Comprehensive emissions per capita for industrialised countries



Similar documents
Six greenhouse gases covered by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol are:

41 T Korea, Rep T Netherlands T Japan E Bulgaria T Argentina T Czech Republic T Greece 50.

Fact sheet: The Kyoto Protocol

Proposal from the Philippines for amendments to the Kyoto Protocol

Updated development of global greenhouse gas emissions 2013

Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory and inventory report 2015

NEW PASSENGER CAR REGISTRATIONS BY ALTERNATIVE FUEL TYPE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 Quarter

SUBMISSION BY DENMARK AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

187/ December EU28, euro area and United States GDP growth rates % change over the previous quarter

99/ June EU28, euro area and United States GDP growth rates % change over the previous quarter

Energy prices in the EU Household electricity prices in the EU rose by 2.9% in 2014 Gas prices up by 2.0% in the EU

With data up to: May Monthly Electricity Statistics

1. Perception of the Bancruptcy System Perception of In-court Reorganisation... 4

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments

Labour Force Survey 2014 Almost 10 million part-time workers in the EU would have preferred to work more Two-thirds were women

Analysis of statistics 2015

Replacement Migration

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

GfK PURCHASING POWER INTERNATIONAL

Pan- European region

Kyoto Protocol MEMO/04/43. What is the Kyoto Protocol? Bruxelles, 4 March 2004

Funding and network opportunities for cluster internationalization

The Economics of Climate Change C 175. To Kyoto and Beyond. Spring 09 UC Berkeley Traeger 7 International Cooperation 22

relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates

AMADEUS: Analyse MAjor Databases from EUropean Sources - A financial database of 4 million European companies, including Eastern Europe MODULE.

Credit transfer to Customer account with AS "Meridian Trade Bank" EUR, USD free of charge * Other countries currency information in the Bank

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Employee eligibility to work in the UK

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

What Is the Total Public Spending on Education?

Alcohol Consumption in Ireland A Report for the Health Service Executive

EEA Technical report No 6/2012

PBL Note. Non-ETS emission targets for 2030

Energy Efficiency Indicators for Public Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels

EBA REPORT ON THE BENCHMARKING OF DIVERSITY PRACTICES. EBA-Op July 2016

The Guardianship Service

Master's in midwifery: challenging the present, protecting the future? Valerie Fleming R.M., Ph.D.

PISA FOR SCHOOLS. How is my school comparing internationally? Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills OECD. Madrid, September 22 nd

Planned Healthcare in Europe for Lothian residents

ENTERING THE EU BORDERS & VISAS THE SCHENGEN AREA OF FREE MOVEMENT. EU Schengen States. Non-Schengen EU States. Non-EU Schengen States.

Submission by Norway to the ADP

// BRIEF STATISTICS 2014

168/ November At risk of poverty or social exclusion 2 rate in the EU28, (% of total population)

European Research Council

How many students study abroad and where do they go?

World Consumer Income and Expenditure Patterns

What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education?

New Zealand s response to climate change. March

Visa Information 2012

SEPA. Changes in the Payment System Implementation of the European SEPA Regulations for Kuna and Euro Payments

in Scotland for holidaymakers from overseas

INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK REGISTRATION UNDER THE MADRID PROTOCOL

Annex 5A Trends in international carbon dioxide emissions

INTERNATIONAL TRACKED POSTAGE SERVICE

Life Domain: Labour Market and Working Conditions Goal Dimension: Preserving Natural Capital Measurement Dimension: Environmental Pollution by Economy

Wind energy scenarios for A report by the European Wind Energy Association - July Wind energy scenarios for 2020

European Research Council

Beer statistics edition. The Brewers of Europe

PORTABILITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH CARE BENEFITS IN ITALY

International Hints and Tips

ERMInE Database. Presentation by Nils Flatabø SINTEF Energy Research. ERMInE Workshop 2 - Northern Europe Oslo, 1. November 2006

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the First Quarter of 2016

PORTABILITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH CARE BENEFITS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

193/ December Hourly labour costs in the EU28 Member States, 2012 (in )

Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio fell to 39.3% of GDP in 2008 Steady decline in top corporate income tax rate since 2000

Exercise 39. The Euro. At the end of this exercise you will:

Genuine BMW Accessories. The Ultimate Driving Machine. BMW Trackstar. tracked. recovered. BMW TRACKSTAR.

