Revising the Current Hazardous Products Act



Similar documents
What causes noise induced hearing loss (NIHL)?

Guideline for Hearing Conservation and Noise Control

NOISE CONTROL AND HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. University of Toronto

Noise at work a guide for health and safety representatives

noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss

Noise and Hearing Protection

Occupational Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Final Program Policy Decision and Supporting Rationale

S-822. Noise and Hearing Conservation RISK MANAGEMENT

In the United Kingdom many thousands of people have been affected by noise induced hearing loss.

Noise at the Work Site

Section 4. Hearing Protection and Hearing Conservation Program (WAC ), Noise Level Survey

MINISTER PORTFOLIO DEADLINE. Hon Dr Nick Smith Minister for ACC 19 January 2010

Audiometric (Hearing) Screening September November 2013

Noise at work. Introduction. What harm can noise cause? A brief guide to controlling the risks. What is this leaflet about?

What are the risks for employees exposed to high levels of noise?

Occupational Noise Exposure Requirements

Entertainment noise in Western Australia

Noise: Impact on Hearing; Regulation

Noise Induced Hearing Loss

OSHA Scripts. Hearing Protection CBT Script

Overview. Introduction To The Revised GPSD

COMPENSATION FOR NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS

Management Essentials for an Effective Hearing Conservation Program

Completion Test Answer Key. 1. Why are young people more likely to be injured on the job than other groups of workers?

Western University. Hearing Protection Program. Prepared by: Occupational Health and Safety

Veterans UK Leaflet 10. Notes about War Pension claims for deafness

The Effects of Ultrasonic Sound Generated by Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems on Human Hearing and Physiology

Sample Written Program. For HEARING CONSERVATION

Your Hearing ILLUMINATED

Working Alone (Part 28 of the Occupational Health and Safety Code) Questions and Answers

World Health Organization Guidelines on Community Noise

(ensure you read and sign page 5),

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

POLICY NUMBER: POL-09

The Regulation is established pursuant to 3 (4) and 6 (6) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 11 NOISE AND HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Ear Disorders and Problems

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAMS

Who are you? Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Hearing is Precious!

SAFE WORKPLACE VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Prince Edward Island Government Departments

Loss Control TIPS Technical Information Paper Series

Pure Tone Hearing Screening in Schools: Revised Notes on Main Video. IMPORTANT: A hearing screening does not diagnose a hearing loss.

3-1 THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

5th Congress of Alps-Adria Acoustics Association NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS

Noise Exposure: Explanation of OSHA and NIOSH Safe Exposure Limits and the Importance of Noise Dosimetry. by Patricia T.

Byron's Hudson Valley Hearing Aid Centers Kingston/Lake Katrine Poughkeepsie Your hearing Journey

Program Policy Background Paper: Occupational Noise Induced Hearing Loss

More information >>> HERE <<<

Hearing Conservation Procedures

Guidance on Risk Assessment and Control

Noise Induced Hearing Loss

THE NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS MILESTONES: PAST AND FUTURE

PROTECT YOUR HEARING

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM September 24, 2015

Exposure to high noise levels from your own and others work activities can cause incurable damage to your hearing

Hearing Loss A growing problem that affects quality of life

Sound Perception. Sensitivity to Sound. Sensitivity to Sound 1/9/11. Not physically sensitive to all possible sound frequencies Range

Questions and Answers for Parents

quick guide to hearing protection Oregon OSHA s What you should know and not a word more!

So, how do we hear? outer middle ear inner ear

Parents and employers must ensure

Accuracy of Smartphone Sound Level Meter Applications

PART 3: RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

DURATION OF HEARING LOSS

The Fort McMurray Catholic Board of Education is committed to the protection of our employees, contractors, volunteers and the students we serve.

Children s Hearings (Scotland) Act asp 1

NOISE IN THE WORKPLACE

Hearing Conservation Program

Noise Induced Hearing Loss Awareness. help

Results: American Academy of Audiology Online Survey on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Children Ages Eight to 12

the risks of removing asbestos containing drywall October 29, 2011

Confirmation of Diagnosis of Disability (To determine eligibility under section 18(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (as amended))

Client Services Policy Manual

A Client s Guide: Noise Induced Hearing Loss

11 doing business in Canada. Business Structures

Information for Workers. Information for Workers

FAO/WHO Regional Conference on Food Safety for the Americas and the Caribbean San José, Costa Rica, 6-9 December 2005

Education Adjustment Program (EAP) Handbook

A Short Guide to The Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act, 2005

Hearing Test Results from 2009 Audio Engineering Society Convention Testing funded by Shure

DHS: PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION. Occupational Public Health Program (OPHP) Introduction. Scope of the problem. Lauren Karam, M.P.H. Program Coordinator

MD #52 WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY CORPORATE HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM

Guidance for employers on the Control of Noise at Work Regulations What is this leaflet about? The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005

Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment And Control Procedure

How To Train An Audiologist

BILL C-14: THE DRINKING WATER MATERIALS SAFETY ACT LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF BILL C-14

8 Ways to Boost User Protection With the Jabra LINK 85 Audio Processor

OSHA Regulation and the Growing Popularity of Employee Leasing Programs. Including Temporary Worker Services and Professional Employer Organizations

A Guide to Ontario Legislation Covering the Release of Students

Stanford University. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation

Occupational Noise Hearing Loss

Road safety a work-environment issue

X-Plain Perforated Ear Drum Reference Summary

OAK GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT. Hearing Conservation Program

What are the causes of presbycusis? What can be done? How can I communicate with someone who has a hearing loss? How does hearing work?

