SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Similar documents
CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Managing Wheat by Growth Stage

Soybean Physiology: How Well Do You Know Soybeans?

Multiple Peril Crop Insurance

Hail Damaged Corn and Soybean

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

Are My. Pine Trees. Ready To Thin?

Measuring Soil Moisture for Irrigation Water Management

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Roberts & McPherson)

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Grasshopper and Bean Leaf Beetle

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS. Preparing a Projected Cash Flow Statement. Introduction. What Information Is Provided? EC-616-W

Consumer Horticulture

Natural Air Drying Corn Paul E. Sumner University of Georgia Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

Soybean Growth and Development

Will It Sprout? Seed Germination Test

CROP INSIGHTS. Early Season Frost Damage to Corn by Paul Carter, Research Coordinator and Daniel Wiersma, Field Sales Agronomist

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

igrow Soybeans Best Management Practices for Soybean Production

DRILL CALIBRATION 1. DETERMINE THE DESIRED SEEDING RATE USING THE CURRENT LOT OF SEED

Making Urea Work in No-till

Delayed Planting & Hybrid Maturity Decisions

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

Using Enterprise Budgets To Make Decisions about Your Farm Richar d Carkner

Growing Balaton - Horticultural Considerations

Plant Physiology Critical Stages in the Life of a Corn Plant

Horticulture Information Leaflet 33-E

Integrated Pest Management

Group Risk Income Protection

Energy and Cost Required to Lift or Pressurize Water

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Farm Financial Management

Harvesting Dry Bean John Nowatzki, NDSU Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Farmland Lease Analysis: Program Overview. Navigating the Farmland Lease Analysis program

Ethanol Usage Projections & Corn Balance Sheet (mil. bu.)

Preparing for the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agricultural and Related Pest Control Applicator Exams 1

OBTAINING OPERATING CAPITAL FOR 2016 GRAIN OPERATIONS: NEEDS, RISKS, REWARDS & THE BOTTOM LINE

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Crop-Share and Cash Rent Lease Comparisons Version 1.6. Introduction

Care of Mature Backyard Apple Trees

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Germination is the process in which a

Hydroseed Care Guide

Dry Bean Types and Development Stages

Corn and Soybean Production Calendar

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Revenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2009 through 2015, Projected 2016

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

The 2014 Farm Bill left the farm-level COM-

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Unit A: General Agricultural Machinery. Lesson 1: Machinery and Equipment

PESTICIDE RATE AND DOSAGE CALCULATIONS

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

Drills vs. Planters for No-till Double-Crop Soybean: Agronomics, Economics, and Equipment Setup

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Key Growth Stages. Kent McKay, NCREC. Minot, ND

Using Enterprise Budgets in Farm Financial Planning

Meat Goats. January Kent Orrell Extension Educator, Kiowa Co. Okla.

Biotech Foods Community Snapshot

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Farm Financial Management

Commercial Fruit Production. Essential Commercial Fruit Production Decisions

GMO CONTAMINATION PREVENTION

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2015

Determining the Use of Technology in World Food and Fiber Production

PEST MANAGEMENT (CSP Enhancements) January 2006 Enhancement Activity Task Sheet

Biodegradable Mulch Product Testing 2006

2016 FIELD CROP BUDGETS Publication 60

Tech Prep Articulation

Hand-held and Backpack Sprayers for Applying Pesticides

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

2015 WISCONSIN SOYBEAN VARIETY EVALUATION PROGRAM Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin - Madison

HARVESTING, DRYING AND STORAGE SOYBEANS Paul E. Sumner, Extension Engineer

Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

CALCULATING AVAILABLE FORAGE

Nutrient Deficiencies

Comparison of Weed Management Strategies with Roundup Ready Corn. J. A. Ferrell and W. W. Witt

Fertilizer, Weed Control, Grubs, and General Application Questions

How much did your farm business earn last year?