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities an updated assessment

Application Form: Receptionist / PA to the Senior Leadership Team

TREATY MAKING - EXPRESSION OF CONSENT BY STATES TO BE BOUND BY A TREATY

EUROPE 2020 TARGETS: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Electricity, Gas and Water: The European Market Report 2014

Family benefits Information about health insurance country. Udbetaling Danmark Kongens Vænge Hillerød. A. Personal data

TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division

Delegation in human resource management

Electricity and natural gas price statistics 1

FUSIONS Food waste data set for EU-28. New Estimates and Environmental Impact

GDP per capita, consumption per capita and comparative price levels in Europe

About us. As our customer you will be able to take advantage of the following benefits: One Provider. Flexible Billing. Our Portal.

EU Energy Policy and the Energy Situation in Germany

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

How To Make A Positive Decision On Asylum Applications In 2014

SMEs access to finance survey 2014

FEDERATION EUROPEENNE DE LA MANUTENTION Product Group. industrial trucks. A brief guide for identification of noncompliant. - Exhaust Emission -

Waste. Copenhagen, 3 rd September Almut Reichel Project Manager Sustainable consumption and production & waste, European Environment Agency

EUROPE 2020 TARGET: TERTIARY EDUCATION ATTAINMENT

First estimate for 2014 Euro area international trade in goods surplus bn 24.2 bn surplus for EU28

Foreign Obligations Notification Process

Among the 34 OECD countries, Belgium performed above the OECD average in each of

Keeping European Consumers safe Rapid Alert System for dangerous non-food products 2014

Ownership transfer Critical Tax Issues. Johan Fall, Anders Ydstedt March, 2010

Technical & Trade Schools Europe Report

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

CO1.2: Life expectancy at birth

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA. Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D Economist, Montreal economic Institute CPBI, Winnipeg June 15, 2007

Transcription:

THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE Comprehensive emissions per capita for industrialised countries Hal Turton and Clive Hamilton The Australia Institute September 2001 the Parties included in Annex I shall implement domestic action in accordance with national circumstances and with a view to reducing emissions in a manner conducive to narrowing per capita differences between developed and developing country Parties while working towards achievement of the ultimate objective of the Convention. 1. Background The resolution above formed part of the agreement on flexibility mechanisms reached at negotiations in Bonn in July 2001. This is one of the first times that official reference has been made in climate change negotiations to the concept of per capita emissions and reflects a growing level of support for some broader principle of equity that would, in time, permit developing countries to take on fair and reasonable targets. Perhaps the most systematic and influential proposal building on the idea of equal per capita entitlements to the use of the global atmospheric commons is the approach known as contraction and convergence advocated by the Global Commons Institute (www.gci.org.uk). Differences in per capita emissions have, nevertheless, had a substantial subterranean effect on climate change negotiations to date. The exclusion of developing countries from targets is due not only to their low incomes but their low emissions per capita. In the case of industrialised countries, expectations about the responsibility to take action have been influenced by recognition of each country s overall contribution to the climate problem as well as by perceptions of the profligacy of individual citizens in each country. However, serious consideration of these issues can proceed only on the basis of good information on emissions. While any number of reports and papers have reported on energy emissions per capita, no-one has reported on comprehensive per capita emissions, taking account of all sources and sinks. 1 Yet the data required to calculate per capita emissions for industrialised countries are readily available from the official communications of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) secretariat. 1 With the exception of The Australia Institute s earlier calculations, published on the web, in 1999 for Annex B countries in 1995. The Australia Institute

