablet. by Professor David Cash. September, 2008

CHEMICAL REACTIONS OF COPPER AND PERCENT YIELD KEY

I. ACID-BASE NEUTRALIZATION, TITRATION

ERDOSTEINE - MONOGRAPH.

Separation by Solvent Extraction

The Empirical Formula of a Compound

NITRIC OXIDE and NITROGEN DIOXIDE 6014

General Chemistry I (FC, 09-10) Lab #3: The Empirical Formula of a Compound. Introduction

5.0 EXPERIMENT ON DETERMINATION OF TOTAL HARDNESS

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds DOC

Determination of calcium by Standardized EDTA Solution

Isolation of Caffeine from Tea

STABILITY TESTING: PHOTOSTABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

Experiment 16-Acids, Bases and ph

Graphite Furnace AA, Page 1 DETERMINATION OF METALS IN FOOD SAMPLES BY GRAPHITE FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY (VERSION 1.

MOISTURE (Karl Fischer, Buffered)

Phosphorus, colorimetry, phosphomolybdate, automated-segmented flow

Measuring Manganese Concentration Using Spectrophotometry

HS 1003 Part 2 HS 1003 Heavy Metals Test

Hands-On Labs SM-1 Lab Manual

In this experiment, we will use three properties to identify a liquid substance: solubility, density and boiling point..

Beware that ordinary prescription glasses do not provide adequate protection. This is also true with poorly fitting safety glasses.

Gel Electrophoresis Teacher Instructions Suggested Grade Level: Grades 7-14 Class Time Required: 1 period (50 minutes)

DYES AND DYEING 2003 by David A. Katz. All rights reserved. Permission for classroom use provided original copyright is included.

Experiment 8 Synthesis of Aspirin

MINERAL OIL (MEDIUM VISCOSITY)

Return to Lab Menu. Acids and Bases in Your House

LUMEFANTRINE Draft proposal for The International Pharmacopoeia (October 2006)

Table 1. Common esters used for flavors and fragrances

Ascorbic Acid Titration of Vitamin C Tablets This lab will be completed individually! Make sure you come prepared!

METHOD 3510C SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION

Drospirenone and Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets. Type of Posting. Revision Bulletin Posting Date. 31 July 2015 Official Date

Acid-Base Extraction.

Acetic Acid Content of Vinegar: An Acid-Base Titration E10-1

TEACHER ACTIVITY GUIDE

EXPERIMENT 10: TITRATION AND STANDARDIZATION

SPIKE RECOVERY AND DETERMINING A METHOD DETECTION LIMIT Pamela Doolittle, University of Wisconsin Madison, pssemrad@wisc.edu 2014

H H H O. Pre-Lab Exercises Lab 6: Organic Chemistry. Lab 6: Organic Chemistry Chemistry Define the following: a.

Making Biodiesel from Virgin Vegetable Oil: Teacher Manual

Material Safety Data Sheet

STANDARDIZATION OF A SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION EXPERIMENT 14

Acid Base Titrations

Determining the Quantity of Iron in a Vitamin Tablet. Evaluation copy

Determination of Aspirin using Back Titration

Experiment 5. Chemical Reactions A + X AX AX A + X A + BX AX + B AZ + BX AX + BZ

LZV585 (B) The 1-cm path is aligned with the arrow on the adapter

PHYSICAL SEPARATION TECHNIQUES. Introduction

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

Calcium Analysis by EDTA Titration

1 of 8 5/10/ :47 AM

OFF! CLIP-ON MOSQUITO REPELLENT

Syllabus OC18 Use litmus or a universal indicator to test a variety of solutions, and classify these as acidic, basic or neutral

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

PREPARATION FOR CHEMISTRY LAB: COMBUSTION

Experiment 8 Preparation of Cyclohexanone by Hypochlorite Oxidation

Material Safety Data Sheet

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

Fighting the Battles: Conducting a Clinical Assay

Transcription:

