THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS



Similar documents
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES, THE HAMBURG RULES AND THE ROTTERDAM RULES

COMPARISON OF HAGUE-VISBY AND HAMBURG RULES

China International Freight Forwarders Association Trading Condition

The Law of International Trade

Scandinavian Maritime Law

Carriage of goods. Lectures by: Researcher Dr. Ellen Eftestøl-Wilhelmsson. Det juridiske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo

Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea

Reform of Japanese Maritime Law

Standard Conditions (1992) governing the FIATA MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT BILL OF LADING

THE CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS WHOLLY OR PARTLY BY SEA (THE ROTTERDAM RULES )

The Coverage of the Rotterdam Rules

Multimodal Transport Operator s Liability Insurance Policy

DUBLIN CAYMAN ISLANDS NEW YORK TOKYO HONG KONG

Company means Jupiter Global Ltd., a member of the Hong Kong Association of Freight Forwarding and Logistics Limited trading under these Conditions.

MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATIONOF LIABILITY) CHAPTER 281

GENERAL CONTRACT OF USE FOR WAGONS GCU

General Conditions of Transport

The Legislative Future of Carriage of Goods by Sea. Could It Not Be the UNCITRAL Draft? An Academic's View

B 4815 Suppliment tal-gazzetta tal-gvern ta Malta, Nru. 17,506, 21 ta Novembru, 2003 Taqsima B MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT (CAP. 234)

INTER-CLUB NEW YORK PRODUCE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 1996 (AS AMENDED SEPTEMBER 2011)

Incompetent or Negligent?


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CARGO LIABILITY STUDY

Trelleborg Sealing Solutions Germany GmbH Handwerkstr. 5-7, Stuttgart. General Conditions of Purchase for Components

BROKER/SHIPPER AGREEMENT

Liability and Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage Edition

Carrier s Liability in Multimodal Carriage Contracts in China and its Comparison with US and EU

LAWS RELATED TO MARINE INSURANCE AND INCOME TAX PROVISIONS RELATED TO INSURANCE

SCHENKERocean Bill of Lading

MERCHANT SHIPPING (CIVIL LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION FOR OIL POLLUTION) ACT (CHAPTER 180)

The Legislative Future of Carriage of Goods by Sea: Could it not be the UNCITRAL Draft?

FIATA Position on the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods wholly or partly by Sea (the Rotterdam Rules ).

Gard s Defence Cover. Gard AS, April

UTi, United States, Inc. ( UTi ) Terms & Conditions (As of December 12, 2014)

Freight Liability. Your specialist commercial insurance partner across Europe

United States Admiralty Law

INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (A)

Table of Contents. 4 Requirement to comply with instructions and signage. 8 Abandoned, disabled and unattended vehicles

General Terms and Conditions for Ship Brokers and Ship Agents in Germany

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Scope Definitions. Article 1

The Training Material on Multimodal Transport Law and Operations has been produced under Project Sustainable Human Resource Development in Logistic

GENERAL CONDITIONS OF LATVIAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREIGHT FORWARDERS and LOGISTIC LAFF

Danish Shipping Academy. The Commercial Shipping Program

LEGAL ASPECTS OF CREWS & CREWING James Trumble 5 Essex Court

Introduction of Three New Regulations related to Freight Forwarder in China

Doctorate of Maritime Law. 24 credit thesis

FREIGHT FORWARDERS INSURANCE (FFL) Schenker Expeditie Verzekering SEV Indemnity Insurance for the party interested in the goods

(b) The Merchant warrants that the particulars of the Goods given to the Carrier and set out in this Shipping Note are correct.

General Terms and Conditions

Giaschi & Margolis BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS

General Terms and Conditions concerning software maintenance

Loaded Up Logistics Terms and Conditions

UPS OCEAN FREIGHT SERVICES, INC. MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT OR PORT TO PORT SHIPMENT CONDITIONS

Transport insurance Guide

53 RD ANNUAL CONGRESS IN LONDON 2-5 SEPTEMBER 2015 MARINE INSURANCE DENYING COVER AS A MARINE INSURER: PLAIN SAILING OR DEAD IN THE WATER?

INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (A)

ACT ON LIABILITY FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE

International Multimodal Transport: Regulation of liability

The new HGB & COGSA. Do German carriers en route to the U.S. need to be on their guard?

