H.A. DePra, J.D. Duggin, D.R. Gill, C.R. Krehbiel, J.B. Morgan, D.C. Bietz, A.H. Trenkle, R.L. Horst, F.N. Owens. Story in Brief



Similar documents
EFFECT OF AGRADO ON THE HEALTH AND PERFORMANCE OF TRANSPORT-STRESSED HEIFER CALVES. Authors:

ROLLED VERSUS WHOLE CORN: EFFECTS ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION OF FEEDLOT STEERS

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

Effects of Supplemental Vitamin E with Different Oil Sources on Growth, Health, and Carcass Parameters of Preconditioned Beef Calves 1

BURNETT CENTER INTERNET PROGRESS REPORT. No. 12 April, Summary of the 2000 Texas Tech University Consulting Nutritionist Survey

PROCESSING OF WHEAT FOR GROWING-FINISHING SWINE

Effect of Flaxseed Inclusion on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestion and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Growing and Finishing Diets for Beef Cattle

Summary. Keywords: methanol, glycerin, intake, beef cattle. Introduction

Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

EFFICACY OF RACTOPAMINE AND PST

Effects of Thiamin Supplementation on Performance and Health of Growing Steers Consuming High Sulfate Water

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

AN EVALUATION OF DEXTROSE, LACTOSE, AND WHEY SOURCES IN PHASE 2 STARTER DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

DAIRY BEEF IMPLANT STRATEGIES: THE BENEFIT OF TBA-CONTAINING IMPLANTS FOR HOLSTEIN STEERS. Court Campbell, Ph.D., Fort Dodge Animal Health

As grain prices fluctuate

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

Recipe For Marbling. Page 1 of 12. Quality grade continues to generate largest grid premiums

BEC Feed Solutions. Steve Blake BEC Feed Solutions

COMPARISON OF DAIRY VERSUS BEEF STEERS

The Effect of Citric Acid, Phytase, and Their Interaction on Gastric ph, and Ca, P, and Dry Matter Digestibilities

6/29/ TDN

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Declining Quality Grades: A Review of Factors Reducing Marbling Deposition in Beef Cattle.

Land O Lakes Feed DDGS. Nutrients Concentrate: United States Ethanol Outlook. A Growing Opportunity

A comparison of beef breed bulls for beef production & carcass traits. Future cattle production -seminar Viikki Campus

Dietary Fat Supplements and Body Condition: Does Fatty Acid Profile Matter? James K. Drackley, Professor of Animal Sciences

Grid Base Prices and Premiums-Discounts Over Time

Feedlot Lamb Nutrition

Grain Finishing Beef: Alternative Rations, Cattle Performance and Feeding Costs for Small Feeders

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

14/11/2014. Copper supply affects growth performance and health in growing pigs. Outline. Copper as essential trace elements

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

FACILITIES FOR FEEDING HOLSTEIN AND BEEF CATTLE

What a re r Lipids? What a re r Fatty y Ac A ids?

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FEEDING WHOLE SHELLED CORN

Net feed intake: Potential selection tool to improve feed efficiency in beef cattle

POISON KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN READ SAFETY DIRECTIONS BEFORE OPENING OR USING FOR ANIMAL TREATMENT ONLY. As an aid in the control of bloat.

Carcass Traits and Merit

Sheep Nutrition. Sheep Nutrition. Nutrient Needs. Sheep Nutrition Water. Products Produced. Use of Pasture\Range and Forages.

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

CREEP FEEDING BEEF CALVES

Copper and zinc in diets of growing pigs

Swine Feeding and Fitting Guidelines. Ryan Harrell Dec. 2008

Consequences of 100% organic diets for pigs and poultry

Relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle

FEEDING MANUAL Feed manual TOPIGS Finishers

In this on-farm study, Ron Rosmann

Nutrition Requirements

Danielle Laura Glanc. A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

What is the Cattle Data Base

Focus on Preventing Disease. keeping an eye on a healthy bottom line. Cattle Industry

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

Lesson Title: Beef Cattle-Animal Care is Everywhere Grade Level: K-4 Time: 1 hour Content Area: Science, Language Arts Objectives:

25-hydroxyvitamin D: from bone and mineral to general health marker

Health Benefits of Grass-Fed Products

Maintaining Nutrition as We Age

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Nutrition & Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

How Profitable is Backgrounding Cattle? Dr. John Lawrence and Cody Ostendorf, Iowa State University