BRIEFING 661.2 Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use. USP proposes the revision and development of a suite of plastic packaging system standards in the current issue of PF. General test chapter Containers Plastics 661 is being revised and will be titled Plastic Packaging Systems and Their Materials of Construction 661 and will provide the testing rationale for plastic materials of construction and packaging systems used for the pharmaceutical industry. USP recognizes that the use of wellcharacterized materials to construct a packaging system is a primary means of ensuring that the packaging system is suited for its intended use, because the properties and characteristics of the materials can be matched to the performance requirements of the packaging system. Thus, new general chapter Plastic Materials of Construction 661.1 will help determine whether a material is deemed well-characterized by establishing its: Identity Biocompatibility (biological reactivity) General physicochemical properties Additives Extractable metals. Plastic packaging systems for pharmaceutical products must be suitable for their intended use. That is, the packaging system should adequately protect the pharmaceutical product, should be compatible with the pharmaceutical product, and should be composed of materials that are safe for use. From a chemical perspective, plastic packaging systems used in pharmaceutical applications should be such that the ingredients of the pharmaceutical product are not adsorbed onto the surface of the packaging system, are not absorbed into the body of the packaging system, and do not migrate through the packaging system (compatibility). Further, the packaging system should not release substances that can accumulate in the pharmaceutical product in quantities sufficient to affect its stability (which addresses compatibility) or to present a risk of toxicity (which addresses safety). The third chapter, Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use 661.2, will provide test methods and standards for metal packaging systems. Other chapters that will be proposed in the future to address the characterization of plastic materials used in the manufacturing process and in medical devices include Plastic Systems Used for Manufacturing Pharmaceutical Products 661.3 and Plastic Medical Devices Used to Deliver or Administer Pharmaceutical Products 661.4. A workshop will be held December 9 and 10, 2013, at USP headquarters in Rockville, MD, to discuss comments on the suite of packaging general chapters and potential future revisions. (GCPS: D. Hunt.) Correspondence Number C128728

Add the following: 661.2 PLASTIC PACKAGING SYSTEMS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE INTRODUCTION A packaging system provides the means for manufacturing, distributing, and storing these articles and potentially for administering a drug product. A plastic packaging system as defined in Packaging and Storage Requirements 659 is composed wholly or in substantial portion of plastic materials and contains or is intended to contain a medical article. The plastic packaging system refers to the sum of packaging components that together contain the pharmaceutical product, including closures. This sum of packaging components includes primary components, which are those components that directly contact the pharmaceutical product at some time during the product's manufacturing, distribution, storage, or use, and secondary components, which are those components that may contact the pharmaceutical product during the product's manufacturing, distribution, storage, and use. SCOPE Plastic packaging systems for pharmaceutical use include bags, bottles, cartridges, dry powder and metered-dose inhalers, nebulizers, prefillable syringes, vials, and bottles as packaging systems for capsules and tablets. Commonly used plastic materials include polyethylene, polypropylene, polyolefins, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene terephthalate G, and poly(vinyl chloride). Some, but not all plastic packaging systems are formed from a single plastic material. For example, bags can be formed from layers of different plastic materials, and solid plastic containers can be manufactured from more than one plastic material by co-molding. These differences notwithstanding, plastic materials used in the construction of plastic packaging systems should be fully characterized (see Plastic Materials of Construction 661.1. Furthermore, plastic packaging systems for pharmaceutical use must be suitable for their intended use. That is, the packaging system should adequately protect, be compatible with, and be composed of materials that are safe for use with the pharmaceutical product. Additionally, if the packaging system has a performance feature in addition to containing the product, the container should function properly. From a chemical perspective, a plastic packaging system used in pharmaceutical applications should be such that the ingredients of the pharmaceutical product are not adsorbed on the surface of the packaging system, are not absorbed into the body of the packaging system, and do not migrate through the packaging system. In addition, the packaging system should not release substances that accumulate in the pharmaceutical product in quantities sufficient to affect its stability. These aspects are related to the compatibility of the pharmaceutical product and its container. Additionally, the

