PPVT -4 Publication Summary Form



Similar documents
Technical Report. Overview. Revisions in this Edition. Four-Level Assessment Process

TEST REVIEW. Purpose and Nature of Test. Practical Applications

Individualized Education Plans

The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, fourth edition (CELF-4;

Early Childhood Measurement and Evaluation Tool Review

The Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (Hammill, Pearson, & Wiederholt,

Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised, Normative Update (WRMT-Rnu) The normative update of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised (Woodcock,

Early Childhood Measurement and Evaluation Tool Review

Overview. Benefits and Features

Allen Elementary School

Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4)

AUTISM SPECTRUM RATING SCALES (ASRS )

Overview of Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2 Gloria Maccow, Ph.D., Assessment Training Consultant

Henrico County Public Schools Department of Exceptional Education

INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTIVITY WITH CELF 4 SOFTWARE! SAMPLE REPORTS. To order, call , or visit our Web site at

Overview: Part 1 Adam Scheller, Ph.D. Senior Educational Consultant

Office of Institutional Research & Planning

General Symptom Measures

Disability Evaluation & Second Language Learners. Martha Buenrostro PhD, Education Program Specialist, ODE Martha.Buenrostro@state.or.us

Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD, and Randy W. Kamphaus, PhD. Additional Information

Efficacy Report WISC V. March 23, 2016

Any Town Public Schools Specific School Address, City State ZIP

Interpretive Report of WMS IV Testing

The Non-English Speaking Population in Hawaii

Harrison, P.L., & Oakland, T. (2003), Adaptive Behavior Assessment System Second Edition, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Categories of Exceptionality and Definitions

BASI Manual Addendum: Growth Scale Value (GSV) Scales and College Report

It s WISC-IV and more!

2. RELATED SERVICES AND SUPPORTS RECEIVED BY YOUTH WITH DISABILITIES

Test Review: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Fifth Edition (CELF-5)

Assessment, Case Conceptualization, Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning Overview

Annual Report On Insurance Agent Licensing Examinations

Staffing Requirements 1. and retain such personnel. All special education teachers K-12 must be highly qualified by

ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Documents Eligible to Earn Added Authorizations in Special Education (AASE) UPDATED 6/2012

Reading Specialist (151)

Total Males Females (0.4) (1.6) Didn't believe entitled or eligible 13.0 (0.3) Did not know how to apply for benefits 3.4 (0.

2014 Demographics PROFILE OF THE MILITARY COMMUNITY

erving Head Start s Diverse Children and Families What Is the Law? What Are the Regulations?

IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION AND INTERVENTION FOR ELL STUDENTS WITH COMMUNICATION DISORDERS

Al Ahliyya Amman University Faculty of Arts Department of Psychology Course Description Special Education

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses in L.D. Identification

Treatment. Race. Adults. Ethnicity. Services. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Service Use among Adults. Inpatient Services.

ETR. Evaluation Team Report TYPE OF EVALUATION: CHILD'S INFORMATION: DATES PARENTS'/GUARDIAN INFORMATION ETR FORM STATUS CHILD'S NAME:

ADMISSIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES POLICY:

DSM-5. Presented by CCESC School Psychologist Interns: Kayla Dodson, M.Ed. Ellen Doll, M.S. Rich Marsicano, Ph.D. Elaine Wahl, Ph.D.

Introducing the WAIS IV. Copyright 2008 Pearson Education, inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

To be considered for our program, the following documents must be submitted on or before the deadline of March 15th:

Where We Stand at Baseline: Results of a Survey of California Children Aged and Adult Decision-Makers Aged 25+ June 2012

Certified Peer Counselor Training Application

The Launch of the New MCAT Exam

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES (SLD)

A s h o r t g u i d e t o s ta n d A r d i s e d t e s t s

WHODAS 2.0 World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule item version, self-administered

WHY DO YOU USE THE NNAT2. NNAT2 Data Interpretation: Part Three. Agenda: BRIEF review of ability. What is the NNAT 2.

