Current status of dengue vaccine development



Similar documents
Algorithm for detecting Zika virus (ZIKV) 1

How To Kill Jesuva

Enveloped Virus Like Particles: Third-generation VLPs for the Development of a Broadly Neutralizing Hepatitis C Vaccine

William Atkinson, MD, MPH Hepatitis B Vaccine Issues June 16, 2016

Pandemic Influenza Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic

Chapter 3. Immunity and how vaccines work

FAST TRACK DEVELOPMENT OF EBOLA VACCINES: FDA REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE

Prospects for Vaccines against Hepatitis C Viruses. T. Jake Liang. M.D. Liver Diseases Branch NIDDK, NIH, HHS

Zika Virus. Fred A. Lopez, MD, MACP Richard Vial Professor Department of Medicine Section of Infectious Diseases

Immunity and how vaccines work

2) Macrophages function to engulf and present antigen to other immune cells.

Overview of Phase 1 Oncology Trials of Biologic Therapeutics

VACCINATIONS FOR FOALS

DNA Vaccine for Chronic Hepatitis C

Natalia Taborda Vanegas. Doc. Sci. Student Immunovirology Group Universidad de Antioquia

Chapter 18: Applications of Immunology

Recombinant protein vaccines produced in insect cells

MOSAIC HIV Prophylactic Vaccine

Treatment and Prevention Options for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI)

RSV F Recombinant Nanoparticle Vaccine: Summary of Clinical Data

Why use passive immunity?

Core Topic 2. The immune system and how vaccines work

Regulatory Pathways for Licensure and Use of Ebola Virus Vaccines During the Current Outbreak FDA Perspective

VACCINATIONS FOR ADULT HORSES

VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO

Diagnosing arbovirus infections (and Bill s holiday snaps) David W Smith Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases PathCentre

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Media Contacts: Annick Robinson Investor Contacts: Justin Holko (438) (908)

Third Meeting of Developing Countries' Vaccine Regulators Network Regulatory Forum on HIV Vaccines November 17-18, 2005

4A. Types of Laboratory Tests Available and Specimens Required. Three main types of laboratory tests are used for diagnosing CHIK: virus

NEW CLINICAL RESEARCH OPTIONS IN PANCREATIC CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY. Alan Melcher Professor of Clinical Oncology and Biotherapy Leeds

Adjuvant Development for IPV. Martin Friede Ph.D. Initiative for Vaccine Research

Vaccination policy, vaccine development and manufacturing in Japan. Yoichiro Kino, Ph.D Executive Managing Director Kaketsuken

Chapter 43: The Immune System

New York State Department of Health Immunization Program Combined Hepatitis A and B Vaccine Dosing Schedule Policy


Assertive outreach enhances hepatitis B vaccination for people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia

Principles of Vaccination

CONTENT. Chapter 1 Review of Literature. List of figures. List of tables

NovaLisa (ZVM0790) Performance Characteristics

REF/2011/08/ CTRI Website URL -

TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE

FMD vaccines and vaccination in India; Production, use and quality. V.A.Srinivasan Research Director Indian Immunologicals Limited Hyderabad

AAV specific issues pertaining to vector shedding in gene therapy clinical trials. Samuel Wadsworth Genzyme Corporation

SOGC recommendation on ZIKA virus exposure for clinicians caring for pregnant women and those who intend to get pregnant

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses

Immunology Ambassador Guide (updated 2014)

TBE vaccines: immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety

Montanide TM adjuvants for stimulation of cellular immune response in FMD vaccines

Principles of Vaccination

Biopharmaceutical Process Evaluated for Viral Clearance

Opportunities for Emerging Vaccine Markets

Prevention of Varicella: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee o...

