Tobii Technology AB. Accuracy and precision Test report. X2-60 fw 1.0.5. Date: 2013-08-16 Methodology/Software version: 2.1.7



Similar documents
Tobii AB. Accuracy and precision Test report. Tobii Pro X3-120 fw Date: Methodology/Software version: 2.1.7*

Designing eye tracking experiments to measure human behavior

Release Notes. Tobii Studio 1.7 release. What s New? What has improved? Important Notice

Video-Based Eye Tracking

Fixplot Instruction Manual. (data plotting program)

Tobii X2 Eye Trackers

Tobii 50 Series. Product Description. Tobii 1750 Eye Tracker Tobii 2150 Eye Tracker Tobii x50 Eye Tracker

EMR-9 Quick Start Guide (00175)D 1

Hierarchical Clustering Analysis

Eye Tracking Instructions

Head-Coupled Perspective

Technical Report An Analysis on the Use of LED Lighting for Video Conferencing

Working paper: Sky Quality Meter cross-calibration in the BMP project

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

2WIN Binocular Mobile Refractometer and Vision Analyzer

PRODUCT SHEET.

Trimble Field Link Software

Scientific Graphing in Excel 2010

How To Use Eye Tracking With A Dual Eye Tracking System In A Collaborative Collaborative Eye Tracking (Duet)

WHITE PAPER. Methods for Measuring Flat Panel Display Defects and Mura as Correlated to Human Visual Perception

FREE FALL. Introduction. Reference Young and Freedman, University Physics, 12 th Edition: Chapter 2, section 2.5

MODUL 8 MATEMATIK SPM ENRICHMENT TOPIC : STATISTICS TIME : 2 HOURS

Scatter Plots with Error Bars

Jitter Measurements in Serial Data Signals

Soaking Up Solar Energy

Motion Activated Camera User Manual

AP Physics 1 and 2 Lab Investigations

Applied Science Laboratories. Model 504. Eye Tracker and Gaze Tracker. System Setup and Operations Manual

User Manual. Tobii Eye Tracker ClearView analysis software. February 2006 Copyright Tobii Technology AB

DeCyder Extended Data Analysis module Version 1.0

Tutorial for Tracker and Supporting Software By David Chandler

Exercise 1: How to Record and Present Your Data Graphically Using Excel Dr. Chris Paradise, edited by Steven J. Price

haze-gard i The objective standard for a clear view Global communication Reliable and Precise

PALLETS ROLLER CONVEYOR LOADING CONVEYOR CHAIN TRANSFER TURNTABLE ROLLER STOP

Setting up the DeskCNC controller.

Brain Maps The Sensory Homunculus

Visual & Auditory Skills Lab

Free 15-day trial. Signata Waveform Viewer Datasheet

Cross-beam scanning system to detect slim objects. 100 mm in

1 Laboratory #5: Grating Spectrometer

Characterizing Digital Cameras with the Photon Transfer Curve

AXIS 205 Network Camera Quick Installation Guide

M A R C O. CP-670 AUTOMATIC CHART PROJECTOR Instruction Manual

Laser Distance Meter Laser-Distanzmesser Laser distance-mètre Metro di distanza laser Medidor Láser de Distancia User Manual

Pipeline External Corrosion Analysis Using a 3D Laser Scanner

DSM155 Digital LED Light Meter User s Manual DSM155

Excel -- Creating Charts

White paper. CCD and CMOS sensor technology Technical white paper

10 Thomas, Irvine, CA USA Tel: (949) Fax: (949) Toll Free: (800) 23 FUTEK

TI GPS PPS Timing Application Note

TROY Secure Print Enterprise Lite Users Guide

GPS Data Collection Procedures for Georeferencing Vegetation Resources Inventory and National Forest Inventory Field Sample Plots

Color Balancing Techniques

SAFELIGHT FILTERS AND DARKROOM LAMPS

sensors Miniature Sensors - S100 The universal miniature photoelectric sensor

An Introduction to Point Pattern Analysis using CrimeStat

The Use of HemoSpat To Include Bloodstains Located on Nonorthogonal Surfaces in Area-of-Origin Calculations

Colour Cartridge Reliability Comparison Study 2014

GelAnalyzer 2010 User s manual. Contents

White paper. In the best of light The challenges of minimum illumination

Basler. Area Scan Cameras

Solar Tracking Controller

How do I. (Phantom 3 Menu Guide) By Arthur L. Burke, Jr.