Nutrition and Chronic Kidney Disease

Understanding CNCPS and CPM: Biology, Modeling, and Best Cost Applications for Balancing the Nutrient Requirements in Dairy Diets

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Feeding Corn to Beef Cows

Creep Feeding Beef Calves Dan E. Eversole, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Chapter 5 DASH Your Way to Weight Loss

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

Managing Bermudagrass Pasture to Reduce Winter Hay Feeding in Beef Cattle Operations

Improves pig performance in a wide range of health and growing conditions

CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS CONTAINING MECHANICALLY DEBONED MEAT 1

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Response of Dairy Cows to Supplements of Energy and Protein in Early and Mid Lactation

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES DAIRY BEEF. Scheme. blade-farming.com

Nutrition Support Service

Growth & Feeding Puppies Karen Hedberg BVSc Growth

FUTURES TRADING OF LIVE BEEF CATTLE (HEDGING) by Clarence C. Bowen

Boost Juice Nutritional Smoothie Creation Taste Test Lab

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE

AS 1-2 October Managing Beef Cattle for Show

IMPLANT STRATEGIES FOR DAIRY STEERS

U.S. Beef and Cattle Imports and Exports: Data Issues and Impacts on Cattle Prices

Effects of Diet Particle Size on Pig Growth Performance, Diet Flow Ability, and Mixing Characteristics

Project Pig Production Planner

Calcium and Vitamin D: Important at Every Age

Let s Talk Oils and Fats!

Eco Gest YS, Whole Plant Yucca schidigera, benefits in cattle

Daily Diabetes Management Book

Transcription:

Effect of Feeding 2,500, 50,000 or 100,000 IU of Vitamin D 3 Daily on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Merit, and Plasma and Tissue Metabolite Concentrations H.A. DePra, J.D. Duggin, D.R. Gill, C.R. Krehbiel, J.B. Morgan, D.C. Bietz, A.H. Trenkle, R.L. Horst, F.N. Owens Story in Brief One hundred eighty yearling steers (initial BW = 357 + 28 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design to determine the effects of supplementing vitamin D 3 throughout the finishing phase on feedlot performance, carcass merit, and plasma and tissue metabolite concentrations. Vitamin D 3 was supplemented at 2,500 (control), 50,000 or 100,000 IU steer -1 day -1 over the entire 175-d (avg) finishing phase. Dry matter intake did not differ among treatments; calculated vitamin D 3 intakes based on lab assay were 3,607, 27,506 and 70,075 IU steer -1 d -1. Final BW and ADG did not differ among treatments. Vitamin D 3 supplementation did not affect hot carcass weight, carcass characteristics or lean and skeletal maturity. Plasma D 3 (5.3, 17.3, 30.9 + 0.8 ng/ml) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 (68.1, 97.0, and 117.0 + 3.5 ng/ml) concentrations increased (P<0.001) as level of vitamin D 3 supplementation increased, whereas plasma 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 level numerically (P=.13) increased. Liver and muscle levels of vitamin D 3 and metabolites did not differ among treatments. Vitamin D 3 can be supplemented over the entire finishing period without negatively affecting feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. In addition, numerical increases in metabolite concentrations of tissue and plasma samples indicate that calcium concentrations within the body can be safely increased with low levels of vitamin D 3 supplementation over extended periods of time. Key Words: Beef, Calcium, Tenderness, Vitamin D Introduction Supplementing vitamin D 3 to beef cattle with the intent of increasing beef tenderness has been debated within the literature despite considerable investigation. The hypothesis has been that increased dietary vitamin D 3 increases the amount of calcium within the body. Upon harvest, the increased calcium is then available to more fully activate the calpain proteolytic system, increasing beef tenderness. Some data has suggested that high doses of vitamin D 3 (5 to 8 million IU animal -1 d -1 ) fed for short periods of time (5 to 10 d) before slaughter improved Warner-Bratzler shear force of specific cooked beef cuts (Swanek et al., 1999; Montgomery et al., 2000, 2002). However, vitamin D 3 supplementation at high levels results in lower DMI, which may subsequently cause lower final live BW and hot carcass weight (HCW) (Karges et al., 1999 and 2001; Scanga et al., 2001). Additionally, high levels of vitamin D 3 supplementation increase the concentration of vitamin D 3 (or its metabolites) within the meat to potentially toxic levels (Montgomery et al., 2000, 2002; Foote et al., 2004). We hypothesized that vitamin D 3 continuously fed at lower levels (50,000 and 100,000 IU animal -1 d -1 ) would improve tenderness without negative effects on intake, BW and HCW. Materials and Methods