This paper uses UNFCCC data to calculate comprehensive per capita greenhouse gas emissions for Annex B countries for the most recently available year, 1998 in most cases. It also analyses the sectoral breakdown of per capita emissions for selected countries. 2. Data for comprehensive emissions Under Articles 4 and 12 of the UNFCCC, Parties to the Convention submit national greenhouse gas inventories to the UNFCCC secretariat (UNFCCC 1992). The information presented in Table 1 is based on recently submitted inventory data for Annex B (industrialised) countries, and has been reproduced as reported by the UNFCCC. The UNFCCC has modified the data slightly through rounding and correction of calculation and typographical errors. In most cases, the UNFCCC has made available greenhouse gas inventory submissions for 2000, which cover the year 1998. Exceptions (with most recent data indicated in brackets) include Iceland (1995), Japan (1997), Liechtenstein (1990), Luxembourg (1995), Romania (1994), the Russian Federation (1996) and Slovenia (1990). The UNFCCC does not provide any data on Croatia, presumably because it had not submitted any appropriate inventories. The figures presented in Table 1 are based on emissions of the three main greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). Emissions of perfluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride are not included. For the three main gases included, we have used the following global warming potentials to convert the gases to carbon dioxide equivalents (CO 2 -e): CO 2 1; CH 4 21; and N 2 O 310 (IPCC 1997). The source categories (fuel combustion, agriculture, etc.) are defined according to IPCC guidelines. Emissions resulting from the combustion of fuel used in international shipping and aviation are not included in country totals, in accordance with IPCC methodology. Emissions and removals from the land-use change and forestry sector are included in the totals. Table 1 also reports population data from the World Bank (2001), for each country (for the appropriate year). These are used to calculate comprehensive per capita emissions. The comprehensive per capita emissions shown in Table 1 are presented graphically in Figure 1. 3. Analysis of results As can be seen from Table 1, Annex B countries (excluding Croatia) were responsible for emissions of more than 14.5 billion tonnes of CO 2 -equivalent in 1998. The USA contributes the largest amount (39.5%), followed by Japan (8.7%), the Russian Federation (7.4%), Germany (6.6%) and the United Kingdom (4.6%). The largest per capita emitters are Australia (27.6 tonnes), Luxembourg (24.2), Canada (21.9), the USA (21.1) and Ireland (15.4). The average for the European Union is 10.3 tonnes, a figure heavily influenced by its largest members, Germany (11.9), UK (11.4), France (8.2) and Italy (9.0). The Australia Institute 2

Table 1 Greenhouse gas emissions of Annex B countries (Mt CO 2 -e) Country Year Energy Combustion Fugitive Industry & Solvents Agriculture LUCF * Waste & Other Total Population Per capita emissions (t CO 2 -e) (millions) Australia 1998 331.3 31.5 8.4 92.2 39.5 15.5 518.5 18.75 27.6 Austria 1998 52.6 2.9 12.7 5.0-7.6 5.3 70.9 8.08 8.8 Belgium 1998 117.0 0.8 12.2 10.7-1.0 3.9 143.7 10.20 14.1 Bulgaria 1998 54.2 3.6 4.8 13.3-6.2 7.8 77.4 8.26 9.4 Canada 1998 492.7 52.4 44.4 69.5-20.1 23.1 662.0 30.25 21.9 Croatia na na na na na na na na na na Czech Rep. 1998 126.3 6.3 4.5 7.9-3.7 2.6 144.0 10.29 14.0 Denmark 1998 59.7 0.7 1.6 12.4-1.0 1.2 74.6 5.30 14.1 Estonia 1998 19.0 0.6 0.3 1.0-3.4 0.8 18.4 1.45 12.7 Finland 1998 60.3 3.6 2.4 7.1-9.7 2.7 66.3 5.15 12.9 France 1998 395.8 9.0 36.7 87.2-62.1 15.0 481.6 58.40 8.2 Germany 1998 875.5 22.0 35.9 58.7-33.5 16.8 975.4 82.05 11.9 Greece 1998 95.1 1.1 9.0 12.0 0.0 3.3 120.5 10.52 11.5 Hungary 1998 55.5 8.4 2.2 13.2-4.4 3.5 78.3 10.11 7.7 Iceland 1995 1.8 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.27 10.0 Ireland 1998 39.2 0.1 3.1 19.7-6.4 1.6 57.3 3.71 15.4 Italy 1998 439.2 7.2 31.8 44.0-23.6 17.1 515.8 57.59 9.0 Japan 1997 1159.1 2.9 69.7 18.6 0.0 30.1 1280.4 126.09 10.2 Latvia 1998 8.4 0.5 0.2 1.7-10.5 0.6 1.0 2.45 0.4 Liechtenstein 1990 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.03 7.4 Lithuania 1998 14.2 0.4 5.4 2.3 7.7 1.6 31.6 3.70 8.5 Luxembourg 1995 9.2 0.0 0.4 0.5-0.3 0.1 9.9 0.41 24.2 Monaco 1998 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.03 4.4 Netherlands 1998 179.6 4.0 12.2 17.2-1.7 13.0 224.2 15.70 14.3 New Zealand 1998 26.0 1.6 2.7 41.2-20.8 2.8 53.5 3.79 14.1 Norway 1998 32.6 2.6 9.7 5.1-17.6 4.2 36.5 4.43 8.2 Poland 1998 330.3 17.4 14.7 21.9-29.8 18.3 372.7 38.67 9.6 Portugal 1998 50.6 0.3 5.2 8.1-3.6 9.6 70.2 9.97 7.0 Romania 1994 125.7 17.8 6.1 9.6-6.6 4.8 157.4 22.73 6.9 Russian Fed. 1996 1469.2 284.1 19.7 103.2-830.7 40.7 1086.3 147.74 7.4 Slovakia 1998 39.4 2.6 4.8 4.2-1.7 1.7 51.1 5.39 9.5 Slovenia 1990 13.6 1.1 0.6 2.3-2.3 1.6 16.9 2.00 8.5 Spain 1998 252.6 5.9 27.1 56.2-29.3 18.6 331.2 39.37 8.4 Sweden 1998 55.7 0.0 5.1 8.2-27.7 1.3 42.6 8.85 4.8 Switzerland 1998 42.0 0.3 2.4 5.5-6.1 2.8 46.9 7.11 6.6 Ukraine 1998 298.9 92.1 18.6 27.1-68.7 18.2 386.2 50.30 7.7 UK 1998 532.6 23.5 33.9 50.6 15.0 17.1 672.7 59.26 11.4 USA 1998 5475.3 225.7 97.4 540.7-773.0 240.1 5806.2 274.89 21.1 EU 1998 3205.7 80.9 229.0 396.9-192.1 126.6 3847.0 374.57 10.3 Annex B 13330.6 832.7 546.6 1378.1-1950.7 547.5 14685.2 1143.29 12.8 * Land-use change and forestry Source: UNFCCC 2001a; UNFCCC 2001b; World Bank 2001 The Australia Institute 3