How much financing will your farm business

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

2010 Estimated Cost of Producing Hops in the Yakima Valley, Washington

Mid-Atlantic Grain and Forage Journal

The financial position and performance of a farm

Irish potatoes are one of America s most

Transcription:

SPS-104-W SPS-100-W SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS Department of Agronomy www.agry.purdue.edu Purdue University Shawn P. Conley Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin One of the most difficult early-season management questions that soybean growers ask is Should I replant this poor soybean stand or leave it alone? The answer depends on a number of factors, and growers quickly need to make accurate stand and potential yield loss estimates to determine the most profitable course of action. This publication examines the important factors growers must consider when making replant decisions and provides tools and strategies they can use to help them make those decisions. Identify the Causes of Low Plant Population The first step all growers should take before making any replant decision is to identify what caused the poor stand. Did the seed fail to germinate or did it germinate, then die? What caused poor emergence? Cool, wet soil? Poor seed quality? Inaccurate planter calibration? Seeding too deep or too shallow? Soil crusting? Herbicide injury? Insect feeding? Disease? Identifying the cause is important because if conditions have not changed, then replanting will simply repeat the problem. Early planting is a common source of poor stand problems. Germination can be slow in early-planted fields. What s more, planting in moist, cold soils (below 50ºF) can result in uneven, sporadic, or delayed emergence, giving the false sense of a poor stand (Wuebker et al., 2001). Delayed germination or emergence can make seed more susceptible to disease and other pressures. Seed treated with fungicide will not hasten emergence, but can provide some protection in cool soils for up to three weeks if emergence is delayed. If the plant population seems low in an early-planted field, scout the field by digging up seeds and checking for germination. Look for swollen seeds, plus radicle and hypocotyl growth that would indicate whether a seed is beginning to germinate or is close to emergence. Remember: depending on growing conditions, it can take six to 36 days for soybean seeds to reach the VE growth stage. After plants emerge, weather, animals, insects, or diseases can cause poor stands. Again, the important thing is to scout each field to determine what caused the thin stand. If necessary, call on a specialist who can provide an accurate diagnosis. Only then can growers determine whether replanting or other actions are required for successful stand establishment. Determine Stand Density Growers also need a good estimate of the stand before deciding to replant. There are two common methods for estimating plant populations: counting plants in a row and using the hula hoop method. Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences

2 No matter which method you use, be sure to count only live plants. Any plant with a stem broken off below the cotyledonary node is considered dead. Plants with missing leaves can recover, but stem damage is more detrimental. Even plants with bruised stems may have difficulty surviving. Counting Plants in a Row To determine the stand by counting plants in a row, count the number of plants in a length of row equal to 1/1,000th of an acre (see Table 1). For row widths not shown in Table 1, use this equation: 43,560 Row Width (in feet) 1,000 = Length of Row Equal to 1/1,000th of an Acre Make at least five counts from different areas of the field, calculate the average, then multiply by 1,000 to get the plant population per acre. Table 1. Use this table to determine how much row is equal to 1/1,000th of an acre. Row Width (inches) Length of Row Needed to Represent 1/1,000th of an Acre 30 17 feet, 5 inches 20 26 feet, 2 inches 15 34 feet, 10 inches 10 52 feet, 3 inches 7.5 69 feet, 7 inches Using the Hula Hoop Method To determine the stand using the hula hoop method, use any perfectly round hoop (hula hoop, wire, barrel hoop, etc.) with a known diameter. Toss the hoop in at least five randomly selected locations within a field or where the plant stand is low. Count the plants within each hoop, calculate the average, then multiply it by the appropriate factor from Table 2. If your hoop s diameter is not listed in Table 2, use this equation to calculate your hoop s factor (remember, the radius is half the distance of the diameter): Factor = 43,560 (Hoop Radius in Inches 2 x 3.14) 144 Table 2. This table provides factors for various hoop diameters for calculating the number of plants per acre using the hula hoop method. For example, if a hoop has a diameter of 21 inches, multiply the number of plants inside the hoop by 18,119 to determine the number of plants per acre. Diameter of Hoop (inches) Factor 18 24,662 21 18,119 24 13,872 27 10,961 30 8,878 33 7,337 36 6,165

3 Figure 1. The Hula hoop method for determining soybean stands involves counting the number of plants inside a perfectly round hoop. Calculating Expected Yield Once the plant population is known, growers can use Table 3 to estimate the expected yield percentage. If specific field locations are a concern, separately determine the stand in those areas. Table 3. Use this table to estimate soybean yields. For example, if the plant population is 60,000 plants per acre and a drill was used, then yield will be 92 percent of normal. Population Yield as Percent of Normal Plants/Acre Drill (7.5-inch rows) Planter (30 inch rows) 160,000 100 100 120,000 100 100 80,000 96 100 60,000 92 94 40,000 87 88 20,000 77 81 10,000 58 72 Replant Decision The decision on whether to replant a field should be based on expected returns. A replant is, in effect, a late planting and that will decrease potential yield (Table 4). Growers also need to consider and evaluate the cost of seed, fuel, machinery, pesticides, labor, and other expenses. Using the replant worksheet (Table 5) can help growers consider all these factors to determine whether replanting is the best economic decision.