Marcia E. Humpal, M.Ed., MT-BC Ronna S. Kaplan, M.A. MT-BC. Journal of Music Therapy

Behavioral Health Barometer. United States, 2013

Chartbook U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration

Strategic Plan Roadmap

Completed Sample IEP

Age at First Measles-Mumps. Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children with Autism and School-Matched Control Subjects. Frank DeStefano, MD, MPH

Sex, Race, and Ethnic Diversity of U.S. Health Occupations ( )

Awareness among Family Members of Children with Intellectual Disability on Relevant Legislations in India

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

The National Survey of Children s Health The Child

Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education A Technical Assistance Guide (Revised)

CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND BEST PRACTICES MANUAL Speech-Language Pathology in the Schools

4. PARTICIPATION IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

EEO Employer/Vet/Disabled

Catholic Conference of Ohio

Michigan Department of Community Health

USER GUIDE AND DIRECTIVES ON DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING FOR DHCD STATE RENTAL ASSISTANCE

Preschool Early Literacy Indicators (PELI ) Benchmark Goals and Composite Score Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. / August 20, 2015

School District of New Richmond 701 East Eleventh Street New Richmond, WI Fax

School Psychologist PK 12 Section 36

Table Required Assessments and Qualified Examiners by Type of Disability Disability Assessments Required Qualified Examiners

May Minnesota Undergraduate Demographics: Characteristics of Post- Secondary Students

SPECIAL EDUCATION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND IEP PLANNING GUIDELINES

PSY554 Fall 10 Final Exam Information

Interpretive Report of WAIS IV Testing. Test Administered WAIS-IV (9/1/2008) Age at Testing 40 years 8 months Retest? No

UNSOM Health Policy Report

A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students Long-Term Academic Achievement

Special Education Coding Criteria 2014/2015. ECS to Grade 12 Mild/Moderate Gifted and Talented Severe

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version BRIEF-A. Interpretive Report. Developed by

Demographic and Labor Market Profile of the city of Detroit - Michigan

Gifted & Talented Program Description

English as a Second Language Supplemental (ESL) (154)

General Membership Handbook

Transcription:

PPVT -4 Publication Summary Form PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Product name Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition Product acronym PPVT 4 scale Authors Lloyd M. Dunn, PhD, and Douglas M. Dunn, PhD Copyright date 1959, 1981, 1997, 2007 Brief description of The PPVT 4 scale is a norm-referenced, wide-range instrument for measuring product the receptive (hearing) vocabulary of children and adults. Enlarged and colorized, this PPVT edition is available in two parallel forms (Form A and Form B) that are administered individually. Each form contains training items and 228 test items, each consisting of four full-color pictures as response options on a page. For each item, the examiner says a word, and the examinee responds by selecting the picture that best illustrates that word s meaning. Primary use/ purpose The PPVT 4 scale measures understanding of the spoken word in standard American English and thus assesses vocabulary acquisition. It has the following uses: Measures response to vocabulary instruction Aids in the diagnosis of reading difficulties and in designing instructional interventions Helps to establish rapport and reduce tension related to the testing environment Contributes to assessment of preschool-age children Screens for verbal development Helps in the detection of language impairments across the age range Aids in measuring language development among nonreaders and people with written-language difficulties Measures linguistic potential Can be used with individuals who have autism/withdrawal or who display symptoms of psychosis Can be used with individuals with cerebral palsy or other major physical disabilities Affords individuals who perform poorly on group tests to demonstrate their ability when administered the test individually Can be used with individuals who have moderate visual disabilities, including those with visual perceptual problems or color blindness Can be used variously in commercial, industrial, or rehabilitation environments (i.e., for the selection of individuals for jobs that require good listening comprehension of standard American English) Can be used for diverse research purposes Screens for the receptive vocabulary knowledge of individuals whose primary language is not English Age range covered Ages 2 years 6 months through 90 years and older Administration time The administration is untimed but takes an average of 10 to 15 minutes. Individual vs. group Individual User qualifications Level 2 1