Figure 1 Per capita net greenhouse gas emissions, Annex B countries, 1998 (or most recent year) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Australia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Canada Per capita emissions (tonnes CO 2 -e pa) Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Japan Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Monaco Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America Annex B average Source: Table 1 A cursory analysis indicates that Ireland s high emissions can be explained by the large contribution made by its agricultural sector, which accounts for around one-third of total emissions. Luxembourg s high per capita emissions are related to its large steel industry (which has contracted significantly since 1995). Australia, Canada and the USA are all large consumers of energy, but Australia also generates a large proportion of emissions from agriculture and land-use change and forestry. These three countries are examined in more detail below. Figure 2 presents a sectoral breakdown of per capita emissions for selected Annex B countries. 2 For land-use change and forestry, net removals are shown below the horizontal axis. For those countries with net removals from this sector, the amount shown below the axis should be subtracted from the aggregate emissions above the axis to give net emissions per capita. It is apparent that the USA generates the largest emissions per capita from fuel combustion, but falls behind Australia and Canada when emissions and removals from all sources are compared. Canada s per capita emissions exceed those of the USA due to higher per capita fugitive emissions and a lower contribution from sinks. Australia s emissions per capita are especially high because land-use change remains a net source of emissions, and emissions from agriculture are high. As a result, Australia has the highest per capita emissions of any industrialised country. By 22 A systematic analysis of the sources of growth in energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in OECD countries over 1982-1997 (including the effects of changes in population, economic growth, energy intensity, primary energy use, share of fossil fuels and the carbon intensity of fossil fuels) can be found in Hamilton and Turton (2002). The Australia Institute 4

contrast, land-use change and forestry makes a relatively large contribution to reducing net emissions in the USA and the Russian Federation. Figure 2 Comprehensive per capita greenhouse gas emissions for selected Annex B countries, 1998 (or most recent year) 30 Per capita emissions (tonnes CO 2 -e pa) 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 -10 Australia Canada France Germany Italy Japan Russian Federation United Kingdom United States of America Annex B average Energy Industries Fugitive Emissions from Fuels Industrial Processes Solvent and Other Product Use Agriculture Land-Use Change & Forestry Waste Other Source: Table 1 above The Australia Institute 5

References Hamilton, C. & Turton, H. 2002, Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries, Energy Policy, Vol. 30, No. 1 (forthcoming January 2002) IPCC 1997, Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change/OECD/IEA World Bank 2001, Health, Nutrition and Population Statistics, Development Data Group, Human Development Network, http://devdata.worldbank.org/hnpstats/ UNFCCC 1992, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, http://www.unfccc.de/resource/conv/index.html UNFCCC 2001a, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Database: Introduction, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, http://62.225.2.23/introghg.htf UNFCCC 2001b, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Database: Sources of data for Annex I Parties, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, http://62.225.2.23/infosrc.htf The Australia Institute 6