4 Table 4. Use this table to determine the decrease in potential yield caused by late planting. For example, planting a mid-season variety on June 20 will yield only 82 percent as it would if planted at a normal date. Planting Date Yield as Percent of Normal Mid-season Variety Full-season Variety May 20 100 100 May 30 96 94 June 10 92 90 June 20 82 78 June 30 70 NR July 10 60 NR NR=Not recommended Table 5. Use this worksheet to account for all the factors that go into making a replant decision. 1. Base yield for field bu./a 2. Estimate of yield as percent of normal from reduced stands (see Table 3) % 3. Estimate of deficient stand yield [(line 1 x line 2) / 100] bu./a 4. Projected gross income (line 3 x market price) $ /A 5. Additional weed control cost for poor stand $ /A 6. Gross return with no replanting (line 4 line 5) $ /A 7. Estimate of yield as a percent of normal from delayed planting (see Table 4) % 8. Estimate of yield for replanting [(line 1 x line 7) / 100] bu./a 9. Projected gross income from replanting (line 8 x market price) $ /A 10. Cost of replanting a. Seed $ /A b. Fuel, machinery, labor $ /A c. Pesticides $ /A d. Other costs $ /A $ /A 11. Gross returns from replanting (line 9 line 10) $ /A 12. Compare gross returns on lines 6 and 11 to determine whether to replant

5 Filling in a Thin Stand If soybean stands are only thin in certain areas of a field it is a common practice to fill in those areas with a 30- inch row planter (Figure 2). Our data indicate that there is no yield advantage to filling in thin stands (66,000 or greater plants per acre) with rowed beans (Figure 3). That s because the second planting can further damage the original thin stand. Plus, the second planting s yield potential is lower because of the late planting date and faces competition from original stand. Our data show that filling in thin stands will yield the same as if the grower did nothing (Figure 4). Figure 2. When soybean stands are thin, it s common to fill in those areas with a 30-inch row planter as shown here. 70 60 Grain Yield (bu per acre) 50 40 30 20 10 0 200,000 66,000 66,000 + 120,000 sup. (V2) 66,000 + 80,000 sup. (V2) Seeding Rate and Timing 66,000 + 40,000 sup. (V2) 66,000 till and replant at 200,000 (V2) Figure 3. This graph shows the effects of filling in thin soybean stands (7.5-inch rows) with a 30-inch row planter at V2 soybean (Semmel, Christmas, and Marini, 2002). The purple bars indicate the yields from the original soybean stands, the red bars indicate yields from the added soybeans.

6 Totally replanting thin stands also may reduce yields because of the later planting date. Traditionally, the difficulty of weed control has been a factor in favor of replanting thin stands. Modern weed control technology largely eliminates that concern. Growers should consider the economics of seed input cost about $31.50 per unit versus the potential for another pass for weed control $10.50 per acre (1 quart of glyphosate plus application cost). Furthermore, our research indicates that there is less than a 50 percent chance that an additional weed control pass will be needed in the thin areas as compared to the normal stands unless the area is wet and already has consistently high weed pressure. Figure 4. Supplemental seeding can lead to competition between the early-planted and late-planted soybean. References Corn & Soybean Field Guide. publication ID-179. Semmel, T., E.P. Christmas, and G.C. Marini. An evaluation of supplemental planting to increase marginal stands of narrow row soybean using a 30 inch planter. (American Society of Agronomy, Annual meetings, 10-14 Nov. 2002. Indianapolis, IN). Agron Absts 2002. Wuebker, E. F., R. E. Mullen, and K. Koehler. 2001. Flooding and temperature effects on soybean germination. Crop Sci. 41:1857-1861. NEW 11/07 You can order or download materials on this and other topics at the Education Store. www.ces.purdue.edu/new It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution. This material may be available in alternative formats.