Pardon My Garden Quilt

CONSTRUCTING SINGLE-SUBJECT REVERSAL DESIGN GRAPHS USING MICROSOFT WORD : A COMPREHENSIVE TUTORIAL

Total Station Setup and Operation. Sokkia SET Total Station

Usability Testing Jeliot 3- Program Visualization Tool: Evaluation Using Eye-Movement Tracking

Course: 3D Design Title: Deciduous Trees Blender: Version 2.6X Level: Beginning Author; Neal Hirsig (June 2012) Deciduous Trees

Firearms & Tool Marks Comparison Microscope. Discovery. Leeds Forensic Systems. Your Forensic Imaging Source

product. Please read this instruction before setup your VenomXTM.

Choosing a classification method

MQSA Quality Control Manual for Monochrome Displays for Mammography

USER MANUAL VS92A / VS94A / VS98A

Instructions Issued on November 30, 2006 Published by. Machine model 372, 373, 374 Page 1/14 Document No. ED373LH017M00. When measures are practiced

The Tobii I-VT Fixation Filter

User Manual. Humidity-Temperature Chart Recorder. Model RH520

Do-It-Yourself Eye Tracker: Impact of the Viewing Angle on the Eye Tracking Accuracy

Eye Tracker System Manual. ASL EyeTrac 6

Eye-Tracking Methodology and Applications in Consumer Research 1

Experiment 3: Magnetic Fields of a Bar Magnet and Helmholtz Coil

Scan2CRM for ACT! User Guide

Implementing ISO12646 standards for soft proofing in a standardized printing workflow

Bloomberg 17 Inch Flat Panel Display. 29 April 2005 Version: 1.1

Reflectivity of Light

Ultrasonic Distance Meter. Operation Manual

STIM202 Evaluation Kit

How To Use A Meter

Correcting the Lateral Response Artifact in Radiochromic Film Images from Flatbed Scanners

Charts for SharePoint

Renishaw apply innovation TM. Calibrating 5-axis machines to improve part accuracy. 5Align

Chapter I Model801, Model802 Functions and Features

The International Table Tennis Federation. The Ball (Version for 40mm Balls) Technical Leaflet T3

Transfer of Energy Forms of Energy: Multiple Transformations

Transcription:

Tobii Technology AB Accuracy and precision Test report X2-60 fw 1.0.5 Date: 2013-08-16 Methodology/Software version: 2.1.7

1. Introduction This document provides an overview of tests in terms of accuracy and precision regarding the Tobii X2-60 Eye Tracker. The tests were conducted by the Department of Quality Assurance, Hardware Division of Tobii Technology AB, and took place in July 2013. 1.1 Product Product category: Remote eye trackers Manufacturer: Tobii Technology AB Trademark: Tobii Technology Type designation:x2-60 with TET Box Firmware version: 1.0.5 Serial Number: 0010103003583 1.2 Method The tests were performed in accordance with the Accuracy and Precision Test Specification version 2.1.7, developed by Tobii Technology AB. This document can be downloaded from the Tobii site (). 20 test participants were recruited from Tobii Technology AB s local office in Stockholm. The subjects were selected according to the ideal population criteria described in the test specification document. As a consequence, individuals with sight correction, droopy eyelids or poor fixation abilities were excluded from the tests. All subjects were between 21-40 years old (nine persons between 21-30, eleven between 31-40). Among the subjects, twelve had blue eyes, five had green eyes and three had brown eyes. There were six people who had the left and fourteen had the right eye as the dominant eye; and all subjects were Caucasian. All tests were performed in the Department of Quality Assurance test lab, at Tobii Technology AB Headquarters. The lab set-up provides adequate conditions to perform accuracy and precision tests in a controlled environment (figure 1). All tests were conducted by an experienced hardware technician.