Status of Vaccine Research and Development of Vaccines for Herpes Simplex Virus Prepared for WHO PD-VAC

How To Follow Up After Treatment With Gene Therapy

Vaccine Production Strategies: Ensuring Alignment and Sustainability

Endpoints in vaccine trials

LIAISON XL HCV Ab Accurate diagnosis of the early stage of HCV infection

ALBERTA IMMUNIZATION POLICY GUIDELINES

FAQs on Influenza A (H1N1-2009) Vaccine

Focus on Preventing Disease. keeping an eye on a healthy bottom line. Cattle Industry

specific B cells Humoral immunity lymphocytes antibodies B cells bone marrow Cell-mediated immunity: T cells antibodies proteins

Decision Analysis Example

Appendix B: Provincial Case Definitions for Reportable Diseases

Guidance for Industry Influenza: Developing Drugs for Treatment and/or Prophylaxis

Pfizer Forms Global Alliance with Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany to Accelerate Presence in Immuno-Oncology. November 17, 2014

Development and validation of neutralising anti-drug antibody (Nabs) assays

Clinical Study Synopsis

Nurse Aide Training Program Application Checklist

Live Attenuated Vaccines: Influenza, Rotavirus and Varicella Zoster Virus

RSA & HIV vaccine efficacy studies. Glenda Gray 15 March 2016

Background paper for SAGE discussions. SAGE non-specific effects of vaccines Working Group

Oral Cholera Vaccines (OCV)

Human hybridoma technology for the production of monoclonal antibodies

FDA Update on the H1N1 Flu Vaccine and Antiviral Medications

Florida Arbovirus Surveillance Week 25: June 19-25, 2016

HBV screening and management in HIV-infected children and adolescents

Vaccine Manufacturing Facilities of the Future. Howard L. Levine, Ph.D. Vaccines Europe London, England December 1 2, 2010

Transcription:

Current status of dengue vaccine development John T. Roehrig, Ph.D. Distinguished Consultant and Research Microbiologist SAGE/Immunization Meeting April 2013 National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Arboviral Diseases Branch

Flavivirus structure 5'- furin NC prm pr+m ns2a ns2b ns4a ns4b C prm E NS1 NS3 NS5 Protease/Helicase Polymerase NC -3' E glycoprotein biology o Major virion surface protein o Induces virus-neutralizing/protective antibody o Involved in virus attachment o Mediates virus-specific membrane fusion NS-proteins (NS3) elicits cytotoxic T-cell response Kuhn et al., 2002

Flavivirus phylogeny based on the gene sequence of NS5

Unique challenges for DENV vaccine Infection by one DENV serotype confers lasting protection only against reinfection with the homotypic DENV serotype. A secondary heterotypic infection is associated with an increased risk of severe disease (immune enhancement, IE). Because of this WHO recommends longer vaccinee follow-up as vaccine immunity wanes. Tetravalent vaccines are aimed at providing long-term protection against all four serotypes at once, thus reducing IE risk, but complicating serological analyses of vaccinees and breakthrough cases. Lack of adequate animal disease models makes it difficult to identify correlates of protection that will likely come only from clinical trial results.

WHO guidance and selected reports related to DENV vaccine development Long-term safety assessment of live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccines: Deliberations from a WHO technical consultation (Vaccine, in press 2013) Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of dengue tetravalent vaccines (live, attenuated) (update of TRS932, in press). Next generation dengue vaccines (Vaccine 29:7276-7, 2011). Dengue modelling (WHO/IVB/11.02). Cell-mediated immunity in dengue vaccine development (Vaccine 27:355-368, 2008). Guidelines for the evaluation of dengue vaccines in endemic areas (WHO/IVB/ 08.12). Guidelines for plaque reduction neutralization testing of human antibodies to dengue viruses (WHO/IVB/07.07, and Viral Immunology 21:123-132, 2008). Immune correlates of protection induced by dengue vaccines (Vaccine 25:4130-4139, 2007).