General Conditions of Purchase (as of March 2002) Abbr.: AEB of the Salzgitter Bauelemente GmbH, Salzgitter

General conditions of the Nordic association of freight forwarders

Legal PinchApril 2011

"the Company" - means Spliethoff Transport B.V. and/or subsidiaries and/or associated companies.

1.1 In these Conditions, the following words and expressions have the following meanings unless the context otherwise requires:

MERCHANT SHIPPING (LIMITATION OF SHIPOWNERS LIABILITY) (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE 2005

TRADING CONDITIONS. Company means SCHENKER SINGAPORE (PTE) LIMITED. means the Trading Conditions contained herein.

CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT

The Dangerous Goods Transportation Act

SHIPBROKING AND CHARTERING PRACTICE

International Conditions of Loading and Transportation (ICLT) 2010 Version

DACHSER TURKEY HAVA VE DENIZ TASIMACILIGI A.S. RULES FOR FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES

1.1 In these Conditions, the following words and expressions have the following meanings unless the context otherwise requires:

Household Goods & Personal Effects Proposal Form B (iii) Insurance of Personal Effects in Barrels

AIMU FPA and WA CARGO CLAUSES (1/1/2004) COMPARED WITH THE LONDON INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (B) and (C) (1/1/2009)

GUIDELINES REGARDING THE VERIFIED GROSS MASS OF A CONTAINER CARRYING CARGO

F S MACKENZIE GROUP LIMITED CONDITIONS OF SUB-CONTRACTING FOR ROAD HAULAGE

Guidelines for Improving Safety and Implementing the SOLAS Container Weight Verification Requirements

How To Protect A Ship From Liability

MODE TRANSPORTATION, LLC

Action Freight Service, Inc. Expedited LTL Service Conditions Table of Contents Application of Service Conditions

CFR (CNF/C&F) (Cost and Freight) has a long history in the INCOTERMS.

Testing, Inspection and Weight

FÖRSÄKRINGSAKTIEBOLAGET ALANDIA. P&I Insurance Terms

ADMIRALTY CASES AND MATERIALS. Jo DESHA LUCAS Late Arnold I. Shure Professor of Urban Law, Emeritus University of Chicago

SOLAS. Verified Gross Mass Shipper Guide. nagel.com

1. The place of performance for all aspects of the delivery agreement shall be the place of the commercial business of the seller.

CIM. Uniform Rules Concerning the Contract of International Carriage of Goods by Rail (CIM - Appendix B to the Convention)

NOTICE OF LOSS, DAMAGE AND DELAY UNDER THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES - ROTTERDAM RULES - NEW TURKISH COMMERCIAL CODE

General Terms and Conditions of Sale and Delivery BruggemannChemical U.S., Inc. Date: January 1, I. General

Essential Documents on International Air Carrier Liability

TRANSPORT WORLDWIDE, LLC

THE COMPENSATION CONVENTION: PATH TO A GLOBAL REGIME FOR DEALING WITH LEGAL LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE

CHARTERER S LIABILITY WORDINGS

THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE. Read the instructions on page 3 carefully before answering any questions.

Comprehensive Carrier s Liability Cover. Risk solutions covering cargo both on and off the ship

ANSWERS ON BEHALF OF THE CANADIAN MARITIME LAW ASSOCIATION TO THE COMITE MARITIME INTERNATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE

Port to Port Bill of Lading (B/L)

General Conditions of Danske Havnevirksomheder 2007

Transcription:

THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS THE HAGUE, HAGUE-VISBY, AND HAMBURG RULES Hakan Karan The Edwin Meilen Press Lewiston'Queenston'Lampeter

TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS TABLE OFCASES TABLE OF LEGISLATION TABLE OF STANDARD FORMS PREFACE by Dr. Ademun-Odeke ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i vii xxxv xlv xlvü li INTRODUCTION /. SUBJECTMATTER AND AIM. 1 //. SCOPEAND STRUCTURE 3 III. APPROACHAND METHODOLOGY 5 PARTI PRELIMINARIES TO THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY CHAPTER1 - HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OFTHE CARRIER'S LIABILITY l THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER ROMAN LAW 7 //. THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY UNDER CIVIL LAW. 9 ///. THE CARRIER'S LIABILITYATCOMMONLAW 11 IV. THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY UNDER THE PRINCIPLE OF «LIABILITY DUETOWRITTEN STATEMENT» 12 A) GENERAL 12

B) THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER MODEL BILLS OF LADING 15 1- The carrier's liability under the Common Form of Bill of Lading 1882 15 2- The carrier's liability under the Hamburg Rules of Affreightment 1885 16 3- The carrier's liability under the London Conference Rules of Affreightment 1893 17 V. THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY UNDER NATIONAL REACTING STATUTES 18 A) THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER THE US HARTER ACT 1893 18 B) THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER THE CANADIAN WATER CARRIAGE OF GOODS ACT 1910 21 VI. THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS 21 A) THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER THE HAGUE RULES 21 1- The carrier's liability under the pre-hague Rules 1921 21 2- The carrier's liability under the Hague Rules 1924 24 3-The carrier's liability under the Hague - Visby Rules 1968 (the Hague Rules amended by the Visby Protocol 1968 and the SDR Protocol 1979) 27 B) THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER THE HAMBURG RULES 1978 32 VII. THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY ATPRESENT 36 VIII. CONCLUSIONS 41 CHAPTER 2 - INTERNATIONAL RULES CONCERNING THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY /. AIMSOF THE RULES 43 A) AIMS OF THE HAGUE AND HAGUE-VISBY RULES 43 B) AIMSOF THE HAMBURG RULES 45 //. LEGISLATIVE STYLES OF THE RULES 46 III. LEGAL NATURE OF THE RULES 48 A) CONVENTION BASED UNIFORM RULES 48

B)MANDATORY RULES 52 1-General 52 2-Principle 53 3-Exceptions 55 4- Sanctions 57 5- General average 59 6- Effects of Contracting States' national public policies 61 IV. SCOPES OF THE RULES 62 A) GENERAL 62 B) UNDER THE HAGUE RULES 63 C) UNDER THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES 64 D) UNDER THE HAMBURG RULES 65 E) ENLARGEMENT OF THE SCOPE OF THE RULES BY PARAMOUNT CLAUSES 66 V. JURISDICTION. 69 VI. ARBITRATION. 75 VII. CONCLUSIONS. 77 CHAPTER 3 - BASIS OF THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY /. THEREASONFORTHECARRIER'SLIABILITY 81 //. LEGAL NATURE OFTHE CARRIER'S LIABILITY 82 A)GENERAL 82 B)STRICT LIABILITY FOROTHERS'FAULT 85 QEXEMPTED LIABILITY 87 D)LIMITED LIABILITY 98 ///. RELATIONS OF THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY W1TH OTHER LIABILITIES 100 A) RELATIONS WITH THE CARRIER'S EXTRACONTRACTUAL (TORTIOUS) LIABILITY 100

B) RELATIONS WITH CARRIER'S OTHER CONTRACTUAL LIABILITIES 1-General 1 4 2- Relations with the carrier's contractual liability for loss or damage arising from unseaworthiness before and at the beginning of the voyage 105 3- Relations with the carrier's contractual liability for loss or damage arising from deviation 113 a-. General 113 b-. Quasi-deviations 118 IV. THE BÜRDEN AND ORDER OFPROOF 120 V. CONCLUSIONS 123 PART II CONDITIONS OF THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY CHAPTER 4 - THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA /. DEFINITION AND ELEMENTS OF THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA 125 A) DEFINITION 125 B) ELEMENTS 126 1-Carriage 126 2- Carriage of goods (cargo) 127 a-. General 127 b-. Carriage oflive animals and deck cargo 128 c-. Carriage of Container goods 131 3- Carriage by sea 133 4- Carriage of goods in the carrier's custody 137 //. TYPES OF CONTRACTS OF CARRIAGE COVERED BY THE RULES 138 A) CONTRACTS COVERED BY THE HAGUE AND HAGUE-VISBY 104