Figure 1, Test setup in the lab. The measurement setup is based on an XYZ-table (illustration in the upper, right corner in the image), and allows the eye tracker to be transferred to the specific positions in the head position tests. The participant is positioned in front of the eye tracker, using a chinrest in order to fixate the eyes location. The lamps with soft boxes are positioned around the table to create an even light-spread in the room (for more details on the lab and test setup please visit to download a copy of the Test Specification document.) The center of the track box was set to 60 cm from the eye tracker. The following five conditions were tested in successive tests: ideal conditions, large gaze angles, varying head positions, varying illumination and white background (Table 1 displays a summary of the different conditions tested). There was a short break between each test trial for the test leader to change conditions and for the participant to rest her/his eyes. Each test session took on average 45 minutes. Accuracy and precision values measured on human eyes were based on stimulus points on a TFT screen (1920 x 1200 pixels). The test subjects were asked to focus their gaze on each of the points in a test trial. Each point was presented for 2 seconds and the points were presented in random order. The target points were used in order to calculate accuracy, with the center point as a reference point in relation to the measured gaze point. Precision was measured from the same data for each point individually. All tests were performed with the subject in a chinrest. 3

Table 1, Manipulated variables in each of the accuracy/precision tests. The table describes the different test categories and which variables are manipulated for each of them. Ideal conditions Large gaze angles Varying illumination White background Varying head positions 20 Participants Eye color Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed Mixed (Same for all Sight None None None None None tests) correction Age (years) 20-40 20-40 20-40 20-40 20-40 Calibration 9-point default 9-point default 9-point default 9-point default 9-point default Gaze angle 20 25, 30 20 20 20 Illumination 300 lux 300 lux Manipulated 300 lux 300 lux Stimulus White/Black White/Black White/Black Black/White White/Black (Foreground/ background color) Eye placement in box Center of box Center of box Center of box Center of box Manipulated The accuracy and precision calculations are specified in the Accuracy and Precision Test Specification document. The variable Precision is as described in the specification calculated via the RMS of successive samples, whereas SDPrecision is the standard deviation measure of the data set. All accuracy and precision results are based on pure raw data, collected directly from the SDK after personal calibration. 4

2. Results 2.1 Summary Average binocular accuracy and precision values for all tests are presented in table 1. For Head positions the best and poorest attained value is specified for each dimension. In addition to accuracy and precision values, (N) is the number of participants that had values that passed for each test. All participants attained tracking according to the track requirements in the method, except for the track box test. The track box includes offsets off 10 cm in vertical axis, 15 cm in horizontal axis and distances from 45 to 80 cm. Table 1, All results. The table presents the binocular accuracy and precision results for all test conditions. N is the number of participants who met the method requirement, i.e. used for analysis. For the head position tests, where several tests were performed in each direction the best and poorest value is specified. As specified in the test specification, all measurements are based on raw data. N Accuracy ( ) Precision ( ) Ideal conditions 20 20 0.4 0.34 Large Gaze angles 25 20 0.4 0.26 30 20 0.4 0.25 Illumination variation 1 lux 17 1.2 0.66 600 lux 20 0.4 0.42 1000 lux 20 0.6 0.65 White background (300 lux) 17 1.2 0.66 Head position variation Z axis (45-80 cm) 20 0.4-0.6 0.34-0.74 X axis 20 0.4-0.5 0.34-0.43 Y axis 20 0.4-0.5 0.34-0.42 5

2.2 Accuracy and precision at ideal conditions The binocular and monocular accuracy and precision values under ideal conditions are presented in table 2. Standard deviation precision (SD Precision) is presented as a complement to the regular precision value. All participants met the track requirements (N=20). The average value for each metric is specified along with the standard deviation (Std). Table 2, Accuracy and precision under ideal conditions. The average and monocular accuracy and precision are presented along with the standard deviation (Std) for each metric. All participants met the tracking requirements (N=20). Accuracy Precision SD Precision N Binocular Monocular Binocular Monocular Binocular Ideal conditions Average 20 0.4 0.4 0.34 0.45 0.29 Std 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.18 0.08 Number of parcticipants 10 8 6 4 2 0 Accuracy at ideal conditions Accuracy ( ) Diagram 1: Accuracy distribution among the participants Number of participants 10 8 6 4 2 0 Precision at ideal conditions Precision ( ) Diagram 2: Precision distribution among the participants 6