Your Guide To PREVENTION OF HEARING LOSS FROM NOISE

LASER SAFETY MANUAL UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR LASER USERS REVISED EDITION 2012 ISSUED BY

Reporting and Investigating Injuries and Incidents

Transcription:

Revising the Current Hazardous Products Act February 2008 Noisy Toys An Issue Paper Prepared By The Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (CASLPA)

Noisy Toys What you need to know Audiologists, speech-language pathologists and supportive personnel across Canada are concerned that some toys have the potential to harm hearing. This can lead to serious communication and learning difficulties. Members of the Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (CASLPA) have seen first-hand the hearing, speech and language implications that can arise from hearing loss due to unacceptable noise conditions. In Canada, regulation exists under the Hazardous Products Act which bans toys emitting noise levels exceeding 100 decibels (db). While CASLPA supports Health Canada s efforts to protect our children s hearing, as audiologists, we have found that 100 db is an unsafe level, and noise-induced hearing loss (N-IHL) could be the result. The 100 db level needs to be re-examined and researched to protect our children. Current regulations not safe enough for our children s hearing health Toy sales in Canada are a multibillion-dollar business. A large majority of the manufacturing is done in China. The numerous recalls in the past months have forced government to look at the important issue of toy safety. In fact, the Prime Minister addressed toy safety in his Throne Speech last Fall. In light of the issues surrounding toy safety in general, the Government has promised to introduce measures on product safety. CASLPA would like to ensure that noise levels in toys are included in the assessment when legislation is being revised. Selling toys in Canada is a $1.4 billion business, according to the Canadian Toy Association. Approximately 60% of the toys sold around the world are from China. Canada s import rate is higher than this average. CASLPA applauds Health Minister Tony Clement s November 27, 2007 announcement of a new joint Canada-Chinese health committee to share information and help enhance product safety. Minister Clement also signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with China's Minister of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) to enhance cooperation on issues related to consumer product safety. The MOU will: Establish technical working groups that will share information on regulatory requirements and laboratory testing procedures for specific consumer products of common concern, such as toys and children's jewellery; Set up training workshops for Chinese manufacturers in order to ensure their full understanding and compliance with Canadian safety requirements; and Establish ongoing information-sharing mechanisms and approaches between the two governments, including an urgent consultation mechanism which would be used when critical product safety issues arise. 1 1 The Government of Canada Announces New Measures to Enhance Canada's Food and Product Safety, press release, November 27, 2007

It is very important that testing for noisy toys be included in the regulatory requirements. Health Canada s website states: Health Canada: Conducts research on potential hazards associated with consumer products, Raises awareness of potential risks of injury through our product safety advisories, warnings and recalls, Develops and enforces product safety regulations and standards. The issue of safe levels for noise in toys has audiologists concerned. Further research and safety advisories on noise as it relates to toy safety should be promoted by Health Canada to a greater degree to ensure more public awareness of safe noise levels for toys. In Canada, the Hazardous Products Act bans toys emitting noise levels exceeding 100 db, measured at a specified distance from a child s ear (arm s length). However, we know that children often hold their toys much closer to the ear than the distance specified in the current law s measurement protocol. The International Standards Organization (ISO) technical committee recommends that close-to-the-ear toys should not exceed 65 db when measured in the free field and all other toys should not exceed 85 db. The current Canadian Act permits a noise level which is potentially dangerous, because it does not take into account the typical use of the toys. If we were to compare current regulatory framework on workplace noise requirements under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, we would find that in Alberta, the current industrial regulation provides an allowable noise exposure of 85 db for 8 hours. This exposure regulation varies from province to province and can be as low as 80 db. In this case, a 3-decibel exchange rate is applied. The exchange rate is used to calculate the amount by which the permitted sound level may increase if the exposure time is halved. For example, using the 3-dB "rule", if the sound level increases from 85 to 88 db, a worker may only be exposed to the sound for 4 hours, instead of 8 hours. If we were to apply the regulations on workplace noise conditions indicated above to toys, a toy producing 100 db of noise should only be used by an adult for 15 minutes! Hold that toy to a child s ear, and the noise at the level of the eardrum is increased to dangerous levels.