RULES 138 1- Principle: Lading contracts 138 2- Exception: Contracts of carriage by chartered ship 141 B) CONTRACTS COVERED BY THE HAMBURG RULES 143 1- Principle: all contracts of carriage of goods by sea 143 2- Exception: contracts of carriage by chartered ship 144 ///. DOCUMENTS PROVING THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE 144 A) BILLS OF LADING 145 B)WAYBILLS 146 C) ELECTRONIC (PAPERLESS) BILLS OF LADING 147 IV. SUB-CONTRACTS OF CARRIAGE 150 V. CONTRACTS OF THROUGH-CARRIAGE 152 A) GENERAL '. 152 B) TYPES OF CONTRACTS OF THROUGH-CARRIAGE 154 1- Contracts oflinked carriage 154 2- Contracts of combined (multimodal) carriage 155 VI. ENLARGEMENT OF THE SCOPE OF THE RULES TO CONTRACTS OUTSIDE THEIR COVERAGE BY AGREEMENT 157 VII. CONCLUSIONS. 159 CHAPTER 5 - LIABLE PARTY UNDER THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE /. THE (CONTRACTING) CARRIER 163 //. LEGAL POSITION OF THE CARRIER ISSUING A BILL OF LADING 165 III. LEGAL POSITION OF THE SHIP 166 IV. THIRD PARTIES DEEMED A CARRIER BY LAW 167 A)SUB-CARRIERS 168 B)SHIPOWNERS 172 C) INTERMEDIÄRES OF TRANSPORT 176

D)CARRIER'S SERVANTS OR AGENTS 179 1-General 2- Definition of "the carrier's servants or agents" 183 a-. Carrier's servants 183 b-. Carrier's agents 184 c-. People deemed "the carrier's servants or agents": carrier's assistants (in the Performance of the contract of carriage) 185 d-. Relationship between the carrier and his servants, agents or assistants 188 V. CONCLUSIONS 189 CHAPTER 6 - BREACH OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION /. CONTENT OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION 193 A) CARRIAGE OBLIGATION 193 B) OBLIGATION TO RECEIVE GOODS 197 C) OBLIGATION TO LOAD GOODS 198 D) OBLIGATION TO HANDLE GOODS 201 E) OBLIGATION TO STOW GOODS 202 F) OBLIGATION TO CARRY GOODS 206 G) OBLIGATION TO KEEP GOODS 207 H) OBLIGATION TO CARE FOR GOODS 209 I) OBLIGATION TO DISCHARGE GOODS 210 J) OBLIGATION TO DELIVER GOODS 211 //. BREACH OF OBLIGATION (LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO GOODS) 216 A)MISFEASANCE OF OBLIGATION (DAMAGE TO GOODS) 216 B) NONFEASANCE OF OBLIGATION (LOSS OF GOODS) 220 III. CONCLUSIONS 222 l19

CHAPTER 7 - BREACH OF THE CARRIAGE OBLIGATION WHILE IN THE CARRIER'S CHARGE /. DURATION OF THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY 225 A) RECEIPT OF GOODS BY CARRIER 226 B) DELIVERY OF GOODS BY CARRIER 228 C) AGREEMENT ON TIME OF RECEIPT OR DELIVERY 232 //. BREACH OF THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGEDURING THEPERIOD OF THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY. 232 A) GENERAL 232 B) STATE OF GOODS AT THE TIME OF RECEIPT 233 1- Receipt function of bills of lading and other documents 233 2- General nature, leading marks, number, weight or quantity of goods 236 3- Apparent orderand condition of goods 241 4- Date of receipt by carrier and quality of goods 245 5- Proofof State of goods with independent evidence 245 C) STATE OF GOODS AT THE TIME OF DELIVERY 246 1-Inspection of goods 246 2- Notice of loss or damage 248 III. CONCLUSIONS 254 CHAPTER 8 - LOSS RESULTING FROM BREACH OF THE CARRIAGE OBLIGATION I. DEFINITION OF LOSS 257 II. QUANTUM OF LOSS 258 A) GENERAL 258 B) DIFFERENCE THEORY 260 1-Decreases in assets 260 a-. Decrease in value ofgoods carried 261 b- Decrease in value of other things in assets 266

c-. Decrease in assets due to non-compensation of decrease in value at the time of occurrence ofloss or damage 266 d-. Decrease in profits 267 e-. Increases in expenses 268 /-. Agreement on the method usedfor calculation 269 2-Increases in benefits 269 III. CONCLUSIONS 270 PART III CONDITIONS OF THE CARRIER'S EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY CHAPTER 9 - EXEMPTED INCIDENT /. UNAVOIDABLEOCCURRENCE 273 A)GENERAL 273 B) OCCURRENCE 275 C) LACK OF FAULT ON THE PART OF THE CARRIER, HIS SERVANTS AND AGENTS 276 1- Lack of faulton the carrier's part 277 2- Lack of fault on the part of the carrier's servants and agents 283 D) ACTS OF GOD 283 II. EXCEPTIONS 284 A) GENERAL 284 B) EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL EXEMPTION RULE: NAUTICAL FAULT AND FIRE 285 1-General 285 2-Nautical fault 288 a-. General 288 b~. Forms of nautical fault 291 aa: Fault in the navigationof the ship 291 bb: Fault in the management of the ship 293