Tetravalent live-attenuated vaccines (LAVs) in human clinical trials The first DENV LAVs were developed by Mahidol University (Thailand/SP) and WRAIR. These vaccines were abandoned. YFV 17D-204 CYD-TDV DENV1 DENV2 DENV3 DENV4 DENVax DENV1 DENV2 DENV3 DENV4 Δ30 TV003 DENV1 DENV2 Δ30 Δ30/31 DENV3 Δ30 DENV4

Tetravalent inactivated or subunit vaccines in human clinical trials DPIV DENV1 DENV2 DENV3 DENV4 80% E-proteins

Global DENV vaccine pipeline Phase I Phase II Phase IIb Phase III CYD-TDV CYD-TDV CYD-TDV DENVax TV003 DENVax TV003 DPIV 80% E-proteins

Large scale CYD-TDV safety and efficacy trials 2009: First Phase IIb Efficacy study initiated in Thailand / Ratchaburi / 1 site 2011: Phase III Large Scale Efficacy trials initiated in Asia and LatAm/ 33 sites Phase III Efficacy Latin America Countries: Colombia, Mexico, Honduras, Puerto Rico, and Brazil Age group: 9-16 years Sample Size: 20,875 Phase III Efficacy Asian Countries: Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Viet Nam, Philippines Age group: 2-14 years Sample Size: 10,278 Phase IIb Efficacy study Thaïland Country: Thailand Age group: 4-11 years Sample size: 4,002 0 6 12 25 36 48 months Design : Active surveillance of all dengue cases Number of case Additional follow-up of hospitalized dengue cases

WHO advisory group summary of initial Phase IIb trial of CYD-TDV DENV vaccine Sabchareon et al., Lancet 2012 The safety profile of CYD-TDV is satisfactory - up to 25 months after the first vaccine dose. The overall efficacy is 30.2% (95% confidence interval: -13.4% to 56.6%) and is not statistically significant - therefore tetravalent vaccine efficacy remains inconclusive. Efficacy estimates for DENV1, 3, and 4 were statistically significant after at least one vaccine dose, but not after three doses. Larger data sets are needed to confirm these observations. Phase III data will be critical for evaluating CYD-TDV performance and efficacy against disease caused by any or all of the four DENV serotypes.

Phase IIb results 0, 6, 12 month regimen Immunogenicity vs vaccine efficacy- intention to treat (ITT) Immuno subset PD3 (PRNT 50 ) n=300 ITT, After at least one dose, n=134 (DENV1=32, DENV2=79, DENV3= 15, DENV4 = 6) 1000 100 VE = 34.9% (6.7-54.3) 90 * * 80 Immuno GMT (1/dil) 100 10 Vaccine Efficacy (%) 70 60 50 40 30 * 20 10 1 Den1 Den2 Den3 Den4 0 Den1 Den2 Den3 Den4 * = Lower bound of 95% CI is > 0

Phase I tetravalent NIH vaccine results Safety and Immunogenicity TV-003 DEN1Δ30 DEN2/4Δ30 DEN3Δ30/31 DEN4Δ30 Single subcutaneous dose (10 3 pfu each serotype) Flavivirus-naïve adult subjects No serious adverse events Remarkably few reported symptoms o 55% of subjects had asymptomatic, faint rash Very low vaccine viremia Up to 36% of vaccinees had peak antibody titers after day 56 % seroconverted (PRNT 50 > 10) Mean titer (GMT) (PRNT 50 > 10) Vaccine N DEN1 DEN2 DEN3 DEN4 DEN1 DEN2 DEN3 DEN4 TV-003 38 92 76 97 100 63 40 85 151 After just ONE dose: 74% of subjects had tetravalent antibody response 95% of subjects had at least a trivalent response After SECOND dose: No detectable vaccine replication. No vaccine rash 91% of subjects had tetravalent antibody response

Ongoing NIH TV-003 vaccine trials Licensing partners: Butantan Foundation, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Biological E Ltd, Hyderabad, India; Panacea Biotec, New Delhi, India; Vabiotech, Hanoi, Vietnam; GSK (inactivated vaccine application) Phase I Countries: U.S. Age groups: Seropositive adults Sample Size: 56 Phase II Countries: Brazil (Butantan) Age groups: Adults Sample Size: 275 Phase II Age de-escalation Countries: Thailand Age groups: 1-4y; 5-12y; 13-17; 18-50y Sample Size: 266 Phase II dosing Bangkok, T=0 and 6 months; Brazil, T=0 only