Animals. A total of 180 yearling steers (initial BW = 357 + 28 kg) were received in three loads at the Willard Sparks Beef Research Center in May, 2003. On arrival (d 0), steers were individually weighed and identified with an individual ear tag. Based on initial BW, steers were stratified into three groups (60 animals per group) by weight and randomly assigned within weight block to 6 pens of 10 steers each. One third of the pens in each block (n=2) were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: 2,500 IU (control), 50,000 IU, or 100,000 IU vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1. To decrease bias of cattle origin, cattle originating from a different source were equally distributed among pens and treatment groups. Processing. Steers were processed (d 1) the day after arrival. Individual weights were recorded and each steer received the following: vaccination with Titanium 5 L5 TM1 and Vision 7 with SPUR TM2 (2 ml each, sub-q; Intervet Inc., Millsboro, DE); treatment with anthelmintics for internal and external parasites (7 ml sub-q; Ivomec-Plus TM3, Merial Limited, Iselin, NJ); and implantation with Revalor-S TM4 (20 mg trenbolone acetate, 4 mg estradiol; Intervet, Inc.). Steers were reimplanted with Revalor-S on d 70. Subsequent BW (unshrunk) were taken on d 35, 70, 105, 141, and 176. Additionally, steers in the heavy block (n = 60) had blood samples drawn on d 176 by venous puncture from the jugular into sterile 10 ml BD Vacutainer [Beckton Dickinson & Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ] tubes containing sodium heparin. Plasma was then collected and frozen at 20 C for later analyses by USDA-ARS National Animal Disease Center. Diet. All steers were stepped up with 4 adaptation diets (55, 70, 80, and 87% DM of concentrate for 8, 6, 7, and 6 d, respectively) to a final finishing diet consisting of (DM basis) 80.7% rolled corn, 8.0% ground alfalfa hay, 3.0% fat, and 8.3% pelleted vitamin D 3 supplement (Table 1). The OSU vitamin premix consisted of 19 parts fine ground corn to 1 part vitamin D 3-500 [Roche Vitamins, Nutley, NJ] to dilute the pure vitamin D 3 to levels that would allow for the mixing of supplemental vitamin D 3 directly into the pelleted supplement. Table 1. Vitamin D 3 supplement ingredients (% DM) a by treatment level Supplement 2,500 IU 50,000 IU 100,000 IU Soybean meal 23.45 23.45 23.45 Cottonseed meal 23.71 23.71 23.71 Wheat midds 23.05 22.83 22.61 Limestone 38% 16.22 16.22 16.22 Salt 3.79 3.79 3.79 Vitamin A 30,000 IU.13.13.13 Vitamin E 50%.08.08.08 Rumensin 80b.21.21.21 Zinc Sulfate.05.05.05

Manganous oxide.05.05.05 Copper sulfate.01.01.01 Selenium 600.09.09.09 Urea 9.03 9.03 9.03 Tylan 40b.12.12.12 OSU vitamin premix.01.23.46 a Rumensin provided at the rate to supply 0.37 g/kg and Tylan provided at the rate to supply 0.11 g/kg b Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN The listed treatment levels of 2,500 (control); 50,000 and 100,000 IU vitamin D 3 were established target levels of intake. Samples were taken from each batch of supplement and composited by month. Assay of the supplements (Dr. Jonathan Wilson, Nutritional Products, Inc., Parsippany, NJ) showed lower than expected levels of vitamin D 3. Calculated average intake of vitamin D 3, based on assay results, are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Calculated average daily intake of assayed vitamin D3 by target treatment Treatment Assayed D 3 level, IU/kg Total D 3 intake, IU/d 2,500 IU 4,748 3,607 50,000 IU 37,397 27,506 100,000 IU 88,998 70,075 Slaughter. Steers were determined to be at optimum finish by visual appraisal and were harvested based on weight block. The heavy and intermediate blocks were harvested together on d 146, while the light block was harvested on day 181. All groups were harvested at Tyson Fresh Meats in Emporia, Kansas. Oklahoma State University personnel accompanied cattle to the plant to collect HCW, REA, marbling score, fat thickness, KPH estimates, lean and skeletal maturity, and USDA quality and yield grade on all harvest groups. Longissimus steak samples, as well as kidney and liver tissue samples, were collected from the heavy block of steers (n = 60) and frozen for later analysis. Analyses of steak, kidney, liver, and plasma samples were conducted by USDA-ARS National Animal Disease Center. Statistical Analysis. Performance and carcass data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with pen serving as the experimental unit. The PROC MIXED procedure of SAS was used to determine means and standard errors of means, with treatment level of vitamin D 3 and block as fixed effects. For tissue and plasma samples, individual animal was considered the experimental unit. The PROC MIXED procedure of SAS was used, but with load and treatment considered as main effects, and pen and the load*pen interaction considered as random effects.

