Norman Wells Wind Energy Pre-feasibility Analysis Summary



Similar documents
Trout Lake Wind and Solar Energy Pre Feasibility Analysis

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS WITH RETSCREEN SOFTWARE

A Discussion of PEM Fuel Cell Systems and Distributed Generation

CANADIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES. Matthew H. Brown InterEnergy Solutions 2007

Renewable Choice Energy

WIND AND SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS IN IRAN

Rethinking Variable Electric Rate Plans in Texas The case to get out of any fixed rate contract over.16 per kwh

Guidance for U.S. Positions on MDBs Engaging with Developing Countries on Coal-Fired Power Generation 1

Commercial Energy Conservation and Efficiency Program

Democratic and Republican Positions on Environmental Issues. Edward H. Klevans, Professor and Department Head Emeritus of Nuclear Engineering

OFF-GRID ELECTRICITY GENERATION WITH HYBRID RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN IRAQ: AN APPLICATION OF HOMER

The Real Cost of Electrical Energy. Outline of Presentation

REMOTE COMMUNITY RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PROJECT IDENTIFICATION INITIATIVE

Half the cost Half the carbon

Energy Economics. Rangan Banerjee

Telefónica South America Feasibility Studies

Sweden s leading manufacturer of small-scale wind power stations!

MAKING SOLAR ENERGY COST-EFFECTIVE TODAY IS A SNAP

Translink Carbon Report 2011/12

Welcome to our open house. Thanks for coming. Please sign in and help yourself to refreshments. Energizing your community.

Definition of effective metrics for evaluating the efficiency of hybrid power systems at telecom cell sites

Energy Benchmarking City of New Westminster: Corporate Facilities

There s power in wind: fact sheet

Non Domestic energy consumption 2013 Kent Local Authorities (Previously Industrial & Commercial energy use)

Case Study 5 Use of Wind Turbine Technology

Calgary Transit Environmental Stewardship

VGB Congress Power Plants 2001 Brussels October 10 to 12, Solar Power Photovoltaics or Solar Thermal Power Plants?

Changes in regulated electricity prices from 1 July 2012

Wind Resource Assessment for BETHEL, ALASKA Date last modified: 2/21/2006 Compiled by: Mia Devine

On June 28, 2011, the Municipal Services Committee recommended that the City Council adopt the recommendations stated in the subject agenda report.

DRAFT TECHNICAL REPORT AND BUSINESS CASE FOR THE CONNECTION OF REMOTE FIRST NATION COMMUNITIES IN NORTHWEST ONTARIO FOR

How To Drive A Marladebronn Hybrid Bus

Hybrid Micro-Power Energy Station; Design and Optimization by Using HOMER Modeling Software

Feed in Tariffs for Microgeneration. Jos Mister Energy Saving Trust

Carbon Footprint Calculator for Royal Society of Arts

Key Solutions CO₂ assessment

Electricity Rates Forecasting:

COMPETITIVENESS COMPARISON OF THE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ALTERNATIVES (PRICE LEVEL MARCH 2003)

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

Energy subsidies in Galapagos Carlos Jácome

Vectren Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Stakeholder Meeting 3 of 3. Discussion of Analysis Results September 24, 2014

Metering for today s systems

A macro-economic viewpoint. What is the real cost of offshore wind? siemens.com / wind

Metrics for Data Centre Efficiency

Increasing Costs in Electric Markets

An Airport Sustainable Energy Strategy

Distributed Energy Systems

WINGAS PRODUCTS GREEN NATURAL GAS. Climate neutral by carbon offsetting

MICRO-HYDROPOWER NEED FOR ENERGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT. By: Payman Hassan Rashed

Module 7 Forms of energy generation

Levelised Unit Electricity Cost Comparison of Alternate Technologies for Baseload Generation in Ontario

COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION COSTS

Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan to 2025: An Update of the 2020 Plan

A E O L I S F O R E C A S T I N G S E R V I C E S WIND FARM ENERGY ASSESSMENT - FEASIBILITY STUDY. Kees van Vliet

2 nd National Workshop on Global Fuel Economy Initiative (GFEI) in Mauritius. Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development 27 th November 2014

CAT CG132. Series Gas Generator Sets

Solar City Master Plan - Executive Summary

LADWP GREEN POWER PROGRAM

A Green Sector Overview

The city of Malmö, Sweden

Borough of South River, New Jersey Alternative Energy & Conservation Committee

Photovoltaic in Mexico Recent Developments and Future

Applicants must ensure the information is complete and accurate and the requirements of the program are met by the deadline.