Domains Test names Composite names Forms Materials included in the kit CONTENT DESCRIPTION The test content covers a broad range of receptive vocabulary levels, from preschool through adult. The items broadly sample words that represent 20 content areas (e.g., actions, vegetables, tools) and parts of speech (nouns, verbs, or attributes) across all levels of difficulty. One test is available for administration with one of two parallel forms (A or B). None The parallel test forms (Form A and Form B) each have 228 items divided into 19 item sets. The PPVT 4 kit includes an easel for either Form A or Form B, a manual, and 25 record forms (A or B). The kit is packaged with a carrying bag for easy transport. ITEM INFORMATION Items cover 20 categories of content and part of speech. Three-fourths of the items are from the previous edition (PPVT-III) and one-fourth is new. Many very easy items were added to improve measurement of low-functioning preschool-age children. Items were reviewed and empirically analyzed for difficulty, validity (discrimination), and freedom from bias with respect to sex, ethnicity, geographic region, and SES. All illustrations were evaluated to ensure they could be perceived by individuals with color blindness. The two forms are closely matched in item content and difficulty. Scoring options Derived scores available Norm groups available SCORING INFORMATION The test can be scored by hand or by computer entry, using the PPVT 4 ASSIST scoring software. Deviation-type normative scores: standard scores, percentiles, normal curve equivalents (NCEs), and stanines Developmental-type normative scores: age equivalents, grade equivalents Growth scale value (GSV) scores Age, Grade: Fall, and Grade: Spring 2

Interpretive features Quantitative methods: Comparison of EVT 2 and PPVT 4 instruments Comparison of GSV scores from repeat administrations Qualitative method: Classification of items by part of speech (noun, verb, or attribute) Computerized scoring The PPVT 4 ASSIST scoring software may be used for the following: Entering item scores Calculating a raw score Converting the raw score to a standard score, percentile, NCE, stanine, age and grade equivalent, and GSV Performing a qualitative analysis of item performance by part of speech Generating score reports, including progress reports and group reports Sample Information Standardization description TECHNICAL INFORMATION The fourth PPVT edition was developed for these purposes: To improve the quality and content of the third edition To increase the number of easy items at the beginning of the test to improve measurement of the vocabulary of children who function at very low levels To increase further the accuracy of test scores across the range of difficulty To update the stimulus words and pictures To replace the black-and-white item illustrations with full-color art The age-norm and grade-norm samples were designed to resemble the Englishproficient population from ages 2:6 to 90+, and closely match 2004 Census data for demographic variables. The PPVT 4 scale was 100% conormed with the Expressive Vocabulary Test, Second Edition (EVT 2; Williams, 2007). Date From the fall of 2005 into the spring of 2006 Size Age and Grade 450 examiners from 320 test sites Age norm sample: 3,540 cases Grade norm subsample: 2,003 cases Age norm sample: ages 2 years 6 months through 90 years and older Grade norm sample: kindergarten through Grade 12 3

Sex Age norm sample: Female: 1,793 Male: 1,747 Grade norm sample: Female: 1,004 Male: 999 Race/ethnicity Age norm sample: African American: 536 Hispanic: 546 White: 2,244 Other: 214* Grade norm sample: African American: 316 Hispanic: 318 White: 1,243 Other: 126* Geographic region * Includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, and all other groups not classified as African American, Hispanic, or White. Age norm sample: Northeast: 621 North Central: 819 South: 1,346 West: 754 Grade norm sample: Northeast: 360 North Central: 458 South: 744 West: 441 SES/Parent education Age norm sample: Grade 11 or Lower: 429 Grade 12 or GED: 989 1 3 Years of College: 1,115 4+ Years of College: 1,007 Grade norm sample: Grade 11 or Lower: 209 Grade 12 or GED: 547 1 3 Years of College: 676 4+ Years of College: 571 Community size Variable 4

Special populations included The sample at ages 2 through 18 includes representative proportions of the following special populations: Speech/Language Impairment Mental Retardation and Developmental Delay Specific Learning Disability Emotional/Behavioral Disturbance Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Autism Other (several low-incidence disabilities) Reliability Internal consistency reliability By Age: Split-Half Form A: M =.94 Form B: M =.94 SEM Form A: 3.6 Form B: 3.6 By Grade: Split-Half Form A: M =.95 Form B: M =.94 SEM Form A: 3.6 Form B: 3.7 Alternate-form By Age: M =.89 reliability Test retest reliability By Age: M =.93 5