Studies on hearing health and noise In an assessment of toy safety conducted in 2004 by Option consommateurs (Québec), field tests revealed that the majority of toys in this study (53%) designed for the 0 3 age group were in fact held much closer to the ear than the distance specified in the current law s measurement protocol. In view of this finding and the toy noise levels measured as if the toy were held at the ear, it was observed that a large majority of the toys tested are likely to cause hearing loss in the long run, even with very short periods of use. At birth, the inner ear is fully developed and has its full complement of hair cells, supporting cells and nerve fibres. Unlike most other tissues in the body, hair cells and nerve fibres do not regenerate when damaged. Children are more susceptible to the effects of noise because of their behaviours and also because of their smaller ear canals. A sound travelling down a child s ear canal will arrive at the eardrum at a greater intensity than in an adult who has a larger ear canal. Boyle s Law: pressure (in this case sound pressure) and volume (in this case ear canal volume) are inversely proportionate. Noise affects the hair cells in the inner ear. Repeated exposure will wear these hair cells down and eventually cause permanent damage. On March 13, 1991, the Quebec Consumers Association (Association des consommateurs du Québec) presented a report to Consumer and Corporate Affairs to challenge its permissive noise level standard for toys, which they felt posed unnecessary risks to children s hearing, and the lack of an adequate test method to assess the noise levels from toys on the Canadian market. The report was prepared by two audiologists from a Montreal consulting firm, who proposed that the regulation should be amended to impose a noise level maximum of 75 db, the noise safety limit defined by the World Health Organization. According to the Montreal researchers, research tends to show that the inner ear of the child is more sensitive to noise and may be susceptible to hearing loss for noise exposures that are safe for adults. They feel, then, that no child s toy should make noise exceeding 75 db, regardless of the amount of time that the child might play with it. They also propose that a clear, precise test method that spells out the distance at which noise levels are measured should be applicable to all kinds of toys. A 1989 University of Montreal study found that almost 85% of children s toys on the Québec market exceeded the World Health Organization s noise limit, and are hazardous to children s hearing. In fact, some toys exceed even the 100 decibel limits imposed by the current Hazardous Products Act. 2 2 Noisy Toys, Canadian Hearing Society web site.

Potential consequences Noise-induced Hearing Loss (N-IHL) is hearing loss caused by excessive exposure to loud sounds. The two primary factors that can contribute to N-IHL are the loudness of the noise and the length of time that a person is exposed to that noise. Moderate exposure to potentially damaging sounds may cause temporary shifts in hearing. For example, after a rock concert, your ears may hurt or ring, or you may have difficulty hearing. Repeated exposure to intense noise gradually produces permanent N-IHL. The social and financial costs of hearing impairment are significant. Hearing aids that are prescribed generally provide digital signal processing. The average cost of one digital hearing aid is $2000. Children often need to replace their hearing aids every 3 years. Throughout a child s lifetime there are many other direct and indirect costs associated with treating and managing hearing impairment. Factors such as decreased quality of life and educational experience and loss in employment opportunities must be considered. Additional potential effects of excessive noise include tinnitus (or ringing in the ears), balance problems, nausea, tension, anxiety, sleep disturbance, irritability, and headaches. Legislative changes now will have the potential to save costs to the Canadian Health Care system in the future. An Audiologist is a trained professional who can help to detect if hearing loss may be developing. Consumer Concerns Canadian consumers at risk One of the most important criteria for examining a revision to this legislation is the impact of toy safety on the consumer. Canadian consumers feel protected and trust that the products they purchase for their children are safe, but may be unaware that the current noise level regulations may not be adequate. Toys sold in Canada currently must register sound levels below 100 db. This level is too high. One must also consider that the toys noise levels are not measured at a distances close to a child s ear. Rather, they are measured at distances simulating arms length. A toy sold in Canada may register a 100 db rating when tested at arm s length. However, if measured at close range to simulate a young child bringing the toy near his or her ear, the measurement can easily exceed the 100 db limit established as acceptable by the Hazardous Product Act, despite the fact that this toy was deemed safe by current standards. International purchases It is also important to consider that in our global economy, toys can come from anywhere, especially if purchased on the internet or during a trip to a foreign country, where noise standards may not exist. International standards should be sought to ensure acceptable noise levels in toys.

What Members of Parliament Should Do The Hazardous Products Act must be revised to reflect noise levels emitted by toys when a child is playing with them under all circumstances. Further research needs to be conducted with this consideration in mind. CASLPA strongly recommends revision of current legislation in order to lower the acceptable loudness level in toys from 100 decibels to a level comparable with international standards, and to consider aspects such as the distance from the ear when establishing acceptable noise standards in toys. CASLPA understands that there are many items to be considered by Health Canada related to toy safety. Noise is one element of toy safety that should never be overlooked. The Canadian Association of Speech- Language Pathologists and Audiologists would be pleased to assist Health Canada when this important piece of legislation is being revisited, by providing expert witnesses who will consult with the appropriate review committee.