Supplier Guidance Document. Energy and Fuel Use Data from Hertfordshire County Council Outsourced Services

Off-grid Hybrid Solar: Market Overview, Business Case & Technical Considerations

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

FACT SHEET. NEM fast facts:

Policies and progress on transport access, including access for the rural population and low-income households

ASSOCIATION INC Geothermal Energy: New Zealand s most reliable sustainable energy resource

4. Thinking on Uses for Tax Revenues How should revenues from Climate Change Tax be used?

KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

Northwest Territories

Australian Remote Renewables: Opportunities for Investment

OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY IS GETTING CHEAPER

carbon footprinting a guide for fleet managers

The CarbonNeutral Company calculation methodology for the carbon calculator

Corporate Carbon Neutral Plan

SSE s criteria used for GHG emissions reporting

TOWN OF CARRBORO NORTH CAROLINA

Transcription:

Norman Wells Wind Energy Pre-feasibility Analysis Summary Summary of Wind Study Since 2005, the Aurora Research Institute (ARI) has researched the wind energy potential for communities in the NWT served by diesel. In September 2008, ARI installed a wind monitoring station on Kee Scarp, 5 km northeast of Norman Wells and measured wind speed and direction there for two years. Results of the wind monitoring program revealed a long-term wind speed of 5.0 m/s at 40 m above ground level. The long term average wind speed was also estimated to be 5.5 m/s at 50 m above ground level and 6.3 m/s at 80 m above ground level. The average electrical power load in Norman Wells is about 1,142 kilowatts (kw), and electrical energy consumption in the town is about 10,000,000 kilowatt hours (kwh) per year. Norman Wells electricity is currently generated from natural gas, but it is expected that sometime in the near future it will be replaced by diesel. A wind project in Norman Wells could produce up to 1,315,000 kwh of wind energy annually at a cost of about $0.57 per kwh. This would displace about 13% of the diesel electricity used in an average year. Subsidies would be needed to make wind energy competitive with present diesel fuel prices; however, diesel rises to $1.60/L, the cost of wind energy generated electricity will become competitive with diesel generated electricity. If the community would like to pursue a wind project, then the next step would be to assess the future plans for the gas plant, and to seek project feasibility funding from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Funding may also be available from the GNWT.

Assessment of Wind Speed The Kee Scarp ridge northeast of Norman Wells was identified as a suitable site for evaluating wind energy (Figure 1). ARI Wind Monitoring Station Airport weather station Upper Air Station and the Climate station Town of Norman Wells Figure 1: Map of the Norman Wells area. Contour interval is 10 m. In September 2008, the Aurora Research Institute installed a wind monitoring tower on Kee Scarp and measured wind speed and direction for two years. For this period the station measured a mean wind speed of 4.2 m/s (or 15.1 km/h) at 25m above ground level, and 4.9 m/s (17.6 km/h) at 40 metres above ground level. Using the nearby upper air measurements taken by weather balloons, the long term annual average wind speed at the Kee Scarp wind site was estimated to be 5 m/s (18 km/h) at 40 metres above ground level. These speeds are considered moderate for a wind energy project.

Using computer analysis, the long term mean wind speeds were also estimated at 5.5 and 6.3 m/s at 50 and 80 m above ground level, respectively. The result of a computer wind flow model indicates that an area of about 120 m by 700 m across the top of Kee Scarp has wind speeds faster than 5 m/s at 40 m above ground level. This area, shown in Figure 2, is large enough to fit at least ten wind turbines of the size of the Aeronautica A225. Area about 120 by 700 m is large enough for a potential wind farm of ten mediumsized wind turbines. Figure 2: Aerial image of Norman Wells overlaid with wind speed contours. The wind speeds are modelled at 40 m above the ground. The wind speed contour interval is 0.1m/s. How Wind Power Costs are Calculated Two different wind turbines were used to calculate the cost of a wind project for Norman Wells (Figure 3). The cost of installing a wind turbine in Norman Wells includes the following: o building a road to the site, o building a new powerline to the site,