packaging system should not release substances that accumulate in the pharmaceutical product in quantities that present a risk of toxicity, thereby adversely affecting user safety or efficacy. The applicant who seeks regulatory approval of a packaging system or packaged drug product is responsible for establishing that the product's packaging system meets these expectations, and thus is suited for its intended use, by ensuring that the packaging system itself and/or the packaged pharmaceutical product has been appropriately tested. A packaging system is chemically suited for its intended use if: The packaging system is constructed from well-characterized materials as established by testing according to Plastic Materials of Construction 661.1. The packaging system's general physicochemical properties have been established. The packaging system's biocompatibility (biological reactivity) has been established. The packaging system has been established to be safe by means of the appropriate chemical testing. In certain packaging applications, appropriate chemical testing is established by conformance with 21 CFR Indirect Food Additives and by performing the testing specified in Plastic Materials of Construction 661.1. Safety is addressed by demonstrating compliance with both 661.2 and 21 CFR Indirect Food Additives and may not require extractables testing, leachables testing and their related toxicological assessment. In other packaging applications, conformance to regulations regarding indirect food additives is not sufficient to address safety, and appropriate chemical testing involves performing the testing specified in Plastic Materials of Construction 661.1 as well as extractables testing, leachables testing, and appropriate toxicological assessment. General essential principles and demonstrated best-practices recommendations for extractable and leachable studies can be found in Assessment of Extractables Associated with Pharmaceutical Packaging/Delivery Systems 1663 and Assessment of Drug Product Leachables Associated with Pharmaceutical Packaging/Delivery Systems 1664, respectively; these chapters may be helpful, but not mandatory, resources. A toxicological safety assessment should be performed for each individual member of the packaging system's extractables profile (or each member of the contained product's leachables profile as appropriate) to demonstrate that the user safety risk associated with each individual leachable (or extractable as worst case leachable) is acceptable and that the probable safety risk posed by all leachables (or extractables as worst case leachables), considered individually, is within acceptable parameters. Limits for elemental impurities in pharmaceuticals can be found in Elemental Impurities Limits 232. The packaging system is chemically compatible with the packaged product, as established by appropriate compatibility assessments (e.g., stability studies).

This chapter deals solely with packaging systems and should not be applied to components or materials from which packaging systems are constructed. The testing and qualification of materials used in packaging systems are addressed in 661.1. The test methods and specifications contained within this document have been developed for general application to plastic packaging systems. In view of the wide variety of materials of construction and packaging systems available and recognizing possible new developments in materials and packaging systems, the publication of a test method and/or specification does not exclude the use, in justified circumstances, of packaging systems that have been tested with different methods and/or which comply with other specifications, subject to agreement by competent authority. TEST METHODS Biological Reactivity In vitro biological tests are performed on the packaging systems according to the test procedures described in the general chapter Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro 87. Packaging systems that meet the requirements of the in vitro tests are not required to undergo any further in vivo testing but are not assigned a plastic class. Packaging systems that do not meet the requirements of the in vitro tests are not suitable as packaging systems for pharmaceutical use. If a plastic class designation (classes I VI) is needed, analysts should perform the appropriate in vivo tests specified by Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vivo 88. Water extraction Physiochemical Tests Solution C1: Fill the packaging system to its nominal capacity with Purified Water and close it, if possible, using the normal means of closure. Otherwise, close with an inert closure. Heat in an autoclave until 121 ± 2 is reached (typically in 20 30 min), and maintain at this temperature for 30 min. If heating at 121 leads to the deterioration of the container, heat at 100 ± 2 for 2 h or at 70 ± 2 for 24 ± 2 h. Use Solution C1 within 4 h of preparation. Prepare a blank by heating Purified Water in a borosilicate glass flask closed with aluminum foil at the same temperature and time used for the preparation of Solution C1. Absorbance: Determine the spectrum of Solution C1 between 230 nm and 360 nm using the Solution C1 blank as the compensation liquid. Acidity or alkalinity: The test for Acidity or alkalinity should be conducted only when packaging systems are intended to hold a liquid product or a product that is dissolved in its container before use. To a volume of Solution C1 corresponding to 4% of the nominal capacity, add 0.1 ml of phenolphthalein solution. The solution is colorless. Add 0.4 ml of 0.01 N sodium hydroxide. The solution is pink. Add 0.8 ml of 0.01 N hydrochloric acid and 0.1 ml of Methyl red TS2 solution. The solution is orange red or red. Methyl red TS2 Test for sensitivity: Add 0.1 ml of methyl red solution to a mixture of 100 ml of carbon dioxide free Purified Water and 0.05 ml of 0.02 N hydrochloric acid.