Validity Correlations The PPVT 4 Scale With the EVT 2 (N = 3,540): Average r =.82 The PPVT 4 Scale With the CASL: Ages 3 5 years (N = 68) Basic Concepts: r =.50 Antonyms: r =.41 Sentence Completion: r =.54 Ages 8 12 years (N = 62) Synonyms: r =.65 Antonyms: r =.78 Sentence Completion: r =.63 Lexical/Semantic Composite: r =.79 The PPVT 4 Scale With the CELF-4 Scale: Ages 5 8 years (N = 55) Core Language: r =.73 Receptive Language: r =.67 Expressive Language: r =.72 Ages 9 12 years (N = 56) Core Language: r =.72 Receptive Language: r =.75 Expressive Language: r =.68 The PPVT 4 Scale With the GRADE (Total Test score): K, Fall (Level P, N = 50): r =.71 K, Spring (Level K, N = 65): r =.40 1 (N = 52): r =.58 2 (N = 48): r =.43 3 (N = 63): r =.65 4 (N = 61): r =.66 6 (N = 49): r =.71 8 (N = 47): r =.79 10 11 (N = 52): r =.59 The PPVT 4 Scale With the PPVT-III Scale (N = 322): Average r =.84 Construct validity The comparability of the total set of PPVT 4 items with a specification of receptive vocabulary knowledge was evaluated. The trend of average performance across age was compared with the profile of growth and decline in crystallized ability reported in the research literature. The PPVT 4 instrument was correlated with the EVT 2, CASL, CELF- 4, GRADE, and PPVT-III instruments to demonstrate the extent to which the observed pattern of correlations agrees with the pattern expected of a valid vocabulary measure. 6

Content validity The stimulus words were chosen based on a review of over 12 published reference works. The stimulus words were representative of 20 content areas. Factor analysis Clinical samples Not applicable. Standard Score Difference From Nonclinical Reference Group* Speech Impairment: Ages 5 15 years (N = 178): 5.6 Ages 50 96 years (N = 60): 7.2 Language Delay (Ages 3 7 years, N = 63): 13.0 Language Disorder: Ages 8 12 years (N = 65): 10.2 Ages 50 92 years (N = 45): 13.4 Hearing Impairment (Ages 4 12 years): With Cochlear Implants (N = 46): 29.7 Without Cochlear Implants (N = 53): 17.3 Specific Learning Disability (Reading; Ages 8 14 years, N = 71): 10.1 Mental Retardation (Ages 6 17 years, N = 70): 26.1 Giftedness (Ages 8 17 years, N = 55): 12.7 Emotional/Behavioral Disturbance (Ages 7 12 years, N = 62): 7.2 ADHD (Ages 6 17 years, N = 91): 7.9 * Controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, and education level. Developmental history OTHER INFORMATION Lloyd M. Dunn, PhD, published the PPVT scale in 1959; he updated the test in 1965. Dr. Dunn and his wife, Leota Dunn, published a revised version, the PPVT-R scale, in 1981. The two authors published the second revision, the PPVT-III scale, in 1997. Douglas M. Dunn, PhD, the son of Lloyd and Leota Dunn, is the coauthor of the PPVT 4 scale, and participated in the development of each of the three earlier PPVT editions. 7

Special features The PPVT 4 scale includes the following new features: Full-color illustrations that are larger than the black-and-white illustrations of its predecessor New, up-to-date stimulus words Additional easy items to strengthen test floor Streamlined procedures for administering the Training Items Classification by Part of Speech, a new qualitative approach to item analysis A new growth scale value (GSV) scale for measuring change A reproducible Report to Parents and a Letter to Parents, in English and Spanish (included in the manual) A portfolio-style bag for transporting and storing the test components Federal mandates met Adaptation of special needs Sensitivity to other cultures Training options available The PPVT 4 instrument was developed using rigorous scientific procedures in order to ensure that it would produce highly reliable and valid scores, and satisfies the need for vocabulary assessment under NCLB. The PPVT 4 scale measures vocabulary, one of the five key early reading skills as a part of Reading First, and can also be used under the optional RtI model under the new IDEA 2004. Because of its wide range of difficulty, the test can be used to measure the degree of aphasia and vocabulary deterioration in adults. As no reading or writing is required, the test can be used for measuring language development among nonreaders and those with written-language difficulties. The test s receptive format makes it particularly useful for evaluating individuals with expressive-language impairments. The test can be administered to people who are autistic or withdrawn, or who have symptoms of psychosis, because it doesn t require spoken or verbal interaction. As neither an oral nor pointing response is needed, individuals with severe cerebral palsy or other major physical disabilities may be tested successfully. The black outlines of the full-color illustrations enable the testing of most individuals with moderate visual disabilities, including those with color blindness. All items underwent qualitative reviews and empirical analyses for fairness and bias according to sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic region. Some professional development options include inservicing and content presentations. Pearson Assessments also offers live (MC-led, trainer-led, or author-led) options and Webinar options. 8