o constructing the tower foundation(s), o shipping the equipment, and o many other expenses. The wind energy costs per kwh are an average annual cost (or levelized cost of energy) based on a typical 20-year life-span for a wind project. The energy costs include: paying the capital borrowed over 20 years at 7.5% interest; accounting for general inflation rate of 2%; and wind project operation and maintenance. Figure 3: The two wind turbines considered in the economic study for Norman Wells. On the left is the Aeronautica A225 (225 kw) and on the right is the NorthWind 100 (100 kw). How Much the Proposed Wind Project will Cost The table below shows costs and production subsidies that would be required to build a wind farm at the selected site. This table shows the two types of wind turbine models used for this study: the Northern Power Systems NorthWind 100kW (NW100) which has a 21 m rotor and a 37 m tower, and the Aeronautica s 225kW (A225) which has a 29 m rotor and a 50 m tower. The Aeronautica A225 with its taller tower would produce the lowest cost energy.

Table 1: A summary of suitable wind energy development options for Norman Wells using two different models of wind turbines. Also listed are the subsidies required to produce wind energy at a rate competitive with current diesel prices of $1.00 per L, which translates into an electricity cost of $0.38 per kwh. Wind Turbine Model Maximum Power Output Total Project Cost Energy Produced in kwh/year Energy Cost per kwh Subsidy Required per kwh Four NW100 400 kw $4,751,000 525,129 $0.97 $0.59 Two A225 450 kw $4,240,000 666,537 $0.78 $0.40 Nine NW100 900 kw $8,099,000 1,181,539 $0.77 $0.39 Four A225 900 kw $6,686,000 1,315,409 $0.57 $0.19 The Aeronautica 225kW provides the most energy per dollar spent. This results in the lowest cost per kwh of electricity produced. At the proposed wind site, a 900 kw wind project with four Aeronautica 225kW will produce 1,315,409 kwh of electricity and displace 355,500 litres of diesel per year. This is about 13% of the diesel-generated electricity the community uses each year. The current cost of diesel-generated electricity in Norman Wells is $0.38/KWh (excluding operation and maintenance), based on diesel purchased at $1.00/L. A wind farm must then be able to produce power at a cost that is lower than that cost of diesel-generated electricity to make a profit. A wind project with the four Aeronautica 225kW turbines would have an average energy cost of $0.57/kWh and would require a production incentive of $0.19/kWh in order for the project to be cost-effective. In 2008, the cost of diesel reached $1.70/L. When the cost of diesel climbs to $1.60/L, a wind energy project in Norman Wells will become competitive with diesel-generated electricity, which will cost $0.58/kWh (but this does not include operation and maintenance costs). A wind project will require very low subsidies when diesel prices reach $1.60/L.

Funding may be available from Indian and North Affairs Canada to carry out more detailed studies, and to seek the required permits for this potential wind project. The EcoEnergy for Northern and Aboriginal Communities Program may provide capital funding. Funding may also be available from the GNWT. Conclusions Kee Scarp has potential as a wind development site. It is within 5 km of the community and is accessible by road and ATV/4x4 trails. Capital costs for a wind project of 400 kw using four NorthWind 100 turbines will cost $4.7 million whereas a 900 kw project using four Aeronautica 225 kw turbines will cost $6.7 million. With forecasted wind speeds of 5.5 m/s at 50 m above ground level, the four A225 wind project would produce power at a cost of $0.572 per kwh. At a wind speed of 5.5 m/s at 50 m above ground, a 900 kw project with four A225 turbines would displace 355,500 litres of diesel fuel per year and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1 million kg of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) equivalent per year. Some subsidies will be required but are available to develop a wind project in Norman Wells. The full Norman Wells Wind Energy Pre-Feasibility Update report is available to download at http://www.nwtresearch.com For more information on this or other wind energy studies in the NWT, contact the Aurora Research Institute at: 191 Mackenzie Road P.O. Box 1450 Inuvik, NT CANADA X0E 0T0 Phone: (867) 777-3298 Fax: (867) 777-4264 Printed March 2011