Ongoing or planned Inviragen DENVax trials Phase I studies 2010, 2012, 2013; Phase II studies 2011, 2013; Phase IIb studies 2014 (n~5000) Phase I Safety and Immunogenicity Countries: U.S., Colombia Age group: Adults Sample Size: 168 Phase I Safety and Immunogenicity Dosing and formulation Countries: U.S. Age group: Adults Sample Size: 155 Phase I Safety and Immunogenicity - Pharmaject Countries: U.S. Age group: Adults Sample Size: 176 Phase II two parts age-descending and endemic population Countries: Puerto Rico, Colombia, Singapore, Thailand Age group: Part 1 = 18m-45y; Part 2 = 18m-11y Sample Size: Part 1 = 144; Part 2 = 200 Phase II dosing T= 0 and 3 months

DENV vaccines in Phase I clinical trials MERCK E proteins Flavivirus-negative, healthy, young adults, Australia Tetravalent: DEN1-80E, DEN2-80E, DEN3-80E, DEN4-80E, formulated with/without adjuvants Safety assessed throughout the study and immunogenicity based on virus neutralizing antibody responses - Seroconversion rates and GMTs of responses for each serotype, 28 days post-dose 3 GSK/WRAIR/Fiocruz - DPIV Two doses of DPIV (Vero), combined with alum or GSK adjuvant system, given 4 weeks apart, for rapid onset of durable protection Joint vaccine development in a public-private partnership including WRAIR (U.S. Army), Fiocruz (MoH Brazil) and GSK Vaccines Two Phase I studies using WRAIR manufactured antigen are ongoing in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. Goal is to select best adjuvant (AS01 vs. AS03 vs. alum) in 2013.

Summary Vaccination for dengue is different than other flaviviruses o Four distinct but related serotypes of DENV o Possibility of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) leading to severe dengue disease (e.g., DHF/DSS) Five DENV vaccines in human clinical trials and all are tetravalent formulations o Phase I/II results do not suggest vaccine-related severe adverse events (SAEs) Sanofi-Pasteur is in the lead, however first protection results were surprising o Follow-up science to decipher results o Phase III data will be critical to appraise vaccine performance o More thought about expectations All LAV vaccines are constructed differently, so each will yield unique data, e.g., contribution of NS proteins to efficacy Inactivated whole virus vaccine approach has worked for other flaviviruses so why not dengue? Second generation vaccines are in development - e.g., DNA, VLP, EDIII, and virus vectored (adenovirus, alphavirus (VEEV), measles, and WNV

Acknowledgements Beth-Ann Coller - Merck Jean Lang and Jean-Antoine Zinsou Sanofi Pasteur Alex Schmidt - GSK Dan Stinchcomb and Aurelia Haller Inviragen Steve Whitehead U.S. NIH

Licensing partners: Butantan Foundation, Sao Paulo, Brazil Biological E Ltd, Hyderabad, India Panacea Biotec, New Delhi, India Vabiotech, Hanoi, Vietnam GSK (inactivated vaccine application) Ongoing studies: Evaluate vaccine in flavivirus-seropositive adults (N = 56) Targeted challenge of vaccinees with DEN2 30 virus Phase II age de-escalation studies in Bangkok (N=266) Adults (18 50 years) Adolescents (13 17 years) Older children (5 12 years) Younger children (1 4 years) Phase II study in Sao Paulo (Butantan Institute) (N = 275)