Results and Discussion Feedlot Performance. Beginning and interim BW, average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency, and DMI are reported in Table 3. At the initiation of the experiment BW did not differ among treatments. Final BW for steers fed 100,000 IU of vitamin D 3 was 11 kg greater compared with control steers. However, final BW did not differ among treatments. By decreasing the level of vitamin D 3 supplementation from previously reported levels, we were able to eliminate decreases in final body weight observed by Karges et al. (2001), Scanga et al. (2001), and Montgomery et al. (2002). Table 3. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on feedlot performance Item 2,500 IU 50,000 IU 100,000 IU SEM Pens 6 6 6 - Inwt, kg 356 357 356.47 Final BW, kg 593 589 602 4.28 Carcass adj. BW, kg a 610 618 616 3.49 DMI d 0 finish, kg/d 9.41 9.50 9.63.18 ADG d 0 finish, kg/d 1.49 1.53 1.56.03 Gain:Feed d 0 finish, kg/kg.158.162.162.002 Carcass adj. ADG, kg/d 1.56 1.60 1.60.02 Carcass adj. gain:feed, kg/kg.174.181.180.003 a Carcass adj. BW calculated by dividing HCW by average dressing percent of each block Average daily gain was calculated by weigh period and by overall time on feed, based on a 4% pencil shrink applied to interim and final BW. In contrast to Scanga et al. (2001) and Montgomery et al (2002), no difference in ADG among treatments was observed. Scanga et al. (2001) reported cattle that received greater than 10 x 10 6 IU of vitamin D 3 over an 8-d period had lower (P<.05) ADG than negative control cattle, and cattle that received 10 x 10 6 IU of vitamin D 3 or less over the same 8-d period had intermediate ADG that did not differ from control cattle or cattle receiving the higher dose of supplementation. Montgomery et al. (2002) observed similar findings and reported vitamin D 3 treatment linearly decreased (P<.01) ADG across the last 21 d of feeding with supplementation rates of 5 and 7.5 x 10 6 IU vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1, resulting in negative ADG that differed (P=.02) from those of steers treated with 1 x 10 6 IU vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1. No difference in DMI was observed among treatments during any period. This agrees with Montgomery et al. (2002) who reported no difference in daily feed intake with vitamin D 3

supplementation. However, Montgomery et al. (2002) did report a vitamin D 3 supplementation x day interaction (P<.002) when feed intake was measured during a 9-d supplementation period; supplementing steers with 2.5, 5, or 7.5 x10 6 vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1 decreased feed intake during d 7 and 8 compared with that of control steers (P<.05). Similarly, Scanga et al. (2001) reported that following d 2 of supplementation with vitamin D 3, the appetite of cattle receiving more than 1 x 10 6 IU vitamin D 3 /d declined. Karges et al. (2001) also reported numerically lower DMI for steers supplemented with vitamin D 3. In the present study, no differences in efficiency (ADG:DMI) were observed when vitamin D 3 levels of 2,500, 50,000, and 100,000 IU/hd/d were fed over the entire finishing period. Carcass Merit. Effects of vitamin D 3 supplementation on carcass characteristics are shown in Table 4. Supplementation did not affect carcass yield, quality, or maturity traits as expected since no difference in feedlot performance was observed. Montgomery et al. (2002) reported that hot carcass weight and dressing percentage were not affected by vitamin D 3 supplementation for 9 d despite supplementation effects on ADG and feed intake. Table 4. Effect of vitamin D 3 supplementation on carcass characteristics Item 2,500 IU 50,000 IU 100,000 IU SEM Hot carcass weight, kg 384 389 388 2.19 12th rib fat thickness, cm 1.14 1.17 1.17.04 Longissimus muscle area, cm 2 87.92 86.18 87.40 1.33 Kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, % 2.2 2.2 2.3.10 Marbling a 380 376 380 7.04 Lean maturity b 172 180 174 3.08 Skeletal maturity b 159 158 156 3.69 USDA yield grade 2.3 2.4 2.2.08 USDA quality grade c 2.7 2.6 2.7.05 a Marbling score: 300 = slight00, 400 = small 00 b Maturity score: 100 = A, 200 = B c USDA quality grade: 3 = select, 2 = choice Plasma and Tissue Concentrations. As shown in Table 5, vitamin D 3 supplementation at 50,000 and 100,000 IU vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1 significantly increased (P<.05) plasma vitamin D 3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 concentrations. Plasma concentrations of vitamin D 3 and 25- hydroxyvitamin D 3 were 5.8 and 1.7 fold greater in cattle fed 100,000 IU vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1 compared with steers fed the control diet (2,500 IU vitamin D 3 steer -1 d -1 ). Additionally, vitamin D 3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 concentrations in kidney tissue increased (P<.05) with increasing