2.3 Accuracy and precision with large gaze angles The binocular and monocular accuracy and precision results at large gaze angles are presented in table 3, as well as in diagram 3 and 4. All participants met the track requirements (N=20). The average value for each metric is specified along with the standard deviation (Std). Accuracy Precision N Binocular Monocular Binocular Monocular 25 Gaze angle Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.26 0.37 Std 0.2 0.2 0.13 0.21 30 Gaze angle Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.37 Std 0.2 0.3 0.12 0.22 Table 3, Accuracy and precision at 25 and 30 degrees gaze angle. Binocular and monocular accuracy and precision values are presented for both angles of measurements. The average values are presented along with the standard deviation (Std). All participants met the tracking requirements (N=20). Diagram 3: Accuracy at large gaze angles. The average binocular and monocular accuracy is presented for both measured gaze angles. 7

Diagram 4: Precision at large gaze angles. The average binocular and monocular accuracy is presented along with both measured gaze angles. 8

2.4 Accuracy and precision with varying illumination Binocular and monocular accuracy and precision results for the illumination test are presented in table 4, as well as in diagram 3 and 4. The average value for each metric is specified along with the standard deviation (Std). Table 4, Accuracy and precision under varying illumination and stimuli background. The number of participants who met the tracking requirements is presented along with the binocular and monocular accuracy and precision data for each test condition. Accuracy Precision N Binocular Monocular Binocular Monocular 1 lux (darkness) Average 17 1.2 1.9 0.66 0.82 300 lux Average 20 0.4 0.4 0.34 0.45 600 lux Average 20 0.4 0.6 0.42 0.55 1000 lux Average 20 0.6 0.9 0.65 0.81 White background Average 17 1.2 1.9 0.66 0.82 Diagram 5: Accuracy under varying illumination. Binocular and monocular accuracy data is presented for each illumination condition. 9

Diagram 6: Precision under varying illumination. Binocular and monocular precision data is presented for each illumination condition. 10

2.4.1 Distance from eye tracker, Z axis The accuracy and precision measured at varying distances from the eye tracker (X=0, Y=0) are presented in table 5 and diagram 5 and 6. In these diagrams the average value is presented with a line and the distribution (max, min and SD from mean) is illustrated with boxes and vertical lines. The average value for each metric is specified along with the standard deviation (Std). Table 5, Accuracy and precision at varying distances from the eye tracker. The binocular and monocular accuracy and precision are presented in average values along with the standard deviation (Std) and the number of participants who met the tracking requirements (N) for each distance. Accuracy ( ) Precision ( ) Distance N Binocular Monocular Binocular Monocular 40 cm Average 11 1.0 1.4 0.74 1.04 Std 0.3 0.6 0.26 0.37 45 cm Average 20 0.5 0.7 0.45 0.60 Std 0.1 0.2 0.19 0.26 50 cm Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.38 0.49 Std 0.1 0.2 0.16 0.20 55 cm Average 20 0.4 0.6 0.39 0.55 Std 0.1 0.2 0.16 0.24 60 cm Average 21 0.4 0.4 0.34 0.45 Std 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.18 65 cm Average 20 0.4 0.4 0.34 0.45 Std 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.18 70 cm Average 20 0.5 0.6 0.46 0.60 Std 0.2 0.2 0.10 0.14 75 cm Average 20 0.6 0.7 0.54 0.68 Std 0.3 0.3 0.15 0.21 80 cm Average 20 0.6 0.7 0.74 1.00 Std 0.3 0.3 0.17 0.29 85 cm Average 13 0.7 0.8 1.07 1.41 Std 0.3 0.3 0.18 0.24 90 cm Average 7 0.7 0.9 1.22 1.61 Std 0.1 0.2 0.18 0.16 11