3-Fire 294 C) EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL BÜRDEN OF PROOF RULE: OCCURRENCES PRESUMED UNAVOIDABLE 296 1-General 296 2-Seaperils 301 3- Acts against public order (policy) 302 4- Restraints of public authority 304 5-Restraintsoflabor 305 6- Acts or omissions of the cargo interest 307 7-Salvage 310 8-Inherentdeteriorationofgoods 313 9- Latent defects 315 ///. PARTICULAR UNAVOIDABLE OCCURRENCES. 317 A) UNDETECTABLE DEFECTS CAUSING UNSEAWORTHINESS BEFORE AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE VOYAGE 317 B) REASONABLE DEVIATION 320 IV. CONCLUSIONS 323 CHAPTER 10 - PROXIMATE CAUSAL RELATION I.GENERAL 325 II. COMBINATION OF PROXIMATE CAUSES 328 III. CHAIN OF PROXIMATE CAUSES 330 IV. LEGAL POSITION OF CARGO INTERESTS ADDUCING EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY 331 V. BLOCKED CAUSAL RELATION 335 VI. CONCLUSIONS 335

PART IV T.IMITATION OF THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY CHAPTER 11 - LIMITATION OF DAMAGES I.GENERAL //. IN CASE OF PHYSICAL LOSS OR DAMAGE 339 A) MEASURES USED FOR LIMITATION OF DAMAGES 339 1-Package 340 a-. General 340 b-. Container, pallet orsimilar article oftransport 344 2-Unit 351 3-Weight 355 B)UNITOF ACCOUNT 357 1-General 357 2-Gold value ofcurrency 358 a-. Gold value ofpound Sterling or other equivalent national currency (in the Hague Rules) 358 b-. Gold value offranc (in the Visby Protocol) 363 3- Special Drawing Rights value together with gold value (in the SDR Protocol and the Hamburg Rules) 364 QMONETARYAMOUNT 366 ///. IN CASE OFNON-PHYSICAL LOSS OR DAMAGE 367 IV. IN CASE OF BOTH PHYSICAL AND NON-PHYSICAL LOSS OR DAMAGE 369 V. LOSS OFRIGHTTO LIMIT DAMAGES 369 A) DECLARATION OF THE NATURE AND VALUE OF GOODS 369 1-General 369 2- Bürden on the carrier to give shippers fair opportunities to declare the value of goods 371 3- Sanction on the shipper for misrepresentation 374 337

B) CONSCIOUS FAULT 376 VI. CONCLUSIONS 379 CHAPTER 12 - LIMITATION OF THE PERIOD FOR ACTION I.GENERAL 383 II. LEGAL NATURE OF THE PERIOD 385 III. LENGTH OF THE PERIOD 388 IV. COMMENCEMENTAND CALCULATION OF THE PERIOD 389 V. COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERIOD 391 VI. THE PERIOD FOR RECOURSE ACTION. 393 VII. ALTERATION OF THE PERIOD 395 VIII. LOSS OFRIGHTTO LIMIT THE PERIOD 396 IX. CONCLUSIONS 397 CONCLUSION /. URGENT NEED FOR THE HARMONIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL LIABILITY REGIMES IN THEFIELD OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS BYSEA 401 //. COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL LIABILITY REGIMES 403 ///. THE PREFERRED INTERNATIONAL LIABILITY REGIME: THE AMENDED HAMBURG RULES 408 APPENDICES /. THE HAGUE RULES 1924 417 //. THE VISBY PROTOCOL 1968 423 III. THE SDR PROTOCOL 1979 428 IV. THE HAMBURG RULES 1978 431 V. SIGNATORIESAND CONTRACTING STATES 448 VI. APPLICATION OF THE RULES ORDOMESTIC STATUES TO THE CONTRACT OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE 453

VII. MONETARY LIMITS OF THE CARRIER 'S LIABILITY IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES 455 BIBLIOGRAPHY I.BOOKS 461 II. THESIS (UNPUBLISHED) 468 III.ARTICLES 469 IV. REPORTS 495 V. JOURNALS & OTHER PERIODICALS 500 INDEX 505