level of supplementation. Concentrations of the biologically active form of vitamin D 3, 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D 3, were numerically greatest in plasma, liver tissue, and muscle tissue. Table 5. Effect of treatment on vitamin D 3 and metabolite concentrations in plasma and tissue 2,500 IU 50,000 IU 100,000 IU SEM P>F Plasma 60 60 60 a D 3 (ng/g) 5.32 a 17.25 b 30.19 c.82 <.0001 b 25D 3 (ng/g) 68.08 a 96.96 b 116.86 c 3.54 <.0001 c 1,25D 3 (pg/g) 53.81 46.63 60.15 4.68.13 Ca (mg%) 8.92 9.06 9.24.15.30 Mg (mg%) 1.69 1.68 1.73.07 89 Liver 44 44 41 a D 3 (ng/g) 38.11 45.93 47.11 3.79.12 b 25D 3 (ng/g) 6.95 8.52 13.58 2.87.35 c 1,25D 3 (pg/g) 138.20 97.28 134.05 18.29.22 Muscle 60 59 60 a D 3 (ng/g) 15.70 16.41 15.90.89.85 b 25D 3 (ng/g) 1.44 a 1.80 ab 2.27 b.18.10 c 1,25D 3 (pg/g) 51.07 61.02 69.33 6.71.19 Kidney 57 57 41 a D 3 (ng/g) 5.51 a 25.05 b 39.71 c 3.75 <.0001 b 25D 3 (ng/g) 6.50 a 9.28 b 11.07 b 0.54 <.0001 c 1,25D 3 (pg/g) 126.95 156.17 131.82 37.28.83 a Vitamin D 3. b 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3. c 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3. abc Means with different subscripts differ, P<0.05

Calcium concentrations in plasma numerically increased as level of vitamin D 3 supplementation increased. This supports previous work by Karges et al. (1999), Montgomery et al (1999), and Swanek et al (1999) who reported increased plasma calcium concentrations with increased vitamin D 3 supplementation. Karges et al. (2001) reported blood plasma calcium concentrations were significantly greater (P<.03) for animals supplemented with 6 x 10 6 IU of vitamin D 3 daily for 4 or 6 d before harvest, with cattle supplemented for 6 d having greater plasma calcium concentrations than those supplemented for 4 d. Implications Low levels (50,000 to 100,000 IU steer -1 d - 1) of vitamin D 3 can be supplemented throughout the finishing period to increase plasma calcium concentrations, as well as concentrations of vitamin D 3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 in plasma and kidney, without affecting feedlot performance or carcass merit. Based on the numerical increase of vitamin D 3 and its metabolites in other tissue samples with increasing level of supplementation, more data are needed to determine at what level, if any, vitamin D 3 can have a positive effect on beef tenderness when fed over the entire finishing period. Literature Cited Foote, M.R., et al. 2004. J. Anim. Sci. 82:242-249. Karges, K., et al. 1999. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. P-973:134-142. Karges, K., et al. 2001. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2844-2850. Montgomery, J.L., et al. 2002. J. Anim. Sci. 80:971-981. Montgomery, J.L., et al. 2000. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2615-2621. Montgomery, J.L., et al. 1999. J. Anim. Sci. 77 (Suppl. 1):173 (Abstr.). Scanga, J.A., et al. 2001. J. Anim. Sci. 79:912-918. Swanek, S.S., et al. 1999. J. Anim. Sci. 77:874-881. Copyright 2004 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Authors DePra, H.A. Graduate Student Duggin, J.D. Graduate Student Gill, D.R. Professor Emeritus Krehbiel, C.R. Assistant Professor

Morgan, J.B. Associate Professor Bietz, D.C. Distinguished Professor, Iowa State University Trenkle, A.H. Professor, Iowa State University Horst, R.L. National Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA Owens, F.N. Pioneer Hi-Bred International