Binocular accuracy in Z-axis 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 Accuracy (⁰) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 40 cm 45 cm 50 cm 55 cm 60 cm 65 cm 70 cm 75 cm 80 cm 85 cm 90 cm Distance from eye tracker Diagram 7: Binocular accuracy at varying positions in Z axis. The average accuracy is illustrated with a line, and the max/min and standard deviation from mean is presented with boxes and vertical lines. 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Binocular precision in Z-axis Precision (⁰) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 40 cm 45 cm 50 cm 55 cm 60 cm 65 cm 70 cm 75 cm 80 cm 85 cm 90 cm Distance from eye tracker Diagram8: Binocular precision at varying positions in Z axis. The average precision is illustrated with a line, and the max/min and standard deviation from mean is presented with boxes and vertical lines 12

2.4.2 Horizontal, X axis Binocular accuracy and precision The binocular and monocular accuracy and precision measured at varying distances from center of track box (Z=60 cm, Y=0) are presented in table 6 and diagram 7 and 8. In these diagrams the average value is presented with a line and the distribution (max, min and SD from mean) is illustrated with boxes and vertical lines. Table 6, Accuracy and precision at varying positions in X axis. The average value for each metric is specified along with the standard deviation (Std). The number of participants who met the tracking requirements (N) is presented for each test. Accuracy ( ) Precision ( ) Distance N Binocular Monocular Binocular Monocular 15 cm Average 20 0.5 0.6 0.38 0.52 Std 0.2 0.2 0.17 0.23 10 cm Average 20 0.5 0.5 0.43 0.60 Std 0.1 0.2 0.24 0.36 5 cm Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.40 0.54 Std 0.1 0.2 0.18 0.25 0 cm Average 20 0.4 0.4 0.34 0.45 Std 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.18-5 cm Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.40 0.51 Std 0.1 0.2 0.19 0.22-10 cm Average 20 0.4 0.6 0.38 0.50 Std 0.1 0.2 0.16 0.21-15 cm Average 20 0.4 0.6 0.42 0.57 Std 0.2 0.3 0.22 0.33 13

Binocular accuracy in X-axis Accuracy (⁰) 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 20 cm 15 cm 10 cm 5 cm 0 cm -5 cm -10 cm -15 cm -20 cm Distance from center of track box Diagram 97: Binocular accuracy at varying positions in X axis. The average accuracy is illustrated with a line, and the max/min and standard deviation from mean is presented with boxes and vertical lines. Binocular precision in X-axis Precision (⁰) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 20 cm 15 cm 10 cm 5 cm 0 cm -5 cm -10 cm -15 cm -20 cm Distance from center of track box Diagram 10: Binocular precision at varying positions in X axis. The average precision is illustrated with a line, and the max/min and standard deviation from mean is presented with boxes and vertical lines 14

2.4.3 Vertical, Y axis The accuracy and precision measured at varying distances from center of track box (Z=60 cm. X=0) are presented in table 8 and diagram 11 and 12. In these diagrams the average value is presented with a line and the distribution (max. min and SD from mean) is illustrated with boxes and vertical lines. Table 7, Accuracy and precision at varying positions in Y axis. The binocular and monocular accuracy and precision are presented as the average values along with the standard deviation (Std) and the number of participants who met the requirements (N) for each test trial. Accuracy ( ) Precision ( ) Distance N Binocular Monocular Binocular Monocular 10 cm Average 20 0.4 0.6 0.38 0.52 Std 0.1 0.2 0.12 0.18 5 cm Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.37 0.46 Std 0.1 0.1 0.19 0.17 0 cm Average 20 0.4 0.4 0.34 0.45 Std 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.18-5 cm Average 20 0.4 0.5 0.42 0.56 Std 0.2 0.2 0.21 0.24-10 cm Average 20 0.5 0.6 0.37 0.45 Std 0.2 0.2 0.10 0.11 Binocular accuracy in Y-axis Accuracy (⁰) 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 15 cm 10 cm 5 cm 0 cm -5 cm -10 cm -15 cm Distance from center of track box Diagram 8: Binocular accuracy at varying positions in Y axis. The average accuracy is illustrated with a line, and the max/min and standard deviation from mean is presented with boxes and vertical lines. 15

Binocular precision in Y-axis Precision (⁰) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 15 cm 10 cm 5 cm 0 cm -5 cm -10 cm -15 cm Distance from center of track box Diagram 9: Binocular precision at varying positions in Y axis. The average accuracy is illustrated with a line, and the max/min and standard deviation from mean is presented with boxes and vertical lines. 16