NMT 0.1 ml of 0.02 N hydrochloric acid is required to change the color from red to yellow. Organic extractables total organic carbon (See Total Organic Carbon 643.) The total organic carbon (TOC) content of Solution C1 is measured according to Total Organic Carbon 643. However, 643 is designed for testing high-purity water that has low TOC values. Because of extracted organic substances, material extracts may have TOC values that are much higher than those of purified water. Thus the TOC analyses performed have a limit of detection of 0.2 mg/l (ppm) and have a demonstrated linear dynamic range from 0.2 20 mg/l. A linear range with a higher upper concentration can be used if linearity is established. If sample extracts exceed this upper linear range limit, then they should be appropriately diluted for analysis. Total terephthaloyl moieties, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyethylene terephthalate G Preparations Polyethylene terephthalate extracting media: 50% alcohol (dilute 125 ml of alcohol, dehydrated R with Purified Water to 238 ml, and mix), hexane, and Purified Water. For each Extracting medium, fill a sufficient number of test packaging systems to 90% of their nominal capacity to obtain NLT 30 ml. Fill a corresponding number of glass bottles with each Extracting medium for use as blanks. Fit the bottles with impervious seals such as aluminum foil, and apply closures. Incubate the test packaging systems and the glass bottles at 49 for 10 days. Remove the test systems and glass bottles, and store at room temperature. Do not transfer the Extracting media samples to alternative storage vessels. Polyethylene terephthalate G extracting media: 25% alcohol (dilute 125 ml of 50% alcohol with Purified Water to 250 ml, and mix), hexane and Purified Water. Proceed as directed for Polyethylene terephthalate extracting media. Procedure: Determine the absorbance of the 50% alcohol or 25% alcohol extract in a 1-cm cell at the wavelength of maximum absorbance at about 244 nm (see Spectrophotometry and Light-Scattering 851 ), using as the blank the corresponding Extracting medium blank. Determine the absorbance of the n-heptane extract in a 1-cm cell at the wavelength of maximum absorbance at about 240 nm (see 851 Extracting medium. ), using as the blank the n-heptane Ethylene glycol, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyethylene terephthalate G Preparations Periodic acid solution: Dissolve 125 mg of periodic acid in 10 ml of Purified Water. Dilute sulfuric acid: To 50 ml of water add slowly and with constant stirring 50 ml of sulfuric acid, and allow to cool to room temperature. Sodium bisulfite solution: Dissolve 0.1 g of sodium bisulfite in 10 ml of water. Use this solution within 7 days.

Disodium chromotropate solution: Dissolve 100 mg of chromotropic acid, disodium salt R in 100 ml of sulfuric acid. Protect this solution from light, and use within 7 days. Standard solution: Dissolve an accurately weighed quantity of ethylene glycol in Purified Water, and dilute quantitatively and stepwise if necessary to obtain a solution having a known concentration of about 1 µg/ml. Test solution: Use the Purified Water extract from the Total terephthaloyl moieties test method. Procedure: Transfer 1.0 ml of the Standard solution to a 10-mL volumetric flask. Transfer 1.0 ml of the Test solution to a second 10-mL volumetric flask. Transfer 1.0 ml of the Purified Water Extracting medium to a third 10-mL volumetric flask. To each of the three flasks, add 100 µl of Periodic acid solution, swirl to mix, and allow to stand for 60 min. Add 1.0 ml of Sodium bisulfite solution to each flask, and mix. Add 100 µl of Disodium chromotropate solution to each flask, and mix. [NOTE All solutions should be analyzed within 1 h after addition of the Disodium chromotropate solution.] Cautiously add 6 ml of sulfuric acid to each flask, mix, and allow the solutions to cool to room temperature. [CAUTION Dilution of sulfuric acid produces substantial heat and can cause the solution to boil. Perform this addition carefully. Sulfur dioxide gas will be evolved. Use of a fume hood is recommended.] Dilute each solution with Dilute sulfuric acid to volume, and mix. Concomitantly determine the absorbances of the solutions from the Standard solution and the Test solution in 1-cm cells at the wavelength of maximum absorbance at about 575 nm (see 851 ), using as the blank the solution from the Purified Water Extracting medium. SPECIFICATIONS Biological Reactivity Test results are consistent with the relevant chapters ( 87 or 88 ). Physiochemical Tests Appearance of solution: Solution C1 is clear and colorless. Absorbance: NMT 0.20 Acidity or alkalinity: The solution is colorless after addition of phenolphthalein solution; pink after the addition of 0.01 N sodium hydroxide; and orange red or red after the addition of 0.01 N hydrochloric acid and 0.1 ml of methyl red solution. TOC: The difference in TOC concentrations between Solution C1 and a suitable blank is NMT 8 mg/l. Ethylene glycol, PET, and PETG: The absorbance of the solution from the Test solution does not exceed that of the solution from the Standard solution, corresponding to NMT 1 ppm of ethylene glycol.

Total terephthaloyl moieties, PET, and PETG: The absorbance of the 50% alcohol, 25% alcohol, and n-heptane extracts does not exceed 0.150, corresponding to NMT 1 ppm of total terephthaloyl moieties. 2S ( USP37 )