Inviragen - DENVax Study Number Sites Purpose Subject Number Route & Dose INV-DEN-101 US Safety, Immunogenicity 72 SC & ID Phase 1 Low and High dose INV-DEN-102 Columbia Safety, Immunogenicity 96 SC & ID Phase 1 (non-endemic) Low and high dose INV-DEN-203 Part 1 - age descending Part 1-144 SC Phase 2* study (18m - 45y) High dose INV-DEN-104 Phase 1 Puerto Rico, Columbia, Singapore, Thailand (endemic areas) US Part 2 - expansion of 18m - 11y children Safety, Immunogenicity Part 1 - Test various dose schedules Part 2-200 ~155 SC High dose new Start Date Jul-10 Oct-10 Nov-11 Feb-13 Aug-12 INV-DEN-103 Phase 1 INV-DEN-105 Phase 1 US US Part 2 Test new vaccine formulation Part 3 test 1/10 diluted HD vaccine Safety, Immunogenicity, compare needle to PharmaJet Safety, Immunogenicity, compare IM vs SC administration using needle-free PharmaJet injector 96 ID Low dose 80 IM Low dose High Dose #2 formulation containing increased DENVax-4 HD and HD#2 diluted 1/10 4Q2012 Not yet started March-13 Feb-13 *Two doses on day 0 and day 90 for the current phase 2.

Merck Dengue Vaccine: Ongoing Phase 1 Clinical Program Overall objective: To evaluate recombinant vaccine for safety and immunogenicity Design: randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial Trial population: Flavivirus-negative, healthy, young adults Trial site: Australia Vaccine formulations: Tetravalent: DEN1-80E, DEN2-80E, DEN3-80E, DEN4-80E Formulated with/without adjuvants Key endpoints: Safety assessed throughout the study Immunogenicity based on virus neutralizing antibody responses: Seroconversion rates for each serotype, 28 days post-dose 3 GMTs of responses for each serotype, 28 days post-dose 3

Collaborative Development of a Dengue Purified Inactivated Virus (DPIV) Vaccine composition: whole dengue virus grown in Vero, inactivated, adjuvanted TPP: Two doses of DPIV, combined with alum or GSK adjuvant system, given 4 weeks apart, for rapid onset of durable protection Joint vaccine development in a public-private partnership including WRAIR (U.S. Army), Fiocruz (MoH Brazil) and GSK Vaccines Highly immunogenic in non-human primates; protection against viremia following challenge Two Phase I safety / immunogenicity studies using WRAIR manufactured antigen are ongoing in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (NCT01666652 & NCT01702857). Goal is to select best adjuvant (AS01 vs. AS03 vs. alum) in 2013. Prospective epi cohort studies: ongoing in Brazil and planned for additional countries in Asia and the Americas 22

Other DENV vaccines in preclinical development From WHO Consultation on next generation dengue vaccine 2010 Approach Rec. subunit DNA VLP Virus-vectored Developers ICGEB, IPK, VaxInnate CDC, Inovio, Kobe University, NMRC Cytos, ICGEB, Kobe University GenPhar (AV), Themis (MV), UNC (VEE), UTMB (WNV) DENV antigens EDIII EDIII or prm/e EDIII or prm/e EDIII or prm/e Schmitz et al., Vaccine 2011

Recommendations to WHO on dengue vaccines by Advisory Committee Continue close scrutiny of ongoing vaccine trial results. Strongly encourage sharing of all information on the results of vaccines trials with WHO. Strongly encourage appropriate specimen collection to assure valid analyses of pre-existing immunity, post-vaccination immune-responses, viremias, and vaccine-induced T-cell responses in vaccine breakthrough cases. In order to get appropriate sample sizes to power analyses, consider recommending collection of specimens from later stages of clinical testing, e.g., Phase III trials. Continue to encourage development of other live-attenuated vaccines and second generation DENV vaccines e.g., killed vaccines, sub-unit vaccines, and prime-boost strategies. Encourage long-term safety follow-up as outlined in WHO safety guidelines. Continue convening regular informational general meetings for subject matter experts, industry, and other stakeholders to be informed of the status of vaccine development and implementation. Consider the development of a human/denv challenge model which would be of use for vaccine development and enhance other areas of dengue diagnostics/treatment/pathogenesis/immunity. Such a model could employ partially attenuated challenge viruses that have been developed in the course of vaccine development research as outlined in the 2008 WHO Guidelines for Evaluation of Dengue Vaccines in Endemic Areas.

Further research questions on dengue vaccines Virus neutralization assays Antibody reactivities Chimeric vaccines Cellular responses Efficacy trial design Viral genetics and variation